• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
XU Bin, CHEN Kehao, WANG Xingliang, PANG Rui. Stochastic seismic response analysis and reliability evaluation of pipelines in liquefied soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(1): 81-89. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221096
Citation: XU Bin, CHEN Kehao, WANG Xingliang, PANG Rui. Stochastic seismic response analysis and reliability evaluation of pipelines in liquefied soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(1): 81-89. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221096

Stochastic seismic response analysis and reliability evaluation of pipelines in liquefied soil

More Information
  • Received Date: September 04, 2022
  • Available Online: January 08, 2024
  • The liquefaction of saturated sand under the action of earthquakes can cause the buried pipeline to float up and the system failure. To investigate the seismic response and reliability level of buried pipelines in liquefaction sites, a probabilistic analysis method based on the probability density evolution method and equivalent extreme value distribution is proposed to fully consider the randomness and non-stationarity of ground shaking. According to the excess pore water pressure, acceleration and displacement of structures, the random dynamic analysis and reliability assessment of the buried pipeline are carried out. The results show that the randomness of ground motion has a significant effect on the dynamic response of buried pipelines, and the traditional deterministic analysis methods may underestimate the seismic response of pipelines. The proposed method can be use to comprehensively study the floating mechanism and reliability level of buried pipelines. Under the action of earthquakes, the pore water pressure increases, which leads to a decrease in the effective soil stress, and then liquefaction of the soil occurs, causing the pipe to float up. The compression of soil at both sides towards the bottom of the pipe and the seepage pressure towards the bottom of the pipe further aggravate the uplift of the pipe. Finally, the disaster mitigation effect and mechanism of U-shaped gravel drainage on buried pipelines are studied based on disaster mechanism. The proposed stochastic probability analysis method can be employed to accurately evaluate the buoyancy mechanism and reliability of pipelines.
  • [1]
    CHIAN S C, TOKIMATSU K, MADABHUSHI S P G. Soil liquefaction-induced uplift of underground structures: physical and numerical modeling[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2014, 140(10): 04014057.
    [2]
    WANG L R L, YEH Y H. A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipeline for fault movement[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1985, 13(1): 75-96.
    [3]
    卢红前, 汉会, 朱永强, 等. 液化场地处循环水系统埋地管道的地基处理[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2011, 44(增刊1): 205-209.

    LU Hongqian, HAN Hui, ZHU Yongqiang, et al. Ground treatment of buried conduit for circulating water system in liquefied soil[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2011, 44(S1): 205-209. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    SAEEDZADEH R, HATAF N. Uplift response of buried pipelines in saturated sand deposit under earthquake loading[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(10): 1378-1384. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.013
    [5]
    邹德高, 孔宪京. 液化土中管线抗上浮排水措施数值分析[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2010, 50(3): 379-385.

    ZOU Degao, KONG Xianjing. Numerical analysis of mitigation methods against pipeline up-lifting in liquefiable soil[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2010, 50(3): 379-385. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    MADABHUSHI S S C, MADABHUSHI S P G. Finite element analysis of floatation of rectangular tunnels following earthquake induced liquefaction[J]. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2015, 45(3): 233-242. doi: 10.1007/s40098-014-0133-3
    [7]
    屈铁军, 王前信. 地下管线在空间随机分布的地震作用下的反应[J]. 工程力学, 2003, 20(3): 120-124.

    QU Tiejun, WANG Qianxin. Seismic response of underground pipelines to ground motion with spatial randomness[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2003, 20(3): 120-124. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    PANG R, ZHOU Y, CHEN G H, et al. Stochastic mainshock–aftershock simulation and its applications in dynamic reliability of structural systems via DPIM[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 149(1): 04022096. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0002176
    [9]
    刘汉龙. 随机地震作用下地基及土石坝永久变形分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1996, 18(3): 19-27. http://www.cgejournal.com/cn/article/id/9020

    LIU Hanlong. Permanent deformation of foundation and embankement dam due to stochastic seismic excitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 18(3): 19-27. (in Chinese) http://www.cgejournal.com/cn/article/id/9020
    [10]
    ZHOU Y, JING M Y, PANG R, et al. A novel method for the dynamic reliability analysis of slopes considering dependent random parameters via the direct probability integral method[J]. Structures, 2022, 43: 1732-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.074
    [11]
    LI J, CHEN J B, FAN W L. The equivalent extreme-value event and evaluation of the structural system reliability[J]. Structural Safety, 2007, 29(2): 112-131. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.03.002
    [12]
    PANG R, XU B, ZHOU Y, et al. Seismic time-history response and system reliability analysis of slopes considering uncertainty of multi-parameters and earthquake excitations[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 136: 104245. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104245
    [13]
    孔宪京, 庞锐, 徐斌, 等. 考虑堆石料软化的坝坡随机地震动力稳定分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(3): 414-421. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201903002

    KONG Xianjing, PANG Rui, XU Bin, et al. Stochastic seismic stability analysis of dam slopes considering softening of rockfills[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(3): 414-421. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201903002
    [14]
    李杰, 陈建兵. 随机结构动力反应分析的概率密度演化方法[J]. 力学学报, 2003, 35(4): 437-442.

    LI Jie, CHEN Jianbing. Probability density evolution method for analysis of stochastic structural dynamic response[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2003, 35(4): 437-442. (in Chinese)
    [15]
    梁建文. 非平稳地震动过程模拟方法(Ⅰ)[J]. 地震学报, 2005, 27(2): 213-224.

    LIANG Jianwen. Simulation of non stationary ground motion processes (Ⅰ)[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2005, 27(2): 213-224. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    DEODATIS G. Non-stationary stochastic vector processes: seismic ground motion applications[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1996, 11(3): 149-167. doi: 10.1016/0266-8920(96)00007-0
    [17]
    PASTOR M, ZIENKIEWICZ O C, CHAN A H C. Generalized plasticity and the modelling of soil behaviour[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1990, 14(3): 151-190. doi: 10.1002/nag.1610140302
    [18]
    GHOSH B, MADABHUSHI S P G. A numerical investigation into effects of single and multiple frequency earthquake motions[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2003, 23(8): 691-704. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.07.004
    [19]
    DEWOOLKAR M M, KO H Y, PAK R Y S. Seismic behavior of cantilever retaining walls with liquefiable backfills[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(5): 424-435. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(424)
    [20]
    ZOU D G, XU B, KONG X J, et al. Numerical simulation of the seismic response of the Zipingpu concrete face rockfill dam during the Wenchuan earthquake based on a generalized plasticity model[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 49: 111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.10.010
    [21]
    李培振, 任红梅, 吕西林, 等. 液化地基自由场振动台模型试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2008, 28(2): 171-178.

    LI Peizhen, REN Hongmei, LÜ Xilin, et al. Shaking table test on free field considering soil liquefaction[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 28(2): 171-178. (in Chinese)
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 张宇,张庆,王逸杰,蔡国军,董晓强,杜延军,蒋宁俊. 原位激发微生物矿化处理铅污染土的工程特性与环境安全性研究. 岩土工程学报. 2024(11): 2352-2360 . 本站查看
    2. 陈浩. 纳米SiO_2-MICP协同固化淤泥效能评价与驱动机制. 长江科学院院报. 2024(12): 117-125 .
    3. 程雷,邓华锋,肖瑶,熊雨,黄小芸,朱文羲. 基于最优含水率的红层泥岩微生物改良材料优化研究. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(04): 61-66 .
    4. 卫仁杰,彭劼,陈泳,许鹏旭,李亮亮. MICP结合南海岛礁资源加固珊瑚砂的方法及效果研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2023(06): 1255-1265 .
    5. 曹光辉,刘士雨,蔡燕燕,俞缙,孙志龙. 靶向激活产脲酶微生物联合酶诱导碳酸盐沉淀加固陆域吹填海砂试验研究. 岩土力学. 2022(08): 2241-2252 .
    6. 彭萌,邓华锋,熊雨,程雷,徐鹏飞,李冠野. 添加剂对微生物胶结砂渗流特性的影响研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2022(05): 999-1009 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article views (352) PDF downloads (122) Cited by(11)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return