Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 40 Issue S2
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
LI Wei-ping, LI Xing, XUE Ya-dong, ZHANG Sen, GE Jia-cheng. Model tests on face stability of shallow shield tunnels in sandy cobble strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S2): 199-203. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S2040
Citation: LI Wei-ping, LI Xing, XUE Ya-dong, ZHANG Sen, GE Jia-cheng. Model tests on face stability of shallow shield tunnels in sandy cobble strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S2): 199-203. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S2040
shu

Model tests on face stability of shallow shield tunnels in sandy cobble strata

  • 1. Zhejiang Transportation Planning and Design Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China;
    2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 21, 2018
  • Published Date: October 29, 2018
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In order to study the response of shallow sandy cobble strata to shield excavation and face stability, an earth pressure balance shield model is designed to conduct the indoor model tests. The failure mode and detailed process of strata are observed in these tests. The regulation of surface settlement and feature of settlement through are analyzed based on experimental data. The results show that: (1) The soil in different spatial position have different sensitivities to face displacement, but have similar failure process. (2) With the increase of the face displacement, the ground settlement-face displacement curves exhibit the regulation of ground settlement, which can be divided into four stages as insensitive stage, slow-linear settlement stage, accelerate stage and fast-linear settlement stage. (3) The directly overall instability occurs after elastic deformation and elastic-plastic failure in the shallow tunnel, and local instability has not appeared. (4) The settlement trough of sandy cobble strata is not exactly symmetrical with the tunnel axis. (5) The influenced region of the shallow tunnel in sandy cobble stratum is smaller than that of the pure sandy one in transverse, while it is greater in the longitudinal direction.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (17)
  • [1]
    王明年, 魏龙海, 路军富, 等. 成都地铁卵石层中盾构施工开挖面稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(1): 99-105.
    (WANG Ming-nian, WEI Long-hai, LU Jun-fu, et al.Study of face stability of cobble-soil shield tunneling at Chengdu metro[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(1): 99-105. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    葛嘉诚. 基于CDEM 的砂卵石土细观力学特性及其EPB 盾构开挖面稳定性研究[D]. 上海:同济大学, 2014.
    (GE Jia-cheng.Study on mesostructural mechanics of cobble -sand soil and its face stability using EPB shield based on CDEM numerical simulation[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2016. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    胡敏. 砂卵石土物理力学特性及盾构施工响应的数值模拟研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2014.
    (HU Min.Numerical method to study the physical and mechanical characteristics of sandy pebble soil and the response caused by shield tunneling[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    杨期祥. 成都地铁砂卵石层盾构开挖引起的地表沉降规律分析[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2016.
    (YANG Qi-xiang.Study on the regularity of surface settlement caused by shield tunneling in Chengdu sandy pebble stratum[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    郑小雪. 砂卵石地层盾构施工对邻近建筑物稳定性影响研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2008.
    (ZHENG Xiao-xue.Study on the stability of the adjacent structure induced by shield tunnel in gravel layer[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    白永学. 富水砂卵石地层盾构施工诱发地层塌陷机理及对策研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2012.
    (BAI Yong-xue.Research on ground collapse mechanism of shield tunneling in saturated sandy pebble stratum and corresponding measures[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    范祚文, 张子新. 砂卵石地层土压力平衡盾构施工开挖面稳定及邻近建筑物影响模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(12): 2506-2512.
    (FAN Zuo-wen, ZHANG Zi-xin.Model test of excavation face stability of epb shield in sandy cobble ground and adjacent building effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(12): 2506-2512. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    胡雄玉, 晏启祥, 何川, 等. 土压平衡盾构掘进对散粒体地层扰动和开挖面破坏特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(8): 1618-1627.
    (HU Xiong-yu, YAN Qi-xiang, HE Chuan, et al.Study on the disturbance and excavation face failure feature of granular mixtures stratum due to epb shield tunneling[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(8): 1618-1627. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    SUN J Z, LIU J Y.Visualization of tunnelling- induced ground movement in transparent sand[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014(40): 236-240.
    [10]
    STERPI D, CIVIDINI A, SAKURAI S, et al.Laboratory model tests and numerical analysis of shallow tunnels[C]// Proceedings of the International Symposium on Eurcok’96-ISRM, Torino, 1996.
    [11]
    KIRSCH A.Experimental investigation of the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2010, 5(1): 43-62.
    [12]
    薛亚东, 杨文亮, 葛嘉诚. 盾构掌子面开挖稳定性精细模拟试验装置[P]. 中国: CN103868749A, 2014-06-18. (XUE Ya-dong, YANG Wen-liang, GE Jia-cheng. A detailed device for model test on stability of tunnel face[P]. China: CN103868749A, 2014-06-18.(in Chinese))
    [13]
    PECK R B.Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground[C]// Proceeding of 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico, 1969: 275-290.
    [14]
    滕丽, 张桓. 盾构穿越砂卵石地层地表沉降特征细宏观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(4): 1141-1150.
    (TENG Li, ZHANG Huan.Meso-macro analysis of surface settlement characteristics during shield tunneling in sandy cobble ground[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(4): 1141-1150. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    李博, 苏华友, 赵旭伟. 成都地铁盾构隧道地表沉降分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2010, 1(4): 64-66.
    (LI Bo, SU Hua-you, ZHAO Xu-wei.Analysis on metro ground settlement caused by shield tunneling in Chengdu city[J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2010, 1(4): 64-66. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    韩煊, 罗文林, 李宁. 地铁隧道施工引起沉降槽宽度的影响因素[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2009, 5(6): 1188-1193.
    (HAN Xuan, LUO Wen-lin, LI Ning.The width of settlement trough influenced by tunneling in soft ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2009, 5(6): 1188-1193. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    O’REILLY M P, NEW B M. Settlements above tunnels in the united kingdom-their magnitude and prediction[C]// JONES Michael, ed. Proc Tunneling 82, London, 1982: 173-181.
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 杨旭辉，柏谦，贾鹏蛟. 地铁车站小直径管幕-横梁支护参数优化分析. 沈阳工业大学学报. 2025(01): 114-123 .
    2. 邱建，赵文，路博，孙旭. 新型管幕工法修建地铁车站地层变形特性及参数优化. 东北大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(11): 1645-1655 .
    3. 崔光耀，宋博涵，何继华，田宇航. 超近接上跨既有隧道施工影响分区及加固措施效果. 长江科学院院报. 2023(06): 114-118+125 .
    4. 伍凯，毕延哲，杨鑫，储修琼. 超浅覆土小净距上跨运营线路盾构掘进超前管幕支护模拟分析. 路基工程. 2023(04): 130-136 .
    5. 陈凯. 基于变形控制的密排管幕顶管施工顺序优化分析. 铁道勘察. 2023(05): 149-157 .
    6. 王子君，赵文，程诚，柏谦. 地铁车站小直径管幕工法开挖变形规律. 东北大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(11): 1630-1637 .
    7. 袁庆利. 大直径密排管幕的力学分析及在地铁车站中的应用. 吉林水利. 2021(06): 1-10 .
    8. 张贺. 新型钢管幕力学变形特征及其在地铁车站中的应用. 工程建设. 2021(09): 1-6 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(11)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return