• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
WU Peng, CHEN Jian, CUI Lan, XU Chen. Model tests and bearing characteristics of composite lining of tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S1): 102-106. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S10019
Citation: WU Peng, CHEN Jian, CUI Lan, XU Chen. Model tests and bearing characteristics of composite lining of tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S1): 102-106. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S10019

Model tests and bearing characteristics of composite lining of tunnel

More Information
  • Received Date: April 29, 2024
  • The mountain tunnels in China often use composite lining support. To explore the bearing characteristics of the composite lining to guide the design of the mining method tunnel is of great significance. A large tunnel structural model test system is designed to carry out large-size model tests on the unsurported, spray-anchor combined support and composite lining support. The whole process of tunnel damage is monitored, and the damage modes of tunnels under different forms of support and the stress characteristics of the support structure are analyzed so as to reveal the bearing characteristics of composite lining. The results show that the composite lining support increases the design bearing capacity by 33.3% compared with the combined spray-anchor support. Under the two forms of support, the surrounding rock can withstand about 60% ~ 75% of the external load, and after its application, the secondary lining can share about 15% ~ 80% of the pressure of the surrounding rock. The combined spray-anchor support can better use the effects of anchors compared to the composite lining.
  • [1]
    肖明清. 复合式衬砌隧道的总安全系数设计方法探讨[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2018, 35(1): 84-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDGC201801014.htm

    XIAO Mingqing. Discussion on design method of general safety factor of composite lining tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2018, 35(1): 84-88. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDGC201801014.htm
    [2]
    王建宇. 对隧道衬砌结构计算问题的思考[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2014, 51(2): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDSD201402001.htm

    WANG Jianyu. On calculation of tunnel lining structure[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2014, 51(2): 1-4. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDSD201402001.htm
    [3]
    李荣锦, 邹鑫, 李荣建, 等. 半嵌泥岩半覆黄土隧道模型试验及承载特性评价[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(增刊1): 98-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2022S1018.htm

    LI Rongjin, ZOU Xin, LI Rongjian, et al. Model test and bearing characteristics evaluation of semi-embedded mudstone and semi-covered loess tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S1): 98-103. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2022S1018.htm
    [4]
    WANG S M, WANG Y, LIN Z Y, et al. Analysis of the influence of the thickness insufficiency in secondary lining on the mechanical properties of Double-layer lining of shield tunnel[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 141: 106663. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106663
    [5]
    何灏典, 唐欣薇, 严振瑞, 等. 复合式衬砌结构联合承载的原位试验与数值分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(3): 560-568. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202203018

    HE Haodian, TANG Xinwei, YAN Zhenrui, et al. In-situ tests and numerical analysis of composite lining structures with joint bearing[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(3): 560-568. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202203018
    [6]
    GUO X L, FAN X S, TAN Z S. Deformation control benchmarks and secondary lining construction timing in squeezing phyllite tunnels: a case study of Chengdu-Lanzhou Railway[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2024, 143: 105454.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(17)

    1. 高乾丰,余涵,余慧聪,曾铃,陈鹏鹛. 植草红黏土干缩开裂特性及影响因素研究. 工程地质学报. 2025(01): 47-57 .
    2. 郭建军,张伟,曹衡,武臻维. 降雨条件下沿阶草加固边坡机理及坡体稳定性分析. 人民珠江. 2025(04): 9-15 .
    3. 廖拉拉,潘露,唐丽霞,吴文丽,阮仕航. 双荚决明不同弯曲程度单根抗拉变形特性. 中国水土保持科学(中英文). 2024(02): 65-72 .
    4. 王连锐,严亚,商崇菊,谭娟,杨永宇. 两种草本植物对红黏土边坡的固土护坡效应. 水土保持通报. 2024(02): 146-154 .
    5. 叶征远. 降雨条件下根系护坡边坡稳定性影响规律分析. 陕西水利. 2024(06): 5-7 .
    6. 罗元仓,张小荣,高英. 降雨入渗对寒旱环境根-土复合体斜坡稳定性的影响. 科学技术与工程. 2024(24): 10500-10507 .
    7. 张小荣,马艳霞,张吾渝. 基于FLAC~(3D)的寒旱环境植被根系分布形态对边坡稳定性的影响. 科学技术与工程. 2023(09): 3831-3838 .
    8. 陈筠,陈泰徐,王爽,王连锐,邬忠虎. 根-土复合体的胀缩变形及干湿循环后的力学特性研究. 水利水电技术(中英文). 2023(05): 136-146 .
    9. 陈飞,谢蕴忠,王俊峰,张仕彬. 基于数值模拟方法的根系护坡研究进展. 科学技术与工程. 2023(16): 6728-6738 .
    10. 赵俊键,梁腾,詹良通,梁钧,陈延博,赵宇,陈云敏. 基于渗透原理的可吸水模型根系研发与性能研究. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2023(07): 1382-1392 .
    11. 罗智芳,周佳,蒋康,刘克非. 红壤地区工程创面植被根系加固作用的数值模拟分析. 湖南交通科技. 2023(03): 7-11 .
    12. 徐华,袁海莉,王歆宇,王栋,陈建勋,荣才权. 根系形态和层次结构对根土复合体力学特性影响研究. 岩土工程学报. 2022(05): 926-935 . 本站查看
    13. 徐宗恒,张宇,陶真鹏,查玲珑,陈云英. 昭通烂泥箐滑坡源区原生状态根-土复合体抗剪特征. 水土保持学报. 2022(04): 128-134 .
    14. 赵呈冉. 植物防护对路堤边坡稳定性的影响研究. 甘肃科学学报. 2022(04): 125-129 .
    15. 戴靖沛 ,黄建坤 ,陈丽华 ,及金楠 ,李珺 . 基于均匀化理论的根土复合体三维本构关系. 农业工程学报. 2022(13): 76-83 .
    16. 夏琼,蒋代军,张延杰. 数值模拟方法在土力学实验教学中的应用. 实验技术与管理. 2022(12): 158-162 .
    17. 张迁. 公路边坡生态恢复设计方法分析. 运输经理世界. 2021(35): 7-9 .

    Other cited types(15)

Catalog

    Article views (118) PDF downloads (24) Cited by(32)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return