• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
LI Fang-ming, CHEN Guo-xing, LIU Xue-zhu. Deformation characteristics of suspended curtain deep foundation pit of metro lines[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 2182-2190. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201812004
Citation: LI Fang-ming, CHEN Guo-xing, LIU Xue-zhu. Deformation characteristics of suspended curtain deep foundation pit of metro lines[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 2182-2190. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201812004

Deformation characteristics of suspended curtain deep foundation pit of metro lines

More Information
  • Received Date: September 24, 2017
  • Published Date: December 24, 2018
  • Based on the actual deformation data of suspended curtain deep foundation pit of metro lines in flood plain areas, the deformation laws of the deep foundation pit are analyzed to provide a reference to the design and monitoring of similar projects by using the methods of theoretical analysis, empirical formulas and finite element numerical simulation. The results show that the distribution curve of the ground subsidence behind the suspended curtain takes a shape of groove. The ground subsidence considering fluid-structure interaction is greater than that without considering fluid-structure interaction. The final shape of the underground diaphragm wall is convex. The horizontal displacement of the wall at the top does not completely move to the pit. The ratio of the maximum horizontal displacement of the diaphragm wall to the excavation depth of the foundation pit is similar to the situation of the foundation pit with wholly used waterproof curtain. The depth of the maximum horizontal displacement point is near the bottom of the foundation pit. The ratio of the ground subsidence caused by precipitation to the total subsidence is about 0.54. The range of ground subsidence can be divided into strong, moderate and weak influence areas. The curve of ground subsidence in each influence area can thus use different functional expressions. The location of the maximum ground subsidence point is farther than that of the foundation pit with wholly used waterproof curtain about 1.0~3.0 m under the same conditions.
  • [1]
    PECK R B.Deep excavation and tunneling in soft ground[C]// Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, State-of-the-Art -Volume. Mexico City, 1969: 225-290.
    [2]
    MANA A I, CLOUGH G W.Prediction of movements for braced cuts in clay[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1981, 107(6): 759-777.
    [3]
    CLOUGH G W, O'ROURKE T D. Construction induced movements of in situ walls[C]// Proceedings, ASCE Conference on Design and Performance of Earth Retaining Structures, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 25. New York: ASCE, 1990: 439-470.
    [4]
    OU C Y, HSIEH P G, CHIOU D C.Characteristics of ground surface settlement during excavation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1993, 30(5): 758-767.
    [5]
    HSIEH P G, OU C Y.Shape of ground surface settlement profiles caused by excavation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(6): 1004-1017.
    [6]
    LONG M.Database for retaining wall and ground movements due to deep excavations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2001, 127(3): 203-224.
    [7]
    MOORMANN C.Analysis of wall and ground movements due to deep excavations in soft soil based on a new worldwide database[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2004, 44(1): 87-98.
    [8]
    LEUNG E H Y, NG C W W. Wall and ground movements associated with deep excavations supported by cast in situ wall in mixed ground conditions[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2007, 133(2): 129-143.
    [9]
    王卫东, 徐中华, 王建华. 上海地区深基坑周边地表变形性状实测统计分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(11): 1659-1666.
    (WANG Wei-dong, XU Zhong-hua, WANG Jian-hua.Statistical analysis of characteristics of ground surface settlement caused by deep excavations in Shanghai soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(11): 1659-1666. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    吴锋波, 金淮, 朱少坤. 北京市轨道交通基坑工程地表变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(4): 1066-1074.
    (WU Feng-bo, JIN Huai. ZHU Shao-kun.Ground deformation characteristics of foundation pit related to the urban rail transit in Beijing[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(4): 1066-1074. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    李淑, 张顶立, 房倩, 等. 北京地铁车站深基坑地表变形特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(1): 189-198.
    (LI Shu, ZHANG Ding-li, FANG Qian, et al.Research on characteristics of ground surface deformation in Beijing subway[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(1): 189-198. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    王昆泰, 胡立强, 吕凯歌. 悬挂式帷幕条件下基坑渗流特性的计算分析[J]. 建筑科学, 2010, 26(1): 81-84.
    (WANG Kun-tai, HU li-qiang. LÜ Kai-ge. Analysis for seepage of deep foundation pit with hanging impervious purdah[J]. Building Science, 2010, 26(1): 81-84. (in Chinese))
    [13]
    周火垚, 王华钦, 张维泉. 悬挂式止水在基坑工程中的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(增刊): 470-473.
    (ZHOU Huo-yao, WANG Hua-qin, ZHANG Wei-quan.Application of pensile impervious curtain to excavations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(S0): 470-473. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    张兴胜, 卢耀如, 王建秀, 等. 上海悬挂式地下连续墙基坑渗流侵蚀引起的沉降研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(增刊2): 284-290.
    (ZHANG Xing-sheng, LU Yao-ru, WANG Jian-xiu, et al.Land subsidence caused by pits seepage erosion of deep foundation with suspended diaphragm walls in Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(S2): 284-290. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    薛丽影, 杨斌, 刘丰敏, 等. 基坑工程地下水渗流模型试验系统研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(增刊1): 126-130.
    (XUE Li-ying, YANG Bin, LIU Feng-min, et al.Model test system for groundwater seepage in foundation pit engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(S1): 126-130. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    JGJ 120—2012 建筑基坑支护技术规程[S]. 2012.
    (JGJ 120—2012 Technical speccification for retaining and protection of building foundation excavations[S]. 2012. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    刘世涛, 程培峰. 基于ABAQUS土体数值分析的本构模型[J]. 低温建筑技术, 2010, 140(2): 90-92.
    (LIU Shi-tao, CHENG Pei-feng.Based on ABAQUS for numerical analysis of soil constitutive model[J]. Low Temperature Architecture Technology, 2010, 140(2): 90-92. (in Chinese))
    [18]
    赵锡宏, 姜洪伟, 袁聚云, 等. 上海软土各向异性弹塑性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2003, 24(3): 322-330.
    (ZHAO Xi-hong, JIANG Hong-wei, YUAN Ju-yun, et al.Anisotropically elastoplastic model of Shanghai soft soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2003, 24(3): 322-330. (in Chinese))
    [19]
    TAN Y, WANG D L.Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay: I Bottom-up construction of the central cylindrical shaft[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(11): 1875-1893.
    [20]
    TAN Y, WANG D L.Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay: II Top-down construction of the peripheral rectangular pit[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(11): 1894-1910.
    [21]
    WANG J H, XU Z H, WANG W D.Wall and ground movements due to deep excavations in Shanghai soft soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(7): 985-994.
    [22]
    HASHASH Y M A, OSOULI A, MARULANDA C. Central artery/tunnel project excavation induced ground deformations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2008, 134(9): 1399-1406.
    [23]
    DJ/TJ08—61—2010 基坑工程技术规程[S]. 2010.
    (DJ/TJ08—61—2010 Technical code for excavation engineering[S]. 2010. (in Chinese))
    [24]
    GB 50911—2013 城市轨道交通工程监测技术规范[S]. 2013. (GB 50911—2013 Code for monitoring measurement of urban rail transit engineering[S]. 2013. (in Chinese))
    [25]
    刘国斌, 王卫东. 基坑工程手册[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
    (LIU Guo-bin, WANG Wei-dong.Excavation engineering handbook[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2009. (in Chinese))
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 徐云山,肖子龙,孙德安,李建平. 游离氧化铁赋存形式对脱吸湿条件下红黏土热传导性能的影响. 岩土工程学报. 2025(04): 811-819 . 本站查看
    2. 刘红,肖宇,肖杨,吴焕然. 土体热力学性质及本构关系研究综述. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2025(03): 21-35 .
    3. 赵华,王成龙,陈志雄,张鼎新,彭宸. 饱和黏土中水平受荷能量桩热–力响应特性研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(01): 248-260 .
    4. 曹卫平,李清源,赵敏,吴奇兴,李庆. 间歇式运行模式下黄土地基中能量桩热-力特性模型试验. 土木工程学报. 2024(09): 123-134 .
    5. 徐云山,肖子龙,孙德安,陈军浩,曾召田. 土体导热系数温度效应及其预测模型. 岩土工程学报. 2023(06): 1180-1189 . 本站查看
    6. 宫玉辉,陈向南,刘鸣,米洋,张鹏,朱珍. “双碳”背景下能量桩在工程建设领域的研究与应用. 建设科技. 2023(10): 61-66 .
    7. 晁军. 不同运行桩数下能量桩群桩承台变形规律研究. 河南科学. 2022(06): 956-963 .

    Other cited types(14)

Catalog

    Article views (411) PDF downloads (290) Cited by(21)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return