大直径盾构隧道拼装过程管片力学响应研究

封坤; 徐凯; 彭祖昭; 周子扬; 何川; 肖明清

doi:10.11779/CJGE201912009

大直径盾构隧道拼装过程管片力学响应研究 English Version

1. 西南交通大学交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,四川成都 610031;
2. 广州市市政工程设计研究总院有限公司,广东广州 510030;
3. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北武汉 430071

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0802202）; 国家自然科学基金项目（51878569,51578462）

详细信息

作者简介:
封坤(1983— ),男,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: windfeng813@163.com。

中图分类号: TU431
计量
- 文章访问数: 280
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 174
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-06-16
- 发布日期: 2019-12-24

Mechanical response of large-diameter shield tunnels during assembly

1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China;
2. Guangzhou Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute, Guangzhou 510030, China;
3. China Railway SIYUAN Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430071, China

摘要

摘要: 通过对拼装阶段管片衬砌进行荷载分析,建立了管片拼装阶段的有限差分模型,结合佛莞城际铁路狮子洋盾构隧道全断面岩层段的现场实测数据深入研究了管片拼装过程的环向内力响应规律,结果表明：①拼装过程中管片轴力实测值以受压为主,但在拼装初期存在局部受拉的情况,而计算值均为受压状态,弯矩实测值和计算值呈现出明显的正弯趋势;②拼装成环后管片轴力、正弯矩及负弯矩实测最大值分别约为计算值的1.5,1.28和1.36倍;③拼装过程引起管片弯矩的响应较轴力更为敏感;④相邻块拼装对管片轴力和弯矩的影响最显著,其次是F块插入,其他拼装步的影响较小,且距相邻块和F块越近的截面,其内力响应越大;⑤拼装成环后,管片轴力和弯矩计算值与实测值大致沿封顶块径向中轴线对称分布,计算值空间分布的对称性比实测值明显;⑥拼装过程中管片轴力实测最大值达到正常使用阶段梁-弹簧模型计算最大值的43.5%,而最大正弯矩、负弯矩则达到正常使用阶段的188.89%,447.84%,表明全断面岩层段管片拼装过程引起的内力响应显著、管片处于弯矩大而轴力小的不利受力状态,设计和施工应予以重视。
- 盾构隧道 /
- 拼装过程 /
- 力学响应 /
- 现场测试
Abstract: Based on loading analysis of shield tunnel segments during the assembly phase, a finite difference model is established for segmental lining structure in assembly stage. The mechanical response of segments during assembling is analyzed regarding the in-situ test results of Shiziyang Intercity Railway Tunnel Project from Foshan to Dongguan. The results show that: (1) The measured values of axial force of segment monitoring section are mainly under compression during assembling process, but in the initial stage of assembling, the local tension exists and the calculated values are under compression. The measured and calculated values of bending moment show obvious positive bending trends. (2) The maximum measured values of axial force, positive bending moment and negative bending moment of segments after the ring is formed are about 1.5 times, 1.28 times and 1.36 times the calculated values, respectively. (3) The response of segment bending moment is more sensitive to assembly process than that of axial force. (4) The adjacent block assembly has the most significant effects on the axial force and bending moment of the segment, and the effects of F block insertion are subordinate. Other assembly steps have less influences, and the closer to the adjacent block and F block, the greater the internal force response. (5) The calculated and measured values of segment axial force and bending moment are approximately symmetrical along the radial central axis of the capping block after assembly, and the symmetry of the calculated values is more obvious than the measured values in the assembly process. (6) During the assembling process, the maximum measured axial force reaches 43.5% of the maximum calculated value of the beam-spring model in the serviceability limit stage, however, the maximum positive and negative bending moments reach 188.89% and 447.84%. It is indicated that the internal force response during assembling process is at a higher level during construction, which makes the segment often in a disadvantageous condition of large bending moment and small axial force when tunneling in full-face rocks. It is rational to pay more attention in design and construction.
- shield tunnel /
- assembly process /
- mechanical response /
- in-situ test

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	LIAO S M, FAN Y Y, SHI Z H, et al.Optimization study on the reconstruction and expansion of an underground rail transit center in Shanghai soft ground[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 38: 435-446.
[2]	LIAO S M, PENG F L, SHEN S L.Analysis of shearing effect on tunnel induced by load transfer along longitudinal direction[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(4): 421-430.
[3]	LIAO S M, LIU J H, WANG R L, et al.Shield tunneling and environment protection in Shanghai soft ground[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009(24): 454-465.
[4]	SUGIMOTO M, ARAMOON A.Theoretical model of shield behavior during excavation: I Theory[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2002, 128(2): 138-155.
[5]	SRAMOON A, SUGIMOTO M, KAYUKAWA K.Theoretical model of shield behavior during excavation: II Application[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2002, 128(2): 156-165.
[6]	吴鸣泉. 钢纤维砼盾构管片在地铁隧道工程的应用研究[J]. 广东建材, 2004(3): 6-8. (WU Ming-quan.Study on the application of steel fiber reinforced concrete shield tube in subway tunnel engineering[J]. GuangDong Building Materials, 2004(3): 6-8. (in Chinese))
[7]	廖少明, 徐进, 焦齐柱. 盾构法隧道管片拼装过程中的衬砌内力解析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2013, 46(3): 127-135. (LIAO Shao-ming, XU Jin, JIAO Qi-zhu.Mechanical behaviors of tunnel lining during segment assembly[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(3): 127-135. (in Chinese))
[8]	廖少明, 门燕青, 张迪, 等. 钱江隧道管片拼装过程中的力学行为实测分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(1): 156-164. (LIAO Shao-ming, MEN Yan-qing, ZHANG Di, et al.In-situ tests on mechanical behaviors during assembly of segmental linings of Qianjiang tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(1): 156-164. (in Chinese))
[9]	BLOM C B M, VAN DER Horst E J, JOVANOVIC P S. Three-dimensional structural analyses of the shield-driven “Green Heart” tunnel of the high-speed line south[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1999, 14(2): 217-224.
[10]	ISHIMURA K, MASHIMO H, ISHIMURA T.How to evaluate the section force at the time of assembling of the segment[J]. Study of Tunnel Engineering, 2003, 13(1): 395-400.
[11]	SUGIMOTO M.Causes of shield segment damages during construction[C]// International Symposium on Underground Excavation and Tunnelling. Thailand, 2006: 67-74.
[12]	MO H H, CHEN J S.Study on inner force and dislocation of segments caused by shield machine attitude[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(3): 281-291.
[13]	陈俊生, 莫海鸿, 梁仲元. 盾构隧道施工阶段管片局部开裂原因初探[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(5): 906-910. (CHEN Jun-sheng, MO Hai-hong, LIANG Zhong-yuan.Study on local cracking of segments in shield tunnel during construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(5): 906-910. (in Chinese))
[14]	CHEN J S, MO H H.Numerical study on crack problems in segments of shield tunnel using finite element method[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(1): 91-102.
[15]	CAVALARO S H P, BLOM C B M, WALRAVEN J C, et al. Structural analysis of contact deficiencies in segmented lining S.H[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(6): 734-749.
[16]	CAVALARO S H P, BLOM C B M, AGUADO A, et al. New design method for the production tolerances of concrete tunnel segments[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2012, 26: 824-834.
[17]	徐进. 盾构隧道管片拼装力学机理分析[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2013. (XU Jin.Mechanical behaviors of tunnel linning induced by segments assembly[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2013. (in Chinese))
[18]	ERDEA奥立维拉, 陈玉田. 有限元和有限差分的区别与相似之点[J]. 华水科技情报, 1985(4): 91-98. (E R DE A, CHEN Yu-tian. Differences and similarities between finite element method and finite difference method[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 1985(4): 91-98. (in Chinese))
[19]	Itasca Consulting Group.Fast Lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 Dimensions[M]. Minneapolis: Itasca Consulting Group, 2005.
[20]	郭瑞, 何川, 苏宗贤, 等. 盾构隧道管片接头抗剪力学性能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2011, 48(4): 72-77. (GUO Rui, HE Chuan, SU Zong-xian, et al.Study of shearing mechanical properties of segment joints of shield tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2011, 48(4): 72-77. (in Chinese))
[21]	赵武胜, 陈卫忠, 杨帆. 盾构隧道管片混凝土接触面力学性能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2015, 52(3): 119-126. (ZHAO Wu-sheng, CHEN Wei-zhong, YANG Fan.Study of the interface mechanical properties of concrete segments in shield tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2015, 52(3): 119-126. (in Chinese))