• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
CUI Chunyi, XU Minze, XU Chengshun, ZHAO Jingtong, LIU Hailong, MENG Kun. Seismic fragility analysis of subway station structures considering statistical uncertainty of seismic demands[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(3): 453-462. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230980
Citation: CUI Chunyi, XU Minze, XU Chengshun, ZHAO Jingtong, LIU Hailong, MENG Kun. Seismic fragility analysis of subway station structures considering statistical uncertainty of seismic demands[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(3): 453-462. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230980

Seismic fragility analysis of subway station structures considering statistical uncertainty of seismic demands

More Information
  • Received Date: October 07, 2023
  • Available Online: October 11, 2024
  • To avoid the epistemic uncertainty for seismic fragility of subway station structures caused by the incomplete seismic demand sample set, a novel procedure of seismic fragility analysis of subway station structures considering the statistical uncertainty of seismic demands is proposed. The limited set of seismic demand samples is firstly converted into a large sample problem based on the Bootstrap method. Then, the joint probability distribution model of statistical uncertainty variables is further established by combining the maximum entropy principle with the copula theory. On this basis, the variability of seismic fragility of subway station structures caused by the statistical uncertainty of seismic demands is further quantified, and the mean fragility curves and envelope fragility curves with certain confidence level are obtained. Finally, the Daikai subway station is taken as the prototype to investigate the influences of the statistical uncertainty. The results show that the seismic fragility of subway station structures derived from the limited seismic demand samples has significant variability which shows a tendency of increase and then decrease with the increase of the ground motion intensity. Moreover, the mean fragility curves and envelope fragility curves can effectively reflect the uncertainty of seismic fragility derived from the limited seismic demand samples, and have higher reliability. It may provide reference and guidance for the seismic performance and seismic risk assessment of subway station structures.
  • [1]
    王国波, 郝朋飞, 孙富学. 地铁车站结构端部效应影响范围研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(8): 1435-1445. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202008008

    WANG Guobo, HAO Pengfei, SUN Fuxue. Spatial influence scope of end wall of metro station structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(8): 1435-1445. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202008008
    [2]
    XU M Z, CUI C Y, ZHAO J T, et al. Fuzzy seismic fragility analysis of underground structures considering multiple failure criteria[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 145: 105614. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2024.105614
    [3]
    KIANI M, GHALANDARZADEH A, AKHLAGHI T, et al. Experimental evaluation of vulnerability for urban segmental tunnels subjected to normal surface faulting[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 89: 28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.012
    [4]
    American Lifelines Alliance (ALA). Seismic Fragility Formulations for Water Systems, Part1-Guideline[M]. Reston: ASCE-FEMA, 2001: 1-96.
    [5]
    National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS). HAZUS-MH: Technical Manual[M]. Washington: National Institute of Building Sciences, 2004: 33-87.
    [6]
    ZHONG Z L, SHEN Y Y, ZHAO M, et al. Seismic fragility assessment of the Daikai subway station in layered soil[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 132: 106044. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106044
    [7]
    JIANG J W, EL NGGAR H M, XU C S, et al. Effect of ground motion characteristics on seismic fragility of subway station[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 143: 106618. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106618
    [8]
    JIANG J W, HESHAM EL NAGGAR M, XU C S, et al. Effect of parameters associated with soil-to-structure relative stiffness on seismic fragility curves of subway station[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 135: 105057. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105057
    [9]
    钟紫蓝, 史跃波, 李锦强, 等. 考虑损伤界限模糊性的地铁车站结构抗震性能评价[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(12): 2196-2205. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202212006

    ZHONG Zilan, SHI Yuebo, LI Jinqiang, et al. Seismic performance assessment of subway station structures considering fuzzy probability of damage states[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(12): 2196-2205. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202212006
    [10]
    WAN Z, CHEN J B, TAO W F, et al. A feature mapping strategy of metamodelling for nonlinear stochastic dynamical systems with low to high-dimensional input uncertainties[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 184: 109656. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109656
    [11]
    LI D Q, ZHANG L, TANG X S, et al. Bivariate distribution of shear strength parameters using copulas and its impact on geotechnical system reliability[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 68: 184-195. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.04.002
    [12]
    唐小松, 李典庆, 周创兵, 等. 基于Bootstrap方法的岩土体参数联合分布模型识别[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(4): 913-922.

    TANG Xiaosong, LI Dianqing, ZHOU Chuangbing, et al. Bootstrap method for joint probability distribution identification of correlated geotechnical parameters[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(4): 913-922. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    LUO Z, ATAMTURKTUR S, JUANG C H. Bootstrapping for characterizing the effect of uncertainty in sample statistics for braced excavations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(1): 13-23. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000734
    [14]
    LAN Y C, XU J, PINNOLA F. Seismic fragility analysis of structures via an adaptive Gaussian mixture model and its application to resilience assessment[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2024, 212: 111332. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111332
    [15]
    王晓磊, 王浠铭, 阎卫东, 等. 基于Copula函数的水平和竖向地震动强度参数相关性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2023, 40(5): 79-92.

    WANG Xiaolei, WANG Ximing, YAN Weidong, et al. Correlation analysis of intensity measures ofhorizontal and vertical ground motions based oncopula function[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 40(5): 79-92. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    XU M Z, CUI C Y, XU C S, et al. Seismic risk analysis of subway station structures combining the epistemic uncertainties from both seismic hazard and numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2024, 28(5): 1474-1494. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2023.2240452
    [17]
    WRIGGERS P. Computational Contact Mechanics[M]. Berlin: Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
    [18]
    杨靖, 云龙, 庄海洋, 等. 三层三跨框架式地铁地下车站结构抗震性能水平研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(12): 2240-2248. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202012010

    YANG Jing, YUN Long, ZHUANG Haiyang, et al. Seismic performance levels of frame-type subway underground station with three layers and three spans[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(12): 2240-2248. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202012010
  • Related Articles

    [1]YING Hongwei, XIONG Yifan, LI Binghe, LÜ Wei, CHENG Kang, ZHANG Jinhong. Time-dependent solution for ground settlement induced by excavation in soft clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(10): 2041-2050. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230727
    [2]WANG Shu-hong, ZHU Bao-qiang. Time series prediction for ground settlement in portal section of mountain tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(5): 813-821. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202105004
    [3]FAN Gang, ZHANG Jian-jing, FU Xiao, WU Jin-biao, TIAN Hua. Axial force of anchor cables in slope reinforced by double-row anti-slide piles and pre-stressed anchor cables[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(6): 1095-1103. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201606017
    [4]WANG Rui, CAO Wei, BRANDENBERG Scott. Method for calculating axial force and settlement of pile foundation in consolidating and reconsolidating ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(3): 512-518. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201503015
    [5]GUO Jian, ZHA Lü-ying, PANG You-chao, SHEN Shuang-shuang, XIA Peng. Prediction for ground settlement of deep excavations based on wavelet analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk2): 343-347. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2060
    [6]HUANG Min, LIU Xiao-li. Ground settlement induced by excavation of pile-anchor retainingfoundation pits in soil-rock mixed areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(suppl): 571-575.
    [7]HAN Kan, LI Deng-ke, WU Guan-zhong. Pull-out tests on anchoring force of prestressed anchor cables[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(zk1): 385-387.
    [8]WANG Guo-cai, MA Da-jun, YANG Yang, ZHANG Jie. 3-D finite element analysis of ground settlement caused by shield construction of metro tunnels in soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(zk1): 266-270.
    [9]WANG Wei-dong, XU Zhong-hua, WANG Jian-hua. Statistical analysis of characteristics of ground surface settlement caused by deep excavations in Shanghai soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(11): 1659-1666.
    [10]ZHANG Zhong-miao, LIN Cun-gang, WU Shi-ming, LIU Guan-shui, WANG Cheng-shan, XIE Wen-bin. Analysis and control of ground settlement of embankments in construction of cross-river shield tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(6): 977.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 刘华仁,佟大威,余佳,苏哲. 基于模糊聚类和随机子空间的高土石坝模态参数自动识别. 水力发电学报. 2025(02): 107-115 .
    2. 蔡正银,范开放,朱洵. 基于现场试验的海上筒型基础风电结构动力特性研究. 岩土工程学报. 2025(03): 443-452 . 本站查看
    3. 张翰,张锋,谭尧升,姚孟迪,邓检华. 基于运行时模态分析和代理模型的大坝力学参数反演方法. 粉煤灰综合利用. 2025(01): 163-166 .
    4. 张晓明,谭蓉,贺育明,强继峰,孙森林,张朝军,梁刚. 基于时频域信号特征的输电塔运行模态分析. 电网与清洁能源. 2025(03): 46-52+59 .
    5. 王晓澎,张浩,李欣,肖森,刘璇. 基于随机子空间法的滑动轴承运行模态参数识别. 噪声与振动控制. 2024(01): 126-133 .
    6. 樊圆,卢文胜,虞终军,任祥香. 多次地震作用下高层建筑结构动力特性识别和响应分析. 建筑结构学报. 2023(01): 225-234 .
    7. 翟世龙,刘萍,黄静,艾萨·伊斯马伊力,毛玉剑. 基于大坝地震反应台阵的土石坝模态参数识别. 内陆地震. 2023(04): 353-361 .
    8. 黄嘉思,徐文城,段元锋,章红梅. 基于随机子空间方法的向量式有限元索网模型模态识别. 结构工程师. 2022(06): 1-6 .

    Other cited types(7)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(15)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return