• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
CHEN Hong-juan, YAN Wei-ming, CHEN Shi-cai, ZHANG Xue-ming. Shaking table tests on immersed tunnel-joint-soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(4): 634-644. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201804007
Citation: CHEN Hong-juan, YAN Wei-ming, CHEN Shi-cai, ZHANG Xue-ming. Shaking table tests on immersed tunnel-joint-soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(4): 634-644. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201804007

Shaking table tests on immersed tunnel-joint-soil

More Information
  • Received Date: January 02, 2017
  • Published Date: April 24, 2018
  • To obtain the dynamic response of the immersed tunnel and its joints under seismic action, with Zhoutouzui immersed tunnel project in China as the background, a series of shaking table tests on immersed tunnel-joint-soil with a scaling factor of 1/60 are conducted under uniform earthquake excitation by using the multiple shaking table test system in Beijing University of Technology. They are performed using a rigid prefabricated continuous model box with the dimensions of 7.7 meters long, 3.2 meters wide and 1.2 meters high. The test system is subjected to strong ground motions from El Centro record, Taft record, Tianjin record and Guangzhou artificial record through horizontal longitudinal and horizontal transverse uniform seismic excitations. The model tunnel joint components are designed to simulate the immersed tunnel joint, and the axial force and deformation of joints are obtained by using the pull-press sensors and laser displacement sensors. The test results show that the acceleration time histories and their Fourier spectra of different model tunnel segments are different from each other. And the seismic response of the tunnel structure is not vibration along with its own features, but is subject to the seismic response of the surrounding soils. Under the seismic excitation with different intensities, the force distribution of joints can provide valuable reference for aseismic design of the immersed tunnels. Under different seismic inputs with different intensities, the displacement of joint 1 is the maximum, and that of joint 2 is the minimum. Such change law makes the whole tunnel along the longitudinal deformation more harmonious. The change trend of displacements along the positive and negative directions at each joint is basicly parallel. The practical water stop of tunnels is in a safe range and will not leak by converting the test results to the prototype data.
  • [1]
    叶海林, 郑颖人, 杜修力, 等. 边坡动力破坏特征的振动台模型试验与数值分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2012, 45(9): 128-135.
    (YE Hai-lin, ZHENG Ying-ren, DU Xiu-li, et al.Shaking table model test and numerical analysis on dynamic failure characteristics of slope[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(9): 128-135. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    刘鹏, 丁文其, 杨波. 沉管隧道接头刚度模型研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增刊2): 133-139.
    (LIU Peng, DING Wen-qi, YANG Bo.Model for stiffness of joints of immersed tube tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(S2): 133-139. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    黎伟, 房营光, 莫海鸿, 等. 砂流法施工致沉管隧道管段竖向位移的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(6): 1102-1108.
    (LI Wei, FANG Ying-guang, MO Hai-hong, et al.Vertical displacement of tube segment of immersed tunnels caused by sand flow construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(6): 1102-1108. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    GLERUM A.Developments in immersed tunnelling in holland[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1995, 10(4): 455-462.
    [5]
    GRANTZ W C.Steel-shell immersed tunnels-forty years of experience[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1997, 12(1): 23-31.
    [6]
    刘鸿哲, 黄茂松. 超长沉管隧道纵向地震响应频域分析方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(11): 1971-1978.
    (LIU Hong-zhe, HUANG Mao-song.Frequency-domain analysis method for longitudinal seismic response of super-long immersed tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(11): 1971-1978. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    HU Zhi-nan, XIE Yong-li, WANG Jun.Challenges and strategies involved in designing and constructing a 6 km immersed tunnel: a case study of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 50: 171-177.
    [8]
    OKAMOTO S, TAMURA C.Behaviour of subaqueous tunnels during earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1973, 1: 253-266.
    [9]
    严松宏, 潘昌实. 沉管隧道地震响应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2006, 43(2): 15-21.
    (YAN Song-hong, PAN Chang-shi.Seismic response analyses of an immersed tube tunnel[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2006, 43(2): 15-21. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    傅继阳, 吴玖荣, 徐安. 广州洲头咀沉管隧道地震响应研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 35(9): 23-27.
    (FU Ji-yang, WU Jiu-rong, XU An.Seismic response of Zhoutouzui immersed tunnel in Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2008, 35(9): 23-27. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    DING Jun-hong, JIN Xian-long, GUO Yi-zhi, et al.Numerical simulation for large-scale seismic response analysis of immersed tunnel[J]. Engineering and Structures, 2006, 28: 1367-1377.
    [12]
    Anastasopoulos. Nonlinear response of deep immersed tunnel to strong seismic shaking[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133: 1067-1090.
    [13]
    LYNGS J H.Model accuracy in aseismic design of immersed tunnel[D]. Aalborg: Aalborg University, 2008.
    [14]
    VAN OORSOUW R S. Behaviour of segment joints in immersed tunnels under seismic loading[D]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2010.
    [15]
    白龙, 赵旭, 杜修力, 等. 沉管隧道接头地震动力响应分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2015, 35(2): 153-159.
    (BAI Long, ZHAO Xu, DU Xiu-li, et al.Seismic response of joints of immersed tube tunnels[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Engineering, 2015, 35(2): 153-159. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    楼梦麟, 董云, 张如林. 沉管隧道地震反应分析局部精细化建模中的几个问题[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(9): 1705-1712.
    (LOU Meng-lin, DONG Yun, ZHANG Ru-lin.Several problems in refined local modeling for seismic response analysis of immersed tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(9): 1705-1712. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    陈红娟, 闫维明, 陈适才, 等. 小比例尺地下结构振动台试验模型土的设计与试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 35(3): 59-66.
    (CHEN Hong-juan, YAN Wei-ming, CHEN Shi-cai, et al.Design and experimental research on model soil used for shaking table test of a small scale underground structure[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2015, 35(3): 59-66. (in Chinese))
    [18]
    陈红娟, 李小军, 闫维明, 等. 锯末混合土地基自由场振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(11): 2068-2077.
    (CHEN Hong-juan, LI Xiao-jun, YAN Wei-ming, et al.Study on shaking table test of sawdust mixed clay site model[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 2068-2077. (in Chinese))
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 满轲,柳宗旭,商艳,宋志飞,刘晓丽,苏宝. 基于灰色关联分析下深度学习盾构姿态预测模型. 工程科学与技术. 2025(02): 203-213 .
    2. 满轲,曹子祥,刘晓丽,宋志飞,柳宗旭,刘汭琳,武立文. 地质突变条件下基于组合模型的围岩等级和TBM掘进参数预测. 河海大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 55-62 .
    3. 邓志兴,谢康,李泰灃,苏谦,韩征,肖宪普. 基于机器学习的高铁边坡位移预测不确定性度量与应用. 中国铁道科学. 2024(01): 56-67 .
    4. 姜浩,郑亚强,金治军,马庆,董强,郑德焰,林峰,赵炳武. 基于ANN算法的钢结构安装工程质量状态评价. 化工管理. 2024(06): 102-109 .
    5. 郝晶晶,段鹏鑫,陈雨欣,段晓晨. 基于IGWO-SVR的地铁车站投资预测. 铁道学报. 2024(05): 179-188 .
    6. 张洁. 新疆超长隧洞TBM智能掘进施工方法研究. 黑龙江水利科技. 2024(08): 123-125 .
    7. 林平,李有鹏,谭彬. 基于Bootstrap方法和LSSVM模型的滑坡位移区间预测. 测绘与空间地理信息. 2024(09): 48-51+56 .
    8. 张琦,甘超,曹卫华. 大洋钻探过程钻速在线区间预测方法——以微型钻探船室内模拟实验为例. 钻探工程. 2024(05): 45-52 .
    9. 赵高峰,姜宝元,芮福鑫,马洪素,李洁勇,赵晓豹,龚秋明. 基于数值仿真的复杂岩体TBM掘进性能评估模型. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 984-997 .
    10. 常建涛,乔子萱,孔宪光,杨胜康,罗才文. 多维非线性特征重构与融合的复杂产品工期预测方法. 机械工程学报. 2023(06): 294-308 .
    11. 禹海涛,朱晨阳. 基于BP神经网络的圆形隧道地震响应预测方法及参数分析. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治. 2023(03): 19-26 .
    12. 彭继慎,郝茗,宋立业,李希桐. 基于TSSA-SVR算法的TBM掘进速度预测. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(05): 634-640 .
    13. 闫静,张雪英,李凤莲,陈桂军,黄丽霞. 结合栈式监督AE与可变加权ELM的回归预测模型. 计算机工程. 2022(08): 62-69+76 .

    Other cited types(11)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(24)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return