Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 43 Issue 5
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
LIU Fei-yu, ZHU Chen, WANG Jun. Influences of shear rate and loading frequency on shear behavior of geogrid-soil interfaces[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(5): 832-840. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202105006
Citation: LIU Fei-yu, ZHU Chen, WANG Jun. Influences of shear rate and loading frequency on shear behavior of geogrid-soil interfaces[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(5): 832-840. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202105006
shu

Influences of shear rate and loading frequency on shear behavior of geogrid-soil interfaces

  • 1.

    Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

  • 2.

    College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 06, 2020
  • Available Online: December 04, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The reinforced soil structures are widely used in road engineering, and the influences of the dynamic load of vehicles on the interaction characteristics of geogrid-soil interfaces cannot be ignored. A series of direct shear tests on the gravelly soil-geogrid interface under normal cyclic loading are carried out using the dynamic direct shear apparatus. The influences of 4 shear rates (0.1, 1, 5, 10 mm/min), 4 cyclic loading frequencies (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 Hz) and 3 normal initial stresses (20, 40, 60 kPa) on the shear behavior of the reinforced soil interface are studied. The test results show that the shear stress and normal displacement under normal cyclic loading change periodically. The upper peak stress, upper residual stress and amplitude of shear stress decrease with the increase of the frequency, increase with the increase of the shear rate, and the lower shear stress is less affected. The peak relative time shift of the shear stress and the normal stress is the largest when the frequency is 0.5 Hz or the rate is 1 mm/min, respectively, while the relative time shift of the friction coefficient and the normal stress is about 0.5 cycle. The upper peak friction angle decreases with the increasing frequency and increases with the increasing shear rate.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (20)
  • [1]
    SAKLESHPUR V A, PREZZI M, SALGADO R, et al. Large-scale direct shear testing of geogrid-reinforced aggregate base over weak subgrade[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2019, 20(6): 649-658. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2017.1321419
    [2]
    PALMEIRA E M. Soil-geosynthetic interaction: modelling and analysis[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2009, 27(5): 368-390. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.003
    [3]
    王志杰, 杨广庆, 王贺, 等. 刚性与柔性顶部边界下筋土界面特性的细观数值研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(5): 967-973.

    WANG Zhi-jie, YANG Guang-qing, WANG He, et al. Mesoscopic numerical studies on geogrid-soil interface behavior under rigid and flexible top boundary conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(5): 967-973. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    MAKKAR F M, CHANDRAKARAN S, SANKAR N. Experimental investigation of response of different granular soil-3D geogrid interfaces using large-scale direct shear tests[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2019, 31(4): 04019012.1-04019012.14.
    [5]
    徐超, 孟凡祥. 剪切速率和材料特性对筋-土界面抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(10): 82-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201010013.htm

    XU Chao, MENG Fan-xiang. Effects of shear rate and material properties on shear strength of geosynthetic-soil interface[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(10): 82-87. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201010013.htm
    [6]
    刘飞禹, 王攀, 王军, 等. 不同剪切速率下格栅-土界面循环剪切及其后直剪特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(2): 387-395. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201602020.htm

    LIU Fei-yu, WANG Pan, WANG Jun, et al. Cyclic and post-cyclic shear behavior of sand-geogrid interface under different shear rates[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(2): 387-395. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201602020.htm
    [7]
    SWETA K, HUSSAINI S K K. Behavior evaluation of geogrid-reinforced ballast-subballast interface under shear condition[J]. Geotextiles & Geomembranes, 2019, 47(1): 23-31.
    [8]
    ALAIE R, CHENARI R J. Cyclic and post-cyclic shear behaviour of interface between geogrid and EPS beads-sand backfill[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(9): 3340-3357. doi: 10.1007/s12205-018-0945-2
    [9]
    刘飞禹, 胡惠丽, 王军, 等. 粒孔比对筋-土界面循环剪切特性的影响[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(12): 115-122, 131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201912013.htm

    LIU Fei-yu, HU Hui-li, WANG Jun, et al. Influence of aperture ratio on cyclic shear behavior of geogrid-soil interface[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(12): 115-122, 131. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201912013.htm
    [10]
    肖成志, 王嘉勇, 周霞. 受静载和循环荷载作用的基础下加筋挡墙工作性能分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(6): 1542-1550. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201706026.htm

    XIAO Cheng-zhi, WANG Jia-yong, ZHOU Xia. Performance of geogrid-reinforced soil retaining walls subjected to static and cyclic footing loadings[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(6): 1542-1550. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201706026.htm
    [11]
    徐超, 石志龙. 循环荷载特征对筋土界面剪切特性的影响试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2011, 24(3): 1-7, 50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201103002.htm

    XU Chao, SHI Zhi-long. Experiment of influence of cyclic load characteristics on shear properties of geogrid-soil interface[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2011, 24(3): 1-7, 50. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201103002.htm
    [12]
    王家全, 王宇帆, 黄世斌, 等. 循环荷载作用下土工格栅剪切特性的颗粒流细观分析[J]. 水利学报, 2014, 45(9): 1082-1090. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB201409009.htm

    WANG Jia-quan, WANG Yu-fan, HUANG Shi-bin, et al. The particle flow mesoscopic analysis of geogrid shear properties under cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014, 45(9): 1082-1090. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB201409009.htm
    [13]
    徐超, 石志龙. 循环荷载作用下筋土界面抗剪特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(3): 655-660. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201103003.htm

    XU Chao, SHI Zhi-long. Experimental research on shearing resistance property of sand-geogrid interface under cyclic load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(3): 655-660. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201103003.htm
    [14]
    CHANG J Y, FENG S J, SHEN Y, et al. Experimental Study of Shear Strength of Geosynthetic Clay Liner for Monotonic Loading[C]//The International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2018, Singapore.
    [15]
    王军, 王攀, 刘飞禹, 等. 密实度不同时格栅-砂土界面循环剪切及其后直剪特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(2): 342-349. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201602023.htm

    WANG Jun, WANG Pan, LIU Fei-yu, et al. Cyclic and post-cyclic direct shear behaviors of geogrid-sand interface with different soil densities[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 342-349. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201602023.htm
    [16]
    TANG L S, CHEN H K, SANG H T, et al. Determination of traffic-load-influenced depths in clayey subsoil based on the shakedown concept[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 77: 182-191.
    [17]
    LEI H Y, LIU M, ZHANG W J, et al. Dynamic properties of reclaimed soft soil under the combined frequency cyclic loading[J]. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2017, 18(S3): 54-64.
    [18]
    徐肖峰, 魏厚振, 孟庆山, 等. 直剪剪切速率对粗粒土强度与变形特性的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(4): 728-733. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201304019.htm

    XU Xiao-feng, WEI Hou-zhen, MENG Qing-shan, et al. Effects of shear rate on shear strength and deformation characteristics of coarse-grained soils in large-scale direct shear tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(4): 728-733. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201304019.htm
    [19]
    DANG W, KONIETZKY H, FRÜHWIRT T. Direct shear behavior of a plane joint under dynamic normal load (DNL) conditions[J]. Engineering Geology, 2016, 213: 133-141.
    [20]
    王家全, 周健, 黄柳云, 等. 土工合成材料大型直剪界面作用宏细观研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(5): 908-915. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201305018.htm

    WANG Jia-quan, ZHOU Jian, HUANG Liu-yun, et al. Macroscopic and mesoscopic studies of interface interaction on geosynthetics by use of large direct shear tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(5): 908-915. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201305018.htm
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 徐云山，肖子龙，孙德安，李建平. 游离氧化铁赋存形式对脱吸湿条件下红黏土热传导性能的影响. 岩土工程学报. 2025(04): 811-819 . 本站查看
    2. 刘红，肖宇，肖杨，吴焕然. 土体热力学性质及本构关系研究综述. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2025(03): 21-35 .
    3. 赵华，王成龙，陈志雄，张鼎新，彭宸. 饱和黏土中水平受荷能量桩热–力响应特性研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(01): 248-260 .
    4. 曹卫平，李清源，赵敏，吴奇兴，李庆. 间歇式运行模式下黄土地基中能量桩热-力特性模型试验. 土木工程学报. 2024(09): 123-134 .
    5. 徐云山，肖子龙，孙德安，陈军浩，曾召田. 土体导热系数温度效应及其预测模型. 岩土工程学报. 2023(06): 1180-1189 . 本站查看
    6. 宫玉辉，陈向南，刘鸣，米洋，张鹏，朱珍. “双碳”背景下能量桩在工程建设领域的研究与应用. 建设科技. 2023(10): 61-66 .
    7. 晁军. 不同运行桩数下能量桩群桩承台变形规律研究. 河南科学. 2022(06): 956-963 .

    Other cited types(14)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (318) PDF downloads (200) Cited by(21)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return