Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 39 Issue 9
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
HE Shao-hui, ZHANG Shu-chao, LI Cheng-hui, ZHU Zi-peng, LIU Xia-bing, WANG Da-hai, LIU Yang-peng. Blowout control during EPB shield tunnelling in sandy pebble stratum with high groundwater pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(9): 1583-1590. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201709005
Citation: HE Shao-hui, ZHANG Shu-chao, LI Cheng-hui, ZHU Zi-peng, LIU Xia-bing, WANG Da-hai, LIU Yang-peng. Blowout control during EPB shield tunnelling in sandy pebble stratum with high groundwater pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(9): 1583-1590. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201709005
shu

Blowout control during EPB shield tunnelling in sandy pebble stratum with high groundwater pressure

  • Department of Underground Works of School of Civil Engineering of Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 10, 2016
  • Published Date: September 24, 2017
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Based on the earth pressure balance shield tunnelling of Shijidadao station to the ventilation shaft section of Lanzhou metro line 1, the blowout control of conditioned muck in sandy pebble stratum with high groundwater pressure is studied through field investigation, laboratory tests and three-dimensional numerical modelling. It is mainly concluded that: (1) A method is established for testing the anti-blowout of conditioned muck in laboratory; (2) The optimum concentration of sodium-based bentonite slurry and the optimum volume ratio of slurry to soil of the conditioned muck are determined, and the reliability of the anti-blowout of the conditioned muck is verified; (3) The volume ratio of foam to soil of the conditioned muck should be less than 1∶5 when using slurry and foam. The results of this study may guide shield tunneling at the section with the maximum longitudinal grade of -28‰ so as to effectively avoid shield-flooding risks due to blowout.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (16)
  • [1]
    乐贵平, 贺少辉, 罗富荣. 北京地铁盾构隧道技术[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2012. (LE Gui-ping, HE Shao-hui, LUO Fu-rong. Beijing subway shield tunneling technology[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    郭彩霞, 孔 恒, 王梦恕. 无水大粒径漂卵砾石地层土压平衡盾构施工渣土改良分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015(增刊1): 201-205. (GUO Cai-xia, KONG Heng, WANG Meng-shu. Study on muck improvement of EPB shield tunneling in waterless sandy-cobble-boulder stratum[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015(S1): 201-205. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    汪国锋. 北京砂卵石地层土压平衡盾构土体改良技术试验研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2011. (WANG Guo-feng. Test research on soil improvement technology for EPBS in Beijing sandy gravel ground[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2011. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    何 川, 晏启祥. 加泥式土压平衡盾构机在成都砂卵石地层中应用的几个关键性问题[J]. 隧道建设, 2007, 27(6): 4-6. (HE Chuan, YAN Qi-xiang. Key issues of applying mudding-type EPB shields to sandy cobble ground in Chengdu, China[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2007, 27(6): 4-6. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    王国义. 成都富水砂卵石地层盾构设备配置探讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2013, 50(1): 34-39. (WANG Guo-yi. Discussion of the modification plan of the EPB TBM applied in a water-rich cobblestone stratum in Chengdu[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2013, 50(1): 34-39. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    晏启祥, 郑代靖, 何 川, 等. 富水砂卵石地层地铁盾构施工若干问题及对策[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2015, 11(3): 713-719. (YAN Qi-xiang, ZHENG Dai-jing, HE Chuan, et al. Problems and countermeasures of metro shield construction in water-soaked sand and cobble stratum[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2015, 11(3): 713-719. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    马连丛. 富水砂卵石地层盾构施工渣土改良研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2010, 30(4): 57-63. (MA Lian-cong. Study on ground conditioning for EPB shield in water-rich cobble ground[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2010, 30(4): 57-63. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    朱 伟, 秦建设, 魏康林. 土压平衡盾构喷涌发生机理研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2004, 26(5): 589-593. (ZHU Wei, QIN Jian-she, WEI Kang-lin. Research on the mechanism of the spewing in the EPB shield tunneling[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2004, 26(5): 589-593. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    魏康林. 土压平衡式盾构施工中喷涌问题的发生机理及其防治措施研究[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2003. (WEI Kang-lin. Research on blowout mechanism and blowout control in EPB shield tunneling[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2003. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    王建刚, 韦 丹, 续长明, 等. 螺旋输送机防喷涌设计介绍及喷涌故障应对措施[J]. 科技与企业, 2014(1): 282. (WANG Jian-gang, WEI Dan, XU Chang-ming, et al. An introduction to blowout control design of screw conveyor and countermeasures against blowout[J]. Technology and Enterprise, 2014(1): 282. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    刘德智, 雷金山, 杨秀竹. 土压平衡式盾构双级螺旋输送机对喷涌的控制技术[C]// 2010城市轨道交通关键技术论坛论文集. 北京, 2010. (LIU De-zhi, LEI Jin-shan, YANG Xiu-zhu. Control of water and sand gush by two-stage helical conveyer in tunnelling[C]// 2010 Key Technologies of Urban Rail Transit. Beijing, 2010. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    BUDACH Christoph, THEWES Markus. Application ranges of EPB shields in coarse ground based on laboratory research[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 50(8): 296-304.
    [13]
    KUPFERROTH F J Ellenberger. The use of foams and polymers in earth pressure balanced TBMs[C]. Switzerland: Degussa Construction Chemicals Underground Construction Group, 2001.
    [14]
    茅 华. 隧道施工盾构螺旋机喷涌应对措施[J]. 铁道建筑, 2014(10): 39-41. (MAO Hua. Countermeasures to stop muck-gushing from shield’s screw conveyer during tunnel construction[J]. Railway Engineering, 2014(10): 39-41. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    罗 欣. 浅谈土压平衡盾构机在隧道掘进中喷涌的治理[J]. 城市建设, 2010(20): 256-257. (LUO Xin. An elementary discussion of governing of blowout in EPB shield tunneling[J]. Urban Construction, 2010(20): 256-257. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    王星钧, 徐长胜. 南宁富水圆砾地层防喷涌施工技术[J]. 建筑机械化, 2014(2): 88-89. (WANG Xing-jun, XU Chang-sheng. Nanning anti spewing water round gravel stratum construction technology[J]. Construction Technique, 2014(2): 88-89. (in Chinese))
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 彭俊皓，魏玉峰，李常虎，王群，李征征. 基于DBO-GRNN神经网络的冰水堆积物渗透系数预测. 人民长江. 2025(02): 167-174 .
    2. 张杰，黄勇. 长江漫滩区软土渗透系数计算方法对比分析. 中国煤炭地质. 2024(02): 37-42 .
    3. 王宇虓，杜广印，刘松玉，杨泳，周同和，徐金涛. 振杆密实法加固粗粒混合土模型试验. 工程科学与技术. 2024(03): 99-108 .
    4. 樊书抗，杨正权，朱凯斌，赵艺颖，刘小生，赵剑明. 土的级配特征与连续级配方程研究. 水利学报. 2024(05): 597-606 .
    5. 郭海，张安银. 基于PCA的长江漫滩软弱黏性土渗透特性研究. 江苏建筑. 2024(04): 102-105 .
    6. 赵桂锋，蒋明杰，张振，王天成，梅国雄. 粗粒土缩尺级配的渗透系数规律试验. 工程科学与技术. 2024(05): 240-246 .
    7. 李诗琪，杨忠平，刘浩宇，高宇豪，刘新荣. 考虑间断级配影响的土石混合体水力侵蚀分异机理. 土木工程学报. 2024(10): 125-134 .
    8. 付宏渊，杨海涛，吴二鲁，曾铃，钟涛，姜懿芸. 考虑炭质泥岩颗粒破碎的级配演化预测模型. 水利学报. 2024(09): 1058-1070 .
    9. 杨锴，杨奇，徐方，徐俏东，韩学良. 考虑细粒含量的单参数连续级配方程研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2024(12): 5094-5103 .
    10. 曲诗章，刘晓明，黎莉，陈仁朋. 基于双分形级配模型参数的粗粒土渗透系数计算公式. 岩土工程学报. 2023(01): 144-152 . 本站查看
    11. 侯龙清，袁晓铭，陈龙伟，李明东. 一种新型南55渗透仪研制及工程应用. 岩土工程学报. 2023(02): 419-425 . 本站查看
    12. 李浩，李春艳，张嵩，谢英美. 建筑工程中地质特征及岩土工程支护研究. 能源与环保. 2023(01): 181-186 .
    13. 赵贵章，孔令莹，徐远志，王淑丽，王展. 银川平原典型介质的颗粒级配对渗透系数的影响研究. 中国农村水利水电. 2023(04): 203-207 .
    14. 张福海，徐嘉成，薛浩宇，刘峥嵘. 级配分布对杂填土地基互嵌沉降影响的试验分析. 河南科学. 2023(05): 730-737 .
    15. 林玉祥，林浩东，莫品强，褚锋，庄培芝. 基于XGBoost的堆场软土渗透系数反演研究. 西安理工大学学报. 2023(01): 133-140 .
    16. 袁仕方，曹志翔，韩志洋，张玲洁. 藏东南粗粒土降雨入渗影响因素试验分析. 高原农业. 2022(02): 189-196 .
    17. 丁林楠，李国英，魏匡民. 描述土体级配分布的级配方程及其适用性. 岩土力学. 2022(S1): 173-183 .
    18. 段钊，袁林，毕银丽，王凯，吴延斌，张庆. 紫花苜蓿根系-黄土复合体剪切特性与库仑修正模型. 煤田地质与勘探. 2022(12): 85-95 .
    19. 骆莉莎，周昕，林军. 颗粒形态对粗粒土渗透系数影响的数值模拟研究. 湖南工业职业技术学院学报. 2021(01): 93-96 .

    Other cited types(16)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (409) PDF downloads (470) Cited by(35)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return