• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
XIE Xiao-li, WANG Zi-fan, YE Bin. Centrifuge shaking table tests on evolution mechanism of sand mesostructure during earthquake liquefaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S2): 45-49. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S2010
Citation: XIE Xiao-li, WANG Zi-fan, YE Bin. Centrifuge shaking table tests on evolution mechanism of sand mesostructure during earthquake liquefaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S2): 45-49. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S2010

Centrifuge shaking table tests on evolution mechanism of sand mesostructure during earthquake liquefaction

More Information
  • Received Date: November 30, 2022
  • Available Online: March 26, 2023
  • The existing studies demonstrate that the history of earthquake liquefaction is an important factor affecting the liquefaction resistance of sand. The researchers think the intrinsic mechanism of these effects is the generation of stable or unstable sand mesostructure after the previous liquefaction event. However, few studies have directly given the experimental results of the evolution behaviors of the sand mesostructure during the whole process of liquefaction. In this study, the centrifuge shaking table tests are conducted to model the earthquake liquefaction of a saturated sand deposit. The pore pressures and accelerations at different depths and the settlements of the sand deposit are measured. Besides, the mesoscopic digital images of the sand mesostructure are recorded simultaneously by a mesoscopic image acquisition system. The experimental results show that the small shaking increases the contacts and decreases the voids among sand particles. The particle contacts are reconstructed and the voids are redistributed with the larger shaking. Approximately vertically and horizontally linked large voids are caused by the upper seepage effects of the pore fluid. The sand particles nearby the approximately vertically large voids rotate vertically under the seepage effects.
  • [1]
    QUIGLEY M C, BASTIN S, BRADLEY B A. Recurrent liquefaction in Christchurch, New Zealand, during the Canterbury earthquake sequence[J]. Geology, 2013, 41(4): 419–422. doi: 10.1130/G33944.1
    [2]
    TOWHATA I, MARUYAMA S, KASUDA K I, et al. Liquefaction in the Kanto region during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2014, 54(4): 859–873. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2014.06.016
    [3]
    FINN W D L, BRANSBY P L, PICKERING D J. Effect of strain history on liquefaction of sand[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1970, 96(6): 1917–1934. doi: 10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001478
    [4]
    SUZUKI T. Effects of density and fabric change on reliquefaction resistance of saturated sand[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1988, 28(2): 187–195. doi: 10.3208/sandf1972.28.2_187
    [5]
    YE B, XIE X L, ZHAO T, et al. Centrifuge tests of macroscopic and mesoscopic investigation into effects of seismic histories on sand liquefaction resistance[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 26(8): 4302–4324. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2020.1826373
    [6]
    WANG R, FU P, ZHANG J-M, et al. Fabric characteristics and processes influencing the liquefaction and re-liquefaction of sand[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 125: 105720. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105720
    [7]
    CHANEY R C, DEMARS K R, DEWOOLKAR M M, et al. A substitute pore fluid for seismic centrifuge modeling[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1999, 22(3): 196. doi: 10.1520/GTJ11111J
    [8]
    ROTHENBURG L, BATHURST R J. Analytical study of induced anisotropy in idealized granular materials[J]. Géotechnique, 1989, 39(4): 601–614. doi: 10.1680/geot.1989.39.4.601

Catalog

    Article views (105) PDF downloads (23) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return