ZHANG Ning, ZHU Wei, MIN Fan-lu, XU Jing-bo. Microscopic pores of filter membranes and permeability during chamber opening under high pressure in slurry shield[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(3): 495-500. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201703013
    Citation: ZHANG Ning, ZHU Wei, MIN Fan-lu, XU Jing-bo. Microscopic pores of filter membranes and permeability during chamber opening under high pressure in slurry shield[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(3): 495-500. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201703013

    Microscopic pores of filter membranes and permeability during chamber opening under high pressure in slurry shield

    More Information
    • Received Date: December 22, 2015
    • Published Date: April 24, 2017
    • Good air tightness of filter membranes is necessary for opening excavation chamber under high pressure. To improve the value of air tightness, one should understand the pore structure and permeability change of filter membranes during chamber opening under high pressure. Taking the sandy cobble stratum of Nanjing Weisan Road river-crossing tunnel as an example, the air tightness tests are carried out for filter membranes formed under different pressures by a self-developed airtightness apparatus. Its pore structures and measured diameters are observed, and the changes of permeability coefficient are analyzed. The results show that the thickness of the filter membranes is 5.0 mm under 0.2 MPa for 6 hours, the porosity is about 67%, the filter membranes are compressed during the air tightness tests and at the first stage it is the largest. With the growth of the air pressure, the large pore group is preferentially compressed. The basic unit of filter membranes is a skeleton-like structure, and the pore structure is mainly inter-particle pore and overhead pore; furthermore, the pore is not continuous and poorly connective. The pore size has a broader distribution, and the group of 0.1~3.0 μm has an absolute advantage. The permeability coefficient in this experiment has a magnitude of 10-9 cm/s. The results define the change of the filter membranes during air tightness, and it plays a significant role in improving the value of filter membranes during air tightness.
    • [1]
      朱 伟, 闵凡路, 姚占虎, 等. 盾构隧道开舱技术现状及实例[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2015(1): 9-18. (ZHU Wei, MIN Fanlu, YAO Zhan-hu, et al. Technical status and case study on intervention in the shield chamber[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2015(1): 9-18. (in Chinese))
      [2]
      邓 彬, 顾小芳. 上软下硬地层盾构施工技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2012(2): 59-64. (DENG Bin, GU Xiao-fang. Study of shield construction technology in soft upper stratumand hard under stratum[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2012(2): 59-64. (in Chinese))
      [3]
      贺霄飞. 压气作业在地铁盾构施工中的应用[J]. 山西建筑, 2007, 33(11): 309-310. (HE Xiao-fei. Pressure gas operations in construction of metro shield[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2007, 33(11): 309-310. (in Chinese))
      [4]
      ANAGNOSTOU G, KOVÁRI K. The face stability of slurry-shield-driven tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1994, 9(2): 165-174.
      [5]
      WATANABE T, YAMAZAKI H. Giant size slurry shield is a success in Tokyo[J]. Tunnels and Tunnelling, 1981, 13: 13-17.
      [6]
      MIN Fan-lu, ZHU Wei, LIN Cheng, et al. Opening the excavation chamber of the large-diameter size slurry shield: A case study in Nanjing Yangtze River Tunnel in China[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 46: 18-27.
      [7]
      刘 成, 孙 钧, 杨 平, 等. 泥膜形成与状态划分细观分析及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(3): 435-442. (LIU Cheng, SUN Jun,YANG Ping, et al. Mesoscopic analysis and model test on formation process and state division of slurry membrane[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(3): 435-442. (in Chinese))
      [8]
      张 宁, 朱 伟, 姚占虎, 等. 泥水盾构带压开舱时泥膜性质对其闭气性的影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2015(4): 62-67. (ZHANG Ning, YAO Zhan-hu, ZHU Wei, et al. Study on filter membrane to its air tightness during opening chamber under high pressure in slurry shield[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2015(4): 62-67. (in Chinese))
      [9]
      姜 腾. 盾构开舱时闭气压力与泥膜孔隙结构[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2015. (JIANG Teng. Experimental study on airproof presure and pore size distribution of the filter cake during compressed air work[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2015. (in Chinese))
      [10]
      CLEMENT Lapierr, SERGE Lergoue, JACQUES Loca. Mercury intrusion and permeability of Louiseville clay[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1990(27): 761-773.
      [11]
      张先伟, 孔令伟. 利用扫描电镜、压汞法、氮气吸附法评价近海黏土孔隙特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2013(增刊2): 134-142. (ZHANG Xian-wei, KONG Ling-wei. Study of pore characteristics of offshore clay by SEM and MIP and NA methods[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013(S2): 134-142. (in Chinese))
      [12]
      韦良文, 张庆贺, 邓忠义. 大型泥水盾构隧道开挖面稳定机理与应用研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2007(1): 87-91. (WEI Liang-wen, ZHANG Qing-he, DENG Zhong-yi. Research on mechanism and application of face stability in large slurry shield tunneling[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2007(1): 87-91. (in Chinese))
      [13]
      程明亮, 何 峰, 吕传田. 大埋深富水砂卵石地层泥水盾构带压换刀及动火焊接技术[J]. 中国工程科学, 2010(12): 46-50. (CHENG Ming-liang, HE Feng, LÜ Chuan-tian. Tools repairing and Welding techniques with high pressure of slurry shield under deep water-rich sandy gravel stratum[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2010(12): 46-50. (in Chinese))
    • Related Articles

      [1]SONG Kun, XIANG Shuchang, CHEN Jianxiang, RUAN Di, LÜ Honglin, YAN Wei. Residual shear strength of soils in sliding zone during non-uniform deformation process of landslides[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(S1): 127-131. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2025S10020
      [2]MIAO Fasheng, ZHAO Fancheng, WU Yiping, MENG Jiajia. Strength characteristics of slip zone soils of Tongjiaping landslide in Three Gorges Reservoir area based on seepage-ring shear tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(7): 1480-1489. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220456
      [3]FAN Zhi-qiang, TANG Hui-ming, TAN Qin-wen, YANG Ying-ming, WEN Tao. Ring shear tests on slip soils and their enlightenment to critical strength of reservoir landslides[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(9): 1698-1706. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909014
      [4]CUI Sheng-hua, PEI Xiang-jun, WANG Gong-hui, HUANG Run-qiu. Initiation of a large landslide triggered by Wenchuan earthquake based on ring shear tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(12): 2268-2277. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201712016
      [5]LI Zhuo, HE Yong-jun, SHENG Jin-bao, LI Hong-en, LI Zheng, YANG Yang. Landslide model for slope of reservoir bank under combined effects of rainfall and reservoir water level[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(3): 452-459. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201703008
      [6]MU Huan-dong, SONG Deng-yan, ZHANG Mao-sheng, DENG Ya-hong. Centrifuge modelling tests on loess landslides induced by irrigation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(z2): 172-177. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S2028
      [7]ZHANG Yong-shuang, GUO Chang-bao, ZHOU Neng-juan. Characteristics of Chongjianghe landslide at a branch of Jinsha River and its local reactivation mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(3): 445-453.
      [8]Monitoring technology of pipelines using fiber bragg grating and its application in landslide areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(6).
      [9]YING Hongwei, PAN Qiuyuan. Landslide analysis and correction of the large scale filled project[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(2): 198-201.
      [10]Jiao Yuyong, Ge Xiurun, Liu Quansheng, Feng Shuren. Three-dimensional discrete element method and its application in landslide analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(1): 104-107.
    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(23)

      1. 陈欣,安然,张先伟,陈昶,袁童. MICP固化花岗岩残积土的崩解特性. 长江科学院院报. 2025(02): 138-144+171 .
      2. 徐敏,刘正明,罗元喜,许宝田,刘开斌. 基于旁压试验的常州地区典型砂土变形特性研究. 工程勘察. 2024(07): 15-21 .
      3. 杨雪强,王坤,刘攀,朱海平,林楷彦. 广州原状花岗岩残积土非饱和力学特性的试验研究. 水利水电技术(中英文). 2024(06): 196-206 .
      4. 宋伟,房江锋,杜琦,李芬. 某项目抗拔桩承载力不足原因分析及处理研究. 工程质量. 2024(S2): 41-45 .
      5. 房江锋,张思祺,杜琦. 灌注桩抗拔承载力不足分析及应对措施研究. 低温建筑技术. 2024(12): 66-71 .
      6. 舒荣军,孔令伟,周振华,简涛,李甜果. 卸荷-增孔压条件下花岗岩残积土的力学特性. 岩土力学. 2023(02): 473-482 .
      7. 廖燕宏,王冉,夏玉云,乔建伟,贾如宾,杨晓鹏. 安哥拉花岗岩残积土强夯法地基处理试验研究. 施工技术(中英文). 2023(07): 149-154 .
      8. 陈欣,安然,汪亦显,陈昶. 胶结液浓度对MICP固化残积土力学性能影响及机理研究. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2023(06): 100-106+149 .
      9. 张晗,杨石飞,王琳,林天翔. 上海地区软土旁压加卸载变形特性试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2022(04): 769-777 . 本站查看
      10. 冯义武,彭倞,岳娟. 亚湖水库花岗岩风化残积土防渗应用研究. 水利水电快报. 2022(04): 61-66+73 .
      11. 朱旻,陈湘生,张国涛,庞小朝,苏栋,刘继强. 花岗岩残积土硬化土模型参数反演及工程应用. 岩土力学. 2022(04): 1061-1072 .
      12. 齐信,黎清华,焦玉勇,谭飞. 梧州市巨厚层花岗岩风化壳垂直分带标准及工程地质特征研究. 工程地质学报. 2022(02): 407-416 .
      13. 安然,孔令伟,师文卓,郭爱国,张先伟. 结构性黏土的原位刚度衰减规律及数学表征. 岩土力学. 2022(S1): 410-418 .
      14. 安然,孔令伟,张先伟,郭爱国,柏巍. 基于原位孔内剪切试验的残积土强度指标及风化程度影响评价. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2022(05): 1275-1286 .
      15. 舒荣军,孔令伟,黎澄生,刘炳恒,简涛. 考虑先期卸荷静偏应力的花岗岩残积土动力特性研究. 振动与冲击. 2022(17): 93-100 .
      16. 苗永红,卜梓轩,王玲,苏靖凤,殷杰. 扰动对软土累积排水量影响试验研究. 西安理工大学学报. 2022(03): 421-425 .
      17. 舒荣军,孔令伟,王俊涛,简涛,周振华. 考虑先期卸荷影响的花岗岩残积土湿化特性试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2022(S1): 154-159+165 . 本站查看
      18. 王斌,韩幽铭,周欣,陈成,张先伟,桂蕾. 太湖湖相黏土层剪切模量衰减特性的原位测试研究. 岩土力学. 2021(07): 2031-2040 .
      19. 胡华,吴轩,张越. 基于降雨滑坡模拟试验的花岗岩残积土边坡破坏模式分析. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(06): 1098-1102 .
      20. 安然,孔令伟,张先伟. 残积土孔内剪切试验的强度特性及广义邓肯–张模型研究. 岩土工程学报. 2020(09): 1723-1732 . 本站查看
      21. 安然,孔令伟,黎澄生,罗晓倩. 炎热多雨气候下花岗岩残积土的强度衰减与微结构损伤规律. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2020(09): 1902-1911 .
      22. 安然,孔令伟,柏巍,黎澄生. 单轴荷载下残积土的电阻率损伤模型及干湿循环效应. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2020(S1): 3159-3167 .
      23. 易军. 风荷载下的黄家仑地区残积土动静力特性研究. 长沙大学学报. 2020(05): 32-37 .

      Other cited types(7)

    Catalog

      Article views (353) PDF downloads (356) Cited by(30)
      Related

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return