Figures of the Article
-
Seepage model for earth pressure balance shield
-
Superposition of boundary conditions of region ①
-
Fluctuating pore pressures on cutter surface
-
Comparison of analytical results and finite element solutions
-
Influences of different frequencies and solidification factor ratios on flow rate
-
Influences of different frequencies and solidification coefficient ratios on seepage field
-
Influences of different frequencies and solidification coefficient ratios on phase hysteresis
-
Calculation of critical permeability coefficient
-
Critical permeability coefficients of typical shield sizes under different water pressures
-
Shield soil transport model test system
-
Comparison of test results
-
Discriminant diagrams of spewing in different cities
Tables of the Article
-
L1 L2 D d θ 1.6 m 6.855 m 6.4 m 0.8 m 22° -
城市 原位土渗透
系数/(cm·s-1)改良渣土渗透
系数/(cm·s-1)刀盘面中心处水头/m 掘进速度/
(mm·min-1)D/m L1/m d/m L2/m θ/(°) 哈尔滨 1.28×10-2 1.08×10-4 23.0 10~20 6.0 1.09 0.8 12.360 22 西安 3.13×10-2 9.63×10-5 10.2 20 6.0 1.00 0.92 6.000 22 兰州 7.50×10-2 5.60×10-5 30.0 50~60 6.4 0.45 0.92 5.300 22 福州 — 2.70×10-5 20.4 30 6.4 1.00 0.80 7.000 22 昆明 4.40×10-4 1.20×10-5 15.2 35~45 6.4 1.60 0.80 6.855 22
Related articles
-
2023, 45(4): 876-882. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220192
-
2019, 41(10): 1854-1862. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201910009
-
2018, 40(5): 925-931. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201805018
-
2011, 33(1)
-
2010, 32(11): 1703-1708.
-
2008, 30(9): 1383-1388.
-
2002, 24(2): 159-163.
-
2001, 23(3): 337-341.
-
2000, 22(1): 64-68.
-
1989, 11(6): 113-119.