Field tests on the effects of diameter of drill pipe on number <em>N</em> of SPT

NIE Qing-ke; JIA Xiang-xin; QIN Lu-sheng; WANG Ying-hui; LIANG Shu-qi

doi:10.11779/CJGE2017S1011

Volume 39 Issue s1

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering > 2017 > 39(s1): 53-58. > DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2017S1011

NIE Qing-ke, JIA Xiang-xin, QIN Lu-sheng, WANG Ying-hui, LIANG Shu-qi. Field tests on the effects of diameter of drill pipe on number N of SPT[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(s1): 53-58. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2017S1011

Citation:

PDF (634 KB)

Field tests on the effects of diameter of drill pipe on number N of SPT

1. Hebei Research Institute of Construction & Geotechnical Investigation Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050031, China;;
2. Research Center for Geotechnical Engineering Technology of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050031, China

More Information

Received Date: December 01, 2016
Published Date: November 19, 2017

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Currently the application of 50 drill pipe is more in the standard penetration test (SPT) in the geotechnical engineering investigation, which is different from the code that 42 drill pipe is specified. Based on the project in Xiaoyi of Shanxi province, the results of SPT with drill pipes of 50 and 42 are compared, and the effects of diameters on the number N of SPT are statistically analyzed. The results show that the diameter of drill pipes has a certain influence on the number N of SPT, and the effects are different due to different test depths and strata. When the test depth is from 0.0 to 30.0 m, the ratio of the average values of number N of 42 to 50 drill pipe is between 0.85~0.87, and the ratio is 1.09 when the test depth is from 30.0 to 40.0 m. In silty clay and silt, the number N of SPT measured by 50 drill pipe is greater than that by 42 drill pipe, while in dense sand, the number N of the two kinds of drill pipe is close.
- geotechnical investigation,
- standard penetration test,
- drill pipe,
- diameter

FullText(HTML)

References (8)

References

[1]	GB 50021—2001岩土工程勘察规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009. (GB 50021—2001 Code for investigation of geotechnical engineering[S]. Beijing: China Architecture& Building Press, 2009. (in Chinese))
[2]	王冲. 标准贯入试验在工程地质勘察中的应用[J]. 山西建筑, 2008, 34(23): 102-103. (WANG Chong. The application of standard penetration test in the geological engineering investigation[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2008, 34(23): 102-103. (in Chinese))
[3]	周瑞林, 贾向荣, 刘京红. 对标准贯入试验中杆长修正问题的探讨[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2006(7): 12-13. (ZHOU Rui-lin, JIA Xiang-rong, LIU Jing-hong. Discussion on the correction of rod length in standard penetration test[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2006(7): 12-13. (in Chinese))
[4]	高玉祥. 关于标准贯入试验杆长修正问题的思考[J]. 煤炭经济研究, 2004(8): 35-35. (GAO Yu-xiang. Thinking on the correction of rod length of standard penetration test[J]. Coal Economic Research, 2004(8): 35-35. (in Chinese))
[5]	龙达平, 姚永华. 深层标贯杆长修正问题的探讨[J]. 工程勘察, 1990(3): 20-23. (LONG Da-ping, YAO Yong-hua. Discussion on the problem of long rod length correction in standard penetration test[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 1990(3): 20-23. (in Chinese))
[6]	张苏民. 关于标准贯入试验的一些问题[J]. 勘察科学技术, 1996(5): 9-10. (ZHANG Su-min. Some problems about standard penetration test[J]. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 1996(5): 9-10. (in Chinese))
[7]	袁钟, 李思源, 申伯熙. 标准贯入试验的应用及贯入击数的影响因素[J]. 港工技术, 2002(4): 50-52. (YUAN Zhong, LI Si-yuan, SHEN Bo-xi. Application of standard penetration test and influence factor of number of blows[J]. Port Engineering Technology, 2002(4): 50-52. (in Chinese))
[8]	杨文卫, 岳中琦. 世界各地标准贯入试验比较和共同问题[J]. 工程勘察, 2008(1): 5-15. (YANG Wen-wei, YUE Zhong-qi. Comparison of standard penetration tests and common problems around the world[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2008(1): 5-15. (in Chinese))

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	元志镕，蒋水华，常志璐，向晖，刘玉伟，黄劲松. 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析. 岩土力学. 2025(03): 1001-1012 .
2.	谌柳谦. 紧邻深基坑的历史保护建筑保护措施关键技术研究. 建筑施工. 2024(01): 81-84 .
3.	高山，周成，周泽昶，罗祺，范丽娟，廖烟开. 石漠化边坡板槽降雨利用室内试验及工程数值模拟. 水利水运工程学报. 2024(06): 126-138 .

Other cited types(5)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (301) PDF downloads (678) Cited by(8)

Field tests on the effects of diameter of drill pipe on number N of SPT

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

Other cited types(5)

Catalog

Related

Field tests on the effects of diameter of drill pipe on number N of SPT

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

Other cited types(5)

Catalog

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content