Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 43 Issue 6
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
GUO Yu-feng, WANG Hua-ning, JIANG Ming-jing. Analytical solutions of seepage field for underwater shallow-buried parallel twin tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(6): 1088-1096. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202106012
Citation: GUO Yu-feng, WANG Hua-ning, JIANG Ming-jing. Analytical solutions of seepage field for underwater shallow-buried parallel twin tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(6): 1088-1096. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202106012
shu

Analytical solutions of seepage field for underwater shallow-buried parallel twin tunnels

  • 1.

    School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

  • 2.

    State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

  • 3.

    Department of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

More Information
  • Received Date: August 01, 2020
  • Available Online: December 02, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Most of the current analytical solutions of seepage field for twin tunnels are directly obtained by the superposition of seepage fields of two single tunnels, which does not really satisfy the conditions at the tunnel boundary and has the deviation from the actual seepage field. Based on the mass conservation law and the Darcy’s law, an analytical solution of seepage field for underwater twin parallel tunnels is derived by the Schwartz alternating method combined with the conformal mapping. After two to three iterations, an analytical solution of the problem with high accuracy is obtained. The numerical software Comsol is used to simulate the problem, and the simulated results are compared with the analytical solutions proposed in this study. It is found that they are in good agreement throughout the entirety of the ground. Compared with the direct superposition results, the two results are consistent in the region far from the tunnel, while there is a large error of the superposition results near the tunnel boundary. Finally, the influences of tunnel spacing, buried depth and relative size on the distribution of hydraulic head and the water inflow of the tunnel are discussed.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (23)
  • [1]
    蒋凌云, 张宏, 蒋美幸, 等. 花岗岩残积土隧道渗流效应数值模拟研究[J]. 湖南工业大学学报, 2019, 33(1): 23-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9833.2019.01.004

    JIANG Ling-yun, ZHANG Hong, JIANG Mei-xing. A numerical simulation study on seepage effect of granite residual soil tunnel[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Technology, 2019, 33(1): 23-30. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9833.2019.01.004
    [2]
    王众. 控制型防排水隧道渗流场数值分析[J]. 石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 24(1): 6-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0373.2011.01.002

    WANG Zhong. Seepage field analysis for tunnel excavation based on drainage control[J]. Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (Natural Science), 2011, 24(1): 6-9. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0373.2011.01.002
    [3]
    王建宇. 再谈隧道衬砌水压力[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003, 40(3): 5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2003.03.002

    WANG Jian-yu. Once more on hydraulic pressure upon lining[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2003, 40(3): 5-9. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2003.03.002
    [4]
    王秀英, 王梦恕, 张弥. 计算隧道排水量及衬砌外水压力的一种简化方法[J]. 北方交通大学学报, 2004, 28(1): 8-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BFJT200401003.htm

    WANG Xiu-ying, WANG Meng-shu, ZHANG Mi. A simple method to calculate tunnel discharge and external water pressure on lining[J]. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 2004, 28(1): 8-10. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BFJT200401003.htm
    [5]
    王秀英, 王梦恕, 张弥. 山岭隧道堵水限排衬砌外水压力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(1): 125-127. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.01.022

    WANG Xiu-ying, WANG Meng-shu, ZHANG Mi. Research on regulating water pressure acting on mountain tunnels by blocking ground water and limiting discharge[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(1): 125-127. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.01.022
    [6]
    HARR M E. Groundwater and seepage[J]. Soil Science, 1963, 95(4): 289.
    [7]
    应宏伟, 朱成伟, 龚晓南. 考虑注浆圈作用水下隧道渗流场解析解[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(6): 1018-1023. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDZC201606002.htm

    YING Hong-wei, ZHU Cheng-wei, GONG Xiao-nan. Analytic solution on seepage field of underwater tunnel considering grouting circle[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2016, 50(6): 1018-1023. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDZC201606002.htm
    [8]
    PARK K H, OWATSIRIWONG A, LEE J G. Analytical solution for steady-state groundwater inflow into a drained circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer: a revisit[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2007, 23(2).
    [9]
    皇甫明, 谭忠盛, 王梦恕, 等. 暗挖海底隧道渗流量的解析解及其应用[J]. 中国工程科学, 2009, 11(7): 66-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1742.2009.07.011

    HUANG Fu-ming, TAN Zhong-sheng, WANG Meng-shu, et al. Analytical solutions for water inflow into an underwater tunnel and its application[J]. Journal of China Engineering Science, 2009, 11(7): 66-70. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1742.2009.07.011
    [10]
    吴金刚, 谭忠盛, 皇甫明. 高水压隧道渗流场分布的复变函数解析解[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2010, 9(1): 31-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDGC201009007.htm

    WU Jin-gang, TAN Zhong-sheng, HUANG Fu-ming. Analytic solution of complex function to distribution of seepage field of tunnel with high water pressure[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2010, 9(1): 31-36. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDGC201009007.htm
    [11]
    潘以恒, 罗其奇, 周斌, 等. 半无限平面含注浆圈深埋隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(6): 1114-1122.

    PAN Yi-heng, LUO Qi-qi, ZHOU Bin, et al. Analytical study on seepage field of deep tunnel with grouting circle in half plane[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2018, 52(6): 1114-1122. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    朱成伟, 应宏伟, 龚晓南. 任意埋深水下隧道渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(11): 1984-1991. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201711005

    ZHU Cheng-wei, YING Hong-wei, GONG Xiao-nan. Analytical solutions for seepage fields of underwater tunnels with arbitrary burial depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 1984-1991. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201711005
    [13]
    TANG Y, CHAN D H, ZHU D Z. Analytical solution for steady-state groundwater inflow into a circular tunnel in anisotropic soils[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 144(9): 8.
    [14]
    ZHANG Y, ZHANG D L, FANG Q, et al. Analytical solutions of non-Darcy seepage of grouted subsea tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 96: 10.
    [15]
    HANSBO S. Aspects of vertical drain design: darcian or non-Darcian flow[J]. Géotechnique, 1997, 47(5): 983-992.
    [16]
    朱成伟, 应宏伟, 龚晓南, 等. 水下双线平行隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(2): 355-360. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201902016.htm

    ZHU Cheng-wei, YING Hong-wei, GONG Xiao-nan, et al. Analytical solutions to seepage field of underwater twin parallel tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(2): 355-360. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201902016.htm
    [17]
    SU K, ZHOU Y, WU H, et al. An analytical method for groundwater inflow into a drained circular tunnel[J]. Groundwater, 2017, 55(5): 712-721.
    [18]
    WANG H N, WU L, JIANG M J, et al. Analytical stress and displacement due to twin tunneling in an elastic semi‐ infinite ground subjected to surcharge loads[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2018, 42(6): 809-828.
    [19]
    ZHANG L Q, LU A Z, YUE Z Q, et al. An efficient and accurate iterative stress solution for an infinite elastic plate around two elliptic holes, subjected to uniform loads on the hole boundaries and at infinity[J]. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids, 2009, 28(1): 189-193.
    [20]
    WANG H N, ZENG G S, UTILI S, et al. Analytical solutions of stresses and displacements for deeply buried twin tunnels in viscoelastic rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2017, 93: 13-29.
    [21]
    WANG H N, ZENG G S, JIANG M J. Analytical stress and displacement around non-circular tunnels in semi-infinite ground[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2018, 63: 303-328.
    [22]
    张丙强. 半无限平面双孔平行隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2017, 39(1): 125-131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201701018.htm

    ZHANG Bing-qiang. Analytical solution for seepage field of twin-parallel tunnels in semi-infinite plane[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2017, 39(1): 125-131. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201701018.htm
    [23]
    吴绍明, 孙瞻, 刘庭金, 等. 龙头山双洞八车道公路隧道地下水渗流初探[J]. 铁道建筑, 2007(12): 45-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJZ200712016.htm

    WU Shao-ming, SUN Zhan, LIU Ting-jin, et al. Elementary discussion on leakage of underground water in Longtoushan mountain highway twin tunnels with 8 lanes[J]. Railway Engineering, 2007(12): 45-47. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJZ200712016.htm
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 洪嘉伟，张彬，潘道明. 隧道注浆圈渗透系数对邻侧隧道的影响. 交通科技与管理. 2025(01): 147-151 .
    2. 袁立刚，冷伍明，姜涌，朱铁环，安永林，岳健. 降雨对江底凹形纵坡隧道排水池区段的影响及排水报警方法. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2025(03): 1369-1382 .
    3. 陈云娟，王乐宁，周宗青，贾润枝，杨卓，罗平利，刘梦悦. 基于海底隧道衬砌孔隙水压力的涌水量预测方法及工程应用. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2024(01): 288-300 .
    4. 韩智铭，闫科宇，王雪，朱正国，崔会敏. 有限地层三孔并行海底隧道渗流场解析研究. 铁道工程学报. 2024(01): 45-52 .
    5. 汤钰，王华宁，宋飞. 渗透各向异性地层中隧洞稳态渗流场的半解析预测模型. 力学季刊. 2024(02): 473-482 .
    6. 韩智铭，闫科宇，崔会敏，刘庆宽. 基于等效面积法的三孔并行海底隧道渗流场解析研究. 工程力学. 2024(S1): 112-116+149 .
    7. 高启程，姜启武，陈志杰，赖鹏安. 考虑损伤效应的隧道二维渗流场解析及涌水量预测. 人民长江. 2024(10): 197-204+211 .
    8. 李航达，杨广鹏，韩智铭. 多洞并行海底隧道最佳覆岩厚度变化规律研究. 石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(03): 40-46 .
    9. 卢玉东，国金琦，程大伟，毛兴隆. 考虑固液二相互态特性的流固耦合模型. 中国公路学报. 2023(01): 58-69 .
    10. 张兵海，崔炜，张石磊，杜三林，邓检强，刘毅，朱银邦. 临近水库的隧洞二维渗流场解析解及工程应用研究. 水利水电技术(中英文). 2023(03): 126-134 .
    11. 马少坤，陈彩洁，段智博，刘莹. 基于镜像法的有限含水层内隧道渗流场解析解及其验证. 工程力学. 2023(05): 172-181 .
    12. 胡红星. 富水破碎带地层TBM隧道围岩稳定性研究. 科技与创新. 2023(17): 39-44 .
    13. 乔彤，周建，张天骄，蒋熠诚. 考虑渗透各向异性的水下非圆形隧道渗流场解析. 工程科学与技术. 2023(05): 109-117 .
    14. 徐锋. 隧道穿越富水断层多场耦合特征分析及施工控制技术. 铁道建筑技术. 2022(05): 148-152 .
    15. 金波，胡明，方棋洪. 考虑渗流效应的深埋海底隧道围岩与衬砌结构应力场研究. 力学学报. 2022(05): 1322-1330 .
    16. 郑培超，闫科宇，王雪，韩智铭. 海底隧道三孔并行渗流场泄压规律研究. 现代隧道技术. 2022(S1): 353-362 .
    17. 王昊，刘广，王静峰，张兴其，浦玉炳，严中，丁兆东. 少荃湖湖底隧道工程渗流场特性分析. 人民珠江. 2021(10): 63-67 .
    18. 李沣展，岳健，安永林，孙超杰，谭仁华. 河底浅埋小净距隧道施工期渗流性状分析. 湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(04): 47-54 .
    19. 叶亮，丁文其，张清照. 地下水对岩石隧道衬砌作用计算方法的探讨. 现代隧道技术. 2021(S1): 326-335 .

    Other cited types(13)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (267) PDF downloads (163) Cited by(32)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return