• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
LI Chunchun, XIONG Feng, ZHANG Guohua, HUA Dongjie, CAO Weiteng, TANG Zhicheng. Mechanical properties of granite under ultra-low temperature and stability of underground LNG storage facilities[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(4): 840-848. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240085
Citation: LI Chunchun, XIONG Feng, ZHANG Guohua, HUA Dongjie, CAO Weiteng, TANG Zhicheng. Mechanical properties of granite under ultra-low temperature and stability of underground LNG storage facilities[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(4): 840-848. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240085

Mechanical properties of granite under ultra-low temperature and stability of underground LNG storage facilities

More Information
  • Received Date: January 24, 2024
  • Available Online: September 28, 2024
  • The granite is widely distributed and has high strength, making it an ideal medium for underground storage of low-temperature liquefied natural gas (LNG). The LNG exhibits extremely low temperatures (-162℃), which causes changes in the properties of the granite and affects storage safety. This study aims to investigate the mechanical properties of dry and saturated granite at ultra-low temperatures (-90℃ to -165℃) through uniaxial compression, thermal expansion, and microscopic tests. The results show that when the temperature decreases from -90℃ to -165℃, the compressive strength and elastic modulus of saturated granite increase by 31.1% and 24%, respectively, while the elastic modulus of dry granite increases by 12.8% without a significant change in the compressive strength. This is attributed to the decrease in temperature, resulting in shrinkage of minerals in the dry granite, which enhances the bonding of internal particles. The presence of pore water in the saturated granite causes it to freeze into ice at low temperatures, resulting in the tighter adhesion of the rock voids and cracks. Consequently, the internal structure of granite becomes denser. Using the test data an empirical formula showing a negative correlation between the rock linear expansion coefficient and the temperature was established. This formula is integrated into the thermal-mechanical coupling model in COMSOL for conducting long-term stability analysis of low-temperature LNG storage. As operating years increase, the surrounding rock of the underground storage will undergo frost heave effects due to temperatures decreases. This can lead to compression deformation between rock layers and risk of surface uplift, while this research is of great significance for the development of underground space engineering.
  • [1]
    徐彬. 大型低温液化天然气(LNG)地下储气库裂隙围岩的热力耦合断裂损伤分析研究[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2008.

    XU Bin. Thermal-Mechanical Coupling Fracture Damage Analysis of Cracked Surrounding Rock in Large-scale Low-temperature LNG Underground Gas Storage[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Technology, 2008. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    吴秋红, 夏宇浩, 赵延林, 等. 不同温度及冷却速率下花岗岩动态拉伸力学特性[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(5): 2179-2193.

    WU Qiuhong, XIA Yuhao, ZHAO Yanlin, et al. Effects of high temperature and cooling rate on dynamic tensile mechanical properties of granite[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2023, 48(5): 2179-2193. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    唐明明, 王芝银, 孙毅力, 等. 低温条件下花岗岩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(4): 787-794.

    TANG Mingming, WANG Zhiyin, SUN Yili, et al. Experimental study of mechanical properties of granite under low temperature[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(4): 787-794. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    李云鹏, 王芝银. 花岗岩低温热力效应参数及强度规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(2): 321-326. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2012.02.001

    LI Yunpeng, WANG Zhiyin. Study of parameters and strength of thermal effects for granite under low temperature[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(2): 321-326. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2012.02.001
    [5]
    王建国, 杨阳, 郭延辉, 等. 高应变率下饱水花岗岩动力学特性的低温效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(增刊2): 163-169.

    WANG Jianguo, YANG Yang, GUO Yanhui, et al. Low temperature effect of saturated granite on dynamic characteristics at high strain rates[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(S2): 163-169. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    田镇, 李银平, 王贵宾, 等. 饱水红砂岩裂隙冻胀力与变形试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(增刊1): 2857-2868.

    TIAN Zhen, LI Yinping, WANG Guibin, et al. Experimental study on frost heaving force and deformation of water saturated red sandstone fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(S1): 2857-2868. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    蒋立浩, 陈有亮, 刘明亮. 高低温冻融循环条件下花岗岩力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(增刊2): 319-323.

    JIANG Lihao, CHEN Youliang, LIU Mingliang. Experimental study of mechanical properties of granite under high/low temperature freeze-thaw cycles[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(S2): 319-323. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    张牡丹, 王苏然, 曾健霜, 等. 花岗岩超低温冻融循环后力学特性研究[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2017, 39(5): 484-489.

    ZHANG Mudan, WANG Suran, ZENG Jianshuang, et al. Mechanical properties of granite under ultra-low temperature freeze-thaw cycles[J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2017, 39(5): 484-489. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    蔡承政, 李根生, 黄中伟, 等. 液氮冻结条件下岩石孔隙结构损伤试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(4): 965-971.

    CAI Chengzheng, LI Gensheng, HUANG Zhongwei, et al. Experiment study of rock porous structure damage under cryogenic nitrogen freezing[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(4): 965-971. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    蔡承政, 李根生, 黄中伟, 等. 液氮压裂中液氮对岩石破坏的影响试验[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(4): 98-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2014.04.014

    CAI Chengzheng, LI Gensheng, HUANG Zhongwei, et al. Experimental study on effect of liquid nitrogen on rock failure during cryogenic nitrogen fracturing[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2014, 38(4): 98-103. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2014.04.014
    [11]
    黄中伟, 位江巍, 李根生, 等. 液氮冻结对岩石抗拉及抗压强度影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(3): 694-700, 834.

    HUANG Zhongwei, WEI Jiangwei, LI Gensheng, et al. An experimental study of tensile and compressive strength of rocks under cryogenic nitrogen freezing[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(3): 694-700, 834. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    FENG Q, JIN J C, ZHANG S, et al. Study on a damage model and uniaxial compression simulation method of frozen–thawed rock[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 55(1): 187-211. doi: 10.1007/s00603-021-02645-2
    [13]
    KODAMA J, GOTO T, FUJII Y, et al. The effects of water content, temperature and loading rate on strength and failure process of frozen rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 62: 1-13.
    [14]
    WANG T, JIA H L, SUN Q, et al. Effects of thawing-induced softening on fracture behaviors of frozen rock[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 16(3): 979-989.
    [15]
    YANG H, SHAN R L, ZHANG J X, et al. Mechanical properties of frozen rock mass with two diagonal intersected fractures[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2018, 28(4): 631-638.
    [16]
    KRAUTBLATTER M, FUNK D, GÜNZEL F K. Why permafrost rocks become unstable: a rock–ice-mechanical model in time and space[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2013, 38(8): 876-887.
    [17]
    SIRDESAI N N, SINGH T N, RANJITH P G, et al. Effect of varied durations of thermal treatment on the tensile strength of red sandstone[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2017, 50(1): 205-213.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Collaborative risk assessment approach in geotechnical engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240581
    [2]FENG Shijin, LI Haodong, CAO Jianfeng, LIU zonghui, ZHANG Xiaolei. Evaluation of collaborative disposal of heavy metals in MSWI fly ash along with its environmental risk assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(4): 699-708. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220004
    [3]CAI Yao-jun, ZHOU Zhao, YANG Xing-guo, WEI Ying-qi, ZHENG Dong-jian, PENG Wen-xiang, ZHONG Qi-ming, WANG Heng. Rapid detection for risk assessment, emergency disposal technology and equipment development of barrier lakes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(7): 1266-1280. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202207007
    [4]WANG Zhe-chao, LU Bao-qi, LI Shu-cai, QIU Dao-hong, QIAO Li-ping, YU Feng, BI Li-ping. Risk assessment for an underground crude oil storage facility with water-curtaining system during construction phase[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(6): 1057-1067. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201506012
    [5]WU Yue, LIU Dong-sheng, ZHOU Zhong-hao. Mobility assessment model for landslide mass considering disintegration energy consumption in slipping process[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(1): 35-46. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201501003
    [6]XIN Xin, WAN Peng, SHEN Yuan-shun. Risk assessment of construction of excavations in areas of rock and soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(suppl): 342-346.
    [7]XU Zhen-hao, LI Shu-cai, LI Li-ping, CHEN Jun, SHI Shao-shuai. Construction permit mechanism of karst tunnels based on dynamic assessment and management of risk[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(11): 1714-1725.
    [8]ZHENG Jun-jie, LIN Chi-feng, ZHAO Dong-an, DING Lie-yun. Risk assessment of shield tunnel construction cost using fuzzy fault tree[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(4): 501.
    [9]LAN Shouqi, ZHANG Qinghe. Risk assessment of deep excavation during construction based on fuzzy theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(4): 648-652.
    [10]HUANG Hongwei, ZHU Lin, XIE Xiongyao. Risk assessment on engineering feasibility of key events in Shanghai metro line No. 11[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(7): 1103-1107.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(41)

    1. 侯瑞彬,潘逸尘,董云瑶,付宇廷,刘蒙蒙. 2023年甘肃积石山M_S6.2地震密集观测记录的区域性差异分析. 世界地震工程. 2025(02): 12-20 .
    2. 常晁瑜,乔峰,薄景山,绽蓓蕾,谷佳沛,李昊宇,田华俊. 甘肃积石山6.2级地震诱发中川乡流滑成因初探. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2025(02): 349-356 .
    3. 王兰民,许世阳,王平,王睿,车爱兰,周燕国,吴志坚,王谦,蒲小武,柴少峰,马星宇. 2023年积石山6.2级地震诱发大规模黄土液化流滑的特征与启示. 岩土工程学报. 2024(02): 235-243 . 本站查看
    4. 刘港,贾俊,张戈,洪勃,董英,裴赢,薛强,高波. 甘肃积石山地震液化型泥流特征、成因及其对黄河上游盆地地震次生灾害风险评估的启示. 西北地质. 2024(02): 220-229 .
    5. 王睿,王兰民,周燕国,王刚. 土动力学与岩土地震工程. 土木工程学报. 2024(07): 71-89+105 .
    6. 潘建磊,梁庆国,刘海生,时伟,王丽丽. 黄土液化作用及其次生灾害风险评估方法初探——以积石山M_S6.2地震为例. 地震工程学报. 2024(04): 836-845 .
    7. 袁近远,崔家伟,李兆焱,袁晓铭,张钰洋. 中国模式下砾性土液化指数评价新方法. 土木工程学报. 2024(09): 98-108 .
    8. 葛一荀,张洁,黄宏伟. 基于贝叶斯分层模型的液化侧移稳健的易损性分析方法. 同济大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(11): 1658-1669 .
    9. 钱法桥,邓亚虹,刘凡,门欢. 黄土地震滑坡研究综述与展望. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2024(05): 5-20 .
    10. 袁近远,苏安双,陈龙伟,许成顺,王淼,袁晓铭,张思宇. 基于剪切波速的砾性土液化概率计算的中国方法. 岩土力学. 2024(11): 3378-3387+3415 .
    11. 袁近远,王兰民,汪云龙,袁晓铭. 不同设防水准下场地液化震害风险差异性研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2023(01): 246-260 .
    12. 代言,邓龙胜,毛伟,范文,李培. 马兰黄土液化特性及孔压模型参数研究. 地震工程学报. 2023(02): 338-345+361 .
    13. 隆然,刘兴东. 基于致灾机理分析的公路滑坡稳定性评价及治理方案研究. 铁道勘察. 2023(02): 33-37 .
    14. 贾科敏,许成顺,杜修力,张小玲,宋佳,苏卓林. 可液化倾斜场地的侧向扩展机制分析. 岩土力学. 2023(06): 1837-1848 .
    15. 罗增文,苏卓林,贾科敏,许成顺. 地震作用下碎石桩场地侧向位移规律研究. 震灾防御技术. 2023(02): 361-368 .
    16. 王兰民,柴少峰,薄景山,王平,许世阳,李孝波,蒲小武. 黄土地震滑坡的触发类型、特征与成灾机制. 岩土工程学报. 2023(08): 1543-1554 . 本站查看
    17. 李孝波,欧阳刚垒,宋霖君,吴义文,徐建元. 黄土高原地区场地设计反应谱特征周期研究. 地震工程学报. 2023(05): 1161-1170 .
    18. 柴少峰,王兰民,王平,郭海涛,夏晓雨,车高凤,王会娟. 石碑塬低角度黄土地层液化滑移特征与机理振动台试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(12): 2565-2574 . 本站查看
    19. 马为功,王兰民,许世阳,李登科,柴少峰. 饱和黄土隧道围岩地震液化特征的振动台试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(S2): 171-176 . 本站查看
    20. 李泊良,张帆宇. 降雨和地震条件下浅层黄土滑坡三维稳定性评价. 工程科学学报. 2022(03): 440-450 .
    21. 程超,钟秀梅,刘钊钊,刘富强,江志杰,王谦,陶冬旺. 饱和黄土动态液化和静态液化机理的差异性研究. 地震工程学报. 2022(01): 136-144 .
    22. 袁近远,李天宁,王兰民,汪云龙,陈龙伟,李兆焱,袁晓铭,王永志,陈卓识,李瑞山. 砂土液化概率计算新方法. 岩土工程学报. 2022(03): 541-549 . 本站查看
    23. 王谦,钟秀梅,高中南,马金莲,万秀红,杨义煊,刘岸果. 门源M6.9地震诱发地质灾害特征研究. 地震工程学报. 2022(02): 352-359 .
    24. 葛一荀,张洁,祝刘文,程小久,廖先斌,汪华安,孔明,郑文棠,王占华. 砂土场地国标与美标标准贯入试验能量分析及击数转换关系研究. 工程地质学报. 2022(02): 507-519 .
    25. 包含,马扬帆,兰恒星,彭建兵,张科科,许江波,晏长根,孙强. 基于微结构量化的含渐变带黄土各向异性特征研究. 中国公路学报. 2022(10): 88-99 .
    26. 苏卓林,贾科敏,许成顺,豆鹏飞,张小玲. 双向地震作用下液化水平和倾斜场地-桩基-桥梁结构地震反应的差异研究. 地震科学进展. 2022(11): 505-512 .
    27. 宋洋,刘思源,王晨炟. 含水率和干湿循环对原状黄土变形特性的影响. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(02): 148-155 .
    28. 王玉峰,林棋文,李坤,史安文,李天话,程谦恭. 高速远程滑坡动力学研究进展. 地球科学与环境学报. 2021(01): 164-181 .
    29. 颜灵勇,李孝波,欧阳刚垒. 黄土地震滑坡形成机理研究的若干进展. 防灾科技学院学报. 2021(02): 46-53 .
    30. 马星宇,王兰民,王谦,王平,钟秀梅,蒲小武,刘富强. 饱和黄土液化流动性试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2021(S1): 161-165 . 本站查看
    31. 袁晓铭,费扬,陈龙伟,袁近远,陈同之,张思宇,王义德. 含剧烈地震动作用不同埋深砂土液化判别统一公式. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2021(10): 2101-2112 .
    32. 李旭东,王平,王丽丽,王会娟,常文斌,钱紫玲. 强震作用下坡顶建筑荷载对边坡稳定性影响研究. 地震工程学报. 2021(05): 1220-1227 .
    33. 张子东,张晓超,任鹏,崔雪婷. 非饱和黄土动力液化研究——以党家岔滑坡为例. 地震工程学报. 2021(05): 1228-1237 .
    34. 许成顺,贾科敏,杜修力,王志华,宋佳,张小玲. 液化侧向扩展场地-桩基础抗震研究综述. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2021(04): 768-791 .
    35. 马晓文,梁庆国,赵涛,周稳弟. 土动力学研究综述及思考. 世界地震工程. 2021(04): 217-230 .
    36. 许成顺,王冰,杜修力,岳冲,杨钰荣. 循环加载频率对砂土液化模式的影响试验研究. 土木工程学报. 2021(11): 109-118 .
    37. 郭海涛,许世阳,蒲小武,张晓军,马星宇. 海原地震石碑塬液化滑移地表特征形成机制探讨. 地震工程学报. 2020(05): 1159-1164 .
    38. 杨博,田文通,孙军杰,刘琨,徐舜华. 海原大地震诱发石碑塬黄土滑坡机制探讨. 地震工程学报. 2020(05): 1165-1172 .
    39. 马星宇,王兰民,钟秀梅,蒲小武,刘富强,王谦. 地震诱发石碑塬黄土地层液化滑移距离研究. 地震工程学报. 2020(06): 1674-1682 .
    40. 车福东,王涛,辛鹏,张泽林,梁昌玉,刘甲美. 近远震作用下黄土滑坡动力响应与变形——以甘肃天水震区黎坪村滑坡为例. 地质通报. 2020(12): 1981-1992 .
    41. MA Xingyu,WANG Lanmin,WANG Qian,WANG Ping,ZHONG Xiumei,PU Xiaowu,LIU Fuqiang,XU Xiaowei. Flow Characteristics of Large-Scale Liquefaction-Slip of the Loess Strata in Shibei Tableland, Guyuan City, Induced by the 1920 Haiyuan M8(1/2) Earthquake. Earthquake Research in China. 2020(04): 469-481 .

    Other cited types(32)

Catalog

    Article views (299) PDF downloads (40) Cited by(73)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return