• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
张文杰, 金典, 郭兴璋, 李西斌. 碱激发高炉矿渣固化/稳定化Cr(VI)污染土试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230991
引用本文: 张文杰, 金典, 郭兴璋, 李西斌. 碱激发高炉矿渣固化/稳定化Cr(VI)污染土试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230991
Experimental study on solidification/stabilization of Cr(VI) contaminated soil by alkali-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230991
Citation: Experimental study on solidification/stabilization of Cr(VI) contaminated soil by alkali-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230991

碱激发高炉矿渣固化/稳定化Cr(VI)污染土试验研究

Experimental study on solidification/stabilization of Cr(VI) contaminated soil by alkali-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag

  • 摘要: 碱激发高炉矿渣(GGBFS)替代水泥用于污染土固化处置,具有能耗低、碳排放少的特点,但在铬(Cr)污染土固化/稳定化中的应用较少,处理效果和相关机理尚不明确。利用GGBFS的还原能力和碱激发后水化产物的胶凝能力,对总Cr含量2000 mg/kg(其中Cr(VI)1210 mg/kg)的污染土进行固化/稳定化,并与PC固化处理进行对比。通过浸出毒性、固定效率和无侧限抗压强度分析处理效果,并借助pH、还原效率、化学形态、矿物成分和微观图像分析揭示了相关机理。结果表明,GGBFS固化污染土的Cr浸出浓度明显低于PC固化土,GGBFS掺量20%时,养护龄期28 d的固化土中总Cr和Cr(VI)浸出浓度分别降至2.12和1.09 mg/L,满足填埋场进场浓度限值要求,且GGBFS固化污染土的强度明显高于PC固化土;还原效率分析表明,GGBFS中的S2-可以有效地将Cr(VI)还原成Cr(III),还原效率可达96.0%,从而很大程度上避免了Cr(VI)对水化过程的抑制作用,对该Cr(VI)含量的污染土使用GGBFS进行固化/稳定化时不需额外添加还原剂;微观分析表明,与PC相比,GGBFS固化后更多不稳定态的Cr转化成稳定形态,Cr的迁移性显著降低,同时生成了更多水化凝胶,土颗粒胶结程度更高,因此具有更好的封固效果和更高强度。该研究为GGBFS固化/稳定化Cr(VI)污染土提供了科学依据。

     

    Abstract: Alkali-excited ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) can be used in solidification of contaminated soil as an alternative to cement, and is low energy consumption and low carbon emission. However, application of GGBFS in solidification/stabilization of chromium(Cr)-contaminated soil has attracted less attention and the curing effect and mechanism are still unclear. Based on the reduction capacity of GGBFS and the gelling ability after alkali excitation, solidification/stabilization of soil with Cr content of 2000 mg/kg (including 1210 mg/kg Cr(VI) ) is carried out. The results are compared with those of PC. Leaching toxicity, immobilization efficiency and unconfined compressive strength analyses are performed to study the treatment effects. The pH, reduction efficiency, chemical morphology, mineral composition and microscope images are analyzed to investigate the related mechanism. The results show that the leached Cr concentration after treated by GGBFS was significantly lower than that of PC. At a GGBFS dosage of 20% and a curing period of 28 d, the leached total Cr and Cr(VI) decrease to 2.12 and 1.09 mg/L, which meet the regulation limit for landfill disposal. The strength of GGBFS treated soil is obviously higher than that of PC. Valence states analysis shows that S2- in GGBFS can effectively reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) with a reduction efficiency as high as 96.0%, which avoid the inhibition of Cr(VI) to the hydration process. Additional reduction agent is not needed when treating such (Cr)-contaminated soil with GGBFS. After the GGBFS treatment, more unstable Cr is transformed to stable forms and the Cr mobility is significantly reduced. Also, more hydrated gels are generated for cementation of soil particles, resulting in better sealing effect and higher strength. This study provides a scientific basis for the stabilized/solidified of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil using GGBFS.

     

/

返回文章
返回