Gaussian process regression-based response surface method and reliability analysis of slopes
-
摘要: 提出了一种新型高斯过程响应面法(GPRSM),通过高斯过程回归算法构建随机变量与功能函数响应值之间的关系。该方法相较多项式响应面法对于功能函数为高维和高度非线性的可靠度问题,具有更高的精度和计算效率。此方法可以通过新增加训练点以动态更新响应面函数。与此同时,为了模拟岩土参数的空间变异性,通过KL展开构建随机场,并与极限平衡法结合进行边坡稳定性分析。使用提出的GPRSM构建替代模型并用于蒙特卡洛模拟求解边坡失稳概率,在保障计算精度的同时减少了对边坡稳定性分析程序的调用。最后将所提出的方法分别应用于功能函数为显式和隐式两个案例,并与其他论文中的方法对比,证明了该方法的有效性和适用性。Abstract: A novel Gaussian process response surface method (GPRSM) is proposed, in which the Gaussian process regression algorithm is used to construct the relationship between the random variables and the response value of the performance function. Compared with the polynomial-based response surface method, the proposed method has high accuracy and efficiency for the reliability analysis with high-dimensional and highly nonlinear performance functions. This method can update the response surface dynamically by adding new training points. Meanwhile, to consider the spatial variability of soil properties, the random field is constructed by KL expansion and combined with the limit equilibrium method to evaluate the stability of slopes. The proposed GPRSM is used to build the surrogate model and used in Monte Carlo simulation for the failure probability of slopes, which reduces the calls to the slope stability analysis program while ensuring the calculation accuracy. Finally, the proposed method is applied to two case studies with explicit and implicit performance functions, respectively. Compared with those of other methods in the published papers, the validity and capability of the proposed method are proved.
-
[1] PHOON K K.Role of reliability calculations in geotechnical design[J]. Georisk, 2017, 11(1): 4-21. [2] WONG F S.Slope reliability and response-surface method[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(1): 32-53. [3] ZHANG J, HUANG H W, PHOON K K.Application of the Kriging-based response surface method to the system reliability of soil slopes[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(4): 651-655. [4] 蒋水华, 魏博文, 黄劲松. 考虑参数空间变异性的失稳边坡参数概率反分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(3): 475-485.
(JIANG S H, WEI B W, HUANG J S.Probabilistic back analysis of slope failure considering spatial variability of soil properties[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(3): 475-485. (in Chinese))[5] LI D Q, ZHENG D, CAO Z J, et al.Response surface methods for slope reliability analysis: Review and comparison[J]. Engineering Geology, 2016, 203: 3-14. [6] ZHU B, PEI H F, YANG Q.Probability analysis of submarine landslides based on the Response Surface Method: a case study from the South China Sea[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2018, 78: 167-179. [7] ZHU B, PEI H F, YANG Q.Reliability analysis of submarine slope considering the spatial variability of the sediment strength using random fields[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2019, 86: 340-350. [8] BETZ W, PAPAIOANNOU I, STRAUB D.Numerical methods for the discretization of random fields by means of the Karhunen-Loève expansion[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 271: 109-129. [9] HOEK E.Practical rock engineering[EB/OL]. https://www.rocscience.com/assets/resources/learning/hoek/Practical-Rock-Engineering-Full-Text.pdf. [10] LOW B K.Reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated nonnormals[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(6): 922-935. [11] LOW B K.Roles of FORM, System-FORM, SORM, and RSM in geotechnical reliability analysis[C]// Proceedings of the 5th Asian-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and its Applications. Singapore, 2012: 265-270. [12] LI D Q, CHEN Y F, LU W B, et al.Stochastic response surface method for reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated non-normal variables[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(1): 58-68. [13] CHO S E.Probabilistic assessment of slope stability that considers the spatial variability of soil properties[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(7): 975-984. [14] LI D Q, JIANG S H, CAO Z J, et al.A multiple response-surface method for slope reliability analysis considering spatial variability of soil properties[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015, 187: 60-72. -
期刊类型引用(12)
1. 王文法，李智，楚泽元，肖克锋. 边坡可靠度理论分析方法研究综述. 四川建筑. 2024(02): 176-177 . 
百度学术
2. 赵文辉. 西延高铁黄土高边坡稳定性计算及强度反演分析. 地质与勘探. 2024(05): 1054-1065 . 百度学术
3. 唐冕，卿岑，宋旭明，刘卧. 新建下穿道路致高铁桥墩位移的时变响应面研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2024(12): 4861-4871 . 百度学术
4. 李火坤，柯贤勇，黄伟，刘双平，唐义员，方静. 基于GPR代理模型和GA-APSO混合优化算法的软基水闸底板脱空反演. 振动与冲击. 2023(14): 1-10+29 . 百度学术
5. 李业. 基于位移突变为判据的边坡响应面稳定性分析. 四川建材. 2023(08): 64-66+69 . 百度学术
6. 赵腾远，宋超，谌文武，郭志谦，许领. 基于k-means聚类与高斯过程分类的土遗址裂隙病害发育等级概率预测. 石窟与土遗址保护研究. 2023(04): 75-86 . 百度学术
7. 陈昌富，李伟，张嘉睿，廖佳卉，吕晓玺. 山区公路边坡工程智能分析与设计研究进展. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(07): 15-31 . 百度学术
8. 何成，唐辉明，申培武，苏雪雪. 应变软化边坡渐进破坏模式及稳定性可靠度. 地球科学. 2021(02): 697-707 . 百度学术
9. 唐启智，辛景舟，周建庭，付雷，周滨枫. 基于AR-GP模型的结构损伤识别方法. 振动与冲击. 2021(09): 102-109 . 百度学术
10. 臧浩，陈鹏，赵盾，董玉芬. 基于3DEC的岩质边坡安全系数影响因素敏感性研究. 山东国土资源. 2021(08): 71-77 . 百度学术
11. 王桂林，杨洋，孙帆，向林川. 边坡失效概率分布特性影响因素研究. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(04): 463-469+484 . 百度学术
12. 杨梅洁，刘俊. 基于多因素交互作用的地面激光回波强度精度分析. 上海工程技术大学学报. 2019(04): 317-322 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(20)
计量
- 文章访问数:
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量:
- 被引次数: 32
下载:
