• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
YANG Li-yun, DING Chen-xi, ZHENG Li-shuang, BAO Shi-jun, ZHANG Yong-jin, LIU Zhen-kun. Evolution of blasting cracks in different static compression fields[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(7): 1322-1327. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201807020
Citation: YANG Li-yun, DING Chen-xi, ZHENG Li-shuang, BAO Shi-jun, ZHANG Yong-jin, LIU Zhen-kun. Evolution of blasting cracks in different static compression fields[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(7): 1322-1327. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201807020

Evolution of blasting cracks in different static compression fields

More Information
  • Received Date: April 18, 2017
  • Published Date: July 24, 2018
  • The blasting-induced fracture of deep underground rock is the main problem in rock blasting, which is commonly subjected to the dynamic loads induced by blasting under high in-situ static stresses. The high static stress fields have great influences on the fracturing behaviors of propagating cracks. The digital-laser dynamic caustics system is utilized in the blasting fracturing tests, in which the PMMA specimen undergoes three kinds of vertical static stresses (0, 2 and 4 MPa, respectively) with the same total charges. Using the theory of fracture mechanics, the mechanism of fracture and propagation behaviors of cracks is analyzed. The results indicate that the propagation direction of the main crack gradually deflects to the direction of the principal stress, the total propagation time of the main crack decreases gradually, the type II test failure is more remarkable, and the maximum deflection angle of the main crack also significantly increases along with the increase of the initial static compression. The relationship between the static compression stress field and the blast-induced cracks behavior is revealed, and the studies on rock blasting fragmentation theory are enriched.
  • [1]
    LU W, CHEN M, GENG X, et al.A study of excavation sequence and contour blasting method for underground powerhouses of hydropower stations[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 29: 31-39.
    [2]
    戴俊. 深埋岩石隧洞的周边控制爆破方法与参数确定[J].爆炸与冲击, 2004, 24(6): 493-498.
    (DAI Jun.The controlled contour blasting technique and its parameter determination for rock tunnel at depth[J]. Explosion and Shock Wave, 2004, 24(6) : 493-498. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    戴俊, 钱七虎. 高地应力条件下的巷道崩落爆破参数[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2007, 27(3): 272-276.
    (DAI Jun, QIAN Qi-hu.Break blasting parameters for driving a roadway in rock with high residual stress[J]. Explosion and Shock Wave, 2007, 27(3): 272-276. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    刘殿书, 王万富, 杨吕俊. 初始应力条件下爆破机理的动光弹实验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 1999, 24(6): 612-614.
    (LIU Dian-shu, WANG Wan-fun, YANG Lü-jun.Holophotoelasticity study on mechanism of blasting under initiative stress field[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 1999, 24(6): 612-614. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    肖正学, 张志呈, 李端明. 初始应力场对爆破效果的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 1996, 21(5): 497-501.
    (XIAO Zheng-xue, ZHANG Zhi-cheng, LI Rui-ming.The influence of initial stress field on blasting[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 1996, 21(5): 497-501. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    高全臣, 赫建明, 冯贵文, 等. 高应力岩巷的控制爆破机理与技术[J]. 爆破, 2003, 20(增刊): 52-55.
    (GAO Quan-chen, HAO Jian-ming, FENG Gui-wen, et al.Mechanism and technology of controlled blasting for high stress rock tunneling[J]. Blasting, 2003, 20(S0) : 52-55. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    KUTTER H K, FAIRHURST C.On the fracture process in blasting[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 1971, 8: 181-202.
    [8]
    ROSSMANITH H P, KNASMILLNER R E, DAEHNKE A, et al.Wave propagation, damage evolution, and dynamic fracture extension part II: blasting[J]. Materials Science, 1996, 32(4): 403-410.
    [9]
    杨立云, 马佳辉, 王学东, 等. 压应力场中爆生裂纹分布与扩展特征实验分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(2): 262-268.
    (YANG Li-yun, MA Jia-hui, WANG Xue-dong, et al.Experimental study on blasting crack initiation and propagation behavior in compression stress field[J]. Explosion and Shock Wave, 2017, 37(2): 262-268. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    白羽, 朱万成, 魏晨慧, 等. 不同地应力条件下双孔爆破的数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(增刊1): 466-471.
    (BAI Yu, ZHU Wan-cheng, WEI Chen-hui, et al.Numerical simulation on two-hole blasting under different in-situ stress conditions[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(S1): 466-471. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    中国航空研究院. 应力强度因子手册[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1981.
    (Chinese Aeronautical Establishment.Handbook of stress intensity factor[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1981. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    SMITH D J, AYATOLLAHI M R, PAVIER M J.The role of T-stress in brittle fracture for linear elastic materials under mixed-mode loading[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2001, 24(2): 137-150.
    [13]
    杨立云, 杨仁树, 许鹏. 新型数字激光动态焦散线实验系统及其应用[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2013, 42(2): 188-194.
    (YANG Li-yun, YANG Ren-shu, XU Peng.Caustics method combined with laser & digital high-speed camera and its applications[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2013, 42(2): 188-194. (in Chinese))
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 李晓龙,栗鹏超,刘小锋,孙立军,郭长龙,何况. 富水粉细砂层联络通道顶管法施工地表沉降分析. 郑州大学学报(工学版). 2025(01): 67-74 .
    2. 杜明芳,赵洁,易领兵,张鹏,王宗勇,任方毅,朱行通. 地铁盾构区间机械法联络通道施工全过程正线隧道力学响应分析. 城市轨道交通研究. 2025(03): 6-13 .
    3. 黄大维,陈后宏,徐长节,罗文俊,耿大新,刘家璇. 联络通道施工盾构机始发对已建盾构隧道影响试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2025(05): 987-994 . 本站查看
    4. 周萌. 盾构法联络通道不同开洞位置对主隧道管片内力影响. 城市轨道交通研究. 2024(07): 81-87 .
    5. 陈星欣,何明高,施文城,郭力群. 土岩复合地层盾构地中对接法刀盘拆卸不完全拱压力计算. 岩土工程学报. 2024(12): 2652-2660 . 本站查看
    6. 焦月红,万治安,顾佳伟,王寿鹤,周游,王勇,张跃曦. 装配式钢板箱水土中接收监测分析. 建设科技. 2024(S1): 199-202 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (323) PDF downloads (143) Cited by(7)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return