Shear creep behaviors of sliding-zone soil of bedding landslide in Jurassic stratum in Three Gorges Reservoir area
-
摘要: 滑带土的蠕变行为对滑坡的预测预报和长期稳定性分析具有重要作用。选取三峡库区侏罗系典型顺层滑坡—万州兴福寺滑坡为研究实例,针对滑带土重塑样,先进行三轴压缩试验测定其峰值及残余抗剪强度指标,然后开展不同法向应力和不同含水率下滑带土试样的剪切蠕变试验。试验结果表明：①兴福寺滑坡滑带土在初始破坏之前经历瞬时蠕变和衰减蠕变阶段,并最终稳定在低速率的等速蠕变阶段。②法向应力越大,滑带土剪切蠕变速率和变形量越小,各级法向应力下蠕变破坏时的剪应变均小于5%。③含水率对滑带土剪切蠕变速率的影响不甚明显。含水率低于塑限时滑带土剪切蠕变模量最大。随着剪切蠕变的进行,低含水率和饱和试样的剪切蠕变模量均在短时间内急剧降低并分别稳定在某一稳定值,而含水率略高于塑限的试样则呈缓慢降低趋势。与此相反的是含水率接近液限的试样呈缓慢增大趋势。④滑带土长期黏聚力为峰值和残余黏聚力的70%和15.0倍,长期内摩擦角为峰值和残余内摩擦角的69%,70%,各强度指标均受滑带土细颗粒含量的影响。Abstract: The creep behaviors of sliding-zone soil play an important role in landslide prediction and long-term stability analysis. The Xingfusi landslide, which is the typical bedding landslide occurring in Jurassic stratum in Wanzhou area, is selected as the study case. The peak and residual shear strength indexes are determined by the triaxial compression tests on the remolding samples firstly, and then the shear creep behaviors of the sliding-zone soil samples are explored by the shear creep tests under different normal stresses and water contents. The results show that: (1) The sliding-zone soil of Xingfusi landslide exhibits the transition from instantaneous creep to attenuation one, and finally keeps a constant creep with a low strain rate before the initial failure. (2) The normal stress shows a negative effect on the strain rate and creep deformation. The shear creep strain at each normal stress is less than 5% before the initial failure. (3) The influence of water content on the strain rate of sliding-zone soil in shear creep is not obvious. The sliding-zone soil has the greatest shear creep modulus when the water content is lower than the plastic limit. As the shear creep proceeds, the shear creep modulis of the samples with low water content or saturated water content have a sharp decrease in short time and then keep a stable value, while the shear creep modulus of the sample with the water content slightly higher than the plastic limit decreases slowly. On the contrary, the shear creep modulus of the sample with water content close to the liquid limit showes a trend of slow increase. (4) The long-term cohesion of sliding-zone soil is 0.70 and 15.0 times the peak and residual cohesions, respectively, and the long-term internal friction angle is 69% and 70% of the peak and residual internal friction angles, respectively. All of the shear strength indexes are affected by the content of fine particles.
-
[1] 李守定, 李晓, 张年学, 等. 三峡库区侏罗系易滑地层沉积特征及其对岩石物理力学性质的影响[J]. 工程地质学报, 2004, 12(4): 385-389.
(LI Shou-ding, LI Xiao, ZHANG Nian-xue, et al.Sedimentation characteristics of the Jurassic sliding-prone stratum in the Three Gorges Reservoir area and their influence on physical and mechanical properties of rock[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2004, 12(4): 385-389. (in Chinese))[2] 殷坤龙, 吴益平. 三峡库区一个特殊古滑坡的综合研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 1998, 9(增刊): 200-206.
(YIN Kun-long, WU Yi-ping.Systematic researches of one special paleo-landslide in the Three-Gorges Reservoir[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 1998, 9(S0): 200-206. (in Chinese))[3] JIAN W, WANG Z, YIN K.Mechanism of the Anlesi landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J]. Engineering Geology, 2009, 108(1): 86-95. [4] 黄润秋. 20世纪以来中国的大型滑坡及其发生机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(3): 433-454.
(HUANG Run-qiu.Large-scale landslides and their sliding mechanisms in China since the 20th century[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(3): 433-454. (in Chinese))[5] 廖秋林, 李晓, 李守定, 等. 三峡库区千将坪滑坡的发生、地质地貌特征、成因及滑坡判据研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(17): 3146-3153.
(LIAO Qiu-lin, LI Xiao, LI Shou-ding.Occurrence, geology and geomorphy characteristics and origin of Qianjiangping landslide in Three Gorges Reservoir area and study on ancient landslide criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(17): 3146-3153. (in Chinese))[6] TERZAGHI K.Mechanism of landslides[M]// PAIGE S, ed. Application of Geology to Engineering Practice (Berkey Volume) New York. Geological Society of America, 1950: 83-123. [7] 龙建辉, 郭文斌, 李萍, 等. 黄土滑坡滑带土的蠕变特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010,32(7): 1023-1028.
(LONG Jian-hui, GUO Wen-bin, LI Ping, et al.Creep property of soil in sliding zone of loess landslide[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(7): 1023-1028. (in Chinese))[8] BHAT D R, BHANDARY N P, YATABE R.Residual-state creep behavior of typical clayey soils[J]. Natural Hazards, 2013, 69(3): 2161-2178. [9] MAIO D C, SCARINGI G, VASSALLO R.Residual strength and creep behaviour on the slip surface of specimens of a landslide in marine origin clay shales: influence of pore fluid composition[J]. Landslides, 2015, 12(4): 657-667. [10] WEN B P, JIANG X Z.Effect of gravel content on creep behavior of clayey soil at residual state: implication for its role in slow-moving landslides[J]. Landslides, 2017, 14(2): 559-576. [11] 刘清秉, 王顺, 夏冬生, 等. 残余强度状态下原状滑带土蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(5): 1305-1313.
(LIU Qing-bing, WANG Shun, XIA Dong-sheng, et al.Experimental study of residual-state creep behavior of intact sliding-zone soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(5): 1305-1313. (in Chinese))[12] 赖小玲, 叶为民, 王世梅. 滑坡滑带土非饱和蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(2): 286-293.
(LAI Xiao-ling, YE Wei-min, WANG Shi-mei, et al.Experimental study on unsaturated creep characteristics of landslide soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 38(5): 1305-1313. (in Chinese))[13] 李连崇, 李少华, 李宏. 基于岩石长期强度特征的岩质边坡时效变形过程分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(1): 47-56.
(LI Lian-chong, LI Shao-hua, LI Hong.Time- dependent deformation of rock slopes based on long-term strength characteristics of rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(1): 47-56. (in Chinese))[14] 孙淼军, 唐辉明, 王潇弘, 等. 蠕动型滑坡滑带土蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(2): 385-391.
(SUN Miao-jun, TANG Hui-ming, WANG Xiao-hong, et al.Creep properties of sliding-zone soil from a creeping landslide[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(2): 385-391. (in Chinese))[15] SINGH A, MITCHELL J K.General stress-strain-time function for soils[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics & Foundations Division, 1969, 95: 406-415. [16] SKEMPTON A W.Residual strength of clays in landslides, folded strata and the laboratory[J]. Géotechnique, 1985, 35(1): 3-18. [17] 简文星, 杨金. 三峡库区黄土坡滑坡I号崩滑体成因[J]. 地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 2013, 38(3): 625-631.
(JIAN Wen-xing, YANG Jin.Formation mechanism of No.1 part slide of Huangtupo landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2013, 38(3): 625-631. (in Chinese))[18] MITCHELL J K, SOGA K.Fundamentals of soil behavior, 3rd edition[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2005. [19] 蒋秀姿, 文宝萍. 缓慢复活型滑坡滑带土的蠕变性质与特征强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(2): 495-501, 549.(JIANG Xiu-zi, WEN Bao-ping. Creep behavior of slip zone of reactivated slow-moving landslide and its characteristic strength[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(2): 495-501, 549. (in Chinese)) -
期刊类型引用(18)
1. 王力，孙文铎，王世梅，胡秋芬，陈玙珊，南芳芸. 库水作用下滑坡土体渗流与蠕变耦合试验研究. 长江科学院院报. 2024(02): 128-134 . 
百度学术
2. 杜毅，晏鄂川，蔡静森，高旭，柳万里. 折线型复合式滑坡渐进破坏稳定性状态的力学判别. 岩土工程学报. 2023(06): 1151-1161 . 本站查看
3. 毛正君，张瑾鸽，仲佳鑫，王军. 基于确定性系数法的梯田型黄土滑坡隐患影响因素分析. 水土保持通报. 2023(02): 183-192+340 . 百度学术
4. 王禹，冯霄，杜娟，刘洋，李东，柴波. 建设区顺层岩质滑坡地质力学演化模型:以万州铁峰乡麦地坪滑坡为例. 地质科技通报. 2023(05): 43-51 . 百度学术
5. 杨志斌. 基于蠕变试验下高边坡稳定性模拟研究. 西安科技大学学报. 2023(05): 988-999 . 百度学术
6. 吴爽爽，胡新丽，孙少锐，魏继红. 间歇式滑坡变形力学机制与单体预警案例研究. 岩土力学. 2023(S1): 593-602 . 百度学术
7. 祝艳波，刘振谦，李文杰，苗帅升，李红飞，兰恒星. 黄土-三趾马红土滑坡滑带土的长期强度影响因素研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2022(02): 148-156 . 百度学术
8. 周洪福，张卓婷，韦玉婷. 基于滑体自重效应的滑带土强度参数取值方法. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2022(05): 1045-1053 . 百度学术
9. 张帅，贺拿，钟卫，杨波. 基于综合监测的滑坡变形特征的分析. 工业建筑. 2022(02): 90-95 . 百度学术
10. 赵立财. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变特性试验研究. 长江科学院院报. 2021(02): 67-72+79 . 百度学术
11. 朱赛楠，殷跃平，王猛，朱茂，王晨辉，王文沛，李俊峰，赵慧. 金沙江结合带高位远程滑坡失稳机理及减灾对策研究——以金沙江色拉滑坡为例. 岩土工程学报. 2021(04): 688-697 . 本站查看
12. 潘永亮，简文星，杨光辉，张海艳，张树坡，李林均. 水压力作用下三峡库区侏罗系软岩损伤演化特性研究. 工程地质学报. 2021(03): 693-701 . 百度学术
13. 陈茂，张家明，龙郧铠. 黏性土剪切蠕变特性研究进展. 工业安全与环保. 2021(07): 15-21 . 百度学术
14. 任三绍，张永双，徐能雄，吴瑞安. 含砾滑带土残余强度与剪切面粗糙度的细观响应机制. 岩土工程学报. 2021(08): 1473-1482 . 本站查看
15. 王体俊，王大群. 某滑坡滑体土蠕变特性及长期强度研究. 路基工程. 2021(05): 70-74 . 百度学术
16. 钟年凤，穆成林，魏莹莹，王鑫雨，漆琦，王余丹. 岩溶区薄层滑带土物质组成及力学性质弱化特征探究. 四川建筑. 2021(06): 149-151 . 百度学术
17. 王怡卓，关容章，伍勇. 溪洛渡电站对外交通辅助道路何家坪滑坡监测及应急措施. 科学技术创新. 2020(11): 106-107 . 百度学术
18. 肖华杰，胡鹏，曾彩云，贾逸，魏建柄. 非饱和土蠕变力学特性试验及分段模拟. 科学技术与工程. 2020(22): 9133-9139 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(23)
计量
- 文章访问数: 315
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 240
- 被引次数: 41
下载:
