Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 43 Issue 1
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
HE Chuan, CHEN Fan, HUANG Zhong-hui, MENG Qing-jun, LIU Chuan-kun, WANG Shi-min. Tunneling parameters and comparison of adaptability for compound strata of dual-mode shield machine[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(1): 43-52. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202101005
Citation: HE Chuan, CHEN Fan, HUANG Zhong-hui, MENG Qing-jun, LIU Chuan-kun, WANG Shi-min. Tunneling parameters and comparison of adaptability for compound strata of dual-mode shield machine[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(1): 43-52. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202101005
shu

Tunneling parameters and comparison of adaptability for compound strata of dual-mode shield machine

  • 1.

    Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

  • 2.

    School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

  • 3.

    Nanning Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd., Nanning 530029, China

More Information
  • Received Date: March 30, 2020
  • Available Online: December 04, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Based on the tunnel project between Wuyi Interchange Sation and Xinxiu Park Station of Nanning rail transit line 5, firstly the selection basis of the earth pressure-slurry dual-mode shield is discussed, and then, according to the field excavation test data of the right line and left line slurry shield, changes of excavation parameters and energy consumptions of different geological sections and different mode sections are analyzed. Compared with that of single-mode shield, the adaptability of dual-mode shield in composite strata is analyzed. The results show that the slurry-balanced mode used in the composite stratum consisting of silt, silty fine sand and round gravel in the initial section strictly controls the land subsidence, and the earth pressure-balanced mode effectively avoids the risk of clay formation in the composite stratum consisting of full fault silty mudstone and argillaceous siltstone in the river-crossing section. In terms of the excavation rate, the rate of dual-mode shield is 181.44% higher than that of the slurry shield of the left line. In terms of energy consumption, the oil consumption of the shield tail, water consumption and electricity consumption of the dual-mode shield of the right line are 7.87%, 30.32% and 30.64% lower than those of the left line, respectively. The research results may provide a reference for the study on driving parameters and selection adaptability of double-mode shield in composite strata.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (20)
  • [1]
    李俊伟, 李丽琴, 吕培印. 复合地层条件下盾构选型的风险分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2007(增刊1): 1241-1244, 1260. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE2007S1016.htm

    LI Jun-wei, LI Li-qin, LÜ Pei-yin. Risk analysis on shield type selection at compound stratum[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2007(S1): 1241-1244, 1260. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE2007S1016.htm
    [2]
    竺维彬, 王晖, 鞠世健. 复合地层中盾构滚刀磨损原因分析及对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2006(4): 72-76, 82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2006.04.014

    ZHU Wei-bin, WANG Hui, JU Shi-jian. Analysis and Countermeasure of the abrasion of shield hob in compound stratum[J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2006(4): 72-76, 82. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2006.04.014
    [3]
    袁敏正, 鞠世健, 竺维彬. 广州地铁一号线和二号线盾构机适应性研究与探讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2004(3): 31-34, 39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2004.03.007

    YUAN Min-zheng, JU Shi-jian, ZHU Wei-bin. Research and discussion on adaptability of shield machine for Guangzhou Metro Line 1 and Line 2[J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2004(3): 31-34, 39. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2004.03.007
    [4]
    张厚美, 吴秀国, 曾伟华. 土压平衡式盾构掘进试验及掘进数学模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(增刊2): 5762-5766. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2005S2085.htm

    ZHANG Hou-mei, WU Xiu-guo, ZENG Wei-hua. Study on tunneling experiment and mathematical model of EPB shield[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(S2): 5762-5766. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2005S2085.htm
    [5]
    韦良文, 张庆贺, 邓忠义. 大型泥水盾构隧道开挖面稳定机理与应用研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2007, 3(1): 87-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0836.2007.01.019

    WEI Liang-wen, ZHANG Qing-he, DENG Zhong-yi. Study on the stability mechanism and application of the excavation face of large slurry shield tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2007, 3(1): 87-91. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0836.2007.01.019
    [6]
    谭忠盛, 洪开荣, 万姜林, 等. 软硬不均地层复合盾构的研究及掘进技术[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(增刊2): 3945-3952. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2006S2094.htm

    TAN Zhong-sheng, HONG Kai-rong, WAN Jiang-lin, et al. Study on composite shield and construction technique in complex uneven strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(S2): 3945-3952. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2006S2094.htm
    [7]
    王为乐. 长沙地铁复合地层盾构选型与掘进参数研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2012.

    WANG Wei-le. Study on Shield Type Selection and Driving Parameters of Changsha Metro Complex Stratum[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2012. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    孟德鑫, 谭忠盛, 李涛. 大直径土压平衡盾构掘进参数对比试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 45(增刊1): 444-448. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2015S1078.htm

    MENG De-xin, TAN Zhong-sheng, LI Tao. Comparative test and research on excavation parameters of large diameter EPB shield[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 45(S1): 444-448. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2015S1078.htm
    [9]
    李正. 深圳复合地层φ7m盾构掘进参数与地层相关性研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2016.

    LI Zheng. Correlation Study between Tunneling Parameters of φ7m EPB TBM and Geotechnical Properties of Shenzhen's Complex Stratum[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    梁桥欣, 魏礼, 何省. 南宁地铁复合地层盾构施工关键技术[J]. 铁道建筑, 2017, 57(10): 67-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2017.10.18

    LIANG Qiao-xin, WEI Li, HE Xing. Key Technology of nanning subway shield construction in composite strata[J]. Railway Engineering, 2017, 57(10): 67-70. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2017.10.18
    [11]
    占传忠. 复合地层盾构的适应性及掘进参数的关联性分析[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2018, 30(增刊1): 101-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMT2018S1021.htm

    ZHAN Chuan-zhong. Relevance analysis of composite strata shield tunneling adaptability and tunneling parameters[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2018, 30(S1): 101-108. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMT2018S1021.htm
    [12]
    门燕青, 王永军, 周建国, 等. 济南复合地层土压平衡盾构掘进效能实测分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2019, 52(8): 110-119. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201908012.htm

    MEN Yan-qing, WANG Yong-jun, ZHOU Jian-guo, et al. Measurement and analysis on EPB shield machine tunneling efficiency in jinan composite stratum[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2019, 52(8): 110-119. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201908012.htm
    [13]
    杨旸, 谭忠盛, 彭斌, 等. 富水圆砾地层土压平衡盾构掘进参数优化研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(增刊1): 94-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2017S1017.htm

    YANG Yang, TAN Zhong-sheng, PENG Bin, et al. Study on optimization boring parameters of earth pressure balance shield in soaked round gravel strata[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(S1): 94-98. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2017S1017.htm
    [14]
    凌波, 史雪珊. 国内首台泥水、土压双模式盾构机的设计[J]. 中国科技投资, 2014(6): 58.

    LING Bo, SHI Xue-shan. Design of the first slurry and EPB dual-mode shield machine in China[J]. China Venture Capital, 2014(6): 58. (in Chinese)
    [15]
    凌波, 吴启光. 一种双模式盾构机实用新型专利: ZL201220602041.4[P]. 2013-06-05[2019-05-13].

    LING Bo, WU Qi-guang. A Utility Model Patent of Dual-Mode Shield Machine: ZL201220602041.4[P]. 2013-06-05[2019- 05-13]. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    赖理春. 浅谈双模式盾构施工模式的选取[J]. 建筑机械化, 2016, 37(2): 48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJH201602022.htm

    LAI Li-chun. Select of the double model shield construction[J]. Construction Mechanization, 2016, 37(2): 48. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJH201602022.htm
    [17]
    管会生, 张瑀, 杨延栋. 新街台格庙矿区斜井隧道双模式盾构关键掘进参数配置研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2015, 35(4): 377. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSSD201504027.htm

    GUAN Hui-sheng, ZHANG Yu, YANG Yan-dong. Study on key boring parameters of dual-mode shield used for inclined shaft of Xinjie Taigemiao Mines[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2015, 35(4): 377. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSSD201504027.htm
    [18]
    周玉标. 双模式盾构下穿岩溶发育区高速公路施工技术[J]. 建筑机械化, 2016, 37(5): 42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJH201605013.htm

    ZHOU Yu-biao. Application of dual mode shield in highway construction in karst development area[J]. Construction Mechanization, 2016, 37(5): 42. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJH201605013.htm
    [19]
    刘东. TBM&EPB双模式盾构复合地层施工关键技术研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2017.

    LIU Dong. Study on the Key Technology of TBM & EPB Double Mode Shield Construction in Composite Stratum[D]. Chengdu: South West Jiaotong University, 2017. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    朱劲锋, 廖鸿雁, 袁守谦, 等. 并联式泥水/土压双模式盾构施工技术与冷冻刀盘开舱技术的创新与实践[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2019, 39(7): 1187-1200. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSSD201907022.htm

    ZHU Jin-feng, LIAO Hong-yan, YUAN Shou-qian, et al. Innovation and practice of parallel dual-mode slurry/EPB shield construction technology and freezing cutterhead opening technology[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(7): 1187-1200. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSSD201907022.htm
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]CHEN Ziyu, LI Guoying, MI Zhankuan, WEI Kuangmin. Creep model for rockfill materials based on particle breakage energy consumption[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(6): 1155-1165. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230202
    [2]WEI Gang, ZHU Dehan, WANG Zhe, QI Yongjie, JIANG Haibo, XIANG Pengfei. Calculation of soil deformation caused by construction of shield tunnels in composite layered strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(5): 919-926. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230151
    [3]SONG Yang, WANG Wei-yi, DU Chun-sheng. Model tests on stability and ultimate support pressure of shield tunnel in sand-gravel composite stratum[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(12): 2206-2214. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202012006
    [4]HE Shao-hui, ZHANG Shu-chao, LI Cheng-hui, ZHU Zi-peng, LIU Xia-bing, WANG Da-hai, LIU Yang-peng. Blowout control during EPB shield tunnelling in sandy pebble stratum with high groundwater pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(9): 1583-1590. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201709005
    [5]ZHANG Hai-yan, HE Ping, YAN Guo-xin, WANG Jian-cheng, LIU Zhe. Effects of existing pile foundation on parameters of shield tunneling[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(9): 1615-1624. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201609008
    [6]LIN Cun-gang, LIU Gan-bin, LIANG Rong-zhu, XIA Tang-dai. Influences of tunnel slope on shield tunnelling-induced heave and subsidence of ground surface[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(7): 1203-1212. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201407003
    [7]Hydraulic fracture extending during slurry shield tunneling in cohesive soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(5).
    [8]ZHANG Xudong. Construction technology of earth pressure balance shield in watery sandy stratum[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(9): 1445-1449.
    [9]SUN Jinshan, LU Wenbo, SU Lijun, ZHOU Chuangbing. Rock mass rating identification based on TBM performance parameters and muck characteristics[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(12): 1847-1854.
    [10]YUAN Jinrong, ZHOU Yuqian, LIU Xuezeng, YU Ning. Structural design of lining and parameter analysis for DOT shield tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(6): 638-641.
    • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(43)

    1. 段岳强. EPB/TBM双模盾构机硬岩掘进卡机脱困技术. 城市轨道交通研究. 2025(01): 237-243 .
    2. 霍军帅，陈爽，杨冀琴. 长距离越江隧道双模盾构选型及转换点位置选择. 铁道建筑. 2025(03): 106-111 .
    3. 邹坤秘，唐维湘. 泥岩-砂卵石复合地层双模盾构适应性设计. 四川建筑. 2024(01): 166-169 .
    4. 张茹玥，邹福清，方勇，耿芳闯，卓彬，王宇博. 基于改进喷涌模型的土压/泥水双模盾构合理转换点研究. 现代隧道技术. 2024(01): 125-136 .
    5. 闫寒冰. 轨道交通越江隧道盾构选型及设计优化研究. 工程建设与设计. 2024(05): 118-120 .
    6. 郭俊平，马经哲，汤勇茂，尹富斌，罗杰. 三模式掘进机选型及模式转换技术研究——以广州市地铁7号线为例. 隧道建设(中英文). 2024(03): 586-595 .
    7. 高丽峰，马思伟，钟恒. 全断面中风化泥质粉砂岩地层中盾构施工技术. 城市建设理论研究(电子版). 2024(14): 115-117 .
    8. 齐春，王闯，胖涛，晏启祥. 高速列车振动下软土震陷对水下盾构隧道的影响. 路基工程. 2024(03): 112-117 .
    9. 王振华，彭勇，王忠钊，王少勇，阳军生，徐海龙，汤冲. 复杂环境下城际铁路大直径双模盾构选型技术及应用. 科学技术与工程. 2024(20): 8699-8706 .
    10. 朱禹，孙恒，梅诗源，杨志勇，刘翼豪. 中粗砂-风化岩复合地层双模盾构渣土改良技术研究. 隧道建设(中英文). 2024(S1): 427-436 .
    11. 刘彦良. 基于正交试验的大直径盾构近距离侧穿桥桩掘进参数敏感性分析. 建筑机械. 2024(10): 249-255 .
    12. 张少平. 双模盾构模式转换技术在地铁隧道施工的应用. 工程机械与维修. 2024(10): 30-32 .
    13. 刘伟，刘永胜，孙振川，赵海雷，王利明，白彦磊. 基于线性回归的大漂石地层盾构掘进参数研究. 铁道建筑技术. 2024(11): 183-186+191 .
    14. 孙海力，闵锐，吴天华，吴恩启. 盾构机盾尾间隙检测技术研究. 农业装备与车辆工程. 2023(01): 99-102 .
    15. 王康，陶云超，王建秀，牛得草，焦雷. 基于数量化理论的盾构选型影响因素评价模型与应用. 绍兴文理学院学报(自然科学). 2023(01): 22-27 .
    16. 刘四进，王宇博，方勇，熊英健，马浴阳. 基于Bi-LSTM-ARIMA的超大直径泥水平衡盾构油脂消耗量预测模型. 隧道建设(中英文). 2023(03): 408-416 .
    17. 邵咪咪. 绍兴文化词汇英译方法探究——基于来华留学生文化认同的视角. 绍兴文理学院学报(人文社会科学). 2023(02): 24-29 .
    18. 石晓阳，郭子琦，夏明，黄志，徐毅勇，张志强. 复合地层土压平衡盾构刀盘掘进参数. 科学技术与工程. 2023(09): 3956-3965 .
    19. 孙峻枫，陈凡，宋天田，毋晨，方勇，王士民. 基于神经网络的双模盾构复合地层掘进参数预测模型. 铁道标准设计. 2023(05): 100-108 .
    20. 宋天田，马杲宇，姚超凡，王士民，康潇月. 深圳地铁岩质地层双模盾构卡机原因及对策研究. 铁道标准设计. 2023(06): 131-139 .
    21. 杨泰华，李林锋，龚建伍. 复合地层EPB/TBM双模盾构掘进参数变化规律及相关性分析. 施工技术(中英文). 2023(13): 72-78+137 .
    22. 刘国强，张斌，朱汉标，王树英. 盾构掘进参数特征及其与渣土状态关联性研究. 施工技术(中英文). 2023(19): 71-77+102 .
    23. 徐峰. 复合地层泥水土压双模盾构模式合理转换点位置研究. 铁道建筑技术. 2023(10): 33-38 .
    24. 刘伟，罗鸿，罗怀钱. 一种EPB&TBM双模盾构机刀盘结构设计及有限元分析. 中国设备工程. 2022(04): 145-148 .
    25. 宋天田，刘川昆，陈凡，徐一帆，王士民，何川. 地铁区间隧道盾构/TBM双模选型适应性研究. 铁道工程学报. 2022(01): 107-113 .
    26. 张永义，罗伟庭，陈泽，刘浩，李刚，于广明. 硬岩段双模盾构TBM-EPB施工优越性分析. 山东理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 38-44 .
    27. 丁文其 ，丁浩 ，门燕青 ，马非 ，马少坤 ，王士民 ，王万平 ，王帅帅 ，王圣涛 ，王亚琼 ，王传武 ，王树英 ，王剑宏 ，王智佼 ，毛锦波 ，方勇 ，邓涛 ，叶飞 ，申志军 ，田方正 ，付艳斌 ，冯冀蒙 ，吕勇刚 ，任锐 ，刘大刚 ，刘帅 ，刘永胜 ，刘学增 ，闫治国 ，孙文昊 ，孙纬宇 ，阳军生 ，李亚隆 ，李科 ，李然 ，李鹏飞 ，杨华 ，何伟 ，闵凡路 ，汪成兵 ，汪波 ，宋天田 ，张冬梅 ，张成平 ，张杨 ，张国柱 ，张俊儒 ，张亮亮 ，张高乐 ，张稳军 ，陈文尹 ，陈建忠 ，陈枰良 ，陈健 ，林志 ，罗彦斌 ，竺维彬 ，金大龙 ，周熙俊 ，郑余朝 ，官林星 ，房倩 ，封坤 ，赵清碧 ，胡斌 ，柳献 ，禹海涛 ，钟祖良 ，贺维国 ，耿萍 ，晏启祥 ，徐平 ，凌同华 ，高攀 ，郭卫社 ，黄阜 ，黄俊 ，黄清飞 ，曹校勇 ，龚彦峰 ，龚琛杰 ，梁庆国 ，董飞 ，韩兴博 ，傅金阳 ，曾艳华 ，管晓明 ，潘勇. 中国交通隧道工程学术研究综述·2022. 中国公路学报. 2022(04): 1-40 .
    28. 马文帅. 在线式土压平衡-单护盾TBM双模盾构模式转换技术. 建筑技术开发. 2022(07): 67-71 .
    29. 陈凡，何川，黄钟晖，孟庆军，刘川昆，王士民. 地铁区间隧道多模式掘进设备选型适应性研究. 现代隧道技术. 2022(03): 53-62 .
    30. 吴成勇. 盾构实时监控系统在常州地铁建设中的应用. 江苏建筑. 2022(03): 80-83+113 .
    31. 周玲芳. 预制装配式地铁车站施工技术与造价控制. 现代城市轨道交通. 2022(07): 55-59 .
    32. 刘富勤，刘颖，孔凡辉. 基于BP神经网络的盾尾油脂消耗预测模型. 湖北工业大学学报. 2022(05): 84-88+109 .
    33. 郑恒良. 小半径曲线隧道盾构始发方式对轴线偏移的影响规律. 水利水电技术(中英文). 2022(09): 123-131 .
    34. 张慧鹏，张康健，夏明，张志强，钟广. 中强风化泥质粉砂岩复合地层盾构掘进参数控制. 地下空间与工程学报. 2022(06): 2016-2026 .
    35. 朱叶艇，翟一欣，闵锐，吴文斐，秦元. 盾构推拼同步顶力重分配分区数量试验比选. 地下空间与工程学报. 2022(S2): 702-713+736 .
    36. 贾科，宋天田，孙前伟，王平豪，娄永录，杨军伍. 复杂地层EPB/TBM双模式盾构掘进性能分析. 隧道建设(中英文). 2022(S2): 479-486 .
    37. 叶蕾. 气垫式泥水/土压双模式盾构选型及快速换模研究. 建筑机械化. 2021(03): 34-40 .
    38. 王春国. 复合地层全断面硬岩隧道掘进机下穿立交桥研究. 山东大学学报(工学版). 2021(03): 45-51 .
    39. 喻畅英，钟志全. 土压平衡/单护盾TBM双模盾构模式转换施工技术探析. 隧道建设(中英文). 2021(S1): 464-469 .
    40. 毋晨，林金华，冯德威，黄明峰，赖泉昌. 复合地层EPB/TBM双模盾构风险分析及针对性设计. 工程技术研究. 2021(23): 17-19 .
    41. 朱向飞，罗伟庭，陈泽，刘浩，李刚，李冉，于广明. 双模盾构TBM转EPB模式转换位置的合理性研究. 建筑结构. 2021(S2): 1734-1740 .
    42. 陈凡，黄钟晖，何川，孟庆军，赖孝辉，刘川昆，王士民. 圆砾-泥岩复合地层土压/泥水双模盾构合理模式转换点选取. 土木工程学报. 2021(S1): 48-57 .
    43. 李建平，汤恺. 盾构正穿灰岩区上软下硬层高速涵洞桩基加固技术. 隧道建设(中英文). 2021(S2): 533-541 .

    Other cited types(15)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (368) PDF downloads (170) Cited by(58)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return