• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
ZHANG Cong, YANG Jun-sheng, ZHANG Gui-jin, YE Xin-tian, ZHANG Zhi-bo, LEI Jin-shan. Experimental study and engineering application of anti-washout properties of underwater karst grout[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(10): 1859-1866. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201710014
Citation: ZHANG Cong, YANG Jun-sheng, ZHANG Gui-jin, YE Xin-tian, ZHANG Zhi-bo, LEI Jin-shan. Experimental study and engineering application of anti-washout properties of underwater karst grout[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(10): 1859-1866. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201710014

Experimental study and engineering application of anti-washout properties of underwater karst grout

More Information
  • Received Date: July 03, 2016
  • Published Date: October 24, 2017
  • The test apparatus for underwater karst grouting materials, which be used to evaluate the anti-washout properties of grout, is developed. Using this device, a series of anti-washout property tests on modified clay cement paste grout in underwater karst fillings are conducted. The retention ratio index of grout is utilized for the quantitative evaluation of the anti-washout properties of grout, and the tests on physical and mechanical properties of retained body are also carried out. The result shows that the anti-washout properties of modified clay cement paste grout are greatly affected by the water cement ratio of grout, karst fillings and velocity of water flow. The anti-washout properties of grout are relatively good when the velocity of karst water flow is no more than 0.8 m/s. With the increasing water cement ratio of grout or the decreasing water flow velocity, the retention ratio of grout tends to increase and can be significantly improved with the existence of karst filling materials. The physical and mechanical performance tests on the retained body indicate that the density is greatly influenced by the filling materials. When grouting under hydrodynamic environment, the downstream grout diffusion distance is greater than the upstream one. The viscosity of grout has a great effect on the diffusion distance, and the velocity of karst water flow can be in favour of the diffusion of grout along the water flow direction and restrain the diffusion along the reverse water flow direction. The 28-d compressive strength of retained body is deeply influenced by filling materials. The 28-d compressive strength under karst water condition is significantly less than that under freshwater condition, but it is still up to 3 MPa. The engineering application of prototype tests indicates that the modified clay cement paste grout can be used for treatment of karst areas under certain velocities of karst water. The formula for grout in underwater karst treatment derived by indoor tests is feasible and may provide theoretical guidance for underwater karst grouting of shield tunnels.
  • [1]
    倪宏革, 孙峰华, 杨秀竹, 等. 采用黏土固化浆液进行岩溶路基注浆加固试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(7): 1242-1247. (NI Hong-ge, SUN Feng-hua, YANG Xiu-zhu, et al. Experimental study of clay hardening grouts for roadbed reinforcements[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(7): 1242-1247. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    张民庆, 黄鸿健, 苗德海, 等. 宜万线隧道工程岩溶治理技术与工程实例[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2008, 112(1): 26-37. (ZHANG Min-qing, HUANG Hong-jian, MIAO De-hai, et al. The technology of treating karst for Yichang-Wan Zhou railway and its engineering example[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2008, 112(1): 26-37. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    李利平, 李术才, 崔金声. 岩溶突水治理浆材的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(12): 3642-3648. (LI Li-ping, LI Shu-cai, CUI Jin-sheng. Experimental research on chemical grout for treating water inrush in rock mass[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(12): 3642-3648. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    JOHNSON K S. Gypsum-karst problems in constructing dams in the USA[J]. Environmental Geology, 2008, 53(5): 945-950.
    [5]
    张旭东. 关于岩溶隧道帷幕注浆材料选择的探讨[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2005, 3(1): 432-434. (ZHANG Xu-dong. Study of material for curtain grouting in karst tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2005, 3(1): 432-434. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    KHAYAT K H, YAHIA A. Simple field tests to characterize fluidity and washout resistance of structural cement grout[J]. Cement Concrete Aggregates, 1998, 20(1): 145-156.
    [7]
    KHAYAT K H, YAHIA A. Effect of welan gum-high-range water reducer combinations on rheology of cement grout[J]. ACI Materials Journal, 1997, 94(5): 365-372.
    [8]
    李利平, 李术才, 崔金声. 岩溶突水治理浆材的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(12): 3642-3648. (LI Li-ping, LI Shu-cai, CUI Jin-sheng. Experimental research on chemical grout for treating water inrush in rock mass[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(12): 3642-3648. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    刘人太, 李术才, 张庆松, 等. 一种新型动水注浆材料的试验与应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(7): 1454-1459. (LIU Ren-tai, LI Shu-cai, ZHANG Qing-song, et al. Experiment and application research on a new type of dynamic water grouting material[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(7): 1454-1459. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    袁敬强, 陈卫忠, 谭贤君, 等. 速凝浆液抗分散性质与凝胶性能试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(5): 960-967. (YUAN Jing-qiang, CHEN Wei-zhong, TAN Xian-jun, et al. Experimental study of anti-washout property and gelling performance of fast-gelling grout[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(5): 960-967. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    何少华, 文竹青. 试验设计与数据处理[M]. 长沙: 国防科技大学出版社, 2002: 182-192. (HE Shao-hua, WEN Zhu-qing. Experimental design and data processing[M]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press, 2002: 182-192. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    湛铠瑜, 隋旺华, 高 岳. 单一裂隙动水注浆扩散模型[J].岩土力学, 2011, 32(6): 1659-1663. (ZHAN Kai-yu, SUI Wang-hua, GAO Yue. A model for grouting into single fracture with flowing water[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(6): 1659-1663. (in Chinese))
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 巫茂寅. 素土挤密桩对西北黄土湿陷性影响的试验研究. 中国新技术新产品. 2025(03): 121-123 .
    2. 倪震. 基于分层综合估算法的粉煤灰回填地基承载力研究. 粘接. 2024(02): 147-150 .
    3. 王红肖. 改良黄土抗压强度试验探究. 水利科技与经济. 2024(09): 21-24 .
    4. 刘荆泉,徐昊天,陈文成,陈云泽,章定文. 施工参数对振杆密实法处理液化砂土地基效果的影响研究. 工程勘察. 2024(10): 29-35 .
    5. 化建新,王浩,张丹,梁涛. 地基处理综述及地基处理智能化——第九届全国岩土工程实录交流会特邀报告. 岩土工程技术. 2024(06): 631-643 .
    6. 徐昊天,苟志孝,王正伟,戴梁,章定文. 振杆密实法在高烈度区液化地基处理中的应用研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2024(06): 1439-1447 .
    7. 郑圣榆. 国有建筑企业中层管理者绩效考核体系构建研究. 现代企业文化. 2023(09): 137-140 .
    8. 唐文斐. 浅谈西北地区湿陷性黄土地基湿陷机理与处理措施. 房地产世界. 2023(14): 157-159 .
    9. 张振海. 湿陷性黄土地基的沉降规律与特征研究——以某商业楼倾斜事故为例. 重庆建筑. 2022(11): 57-61 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(13)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return