Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 39 Issue 11
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
ZHU Cheng-wei, YING Hong-wei, GONG Xiao-nan. Analytical solutions for seepage fields of underwater tunnels with arbitrary burial depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 1984-1991. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201711005
Citation: ZHU Cheng-wei, YING Hong-wei, GONG Xiao-nan. Analytical solutions for seepage fields of underwater tunnels with arbitrary burial depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 1984-1991. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201711005
shu

Analytical solutions for seepage fields of underwater tunnels with arbitrary burial depth

  • 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    2. MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    3. Engineering Research Center of Urban Underground Development Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310058, China

More Information
  • Received Date: August 14, 2016
  • Published Date: November 24, 2017
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • A summary about the analytical solutions in the literatures for the seepage fields of underwater tunnels is given, whose advantages and disadvantages are pointed out. Based on the governing equation for the steady-state seepage, the analytical solutions for the seepage fields of underwater tunnels are derived rigorously using the conformal mapping method. The water inflow and water pressure distribution for the grouted lined underwater tunnel with arbitrary burial depth can be obtained according to the new solutions. The analytical solutions can be degenerated to two limit cases including the unlined underwater tunnel and the underwater pipeline. A numerical model is established using the software Comsol to validate the newly derived solutions. The effects of the burial depth of tunnel, the permeability of lining and the thickness of lining on the water inflow, the pore water pressure around the lining and the distribution of the total water head are investigated. It is found that the maximum water pressure appears at the top of the lining when the tunnel is buried shallowly, which is opposite for the case with a large burial depth. The average pore pressure and the non-uniform degree of distribution of the pore water pressure around the lining decrease first then increase as the burial depth increases gradually. And for a given working condition, there is a burial depth or thickness of lining, which can make the pore water pressure around the lining distributed uniformly.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (23)
  • [1]
    COLI M, PINZANI A. Tunnelling and hydrogeological issues: a short review of the current state of the art[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(3): 839-851.
    [2]
    NILSEN B. Characteristics of water ingress in Norwegian subsea tunnels[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(3): 933-945.
    [3]
    LEE I M, NAM S W. The study of seepage forces acting on the tunnel lining and tunnel face in shallow tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(1): 31-40.
    [4]
    ARJNOI P, JEONG J H, KIM C Y, et al. Effect of drainage conditions on porewater pressure distributions and lining stresses in drained tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(4): 376-389.
    [5]
    CAO Y, JIANG J, XIE K H, et al. Analytical solutions for nonlinear consolidation of soft soil around a shield tunnel with idealized sealing linings[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 61: 144-152.
    [6]
    BOUVARD M, PINTO N. Aménagement Caprivari-Cahoeira étude en charge[J]. La Houille Blanche, 1969(7): 747-760.
    [7]
    SCHLEISS A J. Design of pervious pressure tunnels[J]. Water Power and Dam Construction, 1986, 38(5): 21-26.
    [8]
    FERNANDEZ G, ALVAREZ J T A. Seepage-induced effective stresses and water pressures around pressure tunnels[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(1): 108-128.
    [9]
    LEI S. An analytical solution for steady flow into a ttonnel[J]. Groundwater, 1999, 37(1): 23-26.
    [10]
    HARR M E. Groundwater and seepage[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
    [11]
    应宏伟, 朱成伟, 龚晓南. 考虑注浆圈作用水下隧道渗流场解析解[J]. 浙江大学学报（工学版）, 2016, 50(6): 1018-1023. (YING Hong-wei, ZHU Cheng-wei, GONG Xiao-nan. Analytical solution on seepage field of underwater tunnel considering grouting circle[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) 2016, 50(6): 1018-1023. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    JOO E J, SHIN J H. Relationship between water pressure and inflow rate in underwater tunnels and buried pipes[J]. Géotechnique, 2014, 64(3): 226.
    [13]
    王建宇. 再谈隧道衬砌水压力 [J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003, 40(3): 5-9. (WANG Jian-yu. Once more on hydraulic pressure upon lining[J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2003, 40(3): 5-9. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    王秀英, 王梦恕, 张 弥. 计算隧道排水量及衬砌外水压力的一种简化方法[J]. 北方交通大学学报, 2004, 28(1): 8-10. (WANG Xiu-ying, WANG Meng-shu, ZHANG Mi. A simple method to calculate tunnel discharge and external water pressure on lining[J]. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 2004, 28(1): 8-10. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    EL TANI M. Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2003, 18(1): 49-55.
    [16]
    KOLYMBAS D, WAGNER P. Groundwater ingress to tunnels-the exact analytical solution[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2007, 22(1): 23-27.
    [17]
    HUANGFU M, WANG M S, TAN Z S, et al. Analytical solutions for steady seepage into an underwater circular tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2010, 25(4): 391-396.
    [18]
    PARK K H, OWATSIRIWONG A, LEE J G. Analytical solution for steady-state groundwater inflow into a drained circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer: a revisit[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(2): 206-209.
    [19]
    李鹏飞, 张顶立, 赵 勇, 等. 海底隧道复合衬砌水压力分布规律及合理注浆加固圈参数研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(2): 280-288. (LI Peng-fei, ZHANG Ding-li, ZHAO Yong, et al. Study of distribution law of water pressure acting on composite lining and reasonable parameters of grouting circle for subsea tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(2): 280-288. (in Chinese))
    [20]
    杜朝伟, 王梦恕, 谭忠盛. 水下隧道渗流场解析解及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(增刊2): 3567-3573. (DU Chao-wei, WANG Meng-shu, TAN Zhong-sheng. Analytic solution for seepage field of subsea tunnel and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(S2): 3567-3573. (in Chinese))
    [21]
    VERRUIJT A. Complex variable solutions of elastic tunneling problems[R]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 1996.
    [22]
    陈俊儒, 王星华. 海底隧道涌水量的预测及其应用研究[J].现代隧道技术, 2008, 45(5): 18-27. (CHEN Jun-ru, WANG Xing-hua. Prediction and research on water inflow for a subsea tunnel[J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2008, 45(5): 18-27. (in Chinese))
    [23]
    王育奎, 徐帮树, 李树才, 等. 海底隧道涌水量模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(9): 1477-1482. (WANG Yu-kui, XU Bang-shu, LI Shu-cai, et al. Laboratory method tests on water flow rate of submarine tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(9): 1477-1482. (in Chinese))
    本期广告索引
    24 封2 北京理正软件股份有限公司
    25 封3 重庆地质仪器厂
    26 封4 南瑞集团水利水电技术分公司
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHOU Xin, SHENG Jian-long, YE Zu-yang, LUO Wang, HUANG Shi-bing, CHENG Ai-ping. Effects of geometrical feature on Forchheimer-flow behavior through rough-walled rock fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(11): 2075-2083. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202111014
    [2]CHEN Zi-yu, LI Guo-ying, WEI Kuang-min, WU Li-qiang, ZHU Yu-meng. Ultimate state and probability of particle breakage for rockfill materials based on fractal theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(7): 1192-1200. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202107003
    [3]ZHU Sheng. Gradation equation and compaction characteristics of continuously distributed coarse-grained soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(10): 1899-1906. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201910014
    [4]ZHU Sheng, ZHONG Chun-xin, WANG Jing, HE Shun-bin. Experimental study on filling standard of high rockfill dams with soil core[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(3): 561-566. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201903019
    [5]TAO Gao-liang, CHEN Yin, YUAN Bo, GAN Shi-chao, WU Xiao-kang, ZHU Xue-liang. Predicting soil-water retention curve based on NMR technology and fractal theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(8): 1466-1472. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201808012
    [6]ZHU Sheng, ZHONG Chun-xin, ZHENG Xi-lei, GAO Zhuang-pin, ZHAN Zhen-gang. Filling standards and gradation optimization of rockfill materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(1): 108-115. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201801010
    [7]ZHU Sheng, DENG Shi-de, NING Zhi-yuan, WANG Jing. Gradation design method for rockfill materials based on fractal theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(6): 1151-1155. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201706023
    [8]WANG Sheng-fu, YANG Ping, LIU Guan-rong, FAN Wen-hu. Micro pore change and fractal characteristics of artificial freeze thaw soft clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(7): 1254-1261. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201607012
    [9]ZHANG Tao, CAI Guo-jun, LIU Song-yu. Settlement prediction of soft ground based on Weibull model[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk2): 212-216.
    [10]LIU Shu-Xin, LIU Chang-wu, HAN Xiao-Gang, CAO Lei. Weibull distribution parameters of rock strength based on multi-fractal characteristics of rock damage[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(11): 1786-1791.
    • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 王鹏伟，樊恒辉，任冠洲，谢非含，张星宇，霍江茹. 碳酸酐酶对仿岩溶碳酸氢钙生成速率的影响及其作用机理. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2025(01): 118-124+199 .
    2. 郭弘东，樊恒辉，文纪翔，郭昊炜，鞠鹏，武智鹏. 仿岩溶碳酸氢钙对酸性环境的响应及改性分散土的研究. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报(中英文). 2025(02): 163-172+183 .
    3. 刘彬，杨伟，王宁远，文军，何建新，杨武. 某心墙坝土料分散性判别与石灰改性土的性能规律分析. 人民黄河. 2024(02): 147-151+162 .
    4. 蔡东廷，周详朋，郭弘东，樊恒辉. 不同碳酸钙钙源对CFPK加固风积沙的影响. 人民黄河. 2024(03): 103-108 .
    5. 周娉婷. 福建某农村公路路基分散性土改性处理力学特性试验研究. 交通世界. 2024(13): 16-18 .
    6. 吕鑫江，郑文杰，王琳，吴艾芳，薛中飞. 泾阳黄土分散性综合判别方法与机理研究. 水力发电学报. 2023(03): 92-102 .
    7. 王宇，李兆宇，苏安双，于沭，庄广志. 胶结土改性分散性土冻融特性与微观机理研究. 黑龙江大学工程学报. 2023(01): 83-91 .
    8. 周详朋，任冠洲，蔡东廷，樊恒辉，孟敏强，杨秀娟. 晶核剂对CFPK改良碳酸盐渍土影响的试验研究. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2023(02): 88-94 .
    9. 刘翼飞，布泽凡，蔡东廷，樊恒辉，张卓，茹含，巨娟丽. Si/Ca复合体系改性分散土的崩解特性及作用机制研究. 岩土力学. 2023(05): 1341-1352 .
    10. 蔡东廷，樊恒辉，李星瑶，郭弘东，任冠洲，李玉根，赵常智. 仿岩溶碳酸氢钙加固风积沙的试验研究. 水资源与水工程学报. 2023(04): 191-198 .
    11. 苑晓青，吴泽炬，王清，陈慧娥，林森，牛岑岑，徐鑫. 冻融循环对钙剂改良土体分散性效果的影响. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2023(06): 1812-1825 .
    12. 李曼铎，王梨娜，杨海华. 钙、铝离子滤层结构对分散性土的改性试验研究. 水利建设与管理. 2023(12): 33-37 .
    13. 张晓飞，陈新炜，严涛，张文伟，李守义. 基于裂缝冲刷试验的分散性土自愈性研究. 水资源与水工程学报. 2022(06): 167-173+181 .

    Other cited types(17)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(30)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return