• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
LU Ying-fa, HUANG Xue-bin, LIU De-fu. Distribution characteristics of force and stability analysis of slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(7): 1321-1329. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201707019
Citation: LU Ying-fa, HUANG Xue-bin, LIU De-fu. Distribution characteristics of force and stability analysis of slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(7): 1321-1329. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201707019

Distribution characteristics of force and stability analysis of slope

More Information
  • Received Date: March 27, 2016
  • Published Date: July 24, 2017
  • It is worthy of researching the force distribution and stability analysis during the progressive failure process of slope. The five sorts mechanical failure mechanisms are proposed for the thrust-type and tract-type landslide respectively, the another five sorts existence modes of the thrust-type slope status on site also suggested, the forward direction of slope failure is defined. The characteristics of progressive failure of slope can be described as: the failure mode of slope obeys the geo-material rule under the peak stress state, the critical stress state moves forward step by step under the condition that the slope failure occurs. The sliding force is greater than that of frictional resistance along the sliding face in the destruction zone. The bearing stress of geo-material reaches the maximum and its vector sum is equal to zero on the critical state. The frictional resistance is the same as the sliding force quantitatively in the stable and less-stable zones along sliding face, the pressure is equal to the reaction quantitatively in the entire sliding face. There exist force and moment balances under the critical state during the progressive failure process, when the shear and tensile failure occur by using the slice block method. The bearing stresses occur under the limit stress state, and the stress vector sum is equal to zero under the critical state for the tensile and shear failure. The rigid, flexible and rigid-flexible design methods are proposed for the protective measures of slope, and their location is also suggested. The failure ratio, failure percentage, failure area percentage, mechanical failure and engineering failure are defined respectively, and they can be used to evaluate the stability of slope. The force distribution rules of sliding face is analyzed during the progressive failure of slope. The conventional definition of stability factor which is equal to that of the frictional force is divided by sliding force along sliding face). The case studies indicate the main thrust method (or main traction method), comprehensive displacement method, surplus displacement method and tensile failure method are feasible to evaluate
  • [1]
    GUO M W, GE X R, WANG S L. Slope stability analysis under seismic load by vector sum analysis method[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 3(3): 282-288.
    [2]
    LIU Yan-zhang, GE Xiu-run, LI Chun-guang, et al, Stability analysis of slope and dam foundation based on vector method safety factor[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(10): 2130-2140.
    [3]
    ZHU Da-yong, QIAN Qi-hu, Rigorous and quasi-rigorous limit equilibrium solutions of 3D slope stability and application to engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(8): 1513-1528.
    [4]
    LI Ning, QIAN Qi-hu. Four criteria of stability analysis and assessment of high rock slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(9): 1754-1759.
    [5]
    ZHENG Hong. A rigorous three-dimensional limit equilibrium method[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(8): 1529-1538.
    [6]
    ZHENG H, YANG Z L, SN G H. Extreme solutions to the limit equilibrium method subjected to physical admissibility[J]. Natural Hazards, 2013, 65(1): 79-96.
    [7]
    卢应发, 路 韬, 周建军, 等. 一种新的节理模型及其在基桩分析中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(4): 967-973. (LU Ying-fa, LU Tao, ZHOU Jian-jun, et al, A new joint constitutive model and its application to pile foundation analyses[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(4): 967-973. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    卢应发, 石峻峰, 刘德富. 一种边坡稳定性计算的滑面边界法: 中国, ZL2014100250810[P]. 2014. (LU Ying-fa, SHI Jun-feng, LIU De-fu, A sliding face boundary method of stability analysis of slope: China, ZL2014100250810[P]. 2014. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    卢应发, 刘德富, 石峻峰. 基于牵引式滑坡变形破坏机制的稳定性分析和预测预警方法: 中国, ZL201410025081.2[P]. 2014. (LU Ying-fa, LIU De-fu, SHI Jun-feng, Method of stability analysis and failure precast based on the deformation mechanism of traction-type landslide: China, ZL201410025081.2[P]. 2014. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    卢应发, 邓国栋, 杨丽平, 等. 滑坡的关键块力学行为及力传递特征和不同应力状态的稳定系数研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33: 884-891. (LU Ying-fa, DENG Guo-dong, YANG Li-ping, et al. Study of mechanical behaviors of key block and characteristics of force transmit and stability coefficient of different state stress of landslides[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33: 884-891. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    卢应发, 杨丽平, 华国辉. 一种新的节理本构模型及几种新的滑坡稳定系数计算方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 31(12): 433-454. (LU Ying-fa, YANG Li-ping, HUA Guo-hui. A new joint constitutive model and a few new methods of stability coefficient calculation of landslides[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 31(12): 433-454. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    卢应发, 石峻峰, 刘德富. 基于边坡变形破坏机制的临界位移预测预警方法: 中国, ZL 201410014057.7[P]. 2014. (LU Ying-fa, SHI Jun-feng, LIU De-fu. A precast method of critical deformation of slope failure based on the deformation mechanism: China, No. ZL 201410014057.7[P]. 2014. (in Chinese))
    [13]
    LU Ying-fa. Deformation and failure mechanism of slope in three dimensions[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geo-technical Engineering, 2015, 7(2): 109-119. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    卢应发, 黄学斌, 刘德富. 边坡稳定分析条块力-位移法及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(10): 2780-2786. (LU Ying-fa, HUANG Xue-bin, LIU De-fu. Force-displacement method of slice block analysis of slope stability and its application[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(10): 2780-2786. (in Chinese))
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(25)

    1. 张志哺. 干湿-冻融循环下公路切坡玄武岩力学特性及损伤机制研究. 公路. 2025(03): 41-49 .
    2. 黄彦华,李明旭,武世岩,杨超. 基于连续-离散耦合方法的边坡稳定性模拟研究. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(04): 1502-1513 .
    3. 张科,李娜. 干湿循环作用下岩桥破裂演化及前兆异常定量识别研究. 工程地质学报. 2024(01): 64-73 .
    4. 刘帅,杨更社,潘振兴. 冻融环境下“三段式”岩质边坡锁固段损伤破坏及灾变机制研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(11): 2781-2795 .
    5. 黎俊华. 基于极限平衡法的边坡稳定性分析. 采矿技术. 2023(01): 39-44 .
    6. 王建明,崔新男,陈忠辉,陈冲. 露天矿含后缘裂隙岩质边坡岩体卸荷断裂机理与稳定性研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(02): 345-353 . 本站查看
    7. 郭朋瑜,闫兴田,吉锋,易林立. 四川茂县新磨村滑坡启动机制物理模拟试验研究. 工程地质学报. 2023(01): 154-164 .
    8. 林之岳,黎俊华,王道林. 基于爆破振速演变规律的采场安全分析. 黄金. 2023(03): 5-11 .
    9. 冷先伦,王川,盛谦,宋文军,陈健,张占荣,陈菲. 基于透明相似模型试验的主控裂隙边坡变形破坏演化机制研究. 岩土力学. 2023(05): 1283-1294+1308 .
    10. 冉孟坤,韦港荣,熊春发,卢超波,秦梓航. 广西某高速公路基于切线角理论的隧道变形监测预警应用研究. 四川地质学报. 2023(02): 302-306+312 .
    11. 刘先林,范杰,朱觉文,李明智,朱星. 单轴压缩下岩桥脆性断裂的临界慢化特征. 水利水电技术(中英文). 2022(03): 166-175 .
    12. 朱星,唐垚. 锁固段边坡模型破坏前兆特征. 地球科学. 2022(06): 1957-1968 .
    13. 杨泓全,范杰,黄成年,刘先林,朱星. 中部锁固岩桥脆性断裂特征试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2022(15): 6255-6263 .
    14. 杨奎斌,朱彦鹏. 考虑后缘裂缝影响的均质土坡滑动面形式及搜索研究. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2022(05): 1216-1227 .
    15. 王闯,董金玉,刘汉东,黄志全,赵亚文,杨兴隆. 三段式锁固型岩质边坡动力响应特性及破坏机制振动台模型试验研究. 地球科学. 2022(12): 4428-4441 .
    16. 郑强强,徐颖,胡浩,钱佳威,宗琦,谢平. 单轴荷载作用下砂岩的破裂与速度结构层析成像. 岩土工程学报. 2021(06): 1069-1077 . 本站查看
    17. 陈永峰,张海东,赵广臣. 不同加载速率下端部节理岩桥变形破坏及裂隙扩展试验研究. 长江科学院院报. 2021(07): 66-72 .
    18. 张海东,陈永峰,赵广臣,张清华. 单轴压缩下预制端部节理岩桥变形破坏及裂隙扩展机制研究. 煤矿安全. 2021(09): 78-84 .
    19. 范杰,朱星,霍冬冬,胡桔维,刘俊峰. 基于数字图像相关和声发射的岩质锁固段破坏试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2021(36): 15581-15590 .
    20. 李巧刚,张树东,吴斌. 矿区大型滑坡体力学机理及地质演化模式研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2020(03): 214-220 .
    21. 乔趁,李长洪,王宇,颜丙乾. 冻融循环作用下中部锁固岩桥破坏试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2020(06): 1094-1103 .
    22. 王建明,陈忠辉,周子涵,陈帅,孙小欢. 不同卸荷速率下节理岩桥变形破坏及裂隙扩展演化试验研究. 矿业科学学报. 2020(04): 382-392 .
    23. 袁新华. 单轴压缩下中部锁固岩桥变形破坏模式及演化机制研究. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2020(09): 116-121 .
    24. 李冬冬,刘汉东. 风脉寺滑坡前缘阻滑体不同产状稳定性研究. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(06): 8-12 .
    25. 姜彤,雷家华. 基于图像相关分析的锁固型滑坡模型试验方法. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(06): 41-45 .

    Other cited types(32)

Catalog

    Article views (429) PDF downloads (454) Cited by(57)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return