Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 41 Issue 8
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
TIAN Yi, WU Wen-bing, MEI Guo-xiaong, JIANG Guo-sheng, LIANG Rong-zhu. Analytical solutions for the consolidation of sludge by vacuum preloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(8): 1481-1488. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201908012
Citation: TIAN Yi, WU Wen-bing, MEI Guo-xiaong, JIANG Guo-sheng, LIANG Rong-zhu. Analytical solutions for the consolidation of sludge by vacuum preloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(8): 1481-1488. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201908012
shu

Analytical solutions for the consolidation of sludge by vacuum preloading

  • 1. Engineering Research Center of Rock-Soil Drilling & Excavation and Protection, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
    2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety, Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

More Information
  • Received Date: September 26, 2018
  • Published Date: August 24, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The vacuum preloading is an effective method for the in-situ consolidation of sludge in landfills. Considering its time effects, the analytical solutions for the consolidation by the vacuum preloading combined with the prefabricated vertical drain are obtained based on the equivalent elliptical cylinder model. Then, the parameter reflecting the time effects is obtained by fitting the measured data. The comparative analysis is carried out to validate the rationality and the practicability of the proposed solutions by comparing the settlement curve calculated from the proposed solutions to the measured one. The analysis results show that the elliptic cylinder equivalent model is the optimum choice to consider the shape effects of the PVD, and the calculated results based on the perimeter equivalent models are closer to those based on the elliptic cylinder equivalent model. The larger parameter α means the vacuum pressure is applied on the soil more quickly, which will lead to a quicker consolidation process.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (25)
  • [1]
    韦小颖, 肖细元, 张珑, 等. 城市污泥中重金属和有机污染物的净化与污泥土地利用[J]. 环境工程, 2010(增刊1): 235-240.
    (WEI Xiao-ying, XIAO Xi-yuan, ZHANG Long, et al.Heavy metal and organic contaminants removal from sewage sludge for land application[J]. Chinese Journal of Environment Engineering, 2010(S1): 235-240. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    郭清嵩, 顾潇, 武博然, 等. 真空预压处理非规范填埋污泥的中试[J]. 环境工程, 2017(12): 124-128.
    (GUO Qing-song, GU Xiao, WU Bo-ran, et al.Pilot test on the piled sewage sludge by air-boosted vacuum preloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Environment Engineering, 2017(12): 124-128. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    HANSBO S.Consolidation of caly by band-shaped prefabricated drains[J]. Ground Engineering, 1979, 12(5): 16-18, 21.
    [4]
    FELLENIUS B H, CASTONGUAY N G.The efficiency of band shaped drains: a full scale laboratory study[R]. Ottwa: National Research Council and the Industrial Research Assistance Programme, 1985.
    [5]
    ATKINSON M S, ELDRED P J L. Consolidation of soil using vertical drains[J]. Géotechnique, 1981, 31(31): 33-43.
    [6]
    LONG R P, COVO A.Equivalent diameter of vertical drains with an oblong cross section[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(9): 1625-1630.
    [7]
    ABUEL-NAGA H, BOUAZZA A.Equivalent diameter of a prefabricated vertical drain[J]. Geotextiles & Geomembranes, 2009, 27(3): 227-231.
    [8]
    GB/T 51015—2014 海堤工程设计规范[S]. 2014.
    (GB/T 51015—2014 Code for design of sea dike project[S]. 2014. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    JTS 147—2—2009 真空预压加固软土地基技术规程[S]. 2009.
    (JTS 147—2—2009 Technical specification for vacuum preloading technique to improve soft soils[S]. 2009. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    卢萌盟, 张强, 靖洪文, 等. 基于环形等效的排水板地基固结[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(2): 513-520.
    (LU Meng-meng, ZHANG qiang, JING Hong-wen, et al. Consolidation of band-shaped drain based on equivalent annular drain[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(2): 513-520. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    HUANG C, DENG Y, CHEN F.Consolidation theory for prefabricated vertical drains with elliptic cylindrical assumption[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2016, 77(1): 156-166.
    [12]
    黄朝煊, 方咏来. 线性加载下塑料排水板地基固结理论探讨[J]. 工程地质学报, 2017, 25(3): 678-685.
    (HUANG Chao-xuan, FANG Yong-lai.Consolidation theory for prefabricated vertical drain with linear preloading[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2017, 25(3): 678-685. (in Chinese))
    [13]
    占鑫杰. 市政污泥的化学调理和真空预压联合作用固结机理及应用[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2015.
    (ZHAN Xin-jie.Study on the consolidation mechanism of sewage sludge under combined effect of chemical conditioning and vacuum preloading and its application[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2015. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    TANG M, SHANG J Q.Vacuum preloading consolidation of Yaoqiang Airport runway[J]. Géotechnique, 2004, 50(6): 613-623.
    [15]
    CHU J, YAN S W.Estimation of degree of consolidation for vacuum preloading projects[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2005, 5(2): 158-165.
    [16]
    INDRARATNA B, BAMUNAWITA C, KHABBAZ H.Numerical modeling of vacuum preloading and field applications[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2004, 41(6): 1098-1110.
    [17]
    岑仰润. 真空预压加固地基的试验及理论研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2003.
    (CEN Yang-run.Vacuum preloading: experiment and theory[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2003. (in Chinese))
    [18]
    蒋基安, 陈海英, 陈越, 等. 排水板真空度损耗的排水固结解析解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(3): 406-418.
    (JIANG Ji-an, CHEN Hai-ying, CHEN Yue, et al.Analytical solutions to drainage consolidation considering vacuum loss in prefabricated vertical drain[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(3): 406-418. (in Chinese))
    [19]
    高广运, 聂春晓, 张海丘, 等. 塑料排水板结合真空预压法的径向固结解析解[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(9): 1290-1297.
    (GAO Guang-yun, NIE Chun-xiao, ZHANG Hai-qiu, et al.Radial consolidation solution of plastic wick drain combined vacuum preloading[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Nature Science), 2017, 45(9): 1290-1297. (in Chinese))
    [20]
    姜彦彬, 何宁, 许滨华, 等. 真空预压负压分布规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(10): 127-136.
    (JIANG Yan-bin, HE Ning, XU Bin-hua, ZHOU Yan-zhang, et al.Model tests on negative pressure distribution in vacuum preloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(10): 127-136. (in Chinese))
    [21]
    罗小勇. 处置库污泥工程特性测试及其对垃圾堆体稳定性影响评估[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2012.
    (LUO Xiao-yong.Measurement of geotechnical properties for sewage sludge at a disposal site and evaluation of its influence on slope stability of MSW landfill[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Universaty, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [22]
    龚晓南, 岑仰润. 真空预压加固软土地基机理探讨[J]. 哈尔滨建筑大学学报, 2002, 35(2): 7-10.
    (GONG Xiao-nan, CEN Yang-run.Mechanism of vacuum preloading[J]. Journal of Harbin University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2002, 35(2): 7-10. (in Chinese))
    [23]
    梅国雄, 徐锴, 宰金珉, 等. 真空预压加固软土地基变形机理的探讨[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(9): 1168-1172.
    (MEI Guo-xiong, XU Kai, ZAI Jin-min, et al.Deformation mechanism of soft foundation under vacuum preloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(9): 1168-1172. (in Chinese))
    [24]
    INDRARATNA B, RUJIKIATKAMJORN C, SATHANANTHAN I.Analytical and numerical solutions for a single vertical drain including the effects of vacuum preloading[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(4): 994-1014.
    [25]
    LU M M, XIE K H, GUO B.Consolidation theory for a composite foundation considering radial and vertical flows within the column and the variation of soil permeability within the disturbed soil zone[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2010, 47(2): 207-217.
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(16)

    1. 陈威，王法鑫，蒙邹蕾，姚森，王翀霄，孙阳. 大直径盾构推进引起的桩基侧向位移分析. 甘肃科学学报. 2024(02): 95-101 .
    2. 丁智，张默爆，张霄，魏新江，申文明，周俊宏. 饱和土地区不同直径盾构穿越既有隧道的理论研究. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 1447-1462 .
    3. 张志军，王永杰，陈海伦，贺晨，綦嘉诚，杨智，张连君. 盾构区间隧道下穿暗渠施工稳定性分析. 市政技术. 2024(07): 95-100+108 .
    4. 高子明. 盾构隧道穿越饱和砂土层的流固耦合分析. 低温建筑技术. 2024(11): 131-136 .
    5. 蔡晓明，潘泓，骆冠勇，曹洪. 大直径盾构施工引起的软土竖向变形计算研究. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 185-193 .
    6. 白伟，宁茂权，关振长. 地形不对称条件下盾构隧道掘进施工的地表沉降特性. 福州大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 205-212 .
    7. 房新胜，叶来宾，朱牧原，杜贵新. 清华园隧道大直径泥水盾构始发控制掘进分析. 铁道勘察. 2022(01): 81-86 .
    8. 杨召召，祝彦知，纠永志. 盾构隧道施工引起纵向地表沉降的黏弹性分析. 河南城建学院学报. 2022(04): 1-6+18 .
    9. 汤新辉，首正勇，刘建柯. 超大直径盾构施工引发的上软下硬地层地表沉降规律. 矿冶工程. 2022(05): 34-38+43 .
    10. 许梦飞，姜谙男，史洪涛，李德生，万友生，程利民. 下穿暗涵盾构隧道施工过程损伤-渗流耦合分析. 公路工程. 2022(05): 47-54+101 .
    11. 苏凤阳，朱建才，李东泰，董毓庆，丁智，陈乐华. 上软下硬地层大直径泥水盾构施工土体变形研究. 建筑结构. 2022(S2): 2675-2681 .
    12. 周洁. 大直径泥水盾构机滚动角纠偏技术. 安徽建筑. 2021(01): 164-166 .
    13. 邓皇适，傅鹤林，史越. 小转弯半径曲线盾构隧道开挖引发地表沉降计算. 岩土工程学报. 2021(01): 165-173 . 本站查看
    14. 丁智，何晨阳，董毓庆，吴勇，冯丛烈. 含气地层盾构施工引起的土体变形理论研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2021(11): 2330-2343 .
    15. 朱帆济. 大直径泥水盾构施工对粉质黏土地层变形的影响. 施工技术. 2020(09): 71-73 .
    16. 牟天光，祝江林. 不同施工条件下双线盾构隧道施工引发地表变形规律研究. 湖南文理学院学报(自然科学版). 2020(04): 75-79 .

    Other cited types(15)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(31)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return