Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 43 Issue 3
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
WANG Yan-zhen, ZHAO Ding-feng, CHEN Guo-xing, LIANG Ke. A new nonlinear effective stress method for one-dimensional seismic site response analysis and its validation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(3): 502-510. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202103013
Citation: WANG Yan-zhen, ZHAO Ding-feng, CHEN Guo-xing, LIANG Ke. A new nonlinear effective stress method for one-dimensional seismic site response analysis and its validation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(3): 502-510. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202103013
shu

A new nonlinear effective stress method for one-dimensional seismic site response analysis and its validation

  • 1.

    Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, China

  • 2.

    Civil Engineering & Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210009, China

  • 3.

    Shanghai Waterway Engineering Design and Consulting Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200120, China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 07, 2020
  • Available Online: December 04, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Given modification of earthquake motions due to liquefaction-induced soil softening, the effective stress analysis should be conducted to develop the site-specific design ground motion parameters at liquefiable sites. A loosely coupled nonlinear effective stress method for the site response analysis is proposed. In this method, the nonlinear hysteresis model for soils is incorporated with an excess pore water pressure generation model characterized by cyclic shear-volume strain coupling, which establishes the coupling relationship between the degradation of cyclic stiffness and the generation of excess pore water pressure associated with earthquake events. The material subroutine in ABAQUS/Explicit platform is developed. The method is then used to simulate the seismic response of the downhole array non-liquefied and liquefied sites in Japan. The results show a good consistency between the simulations and the recordings at different depths: (1) The difference between the simulated and the recorded peak ground accelerations for the non-liquefied site is only 2.6% (weak motion) and 11.8% (moderate motion). (2) The difference between the simulated and recorded peak accelerations at different depths for the liquefied site is less than 5%. (3) The simulated and recorded spectral acceleration curves of the non-liquefied and liquefied sites are in good agreement. Compared with the responses of a downhole array multilayer liquefied site calculated by DEEPSOIL V6.0, those of the proposed method show a better agreement with the seismic recordings at different depths.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (23)
  • [1]
    LIYANATHIRANA D S, POULOS H G. Numerical simulation of soil liquefaction due to earthquake loading[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(7): 511-523. doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00037-4
    [2]
    LIYANAPATHIRANA D S, POULOS H G. A numerical model for dynamic soil liquefaction analysis[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(9/10/11/12): 1007-1015.
    [3]
    HASHASH, Y M A, GROHOLSKI, D R, PHILIPS C A, et al. DEEPSOIL V6.0, User Manual and Tutorial[M]. Urbana: Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2014.
    [4]
    OLSON S M, MEI X, HASHASH Y M A. Nonlinear site response analysis with pore-water pressure generation for liquefaction triggering evaluation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2020, 146(2): 04019128. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002191
    [5]
    朱彤, 王睿, 张建民. 盾构隧道在可液化场地中的地震响应分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(增刊1): 57-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2019S1016.htm

    ZHU Tong, WANG Rui, ZHANG Jian-min. Seismic response analysis of shield tunnels in liquefiable soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S0): 57-60. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2019S1016.htm
    [6]
    大崎順彦, 原昭夫, 清田芳治. 地盤震動解析のための土の 動力学的モデルの提案と解析例[C]//第5回日本地震工学シンポジウム, 1978, 东京: 697-704.

    COHSAKI Y, HARA A, KIYOTA Y. Stress-strain model of soil for seimic analysis[C]//Proceedings of the Fifth Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, 1978, Tokyo: 697-704. (in Japanese)
    [7]
    赵丁凤, 阮滨, 陈国兴, 等. 基于Davidenkov骨架曲线模型的修正不规则加卸载准则与等效剪应变算法及其验证[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(5): 888-895. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201705018.htm

    ZHAO Ding-feng, RUAN Bin, CHEN G X, et al. Validation of modified irregular loading-unloading rules based on Davidenkov skeleton curve and its equivalent shear strain algorithm implemented in ABAQUS[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(5): 888-895. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201705018.htm
    [8]
    RUAN B, ZHAO K, WANG S Y, et al. Numerical modeling of seismic site effects in a shallow estuarine bay (Suai Bay, Shantou, China)[J]. Engineering Geology, 2019, 260: 105233. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105233
    [9]
    MIAO Y, YAO E, RUAN B, et al. Improved hilbert spectral representation method and its application to seismic analysis of shield tunnel subjected to spatially correlated ground motions[J]. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 111: 119-130.
    [10]
    陈国兴, 孙瑞瑞, 赵丁凤, 等. 海底盾构隧道纵向地震反应特征的子模型分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(11): 1983-1991. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201911003.htm

    CHEN Guo-xing, SUN Rui-rui, ZHAO Ding-feng, et al. Longitudinal seismic response characteristics of seabed shield tunnels using submodeling analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(11): 1983-1991. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201911003.htm
    [11]
    陈少林, 朱学江, 赵宇昕, 等. 考虑土骨架非线性的饱和土-结构相互作用分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2019, 39(1): 114-126. doi: 10.13197/j.eeev.2019.01.114.chensl.014

    CHEN Shao-lin, ZHU Xue-jiang, ZHAO Yu-xin, et al. Analysis of saturated soil-structure interaction considering soil skeleton nonlinearity[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2019, 39(1): 114-126. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13197/j.eeev.2019.01.114.chensl.014
    [12]
    陈国兴, 朱翔, 赵丁凤, 等. 珊瑚岛礁场地非线性地震反应特征分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(3): 405-413. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201903002.htm

    CHEN Guo-xing, ZHU Xiang, ZHAO Ding-feng, et al. Nonlinear seismic response characteristics of a coral island site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(3): 405-413. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201903002.htm
    [13]
    GREEN R A, MITCHELL J K, POLITO C P. An energy- based excess pore pressure generation model for cohesionless soils[C]//Proceedings of the John Booker Memorial Symposium. Rotterdam, 2000, Netherlands.
    [14]
    CHEN G X, ZHAO D F, CHEN W Y, et al. Excess pore water pressure generation in cyclic undrained testing[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2019, 145(7): 04019022. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002057
    [15]
    MATASOVIC N, VUCETIC M. Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1993, 119(11): 1085-1821.
    [16]
    HASHASH Y M A, PHILLIPS C, GROHOLSKI D R. Recent advances in non-Linear site response analysis[C]//The Fifth International Conference in Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2010, San Diego.
    [17]
    CHEN G X, ZHOU Z L, PAN H, et al. The influence of undrained cyclic loading patterns and consolidation states on the deformation features of saturated fine sand over a wide strain range[J]. Engineering Geology, 2016, 204: 77-93. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.02.008
    [18]
    TAO Y, RATHJE E. Insights into modeling small-strain site response derived from downhole array data[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2019, 145(7): 04019023. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002048
    [19]
    RÉGNIER J, BONILLA, L F, BARD P Y, et al. PRENOLIN: International benchmark on 1D nonlinear site-response analysis‒Validation phase exercise[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2018, 108(2): 876-900.
    [20]
    KOKUSHO T, SATOH K, MATSUMOTO M. Nonlinear dynamic response of soil ground during 1995 Hyogo-ken nanbu earthquake[J]. Tsuchi-tu-Kiso, 1995, 43(9): 39-43. (in Japanese)
    [21]
    YANG J, SATO T, LI X S. Nonlinear site effects on strong ground motion at a reclaimed island[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2000, 37(1): 26-39. doi: 10.1139/t99-092
    [22]
    FOERSTER E, MODARESSI H. Nonlinear numerical method for earthquake site response analysis II—case studies[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 5(3): 325-345.
    [23]
    CUBRINOVSKI M, ISHIHARA K. Assessment of the Kobe Port Island liquefaction through analytical simulation of the vertical array records[C]//Proceedings of the Special Conference on Great Hanshin-Awafi Earthquake Disasters, Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1996, Tokyo: 157-164.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]SHENG Zhi-qiang, TENG Yan-jing, LI Ping. Discussion on several problems in design of retaining structures of deep excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(1): 94-101. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202101011
    [2]XIONG Yi-bo, ZHONG Fang-ping, WANG Wan-peng, XIAO Wei-guo, WANG Lei-yuan, YANG Wen-xi, BAI You-liang, YANG Jin-chao. Structural design technology of reusable blast-resistant caverns in hard rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(9): 1759-1766. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909022
    [3]WANG Zong-jian, MA Shu-wen, TANG Xiao-shuang, WU Jin-ming, ZHI Xian-ping, LU Liang. Application of elastic cable theory in design of reinforced earth structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(1): 122-129. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201801012
    [4]LI Yuan-song, DUAN Xin, LI Yang, LI Xin-ping. Comparative research on design approaches on retaining structure for deep foundation pits in Chinese and European geotechnical design codes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk2): 77-81. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2013
    [5]LI Ling, CHENG Shao-ping, WANG Bin, GAO Xu, LIU Xian-wu. Design and construction monitoring of supporting structures for foundation pit of Lefutianxia Building in Xiangyang[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk1): 132-137. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S1023
    [6]TANG Jun. Design and analysis of retaining structures for a super-deep excavationin Shanghai using late-dismantling support[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(suppl): 451-455.
    [7]CHEN Fu-qiang, YANG Guang-hua, ZHANG Yu-cheng, YAO Li-na. Discussion on value of coefficient in structural design of circular diaphragm wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(suppl): 203-206.
    [8]Determination of design depth of soil-nailing protection structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(5).
    [9]YUAN Jinrong, ZHOU Yuqian, LIU Xuezeng, YU Ning. Structural design of lining and parameter analysis for DOT shield tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(6): 638-641.
    [10]Pon Jia-zheng. Design of Substructures and the Application of Finite Element Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1980, 2(4): 34-48.
    • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 吴学震，姜杰，李大勇，蒋宇静. 深水注浆锚设计原理及其承载特性试验研究. 岩土力学. 2022(10): 2707-2716 .
    2. 刘金龙，祝磊，姚军，肖赟. 基于鱼雷锚施工的海洋组合式锚泊基础. 安徽建筑. 2021(05): 92-94 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (386) PDF downloads (304) Cited by(7)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return