• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
ZHANG Wen-gang, HAN Liang, CHEN Zhi-xiong, FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, LIU Han-long. Model tests on seismic performance of double-box underground utility tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(1): 100-108. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202001011
Citation: ZHANG Wen-gang, HAN Liang, CHEN Zhi-xiong, FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, LIU Han-long. Model tests on seismic performance of double-box underground utility tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(1): 100-108. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202001011

Model tests on seismic performance of double-box underground utility tunnel

More Information
  • Received Date: March 06, 2019
  • Available Online: December 07, 2022
  • A shaking table model test on a double-box underground utility tunnel is conducted based on the theory of similarity simulation test to investigate its seismic behavior. In this test, the Taft earthquake spectra, which are adjusted to have the peak accelerations of 0.2g, 0.4g, 0.8g and 1.2g, respectively to consider the effect of various peak ground accelerations (PGAs), are chosen as the input seismic ones. It is concluded that the maximum dynamic earth pressure has a distribution of reverse "W", and the earth pressure field changes at the end of earthquake. On the whole, the maximum acceleration response, with the amplification from 0.5 to 1.5, increases with an increasing input PGA and decreases with depth. According to the time histories of acceleration and the Fourier spectra, the structures and the surrounding soils basically have consistent acceleration response at the same depth, and the amplitude of the soils is greater than that of the structures under the frequency from 15 to 30 Hz. During the earthquake, there is a larger response of bending moment at corners of the structures, which increases with the input PGAs. At the same time, numerical simulations are carried out with ABAQUS to compare with the results obtained from shaking table tests, which suggests that the results obtained from shaking table tests are highly reliable.
  • [1]
    MILIND P D C, RANJITH P G, ZHAO J. Behavior of shallow tunnel in soft soil under seismic conditions[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 82: 30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.040
    [2]
    STAMOS A A, BESKOS D E. 3-D seismic response analysis of long lined tunnels in half-space[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1996, 15(2): 111-118. doi: 10.1016/0267-7261(95)00025-9
    [3]
    GIL L M, HERNANDEZ E, DE LA FUENTE P. Simplified transverse seismic analysis of buried structures[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2001, 21(8): 735-740. doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00039-2
    [4]
    HASHASH Y M A, HOOK J J, SCHMIDT B, et al. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(4): 247-293. doi: 10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7
    [5]
    TATEISHI A. A study on seismic analysis methods in the cross section of underground structures using static finite element method[J]. Structural Engineering, 2005, 22(1): 41-54. doi: 10.2208/jsceseee.22.41s
    [6]
    CHEN J, SHI X J, LI J. Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake wave excitation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(11): 1400-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.014
    [7]
    杜修力, 王刚, 路德春. 日本阪神地震中大开地铁车站地震破坏机理分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2016, 36(2): 165-171. doi: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2016.02.001

    DU Xiu-li, WANG Gang, LU De-chun. Earthquake damage mechanism analysis of Dakai metro station by Kobe Earthquake[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2016, 36(2): 165-171. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2016.02.001
    [8]
    WANG G, YUAN M, YU M, et al. Experimental study on seismic response of underground tunnel-soil-surface structure interaction system[J]. Tunnelling Underground Space Technology, 2018, 76: 145-59. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.015
    [9]
    YAN K, ZHANG J, WANG Z, et al. Seismic responses of deep buried pipeline under non-uniform excitations from large scale shaking table test[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2018, 113: 180-92. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.036
    [10]
    SINGH D K, MANDAL A, KARUMANCHI S R, et al. Seismic behaviour of damaged tunnel during aftershock[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2018, 93: 44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.028
    [11]
    胡翔, 薛伟辰. 预制预应力综合管廊受力性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(5): 29-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201005008.htm

    HU Xiang, XUE Wei-chen. Experimental study of mechanical properties of PPMT[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(5): 29-37. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201005008.htm
    [12]
    施有志, 柴建峰, 林树枝, 等. 地下综合管廊边界条件对地震动力响应影响数值分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 213-225. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160331

    SHI You-zhi, CHAI Jian-feng, LIN Shu-zhi, et al. Numerical analysis on influence of boundary conditions on seismic dynamic response of underground utility tunnels[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 213-225. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160331
    [13]
    JIANG L, CHEN J, JIE L. Seismic response of underground utility tunnels: shaking table testing and FEM analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2010, 9(4): 555-67. doi: 10.1007/s11803-010-0037-x
    [14]
    MASON H B, TROMBETTA N W, CHEN Z, et al. Seismic soil-foundation-structure interaction observed in geotechnical centrifuge experiments[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 48(6): 162-74.
    [15]
    史晓军, 陈隽, 李杰. 非一致地震激励地下综合管廊振动台模型试验研究(Ⅰ)——试验方法[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2010, 30(1): 147-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201001020.htm

    SHI Xiao-jun, CHEN Jun, LI Jie. Shaking table test on utility tunnel under non-uniform seismic excitations(Ⅰ): experimental setup[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2010, 30(1): 147-154. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201001020.htm
    [16]
    陈隽, 史晓军, 李杰. 非一致地震激励地下综合管廊振动台模型试验研究(Ⅱ)——试验结果[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2010, 30(2): 123-130. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201002021.htm

    CHEN Jun, SHI Xiao-jun, LI Jie. Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform seismic excitations(Ⅱ): experimental results[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2010, 30(2): 123-130. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201002021.htm
    [17]
    蒋录珍, 陈隽, 李杰. 非一致地震激励地下综合管廊振动台模型试验研究(Ⅲ)——数值模拟[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2010, 30(3): 45-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201003005.htm

    JIANG Lu-zhen, CHEN Jun, LI Jie. Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform seismic excitations(Ⅲ): numerical simulation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2010, 30(3): 45-52. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201003005.htm
    [18]
    曹文冉, 田伟, 李春. 双向叠层剪切箱的研制及模型土体振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(增刊2): 249-253.

    CAO Wen-ran, TIAN Wei, LI Chun. Development of 2-D laminar shear box and shaking table tests on model soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(S2): 249-253. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    国巍, 李绿宇, 邵平. 大型结构地震模拟振动台及台阵的试验精度分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2016, 36(2): 16-21.

    GUO Wei, LI Lu-yu, SHAO Ping. Precision analysis of large structure seismic experiment utilizing shaking table for earthquake simulation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2016, 36(2): 16-21. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    陈国兴, 王志华, 左熹, 等. 振动台试验叠层剪切型土箱的研制[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(1): 89-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201001017.htm

    CHEN Guo-xing, WANG Zhi-hua, ZUO Xi, et al. Development of laminar shear soil container for shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2010, 32(1): 89-97. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201001017.htm
    [21]
    刘晶波, 王东洋, 谭辉, 等. 隧道纵向地震反应分析的整体式反应位移法[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(10): 17-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201810003.htm

    LIU Jing-bo, WANG Dong-yang, TAN Hui, et al. Integral response displacement method for longitudinal seismic response analysis of tunnel structure[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(10): 17-26. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201810003.htm
    [22]
    谢礼立, 翟长海. 最不利设计地震动研究[J]. 地震学报, 2003, 25(3): 250-261. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB200303002.htm

    XIE Li-li, ZHAI Chang-hai. Study on the severest real ground motion for seismic design and analysis[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2003, 25(3): 250-261. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB200303002.htm
    [23]
    翟长海, 谢礼立. 抗震结构最不利设计地震动研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2005, 38(12): 51-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200512009.htm

    ZHAI Chang-hai, XIE Li-li. The severest design ground motions for seismicdesign and analysisof structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2005, 38(12): 51-58. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200512009.htm
    [24]
    王国波, 袁明智, 苗雨. 结构-土-结构相互作用体系地震响应研究综述[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(5): 837-847. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201805010.htm

    WANG Guo-bo, YUAN Ming-zhi, MIAO Yu. Review of seismic response of structure-soil-structure interaction system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(5): 837-847. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201805010.htm
    [25]
    史晓军, 陈隽, 李杰. 地下综合管廊大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2008, 28(6): 116-123. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200806017.htm

    SHI Xiao-jun, CHEN Jun, LI Jie. Shaking table test on underground utility tunnel[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2008, 28(6): 116-123. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200806017.htm
    [26]
    CHEN G X, CHEN S, ZUO X, et al. Shaking-table tests and numerical simulations on a subway structure in soft soil[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 76: 13-28.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 唐宇,阳军生,郑响凑,童甲修,汤冲. 高温富水隧道弱风化片麻岩力学特性试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2025(01): 128-139 .
    2. 马双泽,陈伟,吕聪聪,张塑彪,张帆. 高温与循环冷却对花岗岩抗剪强度影响试验研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2025(03): 137-147 .
    3. 王健翔,孙珍平,王士奎,许蕾. 高温作用后砂岩力学性能及裂纹演化特征研究. 金属矿山. 2025(04): 61-68 .
    4. 朱振南,王殿永,杨圣奇,解经宇,袁益龙,吴廷尧,田文岭,孙博文,田红,陈劲. 不同冷却速率下干热花岗岩渗透率演化特征对比研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(02): 385-398 .
    5. 周韬,范永林,陈家嵘,周昌台. 热损伤花岗岩力学劣化特性及损伤演化规律研究. 矿业科学学报. 2024(03): 351-360 .
    6. 何将福,任成程,何坤,余启航,李欣儒,邓旭. 循环热冲击花岗岩微观裂隙表征与渗透特性演化规律. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(12): 131-142 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(15)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return