• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
WANG Yongzhi, YANG Yang, XU Guangming, TANG Zhaoguang, ZHANG Xuedong, SUN Rui, ZHOU Yanguo. Development and performance evaluation of a soft-contact earth pressure transducer for geotechnical centrifuge modeling[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(8): 1655-1664. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230642
Citation: WANG Yongzhi, YANG Yang, XU Guangming, TANG Zhaoguang, ZHANG Xuedong, SUN Rui, ZHOU Yanguo. Development and performance evaluation of a soft-contact earth pressure transducer for geotechnical centrifuge modeling[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(8): 1655-1664. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230642

Development and performance evaluation of a soft-contact earth pressure transducer for geotechnical centrifuge modeling

More Information
  • Received Date: July 09, 2023
  • Available Online: December 19, 2023
  • The miniature earth pressure transducer is one of the key testing tools in geotechnical centrifuge modeling. Aiming at solving the classical problems such as arching effects, size effects and thickness-diameter ratio in the measurement of rigid transducers, and improving the frequency response rate and induction accuracy, a soft-contact pressure transducer ESP-Ⅱ is developed, and its innovations and design methods are introduced. Taking two internationally representative earth pressure transducers as reference, a series of centrifugal model tests are designed and carried out to evaluate its accuracy, frequency response and applicability. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) In the static centrifugal acceleration tests spinning up from 5g to 50g, the difference between the theoretical values and the test results of ESP-Ⅱ and the two reference transducers at each depth is small, and the average deviations are 5.16%, 6.70% and 4.85%, respectively. The coefficient R2 of the three curves K0 fitted along the depth is≥0.9893. (2) In the pulse load tests, the maximum response time of ESP-Ⅱ is about 7.8 ms, which is slightly better than that of the two reference transducers and has a satisfactory frequency response. (3) In the dynamic load tests of sine and seismic with different amplitudes, the incremental trend of earth pressure measured by the three transducers is basically consistent. The variation range of K0 increases from 0.43~0.45 before the seismic to 0.51~0.56 after the seismic, which is consistent with the existing theory. (4) At the decelerating stage of the centrifuge, the good continuity and smoothness of the time history measured by the ESP-Ⅱ, which reflects the soft-contact design, is conducive to ensuring good contact and stable response between the soil and the transducer. The research results have preliminarily proved that the developed soft-contact transducer ESP-Ⅱ satisfies the requirements of static and dynamic centrifugal tests, with significant application value and immense potential.
  • [1]
    张建民, 于玉贞, 濮家骝, 等. 电液伺服控制离心机振动台系统研制[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2004, 26(6): 843-845. http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/11539

    ZHANG Jianmin, YU Yuzhen, PU Jialiu, el at. Development of a shaking table in electro-hydraulic servo-control centrifuge[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2004, 26(6): 843-845. (in Chinese) http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/11539
    [2]
    陈云敏, 马鹏程, 唐耀. 土体的本构模型和超重力物理模拟[J]. 力学学报, 2020, 52(4): 901-915. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LXXB202004001.htm

    CHEN Yunmin, MA Pengcheng, TANG Yao. Constitutive models and hypergravity physical simulation of soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2020, 52(4): 901-915. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LXXB202004001.htm
    [3]
    土工离心模型试验技术规程: DL/T 2013—2020[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2020.

    Specification for Geotechnical Centrifuge Model Test Techniques: DL/T 2013—2020[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    港口工程离心模型试验技术规程: JTS/T 231—7—2013[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2013.

    Code for Centrifugal Model Test for Port Engineering: JTS/T 231-7-2013[S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2013. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    曾辉, 余尚江. 岩土压力传感器匹配误差的计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2001, 22(1): 99-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX200101026.htm

    ZENG Hui, YU Shangjiang. The calculation of matching error of rock-soil pressure transducer[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2001, 22(1): 99-105. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX200101026.htm
    [6]
    MIURA K, OTSUKA N, KOHAMA E, et al. The size of earth pressure cells on measurement in granular materials[J]. The Japanese Geotechnical Society, 2003, 43(5): 133-147.
    [7]
    余尚江, 曾辉. 土中自由场应力与结构表面压力测量的差异[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2003, 25(6): 654-657. http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/11299

    YU Shangjiang, ZENG Hui. The difference between measurements of stress in soil and pressure on wall-surface[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(6): 654-657. (in Chinese) http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/11299
    [8]
    JOSEPH F L, BRENT T. Laboratory calibration of earth pressure cells[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2005, 28(2): 188-196. doi: 10.1520/GTJ12089
    [9]
    TALESNICK M. Measuring soil contact pressure on a solid boundary and quantifying soil arching[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2005, 28(2): 171-179. doi: 10.1520/GTJ12484
    [10]
    徐光明, 陈爱忠, 曾友金, 等. 超重力场中界面土压力的测量[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(12): 2671-2674. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX200712040.htm

    XU Guangming, CHEN Aizhong, ZENG Youjin, et al. Measurement of boundary total stress in a multi-gravity environment[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(12): 2671-2674. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX200712040.htm
    [11]
    WEILER W A, KULHAWAY F H. Factors affecting stress cell measurement in soil[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1982, 108(12): 1529-1548. doi: 10.1061/AJGEB6.0001393
    [12]
    EGAN D, MERRIFIELD C K. The use of miniature earth pressure cells in a multi-gravity environment[C]// Centrifuge 98. Tokyo, 1998.
    [13]
    DAVE T N, DASAKA S M. In-house calibration of pressure transducers and effect of material thickness[J]. Geo-mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 5(1): 1-15.
    [14]
    魏永权, 罗强, 张良, 等. 离心力场中微型土压力传感器非线性响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(1): 286-292. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201501039.htm

    WEI Yongquan, LUO Qiang, ZHANG Liang, et al. Study of nonlinear response of miniature earth pressure transducer in centrifugal force field[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(1): 286-292. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201501039.htm
    [15]
    芮瑞, 吴端正, 胡港, 等. 模型试验中膜式土压力盒标定及其应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(5): 837-845. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201605009

    RUI Rui, WU Duanzheng, HU Gang, et al. Calibration tests on diaphragm-type pressure cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(5): 837-845. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201605009
    [16]
    梁波, 厉彦君, 凌学鹏, 等. 离心模型试验中微型土压力盒土压力测定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 818-826. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201902047.htm

    LIANG Bo, LI Yanjun, LING Xuepeng, et al. Centrifugal model test of micro box of earth pressure[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 818-826. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201902047.htm
    [17]
    蔡正银, 代志宇, 徐光明, 等. 离心模型试验中界面土压力盒标定方法研究[J]. 水利学报, 2020, 51(6): 695-704. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB202006007.htm

    CAI Zhengyin, DAI Zhiyu, XU Guangming, et al. Study on calibration method of interface soil pressure sensor in centrifugal model test[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2020, 51(6): 695-704. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB202006007.htm
    [18]
    刘开源, 许成顺, 贾科敏, 等. 薄膜压力传感器(FSR)曲面土压力测量研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(3): 584-591. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202003021

    LIU Kaiyuan, XU Chengshun, JIA Kemin, et al. Research on measurement of curved soil pressure using thin film pressure sensor (FSR) [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(3): 584-591. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202003021
    [19]
    GAO Y, WANG Y H. Calibration of tactile pressure sensors for measuring stress in soils[J]. Geotechnical testing journal, 2013, 36(4): 1-7.
    [20]
    PALMER M C, O'ROURKE, THOMAS D, OLSON N A, et al. Tactile pressure sensors for soil-structure interaction assessment[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(11): 1638-1645. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000143
    [21]
    MADABHUSHI S S C, HAIGH S K. Using tactile pressure sensors to measure dynamic earth pressures around du-al-row walls[J]. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2018, 19(2): 58-71.
    [22]
    张紫涛, 徐添华, 徐韵, 等. 薄膜压力传感器在土工试验中的适用性初探[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 39(增刊1): 209-213. doi: 10.11779/CJGE2017S1041

    ZHANG Zitao, XU Tianhua, XU Yun, et al. Feasibility of applying tactile pressure sensors in geotechnical tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 39(S1): 209-213. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE2017S1041
    [23]
    MADABHUSHI G. Centrifuge Modelling for Civil Engineers[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015.
    [24]
    汤兆光. 超重力试验动态孔压传感器设计方法、性能评价与应用[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2022.

    TANG Zhaoguang. Design Method and Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Miniature Pore Water Pressure Transducer in Centrifuge Modelling and Its Application[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2022. (in Chinese)
    [25]
    JAKY J. The coefficient of earth pressure at rest[J]. Journal of the Society of Hungarian Architects and Engineers, 1944, 78(22): 355-358.
    [26]
    岩土工程仪器基本参数及通用技术条件: GB/T 15406—2007[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.

    Primary Parameter and General Specification for Geotechnical Engineering Instrument: GB/T 15406—2007[S]. Beijing: China Standards Publishing House, 2007. (in Chinese)
    [27]
    蔡正银, 代志宇, 徐光明, 等. 颗粒粒径和密实度对砂土K0值影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3882-3888. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202012007.htm

    CAI Zhengyin, DAI Zhiyu, XU Guangming, et al. Effect of particle size and compaction on K0 value of sand by centrifugal model test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(12): 3882-3888. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202012007.htm

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return