Advanced Search
  • Indexed in Scopus
  • Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations
  • Included in A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • Indexed in Ei Compendex
Volume 37 Issue 4
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
TIAN Hong-shui, WANG Hua-lin, ZHU Jie-wang, YANG Chuan-cheng, LÜ Ming-ying, ZHANG Shen-he. New revelation from seismic subsidence of soft soils and earthquake-induced soil-layer deformation structures in Anqiu area, Shandong Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(4): 734-740. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201504020
Citation: TIAN Hong-shui, WANG Hua-lin, ZHU Jie-wang, YANG Chuan-cheng, LÜ Ming-ying, ZHANG Shen-he. New revelation from seismic subsidence of soft soils and earthquake-induced soil-layer deformation structures in Anqiu area, Shandong Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(4): 734-740. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201504020
shu

New revelation from seismic subsidence of soft soils and earthquake-induced soil-layer deformation structures in Anqiu area, Shandong Province

  • 1. School of Civil Engineering of Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China; 2. Earthquake Engineering Research Center of Shandong Province, Jinan 250014, China

More Information
  • Received Date: August 03, 2014
  • Published Date: May 05, 2015
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • By means of seism investigation, soil test and 14C dating, disaster phenomena about seismic subsidence of soft soils and some earthquake-induced association structures of soil layers are identified in soft soils of limnetic facies during the Mid-late Holocene in the Anqiu area of Yishu fault-seismic zone, including subsidence synform folds of soft soils, small scale co-seismic faults, pinch-and-swell structures and seismic fissures, in which subsidence synforms are vertical deformations that directly reflect the seismic subsidence disaster. Small scale co-seismic faults are some little faults caused by earthquakes, with vertical lengths of 0.5~1.8 m under the subsidence synform. A subsidence synform comes at first along with producing of co-seismic faults and developes downward treading on the heels of these faults extending to the even deeper place. The earthquake vibration causes the thixotropic deformation of saturated soft soils, and soil particles flow from the hinge zone to two wings of the synform, in which the seismic additional stresses act continually, resulting in formation of the narrow and deep-seated subsidence synform. The deepest seismic subsidence of soft soils is 1.08 m, and the average depth is 0.68 m. It is estimated that the seismic intensity is VIII degree, and the earthquake magnitude is over M6.0. The formation age of the mucky soils for 3901±33a B.P. is obtained by the14C dating, so the seismic event occurred in about 19th Century B.C.. The co-seismic fault is an important factor for forming the seismic subsidence of soft soils, which provides the new information for understanding the formation mechanism of the seismic subsidence of soft soils and the new revelation for preventing or mitigating the harm of the seismic subsidence. Therefore, attention should be paid to possible hidden troubles of co-seismic faults to be produced in the underlying layer of soft soils.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (26)
  • [1]
    陈希哲. 土力学地基基础[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2003: 414-419, 511-521. (CHEN Xi-zhe. Soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2003: 414-419, 511-521. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    赵明华, 俞哓. 土力学与基础工程[M]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学出版社, 2008: 42-43, 318-325. (ZHAO Ming-hua, YU Xiao. Soil mechanics and foundation engineering[M]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology Press, 2008: 42-43, 318-325. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    张虎臣. 淤泥地基地震触变研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1989, 11(3): 78-85. (ZHANG Hu-chen. Study on the earthquake thixotropy of mucky soil foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 11(3): 78-85. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    郁寿松. 石兆吉.土壤震陷试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1989, 11(4): 35-44. (YU Shou-song, SHI Zhao-ji. Experimental investigation of soil settlement due to earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 11(4): 35-46. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    李冬, 陈培雄, 吕小飞, 等. 软土地震震陷研究现状综述[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2011, 33(2): 130-135. (LI Dong, CHEN Pei-xiong, LÜ Xiao-fei, et al. Research progress summarization of soft soil earthquake subsidence[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2011, 33(2): 130-135. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    MONTENAT C, BARRIER P, OTT d’Estevou P. Seismites: an attempt at critical analysis and classification[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2007, 196: 5-30.
    [7]
    VAN L A J. Soft-sediment deformation structures in siliciclastic sediments: an overview[J]. Geologos, 2009, 15: 3-55.
    [8]
    张邦花, 田洪水, 张增奇, 等. 地质名山馒头山及其附近早寒武世古地震沉积事件研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2012, 30(6): 1021-1031. (ZHANG Bang-hua, TIAN Hong-shui, ZHANG Zeng-qi, et al. The study on paleoseismic depositional events of the famous geological mountain ‘Mantoushan’ and its vicinity in the Early Cambrian[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2012, 30(6): 1021-1031. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    QIAO Xiu-fu, SONG Tian-rui, GAO Lin-zhi, et al. Seismic sequence in carbonate rocks by vibrational liquefaction[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 1994, 68(1): 16-29.
    [10]
    晃洪太, 李家灵, 崔昭文, 等. 郯庐活断层与1668年郯城8.5级地震灾害[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1995, 15(3): 69-79. (CHAO Hong-tai, LI Jia-ling, CUI Zhao-wen, et al. Active faults in Tanlu fault zone and hazardsproduced by the 1668 Tancheng Earthquake ( M =8.5)[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 1995, 15(3): 69-79. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    田洪水, 张增奇. 从郯庐地震带安丘地区地震成因土层构造认识地震破坏作用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(12): 1453-1457. (TIAN Hong-shui, ZHANG Zeng-qi. Understanding failure functions caused by earthquakes on the basis of seism- genesis soil-layer structures in Anqiu area, Tancheng- Lujiang seismic zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(12): 1453-1457. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    TIAN Hong-shui, ZHANG Zeng-qi, ZHANG Bang-hua, et al. Tectonic taphrogenesis and paleoseismic records from the Yishu Fault Zone in the initial stage of the Caledonian movement[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2013, 87(4): 936-947.
    [13]
    TIAN Hong-shui, ZHANG Bang-hua, ZHANG Shen-he, et al. Neogene seismites and seismic volcanic rocks in the Linqu area, Shandong province, E China[J]. Geologos, 2014, 20(2): 125-137.
    [14]
    王华林. 公元前70年诸城一昌乐地震发震构造的初步研究[J]. 地震学刊, 1990, 3: 100-103. (WANG Hua-lin. A preliminary study of the seismogenic structures of the Zhucheng-Changle earthquake in 70 BC[J]. Journal of Seismology, 1990, 3: 100-103. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    宋明春, 王沛成. 山东省区域地质[M]. 济南: 山东省地图出版社, 2003: 1-970. (SONG Ming-chun, WANG Pei-cheng. Regional geology of Shandong province[M]. Jinan: Map Press of Shandong Province, 2003: 1-970. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    侯万国. 应用胶体化学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998: 1-391. (HOU Wan-guo. Application of colloid chemistry[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1998: 1-391. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    李丽华, 陈轮, 高盛焱. 翠湖湿地软土触变性试验研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(3): 765-768. (LI Li-hua, CHEN Lun, GAO Sheng-yan. Experimental research on thixotropy of wetland soft soil in Cuihu[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(3): 765-768. (in Chinese))
    [18]
    冯增昭. 中国沉积岩[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2013: 507-615. (FENG Zeng-zhao. Chinese sedimentary rock[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2013: 507-615. (in Chinese))
    [19]
    翁鑫荣. 软土应力路径特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增刊2): 825-828. (WENG Xin-rong. Experimental research on characteristics of stress path for soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(S2): 825-828. (in Chinese))
    [20]
    SEILACHER A. Fault-graded beds interpreted as seismites[J]. Sedimentology, 1969, 13: 155-159.
    [21]
    WHEELER R L. Distinguishing seismic from nonseismic soft-sediment structures: criteria from seismic-hazard analysis[C]// Ancient Seismites. Washington City: Geological Society of America Special Paper, 2002, 359: 1-11.
    [22]
    KNAUST D. Pinch-and-swell structures at the Middle/Upper Muschelkalk boundary (Triassic): evidence of earthquake effects (seismites) in the Germanic Basin[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2002, 90: 291-303.
    [23]
    吴武军, 曾佐勋, 朱文革. 鱼嘴构造流变计研究与基于流变学的分类方案[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(9): 925-932. (WU Wu-jun, ZENG Zuo-xun, ZHU Wen-ge. Research on rheology gauge of fish-headboudin[J]. Advances in Earthscience, 2005, 20(9): 925-932. (in Chinese))
    [24]
    时伟. 工程地质学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 1-300. (SHI Wei. Engineering geology[M]. Beijing: Science Press , 2007: 1-300. (in Chinese))
    [25]
    GB/T 17742—2008中国地震烈度表[S]. 2008. (GB/T 17742—2008 The Chinese seismic intensity scale[S]. 2008. (in Chinese))
    [26]
    万天丰. 山东构造演化与应力场研究[J]. 山东地质, 1992, 8(2): 70-101. (WAN Tian-feng. Tectonic evolution and stress fields of Shandong province[J]. Shandong Geology, 1992, 8(2): 70-101. (in Chinese))
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(22)

    1. 陈军浩，李彧翰，张见，黄靖涵. 地铁盾构始发端垂直分段冻结加固多场演化规律. 福建理工大学学报. 2025(01): 40-47 .
    2. 卫凯，胡俊，周杰. 渗流作用下三亚河口通道管幕冻结法温度场数值模拟分析. 五邑大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 60-69 .
    3. 张松，岳祖润，卢相忠，张庆武，孙铁成，胡田飞，亓源水，张俊洋. 基坑免降水开挖的组合式冻结法支护工艺研究. 铁道标准设计. 2024(02): 143-149 .
    4. 孙引浩. 渗流作用下管幕冻结法加固止水温度场时空变化规律. 铁道建筑技术. 2024(08): 50-54 .
    5. 郭长弓，高伟. 环形冻结温度场演化规律影响因素研究. 建井技术. 2024(05): 83-87 .
    6. 周杰，胡俊，刘冰. 海底隧道管幕冻结法水热耦合温度场数值模拟分析. 森林工程. 2024(06): 221-234 .
    7. 周明文，李文俊，孙翰卿. 运营地铁隧道的内钢圈加固技术研究. 广东土木与建筑. 2024(11): 62-65+109 .
    8. 王捷江，刘添俊，马春景. 隧道围岩组合预加固技术在富水软弱地层中的应用及冻胀分析. 广州建筑. 2024(S1): 11-15 .
    9. 周文，胡俊，曾晖，李珂，曾东灵，王志鑫，冯继超. 不同渗流速度对新型管幕冻结法温度场影响. 海南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 85-94 .
    10. 刘秀芝. 新型管幕预筑一体化结构施工安全控制技术研究. 铁道建筑技术. 2023(02): 179-181+190 .
    11. 李悦，张启瑞，谭建兵，李明宇，朱康康，王增辉. 管幕+CRD法隧道并行下穿对地表变形的影响. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 214-220 .
    12. 孙文昊，牛野，刘雨萌，张俊儒，孔超. 基于多跨单向板力学模型的管幕冻结法隧道初期支护参数优化方法. 铁道标准设计. 2023(08): 120-128 .
    13. 吴永哲，朱泽萱，杨平，刘红伟，吴文亮. 60 m级超长联络通道冻结法施工与实测分析. 建筑科学与工程学报. 2023(06): 148-156 .
    14. 陈湘生，付艳斌，陈曦，肖惠，包小华，庞小朝，王雪涛. 地下空间施工技术进展及数智化技术现状. 中国公路学报. 2022(01): 1-12 .
    15. 周禹暄，胡俊，熊辉，任军昊，占健健，王志鑫. 新型管幕冻结法在河堤防渗加固中的温度场分析. 煤田地质与勘探. 2022(05): 110-117 .
    16. 白天麒，叶超，李忠超，梁荣柱，肖铭钊，蔡兵华. 渗流作用下富水砂层椭圆形冻结管冻结发展规律研究. 安全与环境工程. 2022(04): 85-92 .
    17. 王涛，马骏，周国庆，许大晴，季雨坤. 冻土地层三维空间变异性表征及冻结帷幕温度特征值演化过程研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2022(10): 2094-2108 .
    18. 荣传新，王彬，曹祎，龙伟. 地下水对人工地层冻结过程的影响机制研究进展及展望. 建井技术. 2022(06): 1-9 .
    19. 叶超，李忠超，梁荣柱，肖铭钊，蔡兵华，吴文兵. 地下水含盐量对人工冻结效果影响分析. 水利水运工程学报. 2021(02): 78-86 .
    20. 贺铁刚. 港珠澳大桥拱北隧道冻结法施工成本管理措施. 中国集体经济. 2021(21): 73-74 .
    21. 周扬，武子寒，许程，卢萌盟，周国庆. 高温下饱和冻土一维融化热固结模型及解答. 岩土工程学报. 2021(12): 2190-2199 . 本站查看
    22. 张冬梅，逄健，任辉，韩磊. 港珠澳大桥拱北隧道施工变形规律分析. 岩土工程学报. 2020(09): 1632-1641 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(21)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (429) PDF downloads (108) Cited by(43)
    Related
    Website Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return