• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

宁波浅层软土小应变硬化土模型参数试验研究

沈丹祎, 陈赟, 罗敏敏, 黄家晟

沈丹祎, 陈赟, 罗敏敏, 黄家晟. 宁波浅层软土小应变硬化土模型参数试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(S1): 114-118. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S10016
引用本文: 沈丹祎, 陈赟, 罗敏敏, 黄家晟. 宁波浅层软土小应变硬化土模型参数试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(S1): 114-118. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S10016
SHEN Danyi, CHEN Yun, LUO Minmin, HUANG Jiasheng. Experimental research on parameter selection of HSS model for Ningbo shallow soft soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S1): 114-118. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S10016
Citation: SHEN Danyi, CHEN Yun, LUO Minmin, HUANG Jiasheng. Experimental research on parameter selection of HSS model for Ningbo shallow soft soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S1): 114-118. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S10016

宁波浅层软土小应变硬化土模型参数试验研究  English Version

基金项目: 

浙江省建设科研项目 2021K103

详细信息
    作者简介:

    沈丹祎(1991—),女,博士,工程师,主要从事岩土工程及地质灾害研究。E-mail:shendanyi1107@163.com

    通讯作者:

    罗敏敏, E-mail: zjluominmin@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TU43

Experimental research on parameter selection of HSS model for Ningbo shallow soft soil

  • 摘要: 小应变硬化土模型(HSS模型)因能考虑土体小应变特性,所得数值模拟结果通常更接近于实测值,因此在数值分析中得到广泛应用。目前,关于软土HSS模型参数的研究,主要集中在上海地区,其它地区的研究成果较少。通过室内试验方法对宁波地区的浅层软土进行HSS模型参数的取值研究,并与现有文献的统计成果进行对比,结果表明:大部分HSS模型参数的试验值处在统计范围之内,说明宁波浅层软土与其它地区的软土有其共通性;个别参数的试验值不在统计范围之内,说明宁波浅层软土亦有其地区差异性。
    Abstract: The small strain hardening soil model (HSS model) is widely used in numerical analysis because it can consider the small strain characteristics of soil, and the numerical simulation results are usually closer to the measured values. At present, the researches on the HSS model parameters of soft soil are mainly concentrated in Shanghai, and the research results in other areas are less. The HSS model parameters of shallow soft soil in Ningbo area are studied through indoor tests, and compared with the statistical results of the existing literatures. The results show that most of the HSS model parameters are within the statistical range, indicating that the Ningbo shallow soft soil has its commonness with that in other areas. The test values of some parameters are not within the statistical range, indicating that the Ningbo shallow soft soil also has its regional differences.
  • 图  1   标准固结试验竖向荷载与竖向应变关系图

    Figure  1.   Relationship between load and strain of consolidation tests

    图  2   三轴固结排水剪切试验应力应变关系曲线

    Figure  2.   Strain-stress curves of triaxial CD tests

    图  3   ε1/q-ε1关系曲线

    Figure  3.   ε1/q-ε1 curves of each soil layer

    图  4   三轴固结排水加卸载剪切试验应力应变关系曲线

    Figure  4.   Strain-stress curves of triaxial CD loading-unloading- reloading tests

    图  5   动剪切模量与剪应变的关系曲线

    Figure  5.   Curves of dynamic shear modulus and strain

    图  6   归一化剪切模量衰减曲线

    Figure  6.   Normalized shear modulus reduction curve

    表  1   部分HSS模型参数经验取值[12]

    Table  1   Empirical values of partial HSS model parameters

    参数 ψ K0 νur m
    经验取值 0 1-sinφ' 0.2 0.5~1.0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   基本物理性质参数

    Table  2   Basic physical property parameters

    取样地层 天然密度
    ρ/(g·cm-3)
    天然含水率
    w/%
    初始孔隙比
    e0
    ②-2 1.68 62.7 1.67
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   HSS模型参数及参考模量比例关系汇总

    Table  3   Summary of HSS model parameters and proportional relation of reference modulus

    土层编号 Eoedref/MPa E50ref/MPa Eurref/MPa Rf G0ref/MPa γ0.7/10-4 Eoedref/Es1-2 E50ref/ Eoedref Eurref/ Eoedref G0ref/Eurref
    ②-2 0.98 1.2 15.7 0.5 33.8 2.78 1.10 1.22 16.02 2.15
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    BENZ T. Small Strain Stiffness of Soils and Its Numerical Consequences[D]. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart, 2006.

    [2] 褚峰, 李永盛, 梁发云, 等. 土体小应变条件下紧邻地铁枢纽的超深基坑变形特性数值分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(增刊1): 3184-3192. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2010S1087.htm

    CHU Feng, LI Yongsheng, LIANG Fayun, et al. Numerical analysis of deformation of deep excavation adjacent to metro considering small-strain stiffness of soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(S1): 3184-3192. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2010S1087.htm

    [3] 邵羽, 江杰, 陈俊羽, 等. 基于HSS模型与MCC模型的深基坑降水开挖变形分析[J]. 水利学报, 2015, 46(增刊1): 231-235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB2015S1044.htm

    SHAO Yu, JIANG Jie, CHEN Junyu, et al. Deformation of deep foundation pits due to excavation and dewatering based on HSS model and Modified Cam-Clay Model[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015, 46(S1): 231-235. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB2015S1044.htm

    [4] 龚东庆, 郑渊仁. 硬化土体模型分析基坑挡土壁与地盘变形的评估[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(增刊2): 175-178. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2010S2044.htm

    KUNG GORDON Tungchin, JHENG Uenzen. Evaluation of analyzing excavation-induced wall deflection and ground movement using hardening soil models[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(S2): 175-178. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2010S2044.htm

    [5]

    LÜFTENEGGER R, SCHWEIGER H, SCHARINGER F. 3D finite element analysis of a deep excavation and comparison with in situ measurements[M]//Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.

    [6]

    SURARAK C, LIKITLERSUANG S, WANATOWSKI D, et al. Stiffness and strength parameters for hardening soil model of soft and stiff Bangkok clays[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2012, 52(4): 682-697. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2012.07.009

    [7] 刘畅. 考虑土体不同强度与变形参数及基坑支护空间影响的基坑支护变形与内力研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2008.

    LIU Chang. Analysis of Deformation and Stress Due to Deep Excavation Considering Different Deformation and Strength Parameters of Soil and Space Effect of Excavation and Retaining Structure[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2008. (in Chinese)

    [8] 叶跃鸿. 地下通道施工引起下卧地铁隧道上浮规律及控制措施研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2017.

    YE Yuehong. Influence of Construction of Open-Cut Tunnelling on Uplift Displacement of the Underneath Metro Tunnel and Its Control Measures[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2017. (in Chinese)

    [9] 夏云龙. 考虑小应变刚度的杭州黏土力学特性研究及工程应用[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2014.

    XIA Yunlong. Study of Mechanical Behavior of Hangzhou Clay Considering Small Strain Stiffness and Its Engineering Application[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2014. (in Chinese)

    [10] 顾晓强, 刘文倩, 陈玺元, 等. 广东阳江地区海洋软土HSS模型参数的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(增刊2): 41-44. doi: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2010

    GU Xiaoqiang, LIU Wenqian, CHEN Xiyuan, et al. Experimental study on HSS model parameters for marine soft soils in Yangjiang, Guangdong Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 41-44. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2010

    [11] 王卫东, 王浩然, 徐中华. 基坑开挖数值分析中土体硬化模型参数的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(8): 2283-2290. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201208010.htm

    WANG Weidong, WANG Haoran, XU Zhonghua. Experimental study of parameters of hardening soil model for numerical analysis of excavations of foundation pits[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(8): 2283-2290. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201208010.htm

    [12] 梁发云, 贾亚杰, 丁钰津, 等. 上海地区软土HSS模型参数的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(2): 269-278. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201702010

    LIANG Fayun, JIA Yajie, DING Yujin, et al. Experimental study on parameters of HSS model for soft soils in Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(2): 269-278. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201702010

    [13] 宗露丹, 徐中华, 翁其平, 等. 小应变本构模型在超深大基坑分析中的应用[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(增刊1): 231-242. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE2019S1035.htm

    ZONG Ludan, XU Zhonghua, WENG Qiping, et al. Application of small strain constitutive model in the analysis of a ultra large and deep excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(S1): 231-242. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE2019S1035.htm

    [14]

    HUANG X, SCHWEIGER H F, HUANG H W. Influence of deep excavations on nearby existing tunnels[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2013, 13(2): 170-180.

    [15] 顾晓强, 吴瑞拓, 梁发云, 等. 上海土体小应变硬化模型整套参数取值方法及工程验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 833-845. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202103026.htm

    GU Xiaoqiang, WU Ruituo, LIANG Fayun, et al. On HSS model parameters for Shanghai soils with engineering verification[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(3): 833-845. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202103026.htm

    [16] 林乔宇. 厦门花岗岩残积土HSS模型参数的研究及工程应用[D]. 泉州: 华侨大学, 2019.

    LIN Qiaoyu. Study and Engineering Application of HSS Model Parameters of Xiamen Granite Residual Soil[D]. Quanzhou: Huaqiao University, 2019. (in Chinese)

    [17] 陈赟, 罗敏敏, 夏能武, 等. 软土HSS模型参数现有试验成果统计分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(增刊2): 197-201. doi: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2047

    CHEN Yun, LUO Minmin, XIA Nengwu, et al. Statistical analysis of existing test results of HSS model parameters for soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 197-201. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2047

  • 期刊类型引用(11)

    1. 李大勇,吴沁儒,张雨坤. 吸力基础沉贯及拔出可视化模型实验系统研发及应用. 实验技术与管理. 2025(01): 59-65 . 百度学术
    2. 李大勇,黄凌昰,张雨坤,吴学震. 海上风电吸力基础在分层土中的沉贯特性研究综述. 海洋工程. 2023(01): 110-127 . 百度学术
    3. 范夏玲. 海上风电吸力桩基础破坏包络面理论研究. 能源与环境. 2023(06): 60-62+110 . 百度学术
    4. LI Da-yong,HOU Xin-yu,ZHANG Yu-kun,MA Shi-li,LI Shan-shan. Studies on Suction-Assisted Installation Behavior of Suction Caissons in Clay Under Various Undrained Shear Strengths. China Ocean Engineering. 2023(06): 989-999 . 必应学术
    5. 张雨坤,秦廷辉,李大勇,王冲冲. 分层土中裙式吸力基础吸力沉贯特性模型试验研究. 岩土力学. 2022(05): 1317-1325 . 百度学术
    6. 丁红岩,许云龙,张浦阳,乐丛欢. 复合筒型基础临界负压试验分析. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版). 2022(06): 603-610 . 百度学术
    7. 马士力,谢立全. 循环荷载下粉土中吸力基础承载特性试验研究. 同济大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(10): 1443-1450+1530 . 百度学术
    8. 李佳禧,张雨坤,李大勇. 砂土中裙式吸力基础注水拔出渗流规律数值模拟. 人民长江. 2022(11): 163-169 . 百度学术
    9. HUANG Ling-xia,ZHANG Yu-kun,LI Da-yong. Experimental Studies on Extraction of Modified Suction Caisson(MSC) in Sand by Reverse Pumping Water. China Ocean Engineering. 2021(02): 272-280 . 必应学术
    10. 秦源康,刘康,陈国明,张爱霞,朱敬宇,夏开朗. 海洋水合物地层导管吸力锚贯入安装负压窗口分析. 石油钻采工艺. 2021(06): 737-743 . 百度学术
    11. 李逸凡,李大勇,张雨坤,高玉峰. 吸力基础沉贯过程中桶-土界面力学机理研究进展. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2020(05): 828-840 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(8)

图(6)  /  表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  185
  • HTML全文浏览量:  42
  • PDF下载量:  63
  • 被引次数: 19
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-07-04
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-11-23
  • 刊出日期:  2023-10-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回