Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 40 Issue 5
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
YUAN Xiao-ming, QIN Zhi-guang, LIU Hui-da, CAO Zhen-zhong, XU Hong-xuan. Necessary trigger conditions of liquefaction for gravelly soil layers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(5): 777-785. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201805001
Citation: YUAN Xiao-ming, QIN Zhi-guang, LIU Hui-da, CAO Zhen-zhong, XU Hong-xuan. Necessary trigger conditions of liquefaction for gravelly soil layers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(5): 777-785. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201805001
shu

Necessary trigger conditions of liquefaction for gravelly soil layers

  • 1. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Environment Protection & Safety in Foundation Engineering of Transportation;
    3. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China

More Information
  • Revised Date: February 20, 2017
  • Published Date: May 24, 2018
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The liquefaction of the natural gravelly soils is a new problem beyond the existing awareness and codes, and the trigger conditions of liquefaction are critical. It is the most reliable to extract the relevant knowledge from field investigation of earthquake damages. In view of the world's largest scale of gravelly soil liquefaction in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, using the post-earthquake field investigation data from the meizoseismal area in the Wenchuan earthquake and the historical documents on liquefaction of gravelly soils in the world, the necessary trigger conditions for liquefaction of gravelly soils and the relevant characteristic parameters are studied. The analytical results indicate: (1) The minimum ground shaking of 0.15g is essential to trigger liquefaction of natural gravelly soils, yet the liquefaction of massive gravelly soils requires 0.20g to 0.40g of ground shaking intensity; (2) The most natural gravelly soil layers are very loose. Even though the gravelly soils can be compacted with the increasing ground shaking, the compacted gravelly soils are still slightly dense. (3) The gravel contents of the liquefied soils can reach 85% and even larger in reality, and they do not decrease with the decreasing seismic intensity; (4) The layers of gravelly soils with high shear wave velocity can be liquefied. The shear wave velocities dividing different compactions for sands and gravels are different, and the liquefaction evaluation methods for sand cannot be applied in gravelly soils. (5) The existence of a cap of overburden low- permeability and a non-liquefiable layer with minimum 0.5 m in thickness is a necessary condition for possibility of liquefaction of gravelly soils, which can be defined as the cap effect. (6) The gap for drainage between the underground water table and the overburden cohesive layer cannot be large, which is another necessary condition for possible occurrence of liquefaction of gravelly soils, and the thickness should be less than 2.0 m, which can be defined as the gap effect. (7) Different from liquefaction evaluation of sandy soils, the buried conditions of layers of gravelly soils must be considered in liquefaction evaluation, otherwise the liquefaction possibility of sites is easily misjudged.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (25)
  • [1]
    陈龙伟, 袁晓铭, 孙 锐. 2011年新西兰Mw6.3地震液化及岩土震害评述[J]. 世界地震工程, 2013, 29(3): 1-9. (CHEN Long-wei, YUAN Xiao-ming, SUN Rui. Review of liquefaction phenomena and geotechnical damage in the 2011 New Zealand Mw6.3 earthquake[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 29(3): 1-9. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    李兆焱, 袁晓铭. 2016年台湾高雄地震场地效应及砂土液化破坏概述[J]. 世界地震工程, 2016, 32(3): 1-7. (LI Zhao-yan, YUAN Xiao-ming. Seismic damage summarize of site effect and soil liquefaction in 2016 Kaohsiung earthquake[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 32(3): 1-7. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    谢定义. 土动力学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011. (XIE Ding-yi. Soil dynamics[M]. Beijing: China Higher Education Press, 2011. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    KOESTER P J, DANIEL C, ANDERSON M. In situ investigation of liquefied gravels at Seward, Alaska[J]. Innovations and Applications in Geotechnical Site Characterization, 2000, GSP 97: 33-48.
    [5]
    LIN P, CHANG C, CHANG W. Characterization of liquefaction resistance in gravelly soil: large hammer penetration test and shear wave velocity approach[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2004(24): 675-687.
    [6]
    WONG R T, SEED H B, CHAN C K. Liquefaction of gravelly soils under cyclic loading conditions[R]. Report No. UCB/EERC-74/11. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 1974.
    [7]
    王昆耀, 常亚屏, 陈 宁. 饱和砂砾料液化特性的试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2000(2): 37-41. (WANG Kun-yao, CHANG Ya-ping, CHEN Ning. Experimental study on liquefaction characteristics of saturated sandy gravel[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2000(2): 37-41. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    王志华, 周恩全, 吕 丛, 等. 基于流动性的饱和砂砾土液化机理[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(10): 1816-1822. (WANG Zhi-hua, ZHOU En-quan, LÜ Cong, et al. Liquefaction mechanism of saturated gravelly soils based on flowing property[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(10): 1816-1822. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    陈国兴, 孙 田, 王炳辉, 等. 循环荷载作用下饱和砂砾土的破坏机理与动强度[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(12): 2140-2147. (CHEN Guo-xing, SUN Tian, WANG Bing-hui, et al. Undrained cyclic failure mechanism and resistance of saturated sand-gravel mixtures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(12): 2140-2147. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    康 飞, 彭 涛, 杨秀萍. 基于剪切波速与神经网络的砂砾土地震液化判别[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2014, 31(1): 110-116. (KANG Fei, PENG Tao, YANG Xiu-ping. Gravel soil liquefaction evaluation using artificial neural networks with shear wave velocity[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 31(1): 110-116. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    EVANS D M, SEED H B. Undrained cyclic triaxial testing of gravels-the effect of membrane compliance[R]. Report No. UCB/EERC-87/08. Berkeley: University of California, 1987.
    [12]
    EVANS D M, ZHOU Sheng-ping. Liquefaction behavior of sand-gravel composites[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 121(3): 287-298.
    [13]
    袁晓铭, 曹振中. 砂砾层液化判别的基本方法及计算公式,岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(4): 509-519. (YUAN Xiao-ming, CAO Zhen-zhong. Fundamental method and calculational formula for evaluation of gravel soils liquefaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(4): 509-519. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    曹振中, 袁晓铭. 砂砾层液化的剪切波速判别方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(5): 943-951. (CAO Zhen-zhong, YUAN Xiao-ming. Shear waves velocity-based approach for evaluation gravel soils liquefaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(5): 943-951. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    曹振中, 袁晓铭. 砾性土液化原理与判别技术——以汶川8.0级地震为背景[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015. (CAO Zhen-zhong, YUAN Xiao-ming. Principle and evaluation technique of gravelly soils liquefaction[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    地球科学大词典编委会. 地球科学大词典[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2005. (Earth Science Dictionary Committee. Earth science dictionary[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2005. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    汪云龙, 袁晓铭, 陈龙伟. 基于弯曲元技术的无黏性土剪切波速与相对密度联合测试方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(增刊1): 3418-3423. (WANG Yun-long, YUAN Xiao-ming, CHEN Long-wei. A measurement method for the relationship between shear wave velocity and relative density of cohesionless soils using Bender Elements technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(S1): 3418-3423. (in Chinese))
    [18]
    中国科学院工程力学研究所. 海城地震震害[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 1979. (Institute of Engineering Mechanics. The Haicheng earthquake damages[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1979. (in Chinese))
    [19]
    刘令瑶, 李桂芬, 丙东屏. 密云水库白河主坝保护层地震破坏及砂料振动液化特性[M]// 水利水电科学研究院论文集第8集（岩土工程）. 北京: 水利出版社, 1982: 46-54. (LIU Ling-yao, LI Gui-fen, BING Dong-ping. Earthquake damage of Baihe Dam and liquefaction characteristics of sand and gravel materials[M]// Volume 8 Collected Papers of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research. Beijing: China Waterpower Press, 1982: 46-54. (in Chinese))
    [20]
    汪闻韶, 常亚屏, 左秀泓. 饱和砂砾料在振动和往返加荷下的液化特性[M]// 水利水电科学研究院论文集第23集. 北京: 水利出版社, 1986: 195-203. (WANG Wen-shao, CHANG Ya-ping, ZUO Xiu-hong. Liquefaction characteristics of saturated sand-gravels under vibration and cyclic loading[M]// Volume 23 Collected Papers of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing: China Waterpower Press, 1986: 195-203. (in Chinese))
    [21]
    SIROVICH L. Repetitive liquefaction at a gravelly site and liquefaction in overconsolidated sands[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(4): 23-34.
    [22]
    YOUD T L, HARP E L, KEEFER D K, et al. The borah peak, idaho earthquake of October 28, 1983 Liquefaction[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1985, 2(1): 71-89.
    [23]
    YEGIAN M K, GHAHRAMAN V G, HARUTIUNYAN R N. Liquefaction and embankment failure case histories, 1988 Armenia Earthquake[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(3): 581-596.
    [24]
    KOKUSHO T, TANAKA Y, KAWAI T, et al. Case study of rock debris avalanche gravel liquefaction during 1993 Hokkaido-Nansei-Oki earthquake[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1995, 35(3): 83-95.
    [25]
    HATANAKA M, UCHIDA A, OHARA J. Liquefaction characteristics of a gravelly fill liquefied during the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1997, 37(3): 107-115.
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(43)

    1. 罗桂桃. 降雨-蒸发作用下膨胀土边坡渗流稳定性分析. 煤炭技术. 2025(02): 130-134 .
    2. 蒋水华，元志镕，刘贤，黄劲松，周创兵. 考虑过渡层多层空间变异性的边坡降雨入渗模型及稳定性分析应用. 岩土工程学报. 2025(02): 255-264 . 本站查看
    3. 元志镕，蒋水华，常志璐，向晖，刘玉伟，黄劲松. 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析. 岩土力学. 2025(03): 1001-1012 .
    4. 沈才华，王业钊，蒋新宇，蔡丹丹，于瀚森. 空间变异性蠕变地层中综合管廊变形安全可靠度预测. 武汉大学学报(工学版). 2024(03): 302-310 .
    5. 苏文煊，陈焕美，程谞. 开挖降雨作用下边坡抗滑桩主动加固离心模型试验研究. 交通科技. 2024(02): 32-37 .
    6. 柳伟，徐长节，胡世韬，朱怀龙. 降雨和库水位升降条件下考虑非饱和渗透系数空间变异的边坡可靠度分析. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2024(03): 61-72 .
    7. 蒋水华，刘贤，黄劲松，周创兵. 多层非均质边坡降雨入渗分析的改进Green-Ampt模型. 岩土工程学报. 2024(06): 1177-1186 . 本站查看
    8. 王勤，阎龙，张海莹，刘利骄，柳艳杰. 基于随机场理论的隧道开挖后地表及隧道变形分析. 人民长江. 2024(07): 229-239+253 .
    9. 姚腾飞，徐跃冰，韩函，王璨. 降雨条件下湖南省红层地区浅层土坡失稳机理研究. 钻探工程. 2024(04): 101-110 .
    10. 田华明，李典庆. 勘察数据变化条件下空间变异土坡稳定可靠度协同更新方法. 岩土工程学报. 2024(08): 1613-1621 . 本站查看
    11. 徐杰，李湛. 非饱和土瞬态渗流无限边坡稳定性研究. 低温建筑技术. 2024(06): 87-90 .
    12. 周家文，陈明亮，瞿靖昆，胡宇翔，夏茂圃，蒋楠，李海波，范刚. 水库滑坡灾害致灾机理及防控技术研究与展望. 工程科学与技术. 2023(01): 110-128 .
    13. 王长虹，杜昊东，柳伟，宗振邦，胡世韬. 考虑非饱和渗透系数随机场统计特征的库岸老滑坡稳定性分析. 岩土工程学报. 2023(02): 327-335+443 . 本站查看
    14. 关晓迪，姚夷凡. 基于不同降雨强度的黄土边坡降雨入渗特性研究. 人民珠江. 2023(02): 105-114 .
    15. 付智勇，李典庆，王顺，杜文琪. 基于多时空滑坡编录和TrAdaBoost迁移学习的滑坡易发性评价. 地球科学. 2023(05): 1935-1947 .
    16. 刘贤，揭鸿鹄，蒋水华，黎学优，黄劲松. 融合历史降雨下斜坡稳定性观测信息的可靠度分析. 地球科学. 2023(05): 1865-1874 .
    17. 何敏，耿海东，范立鹏，王艳芳. 改性粉土路堤稳定性影响因素敏感性分析. 市政技术. 2023(06): 20-25 .
    18. 袁心安，温树杰，孙自立，宋亮亮. 非饱和红砂岩风化土土水特征及降雨对其边坡稳定性的影响. 有色金属科学与工程. 2023(03): 363-371 .
    19. 张华宾，张顷顷，王来贵. 露天矿边坡饱和渗透系数随机场数值模型研究. 计算力学学报. 2023(03): 432-439 .
    20. 董港波，鲁敏. 广西北部地区1979～2018年降雨多尺度时空分布特征探究. 吉林水利. 2023(10): 46-51 .
    21. 王绪. 降雨对基覆边坡稳定性的影响研究. 陕西水利. 2023(10): 121-123+126 .
    22. 凌晓梅，张丽，滕新保，胡峰华. 仪征市棕黄色粉质黏土滑坡机制分析. 黑龙江科技大学学报. 2023(05): 724-730 .
    23. 刘晓，葛聪. 降雨对半填半挖路基边坡稳定性的影响分析. 湖南交通科技. 2023(04): 36-41 .
    24. 张晋彰，黄宏伟，张东明，方国光，唐冲. 考虑参数空间变异性的隧道结构变形分析简化方法. 岩土工程学报. 2022(01): 134-143+205-206 . 本站查看
    25. 赵天彪，袁茂莲. 某高速公路高路堤边坡稳定性分析及设计优化研究. 公路. 2022(01): 74-78 .
    26. 吴顺川，贺鹏彬，程海勇，王广和，张小强，张中信. 非煤露天矿山岩质边坡稳定性评价标准探讨. 工程科学学报. 2022(05): 876-885 .
    27. 秦晓同，崔凯，青于蓝. 水热耦合作用下季节冻土边坡降雨入渗规律及入渗机理. 中国公路学报. 2022(04): 87-98 .
    28. 廖文旺，姬建，张童，吴志军，张洁. 考虑降雨入渗参数空间变异性的浅层滑坡时效风险分析. 岩土力学. 2022(S1): 623-632 .
    29. 蒋水华，刘贤，黄发明，黄劲松，张婉彤. 融合观测信息的降雨诱发斜坡失稳机理及可靠度分析. 岩土工程学报. 2022(08): 1367-1375 . 本站查看
    30. 姚云琦，曾润强，马建花，孟祥沛，王鸿，张宗林，孟兴民. 考虑优势流作用的降雨入渗边坡可靠度分析. 岩土力学. 2022(08): 2305-2316 .
    31. 丘永富. 新疆蒙库铁矿露天采场南帮边坡稳定性分析及控制. 现代矿业. 2022(09): 237-240 .
    32. 谭建民，伍寒浪，王世梅，李高. 强降雨作用下花岗岩全风化土坡致灾现场模型试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2022(28): 12307-12314 .
    33. 王威，杨文豪，杨成忠，吴宇健，郑明新. 铁路路基翻浆冒泥的参数敏感性及不确定性分析. 铁道学报. 2022(12): 105-113 .
    34. 何国顺，刘飞，张健，吕平，王延磊. 抗剪强度参数不确定性对库水及降雨作用下边坡可靠度的影响研究. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(04): 37-43 .
    35. 高明辉，张雅贤，王奇智，赵建青，孙超，周记名，张娜娜. 基于上限定理的含裂缝边坡稳定性图表分析方法. 科学技术与工程. 2021(16): 6830-6837 .
    36. 姬建，王乐沛，廖文旺，张卫杰，朱德胜，高玉峰. 基于WUS概率密度权重法的边坡稳定系统可靠度分析. 岩土工程学报. 2021(08): 1492-1501 . 本站查看
    37. 凌建明，张玉，满立，李想. 公路边坡智能化监测体系研究进展. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(07): 2118-2136 .
    38. 孙吉书，邱博超，肖田. 降雨作用下路堤边坡水毁机理及影响因素分析. 河北科技大学学报. 2021(04): 415-423 .
    39. 谢梦龙，叶新宇，张升，盛岱超. LASSO算法及其在边坡稳定性分析中的应用. 岩土工程学报. 2021(09): 1724-1729 . 本站查看
    40. 黄剑斌，许旭堂，徐祥，鲜振兴，刘道奇. 降雨条件下多级残积土坡渗流稳定性研究. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2021(05): 150-156+161 .
    41. 闫强，廉向东，凌建明. 边坡开挖支护时序有限元分析. 交通运输工程学报. 2020(03): 61-71 .
    42. 陈想，段翔. 水合物对海底边坡稳定性的影响. 武汉轻工大学学报. 2020(05): 52-59 .
    43. 年庚乾，陈忠辉，张凌凡，包敏，周子涵. 边坡降雨入渗问题中两种边界条件的处理及应用. 岩土力学. 2020(12): 4105-4115 .

    Other cited types(39)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(82)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return