Experimental study on deformation behaviors of overconsolidated clay under cyclic confining pressure
-
摘要: 通常采用单一轴向循环荷载模拟交通荷载,然而,真实的交通荷载引起的应力场包含循环变化的轴向偏应力和围压。除此之外,部分下卧软黏土是超固结土,并非正常固结土,且针对交通荷载作用下超固结软黏土变形特性的研究较少。因此,通过对超固结软黏土开展一系列变围压不排水循环三轴试验,对超固结软黏土在变围压循环荷载作用下的累积轴向应变变化规律进行了研究,分析了超固结比和循环围压对累积轴向应变的影响。研究结果表明:变围压循环荷载作用下,不同循环围压幅值和超固结比条件对应的累积轴向应变与振动次数关系曲线相似。超固结比和循环围压对累积轴向应变的影响显著,循环围压和超固结比对土体累积轴向应变的发展均存在较为明显的抑制作用,具体为与恒围压循环荷载作用下土体累积轴向应变相比,当应力路径斜率η为1.00,1.50时,其对应的累积轴向应变分别减少了7.7%,15.8%;当超固结比OCR从1增至8时,超固结土和正常固结土对应累积轴向应变比从0.122减少至0.040。上述研究成果可加深对超固结土在交通荷载作用下变形规律的认识,从而为交通荷载作用下超固结土长期变形预测方法的建立奠定试验基础。Abstract: Traffic loading is usually simulated by single cyclic deviator stress. However, the vertical normal stress and horizontal stress acting on the soil elements are all varied cyclically under traffic loading. Nevertheless, part of the subgrade soil is overconsolidated, rather than normally-consolidated. There are few researches on the development of the accumulated axial strain of the overconsolidated soft clay under traffic loading. Recognizing this, a series of cyclic triaxial tests with cyclic confining pressures are conducted on overconsolidated clay under undrained conditions, and the effects of the cyclic confining pressures and overconsolidated ratios on the development of accumulated axial strain are investigated. It is observed that the relationship between the accumulated axial strain and the number of cycles are similar under different test conditions, in which the accumulated axial strain increases rapidly at the beginning of tests and increases with a decreasing rate to achieve a stable value. Besides that, the overconsolidated ratios and cyclic confining pressures have a significant effect on the development of the accumulated axial strain: both the cyclic confining pressure and the overconsolidation ratio inhibit the development of the accumulated axial strain. By comparing with the accumulated axial strain obtained under cyclic triaxial tests with the constant confining pressure, the accumulated axial strain decreases by 7.7% and 15.8% when the slopes of stress path are 1.0 and 1.5, respectively. Additionally, the accumulated axial strain ratio of the overconsolidated soft clay and normal consolidated clay decreases from 0.122 to 0.040 as the overconsolidated ratios increases from 1 to 8. The above research results may deepen the understanding of the deformation evolution of the overconsolidated soil under traffic loading, and provide experimental basis for the establishment of prediction formula for the deformation of the overconsolidated soil under traffic loading.
-
-
-
[1] SAĞLAM S, BAKıR B S. Cyclic response of saturated silts[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 61/62: 164-175. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.02.011
[2] MONISMITH C L, OGAWA N, FREEME C R. Permanent deformation characteristics of subgrade soils due to repeated loading[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1975(537): 1-17.
[3] CHAI J C, MIURA N. Traffic-load-induced permanent deformation of road on soft subsoil[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(11): 907-916. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:11(907)
[4] SUN L, GU C, WANG P. Effects of cyclic confining pressure on the deformation characteristics of natural soft clay[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 78: 99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.07.010
[5] CAI Y Q, GU C, WANG J, et al. One-way cyclic triaxial behavior of saturated clay: comparison between constant and variable confining pressure[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(5): 797-809. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000760
[6] SAKAI A, SAMANG L, MIURA N. Partially-drained cyclic behavior and its application to the settlement of a low embankment road on silty-clay[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2003, 43(1): 33-46. doi: 10.3208/sandf.43.33
-
期刊类型引用(11)
1. 蔺云宏,郝云龙,李明宇,田帅,常瑞成,刘新新. 基坑开挖引起下卧地铁盾构隧道变形的统计与预测方法研究. 河南科学. 2025(03): 337-346 . 百度学术
2. 张毅. 软弱地层下的基坑支护方案比选. 山西建筑. 2024(17): 97-100 . 百度学术
3. 王伟,邓松峰. 深厚软土区邻近地铁深基坑工程关键技术研究. 江苏建筑. 2024(05): 120-126 . 百度学术
4. 刘朝阳,蒋凯,梁禹. 基于Kerr地基模型的覆土荷载引起既有装配式地铁车站沉降分析. 现代隧道技术. 2024(05): 71-78 . 百度学术
5. 贺旭. 软弱地层基坑开挖支护方案比选研究. 铁道建筑技术. 2023(05): 100-104+125 . 百度学术
6. 张继新. 浅埋扩挖隧道变形处理技术分析. 交通世界. 2023(15): 138-140 . 百度学术
7. 邓彬,张磊,郑鹏鹏,陈保国,邹顺清. 深基坑开挖与内支撑调节对邻近沉井影响规律试验研究. 建筑科学与工程学报. 2023(05): 174-182 . 百度学术
8. 马少俊,王乔坎,苏凤阳,徐建章,郑伟,陈思源. 邻地铁盾构隧道超长基坑支护技术——以杭州大会展中心基坑工程为例. 建筑科学. 2022(05): 179-186 . 百度学术
9. 王丽萍. 水平间距对涉水隧道土体变形影响的模拟分析. 黑龙江水利科技. 2022(08): 74-76+108 . 百度学术
10. 冯文刚. 涉水隧道开挖对土体沉降影响分析. 黑龙江水利科技. 2022(08): 89-92 . 百度学术
11. 祖华. 城市地铁隧道开挖及变形控制的数值模拟研究. 山西建筑. 2022(21): 135-137 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(2)