Advanced Search
  • Indexed in Scopus
  • Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations
  • Included in A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • Indexed in Ei Compendex
Volume 41 Issue S2
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
LIU Yang, ZHENG Jun-jie, ZENGYan. Bearing capacity of karst roof based on lower bound method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S2): 181-184. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S2046
Citation: LIU Yang, ZHENG Jun-jie, ZENGYan. Bearing capacity of karst roof based on lower bound method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S2): 181-184. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S2046
shu

Bearing capacity of karst roof based on lower bound method

  • 1. Institute of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430074, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Geo-mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 28, 2019
  • Published Date: July 19, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Based on the existing solution format of lower bound analysis method, stress boundary is directly divided into overload boundary and non-overload boundary by taking the overload coefficient as the objective function. A nonlinear programming model is established to solve the lower bound solution of bearing capacity of karst roof ultimate, and the internal point method is used to solve the optimal solution. The accuracy of the method and program is verified by simulating triaxial tests, and then the program is used to study the bearing capacity of karst roof. The influences of horizontal ground stress on the bearing capacity of karst roof are further considered based on the studies on the bearing capacity of karst roof using the lower bound method. The results show that the karst span has a significant effect on the bearing capacity of karst roof, regardless of whether the karst horizontal and the stress boundary conditions are the same. When the karst size is the same, the thickness of the karst roof has a great influence on the ultimate bearing capacity in a certain range, and the effect is not significant after exceeding this range. Considering the horizontal ground stress has a great influence on the bearing capacity when the thickness of the roof is large and the height of the span is relatively small, the influences of horizontal ground stress can not be neglected when the ultimate bearing capacity of the karst roof is calculated using the lower bound method.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (9)
  • [1]
    DRUCKER D C, PRAGER W.Soil mechanics and plastic analysis of limit design[J]. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1952, 10(2): 157-165.
    [2]
    SLOAN S W.Lower bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming[J]. International Journal for Numerical & Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2010, 12(1): 61-77.
    [3]
    ZOUAIN N, HERSKOVITS J, BORGES LA, et al.Aniterative algorithm for limit analysis with nonlinear yield functions[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1993, 30(10): 1397-1417.
    [4]
    BAUS R L, WANG M C.Bearing capacity of strip footing above void[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1983, 117(5): 753-765.
    [5]
    张细仁. 溶洞地铁隧道地基承载力下限法研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2014.
    (ZHANG Xi-ren.Study on the lower bound analysis method to obtain bearing capacity of subway tunnel in karst areas[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2014. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    李泽, 刘毅, 周宇, 等. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
    (LI Ze, LIU Yi, ZHOU Yu, et al.Lower bound analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of stone masonry retaining wall slope using mixed numerical discretisation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    杨昕光, 迟世春. 土石坝坡极限抗震能力的下限有限元法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(7): 1202-1209.
    (YANG Xin-guang, CHI Shi-chun.Lower bound FEM for limit aseismic capacity of earth-rockfill dams[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(7): 1202-1209. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    李仁江, 盛谦, 张勇慧. 溶洞顶板极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(8): 1621-1625.
    (LI Ren-jiang, SHENG Qian, ZHANG Yong-hui.Study on ultimate bearing capacity of upper rock plate of karst cave[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(8): 1621-1625. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    GB 50218—94 工程岩体分级标准[S]. 1995.
    (GB 50218—94 Engineering rock mass classification standard[S]. 1995. (in Chinese))
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (311) PDF downloads (142) Cited by()
    Related
    Website Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return