LI Guang-xin. Pragmatism and soil mechanics[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(10): 1897-1904. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201810017
    Citation: LI Guang-xin. Pragmatism and soil mechanics[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(10): 1897-1904. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201810017

    Pragmatism and soil mechanics

    More Information
    • Received Date: August 28, 2018
    • Published Date: October 24, 2018
    • According to the recount and analysis about the principal of effective stress, strength criterion, settlement calculation, constitutive model, unsaturated soil and calculation parameters in engineering practice of soils, it is drawn that the pragmatism is a characteristic and effective work method in the subject of soil mechanics. The soil is a very complex kind of material, and soil mechanics is a practical subject. Therefore, the researches on the soils have to be based on engineering application because of the pragmatism characteristic of soil mechanics. The pragmatism and empiricism are often interlinked with each other, and the concept and theory in soil mechanics are not allowed to be overlooked.
    • [1]
      TERZAGHI K, PECK R B, MESRI G.Soil mechanics in engineering practice[M]. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1996.
      [2]
      KNAPPETT J A, CRAIG R F.Craig`s soil mechanics[M]. 8th ed. Spon Press, 2012.
      [3]
      MICHELL J K.Fundamentals of soil behavior[M]. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1993.
      [4]
      LADE P V.Elacto-plastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil with curved yield surface[J]. Int J Solids and Structure, 1977, 13(11): 1019-1035.
      [5]
      NAKAI T, MATSUOKA H.Shear behavious of sand and clay under three dimensional stress condition[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1983, 23(20): 26-42.
      [6]
      俞茂宏, 周小平, 张伯虎. 双剪土力学[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2012.
      (YU Mao-hong, ZHOU Xiao-ping, ZHANG Bo-hu.Twin shear soil mechanics[M]. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 2012. (in Chinese))
      [7]
      ROBERT D H, WILLIAM D K.An introduction to geotechnical engineering[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall, Inc, 1981.
      [8]
      LEE K L.Triaxial compressive strength of saturated sands under seimic loading conditions[D]. Borkley: University of California at Borkley, 1965.
      [9]
      LADE P V, DUCAN J M.Stress path dependent behavior of cohesionless soil[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1976, 102(1): 51-68.
      [10]
      李广信. 高等土力学[M]. 2版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2016.
      (LI Guang-xin.Advance soil mechanics[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2016. (in Chinese))
      [11]
      SKEPTON A W, BJERRUM L.A contribution to the settlement analysis of foundations on clay[J]. Géotechnique, 1957, 7(4): 168-178.
      [12]
      SL274—2001碾压式土石坝设计规范[S]. 2001. (SL274—2001 Design code for rolled earth-rock fill dams[S]. 2001. (in Chinese))
      [13]
      POOROOSHASB H B.The last lecture[C]// Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Lowland Technology. Saga: Institute of Lowland and Marine Research, Saga University, 2010.
      [14]
      弗雷德隆德D G, 拉哈尔佐H. 非饱和土力学[M]. 陈仲颐, 张在明, 译. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1997.
      (FREDLUND D G, RAHARDJO H.Soil mechanics for unsaturated soil[M]. CHEN Zhong-yi, ZHANG Zai-ming, Trans. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 1997. (in Chinese))
      [15]
      梁金国, 冯怀平. 基于非饱和土理论的简化强度判断公式研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2011, 39(11): 11-13.
      (LIANG Jin-guo, FENG Huai-ping.Research on simplified strength quation based on unsaturated soil[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2011, 39(11): 11-13. (in Chinese))
      [16]
      李广信. 土的清华弹塑性模型及其发展[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(1): 1-10.
      (LI Guang-xin.Characteristics and development of Tsinghua Elasto-plastic Model for soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(1): 1-10. (in Chinese))
      [17]
      顾宝和. 岩土工程典型案例述评[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
      (GU Bao-he.Review of classic case in geotechnical engineering[M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2015. (in Chinese))
      [18]
      杨光华. 地基非线性沉降计算的原状土切线模量法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(11): 1927-1931.
      (YANG Guang-hua.Nonliner settlement computation of the soil foundation with the undisturbed soil tangent modulus method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(11): 1927-1931. (in Chinese))
    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(5)

      1. 黄晨虓,郑许冬,刘开友,张智卿,刘开富. 不同桩-土界面摩擦系数对水平荷载下大直径单桩变形特性影响研究. 浙江水利水电学院学报. 2024(01): 31-37+45 .
      2. 吴承亮,邬远康,赵川. 桩土界面参数对单桩极限承载力的影响. 华南地震. 2022(01): 113-118 .
      3. 胡俊杰,刘杰,杨越. 双向循环荷载下海上风机群桩基础累积变形特征分析. 科学技术与工程. 2022(11): 4497-4504 .
      4. 赵爽,王奎华,吴君涛. 水平循环荷载下砂土中斜单桩累积变形特性. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2022(07): 1310-1319 .
      5. 邢磊,王多银,段伦良,王丽. 干湿循环及水平循环荷载下的码头群桩侧向累积位移. 科学技术与工程. 2021(19): 8166-8175 .

      Other cited types(7)

    Catalog

      Article views PDF downloads Cited by(12)
      Related

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return