Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 40 Issue 6
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
KONG Xian-jing, PANG Rui, ZOU De-gao, XU Bin, ZHOU Yang. Seismic performance evaluation of high CFRDs based on incremental dynamic analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(6): 978-984. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201806002
Citation: KONG Xian-jing, PANG Rui, ZOU De-gao, XU Bin, ZHOU Yang. Seismic performance evaluation of high CFRDs based on incremental dynamic analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(6): 978-984. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201806002
shu

Seismic performance evaluation of high CFRDs based on incremental dynamic analysis

  • 1. The State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China;
    2. School of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

More Information
  • Received Date: February 06, 2017
  • Published Date: June 24, 2018
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The seismic performance analysis can effectively estimate the risk of structures under earthquake action, so it gradually becomes the important method of seismic safety evaluation. However, this method is still in the beginning stage of application because of the complexity of CFRDs. The safety of these high dams must be seriously considered as a large number of high CFRDS are constructed, so it is very important to perform the seismic performance analysis of dams. As the seismic performance analysis method, the incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) can analyze the change of structural performance under different intensity earthquakes comprehensively and deeply. IDA is introduced into the field of safety evaluation of high CFRDs, and a seismic damage performance evaluation method is established. Fifteen different strong motion records are chosen according to the site conditions. The peak ground acceleration of earthquake is selected as the earthquake intensity factor. The dam seismic deformation, slope stability and anti-seepage of face safety are selected as the indexes of seismic performance evaluation. First, the damage grade standards of high CFRDs of each evaluation index are suggested after selecting the appropriate performance parameters. Afterwards, the seismic fragility curves of each performance parameter are acquired through a large number of nonlinear finite element calculations. Finally, the failure probability of dams under different earthquake intensities is analyzed, and the results may provide the reference and basis for the seismic performance design and safety risk assessment of high CFRDs.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (21)
  • [1]
    Euro code 8-2004. Design of structures for earthquake resistances 8-2004. Design of structures for earthquake resistances[S]. 2004.
    [2]
    NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[S]. 1996.
    [3]
    CECS160—2004建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)[S]. 2004.
    (CECS160—2004 General rule for performance based seismic design of buildings[S]. 2004. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    Federal Emergency Management Agency.FEMA-65: federal guidelines for dam safety-earthquake analysis and design of dams[R]. Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2005.
    [5]
    张楚汉, 金峰, 王进廷, 等. 高混凝土坝抗震安全评价的关键问题与研究进展[J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(3): 253-264.
    (ZHANG Chu-han, JIN Feng, WANG Jin-ting, et al.Key issues and developments on seismic safety evaluation of high concrete dams[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2016, 47(3): 253-264. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    陈厚群. 大坝的抗震设防水准及相应性能目标[C]// 第二届全国防震减灾工程学术研讨会论文集. 广州, 2005.
    (CHEN Hou-qun.Seismic fortification levels and performance objectives for large dams[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd national conference on Engineering Mitigation of Earthquake Disasters. Guangzhou, 2005. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    VAMVATSIKOS D.Incremental dynamic analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 491-514.
    [8]
    王海波. 水工抗震学科国际科学技术发展动态跟踪[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2009, 7(2): 286-293.
    (WANG Hai-bo.A state-of-art report on aseismic design of hydraulic structure[J]. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2009, 7(2): 286-293. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    沈怀至, 金峰, 张楚汉. 基于性能的重力坝-地基系统地震易损性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(12): 86-91.
    (SHEN Huai-zhi, JIN Feng, ZHANG Chu-han.Performance based seismic fragility analysis of concrete gravity foundation system[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(12): 86-91. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    王笃波, 刘汉龙, 于陶, 等. 基于变形的土石坝地震易损性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(5): 814-819.
    (WANG Du-bo, LIU Han-long, YU Tao, et al.Seismic fragility analysis for earth-rockfill dams based on deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(5): 814-819. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    SWAISGOOD J R.Embankment dam deformations caused by earthquakes[C]// Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering[CD-ROM]. Christchurch, 2003.
    [12]
    陈生水, 李国英, 傅中志. 高土石坝地震安全控制标准与极限抗震能力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(1): 59-65.
    (CHEN Sheng-shui, LI Guo-ying, FU Zhong-zhi.Safety criteria and limit resistance capacity of high earth-rock dams subjected to earthquakes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(1): 59-65. (in Chinese))
    [13]
    赵剑明, 刘小生, 杨玉生, 等. 高面板堆石坝抗震安全评价标准与极限抗震能力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(12): 2254-2261.
    (ZHAO Jian-ming, LIU Xiao-sheng, YANG Yu-sheng, et al.Criteria for seismic safety evaluation and maximum aseismic capability of high concrete face rockfill dams[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(12): 2254-2261. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    GHANAAT Y.Failure modes approach to safety evaluation of dams[C]// 13th World Conf on Earthquake Eng. Vancouver, 2004: 1115.
    [15]
    孔宪京, 邹德高. 紫坪铺面板堆石坝震害分析与数值模拟[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.
    (KONG Xian-jing, ZOU De-gao.The seismic damage analysis and numerical simulation of Zi Pingpu CFRD[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    孔宪京. 混凝土面板堆石坝抗震性能[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
    (KONG Xian-jing.Seismic performance of concrete-faced rockfill dam[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    JM Raphael.The tensile strength of concrete[J]. ACI J Proc, 1984, 81(17): 158-165.
    [18]
    GRDarbre. Swiss Guidelines for the Earthquake Safety of Dams[C]// Proc 13th WCEE, Vancouver B C. 2004: 1794.
    [19]
    OZKAN M Y.A review of considerations on seismic safety of embankments and earth and rock-fill dams[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1998, 17: 439-458.
    [20]
    田景元, 刘汉龙, 伍小玉. 高土石坝极限抗震能力的评判角度及标准述评[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2013(增刊1): 128-131.
    (TIAN Jing-yuan, LIU Han-long, WU Xiao-yu.Evaluation perspectives and criteria of maximum aseismic capability for high earth-rock dam[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2013(S1): 128-131. (in Chinese))
    [21]
    沈怀至, 张楚汉, 寇立夯. 基于功能的混凝土重力坝地震破坏评价模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 47(12): 2114-2118.
    (SHEN Huai-zhi, ZHANG Chu-han, KOU Li-hang.Performance-based seismic damage assessment model for concrete gravity dams[J]. J Tsinghua Univ (Sci& Tech), 2007, 47(12): 2114-2118.(in Chinese))
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]CUI Chunyi, XU Minze, XU Chengshun, ZHAO Jingtong, LIU Hailong, MENG Kun. Seismic fragility analysis of subway station structures considering statistical uncertainty of seismic demands[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(3): 453-462. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230980
    [2]ZHANG Chenlong, ZHANG Dongming, HUANG Zhongkai, HUANG Hongwei. Resilience assessment method for subway stations considering uncertainty of seismic intensity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(1): 164-172. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231153
    [3]LI Jinqiang, ZHONG Zilan, SHEN Jiaxu, ZHANG Bu, ZHANG Yabo, DU Xiuli. Longitudinal seismic fragility analysis of utility tunnel structures based on IDA method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(8): 1622-1631. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230397
    [4]DAI Xuan, MA Yunxiang, WEI Shaowei, WEI Peiyong, HUO Haifeng, CAI Degou, LI Zhao. Seismic performance analysis of frame beams-reinforced slope under different earthquake intensities[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S2): 147-152. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S20019
    [5]QIU Dapeng, CHEN Jianyun, WANG Wenming, CAO Xiangyu. Fragility analysis of underground large-scale frame structures considering seismic effects of vertical earthquakes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(12): 2537-2546. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221053
    [6]ZHEN Libin, SHI Yuebo, ZHONG Zilan, DU Xiuli, LUO Wenlin. Efficient seismic fragility of underground structures using endurance time analysis method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(4): 777-784. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220188
    [7]MENG Chang, TANG Liang. Seismic fragility analysis of pile-supported wharf in nearshore liquefiable ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(12): 2274-2282. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202112014
    [8]ZHONG Zi-lan, SHEN Yi-yao, HAO Ya-ru, LI Li-yun, DU Xiu-li. Seismic fragility analysis of two-story and three-span metro station structures based on IDA method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 916-924. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202005014
    [9]JIN Cong-cong, CHI Shi-chun, NIE Zhang-bo. Seismic safety analysis of high earth-rockfill dams based on seismic deformational fragility[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(2): 334-343. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202002015
    [10]ZHU Hong-wei, YAO Ling-kan, LAI Jun. Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity retaining walls based on performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(1): 150-157. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202001017
    • Supplements (0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (366) PDF downloads (207) Cited by()
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return