• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
LI Ruishan, WU Jinhui, CHEN Longwei, YUAN Xiaoming, LI Mingrui. Probabilistic model for seismic effects on soft soil sites[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S2): 189-194. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S20026
Citation: LI Ruishan, WU Jinhui, CHEN Longwei, YUAN Xiaoming, LI Mingrui. Probabilistic model for seismic effects on soft soil sites[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S2): 189-194. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S20026

Probabilistic model for seismic effects on soft soil sites

More Information
  • Received Date: November 29, 2023
  • Available Online: April 19, 2024
  • The seismic response exhibits strong nonlinear amplification on soft soil sites. The common practice in different countries and regions for the seismic design codes is to provide a set of adjustment coefficients that are consistent with their respective site classification criteria to consider the local site effects. Given the significant uncertainties in bedrock input motions, putting forward the site adjustment factors with different levels of exceedance probabilities better meets the performance-based seismic design requirements. 50 type Ⅲ and Ⅳ soft soil sites with covering soil layer thicknesses ranging from 50 to 150 m are collected as numerical models. 100 strong seismic records are selected from 43 reference sites recorded during 73 earthquake events in the ESM database and their peaks are adjusted to 25, 50, 100 and 150 gal as inputs. Using the one-dimensional equivalent linear program SHAKE2000, a total number of 20000 site response calculations are carried out. The distribution features and characteristic parameters of the peak acceleration, peak velocity and peak displacement amplification coefficient, as well as the short-period (T = 0.2 s) and medium-to-long period (T = 1 s) acceleration response spectrum amplification coefficients, namely FPGA, FPGV, FPGD, Fa and Fv, under different intensities of input motions are given. The recommended values for various amplification coefficients are also provided for the exceedance probabilities of 2%, 16% and 50%.
  • [1]
    BORCHERDT R D, GLASSMOYER G. On the characteristics of local geology and their influence on ground motions generated by the Loma Prieta earthquake in the San Francisco Bay region, California[J]. The Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1992, 82(2): 603-641. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0820020603
    [2]
    FIELD E H, JOHNSON P A, BERESNEV I A, et al. Nonlinear ground-motion amplification by sediments during the 1994 Northridge earthquake[J]. Nature, 1997, 390: 599-602. doi: 10.1038/37586
    [3]
    李平, 薄景山, 齐文浩, 等. 土层结构对汉源烈度异常的影响[J]. 地震学报, 2012, 34(6): 851-857, 880. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2012.06.011

    LI Ping, BO Jingshan, QI Wenhao, et al. Effects of soil structure on abnormal intensity in Hanyuan old town[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2012, 34(6): 851-857, 880. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2012.06.011
    [4]
    钱胜国. 软土夹层地基场地土层地震反应特性的研究[J]. 工程抗震, 1994, 16(1): 32-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCKZ401.009.htm

    QIAN Shengguo. Study on seismic response characteristics of soil layer in soft soil interlayer foundation site[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering, 1994, 16(1): 32-36. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCKZ401.009.htm
    [5]
    黄玉龙, 周锦添, 郭迅, 等. 软泥夹层对香港软土场地地震反应的影响[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2000, 9(1): 109-116. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZH200001020.htm

    WONG YukLung, ZHOU Jintian, GUO Xun. Influence of soft sandwich layer on seismic response in Hong Kong [J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2000, 9(1): 109-116. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZH200001020.htm
    [6]
    陈国兴, 陈继华. 软弱土层的厚度及埋深对深厚软弱场地地震效应的影响[J]. 世界地震工程, 2004, 20(3): 66-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJDC200403012.htm

    CHEN Guoxing, CHEN Jihua. The effect of depth and thickness of soft soil layer on earthquake response for deep soft sites[J]. World Information On Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 20(3): 66-73. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJDC200403012.htm
    [7]
    陈继华, 陈国兴, 史国龙. 深厚软弱场地地震反应特性研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2004, 24(2): 131-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK200402002.htm

    CHEN Jihua, CHEN Guoxing, SHI Guolong. Research on seismic response characteristics of sites with deep and soft soils[J]. Journal of Seismology, 2004, 24(2): 131-138. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK200402002.htm
    [8]
    杨宇, 李小军, 贺秋梅. 自贡西山公园山脊场地地形和土层效应数值模拟[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2011, 6(4): 436-447. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2011.04.009

    YANG Yu, LI Xiaojun, HE Qiumei. Numerical simulation for site effect of ridge terrain and overlaying soil in Zigong Xishan Park[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2011, 6(4): 436-447. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2011.04.009
    [9]
    唐晖, 李小军, 李亚琦. 自贡西山公园山脊地形场地效应分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(8): 74-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201208016.htm

    TANG Hui, LI Xiaojun, LI Yaqi. Site effect of topograghy on ground motions of Xishan Park of Zigong City[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(8): 74-79. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201208016.htm
    [10]
    BRADLEY B A, WOTHERSPOON L M, KAISER A E, et al. Influence of site effects on observed ground motions in the Wellington region from the MW 7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand, earthquake[J]. The Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2018, 108(3B): 1722-1735. doi: 10.1785/0120170286
    [11]
    THEODOULIDIS N, HOLLENDER F, MARISCAL A, et al. The ARGONET (greece) seismic observatory: an accelerometric vertical array and its data[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 2018, 89(4): 1555-1565. doi: 10.1785/0220180042
    [12]
    MALEKMOHAMMADI M, PEZESHK S. Ground motion site amplification factors for sites located within the Mississippi embayment with consideration of deep soil deposits[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2015, 31(2): 699-722.
    [13]
    杨燕, 楼梦麟. 汶川地震中远场深覆盖土层动力反应分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2011, 31(4): 462-468. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK201104020.htm

    YANG Yan, LOU Menglin. Dynamic response analysis of far-field soil layer with deep deposit during Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2011, 31(4): 462-468. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK201104020.htm
    [14]
    中国地震动参数区划图: GB 18306—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.

    Seismic Ground Motion Parameters Zonation Map of China: GB 18306—2015[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2016. (in Chinese)
    [15]
    FEMA 450. NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, Volume Ⅰ: Part 1: Provisions, Part 2: Commentary[R]. Sofia: Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, 2015.
    [16]
    CEN. Design of Tructures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings[S]. 2004.
    [17]
    Ministry of Construction, Japan. The Building Standard Law of Japan[S]. 2004.
    [18]
    XIE J J, LI K W, LI X J, et al. VS30-based relationship for Chinese site classification[J]. Engineering Geology, 2023, 324: 107253.
    [19]
    陈龙伟, 陈卓识, 袁晓铭. 基于KiK-Net单场强震记录场地放大函数估计及标准差分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2013, 46(增刊2): 141-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2013S2024.htm

    CHEN Longwei, CHEN Zhuoshi, YUAN Xiaoming. Site-specific amplification function assessment and variability analysis using KiK-Net single-station strong motion data[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(S2): 141-145. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2013S2024.htm
    [20]
    刘也, 任叶飞, 王大任, 等. 基于地震动预测残差分析的工程场地分类标准检验与评价[J]. 工程力学, 2023, 40(6): 99-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX202306010.htm

    LIU Ye, REN Yefei, WANG Daren, et al. Evaluating the schemes of engineering site classification based on residual analysis of ground motion prediction[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 40(6): 99-109. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX202306010.htm
    [21]
    李瑞山, 袁晓铭. 成层场地基本周期简化计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3227-3235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201908040.htm

    LI Ruishan, YUAN Xiaoming. Study on simplified calculation method of basic period of layered site[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3227-3235. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201908040.htm
    [22]
    袁晓铭, 孙锐, 孙静, 等. 常规土类动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2000, 20(4): 133-139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200004021.htm

    YUAN Xiaoming, SUN Rui, SUN Jing, et al. Laboratory experimental study on dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio of soils[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2000, 20(4): 133-139. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200004021.htm
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(18)

    1. 姚怡宁,宗桦,周璐,李荷,冯旭环. 川西大渡河干热河谷优势灌草植物根系特征及固土能力. 生态学报. 2025(06): 2798-2810 .
    2. 王铁行,赵翊豪,金鑫. 喷射秸秆加筋黄土的强度特性研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2024(03): 800-811 .
    3. 陈婧逸,陈晓清,宋东日,吕明,蒋豪. 灌木根系形态对土体强度影响的大型直剪试验研究. 长江科学院院报. 2024(08): 120-127+163 .
    4. 程虎,李蒙,杨劭,张乃畅,李厚峰. 水陆交错带护坡植物固土抗蚀能力比较分析. 中国水土保持科学(中英文). 2024(03): 56-63 .
    5. 谭瑞琪,谢亚军,李欣然,姜宝莹,张桂荣. 植被防护岸坡加筋机理研究. 中国水运. 2023(06): 71-74 .
    6. 陈飞,谢蕴忠,王俊峰,张仕彬. 基于数值模拟方法的根系护坡研究进展. 科学技术与工程. 2023(16): 6728-6738 .
    7. 梅红,马柯,刘瑾,王禄艺,冯玉晗,齐梦瑶,胡梦园. 生态型稳定剂协同植物根系固土特性及机理研究. 水利水电科技进展. 2023(04): 52-58 .
    8. 蒋冬卫. 不同地区沿海港口物流业发展现状评价分析. 中国水运. 2023(11): 74-76 .
    9. 杜技能,王中珏,段继琪,王忠良,段青松. 生态护坡理论及技术研究现状综述. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2023(06): 211-220 .
    10. 徐华,袁海莉,王歆宇,王栋,陈建勋,荣才权. 根系形态和层次结构对根土复合体力学特性影响研究. 岩土工程学报. 2022(05): 926-935 . 本站查看
    11. 杨家庆,鲁明星,吴冠辰,袁雪涛,李富平,许永利,李小光. 矿山边坡植被修复研究现状及发展趋势分析. 矿山测量. 2022(01): 83-87 .
    12. 穆奎,潘伟良,王利彬,李婷,陈雅雯,丁奠元. 生态河道植物护坡工程技术研究现状与展望. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2022(03): 206-216 .
    13. 毕银丽,罗睿,王双明. 接菌对紫花苜蓿根系抗拉性及根菌复合土体抗剪强度影响. 煤炭学报. 2022(06): 2182-2192 .
    14. 黄琛,张友谊,叶小兵. 基于SEEP/W的强震区根系土坡面物源失稳机制分析. 科技通报. 2022(07): 57-66+72 .
    15. 李杰. 河道整治中根系植被特征对岸坡改良土影响试验研究. 水利技术监督. 2022(10): 129-132+177 .
    16. 梅红,胡国长,王禄艺,梅绪哲,刘瑾,徐佳俊,杨欣雅,杨诺. 边坡植被固土抗冲刷特性及其护坡机理研究. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 86-91 .
    17. 姜彤,李龙飞,薛雷,黄坤,丁昊,王昊宇. 乔木护坡效果物理模型试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2022(35): 15546-15553 .
    18. 陈飞,施康,钱乾,罗特. 根土复合体材料的抗剪强度特性研究进展. 有色金属科学与工程. 2021(06): 96-104 .

    Other cited types(20)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(38)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return