• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
YAO Jun-kai, YE Yang-sheng, WANG Peng-cheng, CHEN Feng, CAI De-gou. Subgrade heave of sulfate attacking on cement-stabilized filler[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(4): 782-788. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201904024
Citation: YAO Jun-kai, YE Yang-sheng, WANG Peng-cheng, CHEN Feng, CAI De-gou. Subgrade heave of sulfate attacking on cement-stabilized filler[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(4): 782-788. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201904024

Subgrade heave of sulfate attacking on cement-stabilized filler

More Information
  • Received Date: May 01, 2018
  • Published Date: April 24, 2019
  • A high-speed railway subgrade which experiences a continuous and severe heave after construction is investigated through the delamination deformation monitoring, expansive tests and XRD tests. Sulfate attacking on cement-stabilized filler is the main reason of subgrade heave, and the reaction conditions and the development process of sulfate attacking expansion are analyzed based on the mechanism of crystal growth and chemical reaction. The results show that the cement-stabilized filler where the ettringite and thaumasite are identified has obvious swelling deformation, and the subgrade heave relates to the crystal formation of ettringite and thaumasite caused by sulfate attacking on cement-stabilized filler. The relatively humid alkaline environment and existence of sulfate minerals in cement stabilized filler are the necessary condition for such sulfate attacking expansion. The sulfate attacking on cement-stabilized filler exhibits a long-term persistent heave characteristic, and typical expansion of this type may develop for several years to create a critical and dangerous situation.
  • [1]
    SHERWOOD P T.Effect of sulfates on cement and lime treated soils[J]. Hwy Res Board Bull, 1962, 353.
    [2]
    ROLLINGS M P, ROLLINGS R S.Geotechnical materials in construction[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
    [3]
    MICHAEL J M, LASZLO J C, ANISHA S.Fly ash influences on sulfate heave in lime-stabilized soils[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 2012, 165: 147-157.
    [4]
    ALONSO PÉREZ DE, EDUARDO R T A. Massive sulfate attack to cement-treated railway embankments[J]. Géotechnique, 2013, 63(10): 857-870.
    [5]
    CHEN D H, HARRIS P, SCULLION T.Forensic investigation of a sulfate-heaved project in texas[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2005, 19(4): 324-330.
    [6]
    DURAN D R.Case study: heave potential associated with ettringite formation in lime treated materials for an aurora, Colorado, roadway[C]// Biennial Geotechnical Seminar. Denver, 2010.
    [7]
    ADAMS A G, DUKES O M, TABET W, et al.Sulfate induced heave in oklahoma soils due to lime stabilization[J]. Geocongress: Characterization, Monitoring, and, Modeling of Geosystems, 2008, 179: 444-451.
    [8]
    薛君玕. 钙矾石相的形成、稳定和膨胀记钙矾石学术讨论会[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 1983(6): 247-251.
    (XUE Jun-gan.Ettringite formation, stability and expansion-ettringite Symposium[J]. Journal of The Chinese Ceramic Society, 1983(6): 247-251. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    席耀忠. 二次钙矾石形成和膨胀混凝土的耐久性[J]. 混凝土的水泥制品, 2003(2): 5-9.
    (XI Yao-zhong.The formation of SEF and expansive concrete durability[J]. China Concrete And Cement Products, 2003(2): 5-9. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    韩宇栋, 张君, 高原. 混凝土抗硫酸盐侵蚀研究评述[J]. 混凝土, 2011(1): 52-61.
    (HAN Yu-dong, ZHANG Jun, GAO Yuan.Review of sulfate attack on concrete[J]. Concrete, 2011(1): 52-61. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    孟庆业. 水泥基胶凝材料中碳硫硅钙石的形成研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2014.
    (MENG Qing-ye.Investigation on thaumasite formation in cementitious materials[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2014. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    BARNETT S J, MACPHEE D E, LACHOWSKI E E.XRD, EDX and IR analysis of solid solutions between thaumasite and ettringite[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2002, 32(5): 719-730.
    [13]
    LITTLE D N, NAIR S, HERBERT B.Addressing sulfate-induced heave in lime treated soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(1): 110-118.
    [14]
    HUNTER D.Lime-induced heave in sulphate-bearing clay soils[J]. Geotech Engng, ASCE 1988, 114: 150-167.
    [15]
    MOHAMED A M O. The role of clay minerals in marly soils on its stability[J]. Engng Geol, 2000, 57: 193-203.
    [16]
    BENSTED J.Thaumasite: direct, woodfordite and other possible formation routes[J]. Cem Concr Compos, 2003, 25(8): 873-877.
    [17]
    TALLURI N, PUPPALA A J, CHITTOORI B C S. Calcium- based stabiliser treatment of sulfate-bearing soils[J]. Proceedings of the ICE-Ground Improvement, 2014, 167(3): 162-172.
    [18]
    MITCHELL J K, DERMATAS D.Clay soil heave caused by lime-sulfate reactions[J]. Innovations & Uses for Lime Astm Stp, 1992(1135): 24.
    [19]
    邓德华, 刘赞群, GEERT DE S, 等. 关于“混凝土硫酸盐结晶破坏”理论的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2012, 40(2): 175-185.
    (DENG De-hua, LIU Zan-qun, GEERT DE S, et al.Research progress on theory of “sulfate salt weathering on concrete”[J]. Journal of The Chinese Ceramic Society, 2012, 40(2): 175-185. (in Chinese))
    [20]
    LITTLE D N, NAIR S.Sensitivity of selected Colorado soils to form ettringite/thaumasite when treated with calcium- based stabilizer sand when soluble sulfates are available[J]. Transportation-Research, 2007, 193(6): 51-59.
    [21]
    PUPPALA A J, INTHARASOMBAT N, VEMPATI R K.Experimental studies on ettringite-induced heaving in soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(3): 325-337.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(18)

    1. 姚怡宁,宗桦,周璐,李荷,冯旭环. 川西大渡河干热河谷优势灌草植物根系特征及固土能力. 生态学报. 2025(06): 2798-2810 .
    2. 王铁行,赵翊豪,金鑫. 喷射秸秆加筋黄土的强度特性研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2024(03): 800-811 .
    3. 陈婧逸,陈晓清,宋东日,吕明,蒋豪. 灌木根系形态对土体强度影响的大型直剪试验研究. 长江科学院院报. 2024(08): 120-127+163 .
    4. 程虎,李蒙,杨劭,张乃畅,李厚峰. 水陆交错带护坡植物固土抗蚀能力比较分析. 中国水土保持科学(中英文). 2024(03): 56-63 .
    5. 谭瑞琪,谢亚军,李欣然,姜宝莹,张桂荣. 植被防护岸坡加筋机理研究. 中国水运. 2023(06): 71-74 .
    6. 陈飞,谢蕴忠,王俊峰,张仕彬. 基于数值模拟方法的根系护坡研究进展. 科学技术与工程. 2023(16): 6728-6738 .
    7. 梅红,马柯,刘瑾,王禄艺,冯玉晗,齐梦瑶,胡梦园. 生态型稳定剂协同植物根系固土特性及机理研究. 水利水电科技进展. 2023(04): 52-58 .
    8. 蒋冬卫. 不同地区沿海港口物流业发展现状评价分析. 中国水运. 2023(11): 74-76 .
    9. 杜技能,王中珏,段继琪,王忠良,段青松. 生态护坡理论及技术研究现状综述. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2023(06): 211-220 .
    10. 徐华,袁海莉,王歆宇,王栋,陈建勋,荣才权. 根系形态和层次结构对根土复合体力学特性影响研究. 岩土工程学报. 2022(05): 926-935 . 本站查看
    11. 杨家庆,鲁明星,吴冠辰,袁雪涛,李富平,许永利,李小光. 矿山边坡植被修复研究现状及发展趋势分析. 矿山测量. 2022(01): 83-87 .
    12. 穆奎,潘伟良,王利彬,李婷,陈雅雯,丁奠元. 生态河道植物护坡工程技术研究现状与展望. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2022(03): 206-216 .
    13. 毕银丽,罗睿,王双明. 接菌对紫花苜蓿根系抗拉性及根菌复合土体抗剪强度影响. 煤炭学报. 2022(06): 2182-2192 .
    14. 黄琛,张友谊,叶小兵. 基于SEEP/W的强震区根系土坡面物源失稳机制分析. 科技通报. 2022(07): 57-66+72 .
    15. 李杰. 河道整治中根系植被特征对岸坡改良土影响试验研究. 水利技术监督. 2022(10): 129-132+177 .
    16. 梅红,胡国长,王禄艺,梅绪哲,刘瑾,徐佳俊,杨欣雅,杨诺. 边坡植被固土抗冲刷特性及其护坡机理研究. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 86-91 .
    17. 姜彤,李龙飞,薛雷,黄坤,丁昊,王昊宇. 乔木护坡效果物理模型试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2022(35): 15546-15553 .
    18. 陈飞,施康,钱乾,罗特. 根土复合体材料的抗剪强度特性研究进展. 有色金属科学与工程. 2021(06): 96-104 .

    Other cited types(20)

Catalog

    Article views (328) PDF downloads (161) Cited by(38)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return