Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 41 Issue 3
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
TU Bing-xiong, YU Jin, HE Jin-fang, CHENG Qiang, XU Guo-ping, JIA Jin-qin. Analysis of anchorage performance on new tension-compression anchorⅡ: model test[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(3): 475-483. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201903009
Citation: TU Bing-xiong, YU Jin, HE Jin-fang, CHENG Qiang, XU Guo-ping, JIA Jin-qin. Analysis of anchorage performance on new tension-compression anchorⅡ: model test[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(3): 475-483. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201903009
shu

Analysis of anchorage performance on new tension-compression anchorⅡ: model test

  • 1. Fujian Engineering Technology Research Center for Tunnel and Underground Space, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China;
    2. Xiamen Yuanchang Urban Construction Group Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361004, China;
    3. Fujian Academy of Building Research Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350025, China;
    4. School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

More Information
  • Received Date: February 02, 2018
  • Published Date: March 24, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The new tension-compression composite anchor (TC-anchor) is developed to overcome the shortcomings of the traditional tensile-type anchor (T-anchor) and pressure-type anchor (C-anchor), such as stress concentration, insufficient bonding strength between anchorage body and soil mass, and low uplift bearing capacity. The ultimate uplift bearing capacity and anchorage performance are analyzed comparatively based on the model tests for T-anchor, C-anchor and TC-anchor. The results show that, in contrast with T-anchor, the ultimate uplift bearing capacities of TC-anchor significantly increase by 79% and 161% respectively for the tension-compression anchorage length ratios (TCAL-ratio) of 1:2 and 2:1. The TC-anchor has better displacement ductility and deformation resistivity, and its residual uplift bearing capacity increases significantly. The maximum ratios of the residual uplift bearing capacity to the ultimate one (RU-ratio) of T-anchor and C-anchor are both not more than 0.40, with the average values of 0.292 and 0.259 for relative out deformation of anchor head ξs=2.5%. The tension and compression anchorage segments of TC-anchor with TCAL-ratio of 2:1 have stronger coordination-bearing capacity. When the TC-anchor is closed to failure, the bonding strength between grouting body and concrete failure plays sufficiently. So the ultimate uplift bearing capacity of TC-ancor with TCAL-ratio 2:1 is higher.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (19)
  • [1]
    贾强, 应惠清, 张鑫. 锚杆静压桩技术在既有建筑物增设地下空间中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(7): 2053-2058.
    (JIA Qiang, YING Hui-qing, ZHANG Xin.Construction of basement in existing buildings by static bolt-pile[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(7): 2053-2058. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    刘宝琛. 综合利用城市地面及地下空间的几个问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1999, 18(1): 109-111.
    (LIU Bao-chen.Some aspects for utilization of ground surface and underground space in cities[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1999, 18(1): 109-111. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    郭钢, 刘钟, 邓益兵, 等. 砂土中扩体锚杆承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(12): 3645-3652.
    (GUO Gang, LIU Zhong, DENG Yi-bing, et al.Model test research on bearing capacity characteristics of underreamed ground anchor in sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(12): 3645-3652. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    郭钢, 刘钟, 李永康, 等. 扩体锚杆拉拔破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(8): 1677-1684.
    (GUO Gang, LIU Zhong, LI Yong-kang, et al.Model test research on failure mechanism of underreamed ground anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(8): 1677-1684. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    胡建林, 张培文. 扩体型锚杆的研制及其抗拔试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(6): 1615-1619.
    (HU Jian-lin, ZHANG Pei-wen.Development of underreamed anchor and experimental study of uplift resistance[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(6): 1615-1619. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    张虎元, 王晓东, 王旭东, 等. 楠竹加筋复合锚杆内部界面黏结滑移模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(3): 789-796.
    (ZHANG Hu-yuan, WANG Xiao-dong, WANG Xu-dong, et al.Bond-slip model for bamboo-steel cable composite anchor[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(3): 789-796. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    王晓东, 张虎元, 吕擎峰. 楠竹加筋复合锚杆静力学性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(12): 108-115.
    (WANG Xiao-dong, ZHANG Hu-yuan, LÜ Qing-feng.Laboratory study of the static properties of bamboo-steel cable composite anchor[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(12): 108-115. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    曹佳文, 彭振斌, 彭文祥, 等. 充气锚杆在砂土中的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(7): 1957-1962.
    (CAO Jia-wen, PENG Zhen-bin, PENG Wen-xiang, et al.Model test study of inflated anchors in sands[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(7): 1957-1962. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    彭文祥, 张旭, 曹佳文. 充气锚杆极限承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(6): 1696-1702.
    (PENG Wen-xiang, ZHANG Xu, CAO Jia-wen.Calculation method for ultimate bearing capacity of inflatable anchor[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(6): 1696-1702. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    刘钟, 郭钢, 张义, 等. 囊式扩体锚杆施工技术与工程应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(增刊2): 205-211.
    (LIU Zhong, GUO Gang, ZHANG Yi, et al.Construction technology and engineering applications of capsule-type under-reamed ground anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(S2): 205-211. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    涂兵雄, 贾金青, 俞缙, 等.一种拉压复合型锚杆:ZL201420450678.5, 中国[P]. 2014.
    (TU Bing-xiong, JIA Jin-qin, YU Jin, et al.A tension-compression composite anchor: ZL201420450678.5, China[P]. 2014. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    程良奎, 范景伦, 韩军, 等. 岩土锚固[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2000: 35-45.
    (CHENG Liang-kui, FAN Jing-lun, HAN Jun, et al.Ground anchrage[M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2000: 35-45. (in Chinese))
    [13]
    SERRANO A, OLALLA C.Tensile resistance of rock anchors[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1999, 36(4): 449-474.
    [14]
    KILIC A, YASAR E, ATIS C D.Effect of bar shape on the pull-out load capacity of fully grouted rock bolt[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2002, 18(1): 1-6.
    [15]
    郭锐剑, 谌文武, 段建, 等. 考虑界面软化特性的土层锚杆拉拔受力分析[J]. 中南大学学报, 2012, 43(10): 4003-4009.
    (GUO Rui-jian, CHEN Wen-wu, DUAN Jian, et al.Pullout mechanical analysis of soil anchor based on softening behavior of interface[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 43(10): 4003-4009. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    尤春安, 战玉宝. 预应力锚索锚固段界面滑移的细观力学分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(10): 1976-1985.
    (YOU Chun-an, ZHANG Yu-bao.Analysis of interfacial slip mesomechanics in anchorage section of prestressed anchor cable[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(10): 1976-1985. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    夏元友, 陈泽松, 顾金才, 等. 压力分散型锚索受力特点的室内足尺模型实验[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2010, 32(3): 33-38.
    (XIA Yuan-you, CHEN Zhe-song, GU Jin-cai, et al.Indoor full-size model test on stress features of pressure-dispersive prestressed anchorage cable[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2010, 32(3): 33-38. (in Chinese))
    [18]
    JGJ/T70—2009建筑砂浆基本性能试验方法标准[S]. 2009.
    (JGJ/T70—2009 Standard for test method of basic properties of construction mortar[S]. 2009. (in Chinese))
    [19]
    JGJ/T 401—2017锚杆检测与监测技术规程[S]GJ/T 401—2017锚杆检测与监测技术规程[S].. 2017.
    (JGJ/T 401—2017 Technical specification for testing and monitoring of anchors[S]GJ/T 401—2017 Technical specification for testing and monitoring of anchors[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2017. (in Chinese))
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(37)

    1. 张远庆，陈勇，王世梅，王力. 岸坡渗流潜蚀模型试验系统变革研究. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(02): 48-54 .
    2. 程瑞林，汪泾周，范钦煜，湛正刚，周伟，马刚. 高心墙堆石坝材料本构模型计算的适用性研究. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 219-229 .
    3. 张丹，邱子源，金伟，张梓航，罗玉龙. 粗粒土渗透及渗透变形试验缩尺方法研究. 岩土力学. 2024(01): 164-172 .
    4. 崔熙灿，张凌凯，王建祥. 缩尺效应对砂砾石料力学特性及其本构模型的影响. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2024(06): 1198-1208 .
    5. 邹德高，宁凡伟，刘京茂，崔更尧，孔宪京. 基于超大型三轴仪的堆石料动力特性缩尺效应研究. 水利学报. 2024(05): 528-536 .
    6. 王睿，王兰民，周燕国，王刚. 土动力学与岩土地震工程. 土木工程学报. 2024(07): 71-89+105 .
    7. 刘赛朝，瞿常杰，石北啸. 堆石料缩尺效应试验及其数值模拟. 江西水利科技. 2024(05): 332-336 .
    8. 邹德高，刘京茂，宁凡伟，孔宪京，崔更尧，金伟，湛正刚. 基于超大型三轴试验和原型监测的堆石料模型参数缩尺效应修正. 岩土工程学报. 2024(12): 2476-2483 . 本站查看
    9. 陈洪春，王珊，段玉昌，王柳江，梁睿斌，徐祥，沈超敏. 基于现场载荷试验的压实土石填筑料变形参数反演. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 22-27 .
    10. 蒋明杰，朱俊高，张小勇，梅国雄，赵辰洋. 缩尺效应对粗颗粒土静止侧压力系数影响规律试验. 工程科学与技术. 2023(02): 259-266 .
    11. 蒋明杰，吉恩跃，王天成，栗书亚，朱俊高，梅国雄. 粗粒土抗剪强度的缩尺效应规律试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(04): 855-861 . 本站查看
    12. 孙向军，潘家军，卢一为，左永振，周跃峰，王俊鹏. 级配和密度组合对粗粒土强度特性的影响. 长江科学院院报. 2023(08): 133-138 .
    13. 沈超敏，邓刚，刘斯宏，严俊，毛航宇，王柳江. 基于颗粒堆积算法的堆石料压实密度预测研究. 水利学报. 2023(08): 920-929 .
    14. 潘家军，孙向军. 粗颗粒土缩尺方法及缩尺效应研究进展. 长江科学院院报. 2023(11): 1-8 .
    15. 吴鑫磊，石北啸，刘赛朝，徐卫卫，常伟坤. 考虑颗粒破碎的堆石料大型三轴试验. 科学技术与工程. 2022(02): 749-756 .
    16. 徐琨，杨启贵，周伟，马刚，黄泉水. 基于可破碎离散元法的堆石料应力变形及剪胀特性缩尺效应研究. 中国农村水利水电. 2022(03): 200-206+211 .
    17. 吴平，万燎榕，夏万求，高从容. 考虑级配影响的粗粒料三轴剪切破碎特性分析. 水电能源科学. 2022(05): 156-159+155 .
    18. 孟敏强，肖杨，孙增春，张志超，蒋翔，刘汉龙，何想，吴焕然，史金权. 粗粒料及粒间微生物胶结的破碎-强度-能量耗散研究进展. 中国科学:技术科学. 2022(07): 999-1021 .
    19. 邹德高，刘京茂，孔宪京，陈楷，屈永倩，宁凡伟，龚瑾. 强震作用下特高土石坝多耦合体系损伤演化机理及安全评价准则. 岩土工程学报. 2022(07): 1329-1340 . 本站查看
    20. 徐靖，叶华洋，朱晟. 粗粒料颗粒破碎三维离散元模型及其在密度桶试验中的应用. 河海大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 127-134 .
    21. 汤洪洁，杨正权，赵宇飞，田忠勇. 阿尔塔什高面板坝变形控制与安全保障关键技术研究. 水利规划与设计. 2022(12): 26-32 .
    22. 宁凡伟，孔宪京，邹德高，刘京茂，余翔，周晨光. 筑坝材料缩尺效应及其对阿尔塔什面板坝变形及应力计算的影响. 岩土工程学报. 2021(02): 263-270 . 本站查看
    23. 刘赛朝，吴鑫磊，徐卫卫，石北啸. 堆石料缩尺效应试验研究. 人民长江. 2021(01): 173-176+217 .
    24. 姜景山，左永振，程展林，韦有信，张超，夏威夷. 考虑密度影响的粗粒料剪胀模型. 人民长江. 2021(04): 182-186 .
    25. 潘生贵，陈少峰，杨辉，郑有强，李传懿. 海岸带强风化花岗岩强度及应力应变特性的尺寸效应研究. 工程勘察. 2021(05): 6-10 .
    26. 毛航宇，刘斯宏，沈超敏，王柳江，初文婷. 温、湿控制粗粒料大型三轴仪的研制及应用. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2021(06): 1258-1266 .
    27. 周泳峰，王俊杰，王爱国，杨希. 缩尺效应对堆石料颗粒破碎特性的影响. 水电能源科学. 2021(08): 165-168+65 .
    28. 王家全，畅振超，王晴，唐毅. 不同动应力比下加筋前后砾性土的动三轴试验分析. 水力发电. 2020(04): 120-125 .
    29. 李传懿，陈志波. 海底强风化花岗岩K_0固结三轴试验尺寸效应. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(06): 1646-1653 .
    30. 邵晓泉，迟世春. 堆石料变形参数的粒径尺寸相关性研究. 岩土工程学报. 2020(09): 1715-1722 . 本站查看
    31. 李学丰，李瑞杰，张军辉，王奇. 堆石料三维强度特性. 中国公路学报. 2020(09): 54-62 .
    32. 吴鑫磊，徐卫卫，刘赛朝，常伟坤，石北啸. 粗粒料缩尺效应的试验研究进展. 水利科学与寒区工程. 2020(03): 1-7 .
    33. 王晋伟，迟世春，邵晓泉，赵飞翔. 正交–等值线法在堆石料细观参数标定中的应用. 岩土工程学报. 2020(10): 1867-1875 . 本站查看
    34. 陈之祥，邵龙潭，李顺群，郭晓霞，田筱剑. 三维真土压力盒的设计与应力参数的计算. 岩土工程学报. 2020(11): 2138-2145 . 本站查看
    35. 郭万里，朱俊高，王俊杰，鲁洋. 粗粒土静力特性及室内测试技术研究进展. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2020(S2): 3570-3585 .
    36. 武利强，叶飞，林万青. 堆石料力学特性缩尺效应试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2020(S2): 141-145 . 本站查看
    37. 任秋兵，李明超，杜胜利，刘承照. 筑坝堆石料抗剪强度间接测定模型与实用计算公式研究. 水利学报. 2019(10): 1200-1213 .

    Other cited types(25)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(62)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return