• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
HAN Jun-yan, GUO Zhi-ke, LI Li-yun, HOU Ben-wei, GAO Yun-hao, DU Xiu-li. Shaking table tests on buried pipelines in inhomogeneous soil under transverse non-uniform excitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(11): 2020-2028. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202111008
Citation: HAN Jun-yan, GUO Zhi-ke, LI Li-yun, HOU Ben-wei, GAO Yun-hao, DU Xiu-li. Shaking table tests on buried pipelines in inhomogeneous soil under transverse non-uniform excitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(11): 2020-2028. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202111008

Shaking table tests on buried pipelines in inhomogeneous soil under transverse non-uniform excitation

More Information
  • Received Date: March 04, 2021
  • Available Online: December 01, 2022
  • A series of multi-point shaking table tests are conducted on model pipelines to investigate the seismic response of pipelines buried in inhomogeneous soil under transverse non-uniform seismic excitation. The acceleration and strain response laws of the buried pipelines under different ground motion intensities are analyzed. The main conclusions are as follows: the acceleration response of the pipelines is basically subjected to the acceleration response of the surrounding soil under uniform and non-uniform excitation. The buried pipelines mainly exhibit longitudinal bending deformation. Under the higher uniform seismic excitation, the peak strain of the pipelines in the transient zone where the soil properties change in the inhomogeneous soil model is larger than that in the homogeneous soil model. The maximum peak strain is basically about 30% higher than that in the homogeneous soil, However, the maximum strain peak is basically about 30% lower than that in homogeneous soil under non-uniform excitation. The strain response of the pipelines in homogeneous soil under the higher non-uniform seismic excitation is almost twice as large as that under uniform excitation, but then the strain response of the pipelines in inhomogeneous soil does not change significantly. The test results can provide a reference for the seismic design of large-diameter buried pipelines passing through inhomogeneous soil sites.
  • [1]
    SUN S. Earthquake damage to pipelines[C]//2nd US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Stanford, 1979: 61-67.
    [2]
    SUN S. Analysis of seismic damage to buried pipelines in Tangshan earthquake[C]//Proc Earthquake Behavior & Safety of Oil and Gas Storage Facilities, Buried Pipelines & Equipment, New York, 1983.
    [3]
    孙绍平. 中国地下管道的震害[M]. 北京: 学术书刊出版社, 1990.

    SUN Shao-ping. The damage of Chinese underground pipe[M]. Beijing: Academic Books and Periodicals Publishing Company, 1990. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    LIANG J W, SUN S P. Site effects on seismic behavior of pipelines: a review[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2000, 122(4): 469-475. doi: 10.1115/1.1285974
    [5]
    NISHIO N, TSUKAMOTO K. Seismic behavior of a buried pipeline in a non-uniform subsurface layer[C]//Proc ASME PVP Conference, LA, USA, 1985.
    [6]
    NISHIO N. Earthquake observation of a buried pipeline in a non-uniform ground[C]//Proc the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, 1988.
    [7]
    NISHIO N. Mechanism of seismic strain in buried pipelines based on field observations and model experiments[C]//Proc of 5th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Ottawa, 1987.
    [8]
    NISHIO N. Damage ratio prediction for buried pipelines based on the deformability of pipelines and the nonuniformity of ground[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1994, 116(4): 459-466. doi: 10.1115/1.2929616
    [9]
    HINDY A, NOVAK M. Earthquake response of underground pipelines[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1979, 7(5): 451-476.
    [10]
    ARIMAN T, MULESKI G E. A review of the response of buried pipelines under seismic excitations[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1981, 9(2): 133-152.
    [11]
    ZERVA A, ANG A H S, WEN Y K. Lifeline response to spatially variable ground motions[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1988, 16(3): 361-379.
    [12]
    闫孔明, 张建经, 王志佳, 等. 非一致激励下地下管线振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(9): 2621-2628, 2638. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201709022.htm

    YAN Kong-ming, ZHANG Jian-jing, WANG Zhi-jia, et al. Shaking table test of underground pipelines under non-uniform excitations[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(9): 2621-2628, 2638. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201709022.htm
    [13]
    KAWABATA T, SONODA Y, MOHRI Y, et al. Dynamic behavior of buried flexible pipes of varying thickness using the shaking table test[C]//Pipelines Conference 2012. August 19-22, 2012, Miami Beach, Florida. Reston, VA, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2012: 1015-1024.
    [14]
    JAFARZADEH F, JAHROMI H F, TORGHABEH E A. Investigating dynamic response of a buried pipeline in sandy soil layer by 1g shaking table test[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2010, 8(2): 107-124.
    [15]
    NEWMARK N M. Problems in wave propagation in soil and rock[C]//Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials, 1968, Albuquerque.
    [16]
    WANG L R L, CHENG K M. Seismic response behavior of buried pipelines[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1979, 101(1): 21-30. doi: 10.1115/1.3454594.
    [17]
    李鸿晶, 王竞雄. 生命线地震工程的若干最新研究进展[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2017, 37(3): 10-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201703002.htm

    LI Hong-jing, WANG Jing-xiong. Recent research advances in lifeline earthquake engineering[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2017, 37(3): 10-26. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201703002.htm
    [18]
    PSYRRAS N K, SEXTOS A G. Safety of buried steel natural gas pipelines under earthquake-induced ground shaking: a review[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 106(19): 254-277.
    [19]
    孟海. 埋地管线—土动力相互作用非一致激励振动台模型试验研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2008.

    MENG Hai. Buried Pipeline and Soil Dynamic Interaction of Non-Uniform Excitation Shaking Table Model Test Research[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2008. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    YAN K M, ZHANG J J, WANG Z J, et al. Seismic responses of deep buried pipeline under non-uniform excitations from large scale shaking table test[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 113(19): 180-192.
    [21]
    HAN J Y, EL NAGGAR M H, LI L Y, et al. Design and commissioning of continuous soil box supported on shake tables array for testing long geostructures[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 132(21): 1-13.
    [22]
    MEYMAND P. Shaking Table Scale Model Tests of Nonlinear Soil-Pile-Superstructure Interaction in Soft Clay[D]. Berkeley: University of California, 1998.
    [23]
    杜修力, 韩俊艳, 李立云. 埋地管道振动台试验设计中相似关系的选取[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2013, 33(3): 246-252. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK201303003.htm

    DU Xiu-li, HAN Jun-yan, LI Li-yun. Selection of shaking table test similarity relations for long-distance buried pipeline[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2013, 33(3): 246-252. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK201303003.htm

Catalog

    Article views (215) PDF downloads (85) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return