XIE Jun, BAO Shu-xian, HU Ying-fei, NI Ya-jing, LI Yan-tao. Design and experimental research on model soils used for shaking table tests of superstructure-soil-tunnel interaction system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(3): 476-485. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202003009
    Citation: XIE Jun, BAO Shu-xian, HU Ying-fei, NI Ya-jing, LI Yan-tao. Design and experimental research on model soils used for shaking table tests of superstructure-soil-tunnel interaction system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(3): 476-485. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202003009

    Design and experimental research on model soils used for shaking table tests of superstructure-soil-tunnel interaction system

    More Information
    • Received Date: May 04, 2019
    • Available Online: December 07, 2022
    • In order to match the similitude ratio of acceleration of a superstructure-soil-tunnel interaction system and truly restore its dynamic response under earthquake action, a kind of model soil composed of sawdust, river sand, silty clay and water is designed by combining the theoretical analysis with experiments. A large number of resonant column tests on the model soils with different material ratios are carried out at confining pressure of 30 kPa, then the orthogonal test scheme is designed and conducted, and Y(r, Sα, Q) function is created to judge the similitude about dynamic shear modulus ratio-shear strain curves between model and prototype soils. The orthogonal test results show that the optimal mass ratio of sawdust, river sand and silty clay is 18%∶27%∶55%, and the moisture content is 50%. The model soil with the optimal proportion basically satisfies the expected target that its similitude ratio of acceleration to the prototype soil is 3 and its correlation curve of dynamic shear modulus ratio-shear strain is similar to that of the prototype soil. The influence laws about dynamic parameters of model soils are obtained for various additive materials. In addition, the resonant column tests on the model soil with the optimal proportion are carried out at confining pressures of 50 and 70 kPa. It is verified that the similitude between the model and prototype soils at different confining pressures is basically satisfied, their correlation curves about damping ratio and shear strain are compared, and it is obtained that their similitude about damping ratio is reasonable. Based on the similarity analysis of the predominant period, the similitude between the model and prototype soils is verified again. The research conclusions may provide some reference for the preparation of model soils in shaking table tests in the future.
    • [1]
      ROBB E S M, VIC C, STEVEN K. Shake Table Testing to Quantify Seismic Soil-structure Interaction of Underground Structure[C]//Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. San Diego, 2010: 1-5.
      [2]
      KEIZO O, TOSHIO S, TADASHI K, et al. Research on streamlining seismic safety evaluation of underground reinforced concrete duct type structures in nuclear power stations. -Part2. Experimental aspects of laminar shear sand box excitation test with embedded RC models[C]//Transactions, SMIRT 16. Washington D C, 2001.
      [3]
      HAMID R T. Development of synthetic soil mixture for experimental shaking table tests on building frames resting on soft soils[J]. Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal, 2017, 12(1): 28-35. doi: 10.1080/17486025.2016.1153731
      [4]
      魏宝华, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 等. 动力模型试验模型土配制初探[J]. 工程地质学报, 2015, 23(5): 937-942. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ201505019.htm

      WEI Bao-hua, DENG Ya-hong, MU Huan-dong, et al. Study on preparation of model soil in dynamic model test[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2015, 23(5): 937-942. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ201505019.htm
      [5]
      窦远明, 王建宁, 朱旭曦, 等. 软弱土质类相似材料的配比试验结果分析[J]. 水利水电技术, 2017, 48(5): 128-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJWJ201705021.htm

      DOU Yuan-ming, WANG Jian-ning, ZHU Xu-xi, et al. Analysis of results of the mixture ratio test of soft soil similar material[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2017, 48(5): 128-135. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJWJ201705021.htm
      [6]
      尚守平, 刘方成, 卢华喜, 等. 振动台试验模型地基土的设计与试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2006, 26(4): 199-204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200604033.htm

      SHANG Shou-ping, LIU Fang-cheng, LU Hua-xi, et al. Design and experimental study of a model soil used for shaking table test[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2006, 26(4): 199-204. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200604033.htm
      [7]
      燕晓, 袁聚云, 袁勇, 等. 大型振动台试验模型场地土的配制方法[J]. 结构工程师, 2015, 31(5): 116-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGGC201505020.htm

      YAN Xiao, YUAN Jun-yun, YUAN Yong, et al. Study on model soil of large-scale shaking table test[J]. Structural Engineers, 2015, 31(5): 116-120. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGGC201505020.htm
      [8]
      陈红娟, 闫维明, 陈适才, 等. 小比例尺地下结构振动台试验模型土的设计与试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 35(3): 59-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201503007.htm

      CHEN Hong-juan, YAN Wei-ming, CHEN Shi-cai, et al. Design and experimental research on model soil used for shaking table test of a small scale underground structure[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2015, 35(3): 59-66. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201503007.htm
      [9]
      王志佳. 岩土工程振动台试验理论及在地下管线动力响应研究中的应用[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2016.

      WANG Zhi-jia. Theory of geotechnical shaking table test and its application in study of dynamic response of buried pipeline[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese)
      [10]
      王志佳, 张建经, 闫孔明, 等. 考虑动本构关系相似的模型土设计及相似判定体系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(5): 1328-1332, 1338. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201505013.htm

      WANG Zhi-jia, ZHANG Jian-jing, YAN Kong-ming, et al. Model soil design considering similitude of dynamic constitutive model and evaluati-on of similarity level[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(5): 1328-1332, 1338. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201505013.htm
      [11]
      董亮, 夏峰. 天津地区土动力学参数变异性对地表地震动参数的影响[J]. 地震工程学报, 2017, 39(6): 1062-1069. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ201706011.htm

      DONG Liang, XIA Feng. Effect of variability in soil dynamic parameters on the ground motion parameters of a site surface in the Tianjin Area[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2017, 39(6): 1062-1069. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ201706011.htm
      [12]
      土工试验方法标准[M]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 1999.

      Standard for Geotechnical Testing Method[M]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 1999. (in Chinese)
      [13]
      徐炳伟. 大型复杂结构-桩-土振动台模型试验研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2010.

      XU Bing-wei. Shaking Table Test Studying Large-scale Soil-pile-complex Structure Interaction[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2010. (in Chinese)
      [14]
      吴薪柳. 桩-土-复杂结构振动台试验与数值模拟及桩-土相关参数研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2013.

      WU Xin-liu. Pile-soil-complex Structure Shaking Table Test and Numerical Simulation and Study on Related Parameter of Pile-Soil[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2013. (in Chinese)
      [15]
      张克绪, 谢君斐. 土动力学[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1989.

      ZHANG Ke-xu, XIE Jun-fei. Soil Dynamics[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1989. (in Chinese)
    • Related Articles

      [1]TANG Haoran, HU Yao, LEI Huayang, LU Junfu, LIU Ting, WANG Kai. Time series prediction of surface displacement induced by excavation of foundation pits based on deep learning[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S2): 236-241. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S20014
      [2]PANG Yuanen, SHI Guodong, DUAN Yu, YAO Min, JI Haoze, LUO Ming, LI Maobiao, LI Xu. Gradation recognition of coarse-grained soil based on searcher-analyzer deep learning network (SaNet)[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(9): 1984-1993. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221516
      [3]ZHANG Zi-shan, WANG Shu-hong, WANG Peng-yu, WANG Cun-gen. Intelligent identification and extraction of geometric parameters for surface fracture networks of rocky slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(12): 2240-2248. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202112010
      [4]LIU Fei-yue, LIU Yi-han, YANG Tian-hong, XIN Jun-chang, ZHANG Peng-hai, DONG Xin, ZHANG Hai-tao. Meticulous evaluation of rock mass quality in mine engineering based on machine learning of core photos[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(5): 968-974. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202105023
      [5]WANG Peng-yu, WANG Shu-hong. Method for identifying four common rock types of slopes and determining boundary range[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(8): 1505-1512. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201908015
      [6]HUANG Hong-wei, LIU De-jun, XUE Ya-dong, WANG Ping-rang, LIU Yin. Numerical analysis of cracking of tunnel linings based on extended finite element[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(2): 266-275.
      [7]Hydraulic fracture extending during slurry shield tunneling in cohesive soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(5).
      [8]Coupling model of seepage-damage-fracture in fractured rock masses (extended flac3D model) and its appliance[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(1).
      [9]No confusing fiction with reality ——Analysis of misunderstanding of some concepts in Geotechnical Engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(6): 767-768.
      [10]ZHANG Luyu, LIU Dongsheng, SHI Weimin. Application of the extended general Drucker-Prager yield criterion to slope stability analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(2): 216-219.

    Catalog

      Article views (321) PDF downloads (176) Cited by()
      Related

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return