• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
ZHANG Gao, LI Liang, JIANG Xi-quan, LUAN Yi-heng. Experimental study on dynamic compressive behaviors of sandy soil under passive confining pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 184-188. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2044
Citation: ZHANG Gao, LI Liang, JIANG Xi-quan, LUAN Yi-heng. Experimental study on dynamic compressive behaviors of sandy soil under passive confining pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 184-188. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2044

Experimental study on dynamic compressive behaviors of sandy soil under passive confining pressures

More Information
  • Received Date: August 15, 2021
  • Available Online: December 05, 2022
  • The dynamic compressive experiments on sands pecimens under passive confining pressures are carried out using a 50 mm split Hopkinson pressure bar. The dynamic response behaviors of sands with different relative densities and water content at medium high strain rates are investigated. The effects of the relative density and water content on the dynamic compressive behaviors of sand are also studied. It is indicated by the test results that: (1) The dynamic response of sands under the dynamic compressive action shows obvious strain rate effect. The peak stress of dry sand increases with the increase of strain rate, and the peak stress of wet sand first increases and then decreases with the increase of strain rate. The peak strain of dry and wet sands first increase and then decrease with the increase of strain rate. (2) The density of sand has an important effect on its dynamic compressive behaviors. The peak stress and peak strain of sand increase with the increase of relative density. (3) The water content of sand can impact its dynamic compressive properties in a certain extent. The peak stress and strain first increase and then decrease with the increase of water content. There is a dividing water content and the varying trend of the peak stress and strain are different when the water content is larger or less than the dividing water content. For the tests performed in the current study, the dividing water content is 6% for the sand specimens with the relative density of 0.9.
  • [1]
    卢芳云, 陈荣, 林玉亮. 霍普金森杆实验技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.

    LU Fang-yun, CHEN Rong, LIN Yu-liang. Hopkinson bar techniques[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    FELICE C W, GAFFNEY S, BROWN J A. Extended split-Hopkinson bar analysis for attenuating materials[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1991, 117(5): 1119-1135. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:5(1119)
    [3]
    SONG B, CHEN W N, LUK V. Impact compressive response of dry sand[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2009, 41(6): 777-785. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.003
    [4]
    LU H B, LUO H Y, COOPER W L, et al. Effect of particle size on the compressive behavior of dry sand under confinement at high strain rates[C]//Dynamic Behavior of Materials, Volume 1, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4238-7_67.
    [5]
    朱志武, 宁建国, 刘煦. 冲击载荷下土的动态力学性能研究[J]. 高压物理学报, 2011, 25(5): 444-450. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYWL201105011.htm

    ZHU Zhi-wu, NING Jian-guo, LIU Xu. Dynamic mechanical behaviors of soil under impact loads[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2011, 25(5): 444-450. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYWL201105011.htm
    [6]
    吕亚茹, 王明洋, 魏久淇, 等. 钙质砂的SHPB实验技术及其动态力学性能[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(6): 1262-1270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BZCJ201806009.htm

    LYU Ya-ru, WANG Ming-yang, WEI Jiu-qi, et al. Experimental techniques of SHPB for calcareous sand and its dynamic behaviors[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6): 1262-1270. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BZCJ201806009.htm
    [7]
    郑文, 徐松林, 胡时胜. 侧限压缩下干燥砂的动态力学性能[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2011, 31(6): 619-623. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BZCJ201106011.htm

    ZHENG Wen, XU Song-lin, HU Shi-sheng. Dynamic mechanical properties of dry sand under confined compression[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2011, 31(6): 619-623. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BZCJ201106011.htm
    [8]
    DAVIES E D H, HUNTER S C. The dynamic compression testing of solids by the method of the split Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1963, 11(3): 155-179. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90050-4
    [9]
    SONG B, CHEN W. Dynamic stress equilibration in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests on soft materials[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2004, 44(3): 300-312. doi: 10.1007/BF02427897
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 张帅,王瑞春,朱绍东,郑媛媛,曹玉鹏. 固化土-微型桩复合地基桩-土应力比分析. 土木工程与管理学报. 2025(01): 27-33 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(1)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return