Model tests on uplift bearing capacity of gravitational reinforced composite suction caisson foundation

DAI Guo-liang; ZHU Wen-bo; GONG Wei-ming; ZHU Ming-xing; WAN Zhi-hui

doi:10.11779/CJGE202009005

Volume 42 Issue 9

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering > 2020 > 42(9): 1612-1621. > DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202009005

DAI Guo-liang, ZHU Wen-bo, GONG Wei-ming, ZHU Ming-xing, WAN Zhi-hui. Model tests on uplift bearing capacity of gravitational reinforced composite suction caisson foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(9): 1612-1621. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202009005

Citation:

PDF (2911 KB)

Model tests on uplift bearing capacity of gravitational reinforced composite suction caisson foundation

DAI Guo-liang^{1, 2,},
ZHU Wen-bo^{1, 2, ,},
GONG Wei-ming^{1, 2},
ZHU Ming-xing^{1, 2},
WAN Zhi-hui^{1, 2}

1.
Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structure of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
2.
School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

More Information

Received Date: December 08, 2019
Available Online: December 07, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

As the anchoring foundation of the tension leg platform (TLP), the suction caisson foundation is mainly subjected to the vertical pullout loads. The uplift bearing capacity of caisson is only composed of the internal and external frictions and caisson weight under the drainage condition, so the uplift bearing capacity is very small. Therefore, the gravitational reinforced composite suction caisson foundation is proposed to solve this problem. The uplift bearing capacity of the new suction caisson foundation and the shearing characteristics of caisson-cement soil interface are studied through the model tests, large-scale shear tests and push out tests. The test results show that the uplift bearing capacity of the new suction caisson foundation is much higher than that of the traditional suction caisson foundation. It increases gradually with the increase of the additional load and reinforcement range. The interface shear strength of caisson-cement soil increases with the increase of normal stress and cement ratio. When the rib width is wider, the area of the shear zone above the ring rib is larger and the ratio of the relative area is larger, the shear strength of the whole interface between the caisson and cement soil is higher. Based on the uplift bearing characteristics of new caisson by model tests and push out tests, the interface failure mode, the overall shear strength, the bearing capacity composition and the relevant method are proposed for analyzing the uplift bearing capacity of suction caisson foundations. It can provide a reference for the engineering design of the new suction caisson foundation under vertical loads.
- suction caisson foundation,
- uplift bearing capacity,
- failure mode,
- interface shear strength,
- soft clay,
- cement soil

FullText(HTML)

References (25)

References

[1]	刘润, 李成凤, 练继建, 等. 筒型基础–砂土地基动力响应的离心振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(5): 817-826. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC202005006.htm LIU Run, LI Cheng-feng, LIAN Ji-jian, et al. Centrifugal shaking table tests on dynamic response of bucket foundation-sandy soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 817-826. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC202005006.htm
[2]	张永涛, 杨炎华, 黎冰, 等. 桥梁吸力式沉箱基础承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(1): 177-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201501025.htm ZHANG Yong-tao, YANG Yan-hua, LI Bing, et al. Model tests on bearing performance of suction caisson foundation for bridges[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(1): 177-182. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201501025.htm
[3]	黎冰, 郑翔, 高玉峰, 等. 砂土中吸力式沉箱基础抗拔承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(5): 902-907. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201305016.htm LI Bing, ZHENG Xiang, GAO Yu-feng, et al. Model tests on pull-out capacity of suction caisson foundation in sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(5): 902-907. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201305016.htm
[4]	栾茂田, 范庆来, 杨庆. 非均质软土地基上吸力式沉箱抗拔承载力数值分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(7): 1054-1059. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.07.015 LUAN Mao-tian, FAN Qing-lai, YANG Qing. Numerical analysis of ultimate pull-out resistance of suction caissons in inhomogeneous soft foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(7): 1054-1059. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.07.015
[5]	BYRNE B W, HOULSBY G T. Experimental investigations of the response of suction caissons to transient vertical loading[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2002, 128(11): 926-939. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:11(926)
[6]	MANA D S K, GOURVENEC S M, RANDOLPH M F. Numerical modeling of seepage beneath skirted foundations subjected to vertical uplift[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 55: 150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.007
[7]	ISKANDER M, EL-GHARBAWY S, OLSON R. Performance of suction caissons in sand and clay[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2002, 39: 576-584. doi: 10.1139/t02-030
[8]	朱斌, 孔德琼, 童建国, 等. 粉土中吸力式桶形基础沉贯及抗拔特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工工程学报, 2011, 33(7): 1045-1053. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201107008.htm ZHU Bin, KONG De-qiong, TONG Jian-guo, et al. Model tests on penetration and pullout of suction caissons in silt[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(7): 1045-1053. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201107008.htm
[9]	LUKE A M. Axial Capacity of Suction Caissons in Normally Consolidated Kaolinite[D]. Austin: University of Texas at Austin, 2002.
[10]	CHEN W, RANDOLPH M F. Uplift capacity of suction caissons under sustained and cyclic loading in soft clay[J]. ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1352-1363. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:11(1352)
[11]	RAO S N, RAVI R, PRASAD B S. Pullout behavior of suction anchors in soft marine clays[J]. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 1997, 15(2): 95-114.
[12]	SINGH B, DATTA M, GULHATI S K. Pullout behavior of superpile anchors in soft clay under static loading[J]. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 1996, 14: 217-236. doi: 10.1080/10641199609388313
[13]	DENG W, CARTER J P. A theoretical study of the vertical uplift capacity of suction caissons[J]. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 2002, 12(2): 89-97.
[14]	矫滨田, 鲁晓兵, 赵京, 等. 吸力式桶形基础抗拔承载力特性试验研究[J]. 中国海洋平台, 2006(3): 27-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGHY200603004.htm JIAO Bin-tian, LU Xiao-bing, ZHAO jing, et al. On the pullout bearing capacity of bucket foundation[J]. China Ocean Platform, 2006(3): 27-30. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGHY200603004.htm
[15]	施晓春, 龚晓南, 俞建霖, 等. 桶形基础抗拔力试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2003(8): 49-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCJG200308017.htm SHI Xiao-chun, GONG Xiao-nan, YU Jian-lin, et al. Experimental study on the pullout force of bucket foundation[J]. Building Structure, 2003(8): 49-56. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCJG200308017.htm
[16]	ZHAI H, LI D. Experimental studies on modified suction caissons in fine sand subject to uplift loading[J]. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2017, 23(6): 562-569.
[17]	DU J Q, DU S J, SHEN S L, et al. Centrifuge evaluation of the influential factors in the uplift capacity of suction foundations in clay[J]. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2017, 35(4): 456-465.
[18]	GUO Z, WANG L Z, YUAN F. Set-up and pullout mechanism of suction caisson in a soft clay seabed[J]. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2014, 32(2): 135-54.
[19]	朱文波, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 等. 基于Meyerhof机构的吸力式沉箱基础抗拔承载力极限分析上限解[J]. 东南大学学报, 2018, 48(5): 828-833. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX201805008.htm ZHU Wen-bo, DAI Guo-liang, GONG Wei-ming, et al. Upper bound solution for ultimate bearing capacity of suction caisson foundation based on Meyerhof failure mode[J]. Journal of Southeast University, 2018, 48(5): 828-833. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX201805008.htm
[20]	王志云. 软土地基上吸力式沉箱基础的抗拔承载特性研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2008. WANG Zhi-yun. A Study on Uplift Bearing Characteristics of Suction Caisson Foundation in Soft[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2008. (in Chinese)
[21]	ACOSTA-MARTINEZ H E, GOURVENEC S M, RANDOLPH M F. Effect of gapping on the transient and sustained uplift capacity of a shallow skirted foundation in clay[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2010, 50(5): 725-735.
[22]	MANA D S K, GOURVENEC S M, RANDOLPH M F. Experimental investigation of reverse end bearing of offshore shallow foundations[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2013, 50(10): 1022-1033.
[23]	LEHANE B M, GAUDIN C, RICHARDS D J, et al. Rate effects on the vertical uplift capacity of footings founded in clay[J]. Géotechnique, 2008, 58(1): 13-21.
[24]	LEHANE B M, O'LOUGHLIN C D, GAUDIN C, et al. Rate effects on penetrometer resistance in kaolin[J]. Géotechnique, 2009, 59(1): 41-52.
[25]	CHEN R, GAUDIN C, CASSIDY M J. Investigation of the vertical uplift capacity of deep water mudmats in clay[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2012, 49: 853-865.