Centrifugal shaking table tests on dynamic response of bucket foundation-sandy soil

LIU Run; LI Cheng-feng; LIAN Ji-jian; MA Peng-cheng

doi:10.11779/CJGE202005003

Volume 42 Issue 5

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering > 2020 > 42(5): 817-826. > DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202005003

LIU Run, LI Cheng-feng, LIAN Ji-jian, MA Peng-cheng. Centrifugal shaking table tests on dynamic response of bucket foundation-sandy soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 817-826. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202005003

Citation:

PDF (2932 KB)

Centrifugal shaking table tests on dynamic response of bucket foundation-sandy soil

1.
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2.
Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Wuhan 430010, China

More Information

Received Date: August 16, 2019
Available Online: December 07, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In the sites with seismic intensity greater than 7 degrees, liquefaction identification of sandy soil within 15 m is required by the relevant seismic codes. The shallow-buried bucket foundation, a new type of foundations for offshore wind turbines, is sensitive to the liquefaction of shallow sandy soil subjected to earthquake loads because of the shallow depth of its burial. To study the seismic response rules of shallow buried-bucket foundation-sandy soil, a series of centrifugal shaking table tests are designed and carried out. Acceleration changes of shallow-buried bucket foundation and sandy soil as well as the pore pressure responses of the sandy soil are monitored during and after earthquakes. Also, the influence rules of bucket foundation on the anti-liquefaction performance of sandy soil foundations are analyzed. The results show that the acceleration response factor of bucket foundation in sandy soil subjected to seismic loading is greater than 1.0, and the response coefficient is positively correlated with the bucket foundation weight. As the shallow-buried bucket foundations are usually larger than 30 m in diameter and 2000 t in weight, the combined effect with the upper loads significantly increases the additional stress in the sandy soil foundation, which is beneficial to improve the anti-liquefaction capability of sandy soil foundations. Based on the excess pore pressure ratio, the method for determining the anti-liquefaction performance of sandy soil affected by the bucket foundation is established. And the degree of improving the anti-liquefaction of sandy soil by the bucket foundation is quantitatively analyzed.
- shallow-buried bucket foundation,
- centrifugal shaking table test,
- sandy soil foundation,
- acceleration response,
- pore water pressure

FullText(HTML)

References (25)

References

[1]	DING H, LIU Y, ZHANG P, et al. Model tests on the bearing capacity of wide-shallow composite bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines in clay[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 103: 114-122. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.068
[2]	刘梅梅, 练继建, 杨敏, 等. 宽浅式筒型基础竖向承载力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(2): 379-384. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201502029.htm LIU Mei-mei, LIAN Ji-jian, YANG Min, et al. Vertical bearing capacity of wide-shallow bucket foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(2): 379-384. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201502029.htm
[3]	MA P, LIU R, LIAN J, et al. An investigation into the lateral loading response of shallow bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines through centrifuge modeling in sand[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2019, 87: 192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2019.03.021
[4]	刘润, 王磊, 丁红岩, 等. 复合加载模式下不排水饱和软黏土中宽浅式筒型基础地基承载力包络线研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(1): 146-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201401018.htm LIU Run, WANG Lei, DING Hong-yan, et al. Failure envelopes of large-diameter shallow buried bucket foundation in un-drained saturated soft clay under combined loading condi-tions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(1): 146-154. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201401018.htm
[5]	刘润, 陈广思, 刘禹臣, 等. 海上风电大直径宽浅式筒型基础抗弯特性分析[J]. 天津大学学报, 2013(5): 393-400. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDX201305004.htm LIU Run, CHEN Guang-si, LIU Yu-chen, et al. Resisting mo-ment behavior of large diameter and shallow buried bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2013(5): 393-400. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDX201305004.htm
[6]	闫澍旺, 霍知亮, 孙立强, 等. 海上风电机组筒型基础工作及承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(7): 2036-2042. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201307032.htm YAN Shu-wang, HUO Zhi-liang, SUN Li-qiang, et al. Study of working mechanism and bearing capacity behavior of bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(7): 2036-2042. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201307032.htm
[7]	YANG Z H, ZHANG X Y, YANG R L. Shake table modeling of laterally loaded piles in liquefiable soils with a frozen crust[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012: 204-208, 654-658.
[8]	杨耀辉, 陈育民, 刘汉龙, 等. 排水刚性桩单桩抗液化性能的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(2): 287-295. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201802010.htm YANG Yao-hui, CHEN Yu-min, LIU Han-long, et al. Shaking table tests on liquefaction resistance performance of single rigid-drainage pile[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(2): 287-295. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201802010.htm
[9]	LI W, CHEN Y, STUEDLEIN A W, et al. Performance of X-shaped and circular pile-improved ground subject to liquefac-tion-induced lateral spreading[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earth-quake Engineering, 2018, 109: 273-281.
[10]	陈跃庆. 结构–地基动力相互作用体系振动台试验研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2001. CHEN Yue-qing. Shaking Table Test on Dynamic Interaction System of Structure and Foundation[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2001. (in Chinese)
[11]	SUZUKI H, TOKIMATSU K, TABATA K. Factors affecting stress distribution of a 3×3 pile group in dry sand based on three-dimensional large shaking table tests[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2014, 54(4): 699-712.
[12]	ZHANG Z, WEI H, QIN X. Experimental study on damping characteristics of soil-structure interaction system based on shaking table test[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 98: 183-190.
[13]	YAMAZAKI H, MORIKAWA Y, KOIKE F. Study on design method of suction foundation using model tests[J]. Soft Ground Engineering in Coastal Areas, 2003: 419-422.
[14]	YU H, ZENG X, LI B, et al. Centrifuge modeling of offshore wind foundations under earthquake loading[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 77: 402-415.
[15]	WANG X, XU Y, ZENG X. Seismic centrifuge modelling of suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine[J]. Re-newable Energy, 2017, 114: 1013-1022.
[16]	张浦阳, 丁红岩, 李芳. 海上筒型风机基础地震荷载下的抗液化性能研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2013, 34(9): 1587-1593. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYLX201309018.htm ZHANG Pu-yang, DING Hong-yan, LI Fang. Study on soil lique-faction of bucket foundation of offshore wind turbine[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2013, 34(9): 1587-1593. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYLX201309018.htm
[17]	YANG Z, ELGAMAL A, ADALIER K, et al. Container boundary effect on seismic earth dam response in centrifuge model tests[C]//11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering and 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 2004, Vancouver: 669-675.
[18]	ELGAMAL A, YANG Z, ADALIER K, et al. Effect of rigid container size on dynamic earth dam response in centrifuge experiments[C]//16th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, 2003, Seattle: 1-9.
[19]	马险峰, 孔令刚, 方薇, 等. 砂雨法试样制备平行试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(10): 1791-1801. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201410007.htm MA Xian-feng, KONG Ling-gang, FANG Wei, et al. Parallel tests on preparation of samples with sand pourer[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(10): 1791-1801. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201410007.htm
[20]	郝建斌, 李金和, 程涛, 等. 锚杆格构支护边坡振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(2): 293-304. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201502010.htm HAO Jian-bin, LI Jin-he, CHENG Tao, et al. Experimental study of slopes supported with framed anchors on shaking table[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(2): 293-304. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201502010.htm
[21]	周燕国, 梁甜, 李永刚, 等. 含黏粒砂土场地液化离心机振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 35(9): 1650-1658. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201309013.htm ZHOU Yan-guo, LIANG Tian, LI Yong-gang, et al. Dynamic centrifuge tests on liquefaction of clayey sand ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 35(9): 1650-1658. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201309013.htm
[22]	ZHOU Y, CHEN J, CHEN Y, et al. Centrifuge modeling and numerical analysis on seismic site response of deep offshore clay deposits[J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 227: 54-68.
[23]	吕西林, 任红梅, 李培振, 等. 液化场地自由场体系的数值分析及振动台试验验证[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 28(增刊2): 4046-4053. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2009S2114.htm LU Xi-lin, REN Hong-mei, LI Pei-zhen, et al. Numerical analysis of free field system in liquefiable site and validation of shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 28(S2): 4046-4053. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2009S2114.htm
[24]	陈国兴, 左熹, 王志华, 等. 可液化场地地铁车站结构地震破坏特性振动台试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2012, 33(1): 128-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201201017.htm CHEN Guo-xing, ZUO Xi, WANG Zhi-hua, et al. Shaking table test on seismic failure characteristics of subway station structure at liquefiable ground[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2012, 33(1): 128-137. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201201017.htm
[25]	苏栋, 李相菘. 砂土自由场地震响应的离心机试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2006, 26(2): 166-170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200602027.htm SU Dong, LI Xiang-song. Centrifuge modeling of seismic response of free sand ground[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2006, 26(2): 166-170. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200602027.htm