基于承压含水层水力响应的溪洛渡水电工程区谷幅收缩变形预测研究

庄超; 周志芳; 李鸣威; 王锦国

doi:10.11779/CJGE201908011

基于承压含水层水力响应的溪洛渡水电工程区谷幅收缩变形预测研究 English Version

河海大学地球科学与工程学院,江苏南京 211100

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（91747204）; 中国三峡公司资助项目

详细信息

作者简介:
庄超(1990— ),男,博士,讲师,主要从事水文地质方面的科研工作。E-mail: zchao1990@hhu.edu.cn。

通讯作者:
周志芳，E-mail：zhouzf@hhu.edu.cn

中图分类号: TU413.6
计量
- 文章访问数: 0173
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0137
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-07-31
- 发布日期: 2019-08-24

Prediction of valley shrinkage deformation in Xiluodu Hydropower Plant based on the hydraulic responses of a confined aquifer

School of Earth Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China

摘要

摘要: 溪洛渡高拱坝位于一个向斜盆地内,区域水文地质的一个典型特征是盆地内下覆有一个完整延伸的阳新灰岩承压含水层。水库蓄水以来上下游库岸边坡发生了明显的谷幅收缩变形,主要是由于水库蓄水引起承压含水层孔隙水压力增加,从而引起灰岩地层因有效应力减小而产生膨胀,以及相对隔水层底板扬压力增加所引起的。基于承压含水层水力响应规律,建立了谷幅收缩变形反演及预测的解析模型,分别预测了在变形速率小于0.01,0.001 mm/d两个收敛准则下的谷幅收缩变形收敛时间以及收敛值。所建立的反演预测模型能够较好地重现谷幅收缩变形历时曲线,反映出谷幅收缩变形与库水位变化具有高度的相关性。模型预测结果显示,溪洛渡水电工程的谷幅收缩变形已趋于收敛。
- 谷幅收缩变形 /
- 承压含水层 /
- 水力响应 /
- 预测
Abstract: The Xiluodu high-arch dam is situated in a synclinal basin, and one of the typical hydrogeologic features is that there exists an intact and regionally extended confined aquifer consisting of Yangxin limestone buried beneath the riverbed. Remarkable valley shrinkage deformation has been detected on both the upstream and downstream of the dam since the impoundment. The valley shrinkage deformation is speculated to be due to the expansion, which is associated with the decrease in the effective stress of the Yangxin limestone formation and the increase in the hydraulic uplift pressure imposed on the bottom plane of the relatively impervious formation, which result from the increase in pore water pressure when responding to the change of the reservoir stage. Based on the patterns of hydrualic responses of the Yangxin confined aquifer, an analytical model is established to calibrate and predict the valley shrinkage deformation of each measuring line. Furthermore, the convergence time and values of each line are predicted under two prescribed convergence principles with the respect of deformation rate, i.e., less than 0.01 mm/d and 0.001 mm/d. Overall, the proposed analytical model yields fairly good calibration performance, revealing that the valley shrinkage deformation is highly correlated with the change of the reservoir stage. The prediction results demonstrate that the valley shrinkage deformation of the Xiluodu Hydropower Plant is approaching the convergence condition.
- valley shrinkage deformation /
- confined aquifer /
- hydraulic response /
- prediction

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	蒋中明, 李双龙, 丁鹏, 等. 水库枢纽区抬升变形水文地质结构模式研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(11): 2026-2033. (JIANG Zhong-ming, LI Shuang-long, DING Peng, et al.Modes of hydro-geological structure for uplift deformation near reservoir pivot[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 2026-2033. (in Chinese))
[2]	伍法权, 祁生文. 江垭水库大坝及近坝山体抬升变形机理[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2003, 25(4): 295-300. (WU Fa-quan, QI Sheng-wen.Mechanism of uplift deformation of the dam foundation of Jiangya reservior and the nearby mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotecnical Engineering, 2003, 25(4): 449-454. (in Chinese))
[3]	祁生文, 伍法权. 江娅水库大坝及近坝山体拾升发展趋势[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2004, 26(2): 259-262. (QI Sheng-wen, WU Fa-quan.Development of uplift deformation of dam foundation and sorrounding mountains of Jiangya water power station[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotecnical Engineering, 2004, 26(2): 259-262. (in Chinese))
[4]	张超萍, 王东, 沈定斌, 等. 铜街子水电站右岸大坝抬升原因浅析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2015, 32(5): 57-60, 65.(ZHANG Chao-ping, WANG Dong, SHEN Ding-bin, et al. Causes of uplift deformation on the right bank of the dam of Tongjiezi hydropower station[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2015, 32(5): 57-60, 65. (in Chinese))
[5]	MULLER P.The rock slide in the Vajont Valley[J]. Journal of the International Society of Rock Mechnics, 1964, 2: 148-212.
[6]	邓建辉, CHAN D H, MARTIN C D, 等. 一例由蓄水诱发的库岸边坡变形[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2002, 13(1): 21-24. (DENG Jian-hui, CHAN D H, MARTIN C D, et al.Impounding-inudced deformation of reservoir banks, a case history[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2002, 13(1): 21-24. (in Chinese))
[7]	杨杰, 胡德秀, 关文海. 李家峡拱坝左岸高边坡岩体变位与安全性态分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(19): 3551-3560. (YANG Jie, HU De-xiu, GUAN Wen-hai.Analysis of high slope rock deformation and safety performance for left bank of Lijiaxia arch dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(19): 3551-3560. (in Chinese))
[8]	杨强, 潘元炜, 程立, 等. 蓄水期边坡及地基变形对高拱坝的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(增刊2): 3979-3986. (YANG Qiang, PAN Yuan-wei, CHENG Li, et al.Impounding influence of slope and foundation deformation on high arch dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(S2): 3979-3986. (in Chinese))
[9]	杨强, 潘元炜, 程立, 等. 高拱坝谷幅变形机制及非饱和裂隙岩体有效应力原理研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(11): 2258-2269. (YANG Qiang, PAN Yuan-wei, CHENG Li, et al.Mechanism of valley deformation of high arch dam and effective stress principles for unsaturated fractured rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(11): 2258-2269. (in Chinese))
[10]	梁国贺, 胡昱, 樊启祥, 等. 溪洛渡高拱坝蓄水期谷幅变形特性与影响因素分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2016, 35(9): 101-110. (LIANG Guo-he, HU Yu, FAN Qi-xiang, et al.Analysis on valley deformation of Xilulodu high arch dam during impoundment and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2016, 35(9): 101-110. (in Chinese))
[11]	杨学超, 高克静, 赵文光, 等. 谷幅收缩变形对溪洛渡拱坝的安全影响分析[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2018, 16(1): 72-78. (YANG Xue-chao, GAO Ke-jing, ZHAO Wen-guang, et al.Influence of valley deformation on safety of Xiluodu arch dam[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2018, 16(1): 72-78. (in Chinese))
[12]	周志芳, 王锦国. 河流峡谷区地下水温度异常特征分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2003, 14(1): 62-66. (ZHOU Zhi-fang, WANG Jin-guo.Abnormal characteristics analysis of groundwater temperature field in canyon areas[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2003, 14(2): 62-66. (in Chinese)
[13]	周志芳, 李鸣威, 庄超, 等. 溪洛渡水电站谷幅变形成因与形成条件[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(6): 497-505. (ZHOU Zhi-fang, LI Ming-wei, ZHUANG Chao, et al.Impact factors and forming conditions of valley deformation of Xiluodu Hydropower Station[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2018, 46(6): 497-505. (in Chinese))
[14]	周志芳, 庄超, 李鸣威, 等. 水库库盘变形的特征及其地质成因分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2019, 27(1): 38-47. (ZHOU Zhi-fang, ZHUANG Chao, LI Ming-wei, et al.Analysis on the characteristics and geological causes of reservoir plate deformation[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019, 27(1): 38-47. (in Chinese))
[15]	周志芳, 王锦国. 金沙江溪洛渡水电站环境水文地质综合评价[J]. 高校地质学报, 2002, 8(2): 227-235. (ZHOU Zhi-fang, WANG Jin-guo.Comprehensive assessment of environmental hydrogeology in Xiluodu hydropower station[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2002, 8(2): 227-235. (in Chinese))
[16]	ZHUANG C, ZHOU Z, ZHAN H, et al.A new type curve method for estimating aquitard hydraulic parameters in a multi-layered aquifer system[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 527: 212-220.
[17]	HAARIO H, LAINE M, MIRA A, et al.DRAM: efficient adaptive MCMC[J]. Statistics and Computing, 2006, 16: 339-354.

施引文献(9)

期刊类型引用(4)

1.	张恒，张巍，徐文瀚，朱鸿鹄，施烨辉，程荷兰. 减湿过程中南京粉细砂孔隙结构演化精细表征. 工程地质学报. 2025(01): 74-85 . 百度学术
2.	陈克政，丁琳，孙剑飞. 冻土动力学研究综述. 世界地震工程. 2024(01): 185-198 . 百度学术
3.	黎澄生，张炳鑫，刘智军. 花岗岩残积土复杂次生裂隙的分类与损伤特征. 岩土力学. 2023(10): 2879-2888 . 百度学术
4.	栾纪元，王冀鹏. 基于4D显微成像的非饱和颗粒土微观力学与渗流试验研究. 岩土力学. 2023(11): 3252-3260 . 百度学术