• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

黄土非线性应力-应变新模型及对比研究

王丽琴, 鹿忠刚, 邵生俊

王丽琴, 鹿忠刚, 邵生俊. 黄土非线性应力-应变新模型及对比研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(9): 1724-1730. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201709022
引用本文: 王丽琴, 鹿忠刚, 邵生俊. 黄土非线性应力-应变新模型及对比研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(9): 1724-1730. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201709022
WANG Li-qin, LU Zhong-gang, SHAO Sheng-jun. New nonlinear stress-strain model for loess and its comparative research[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(9): 1724-1730. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201709022
Citation: WANG Li-qin, LU Zhong-gang, SHAO Sheng-jun. New nonlinear stress-strain model for loess and its comparative research[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(9): 1724-1730. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201709022

黄土非线性应力-应变新模型及对比研究  English Version

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(11572245,51608442); 陕西省科技厅基金项目(2014JQ5173)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王丽琴(1976- ),女,博士研究生,副教授,主要从事黄土力学及防灾减灾等方面的教学和科研。E-mail: jbcwlq@126.com。

  • 中图分类号: TU444

New nonlinear stress-strain model for loess and its comparative research

  • 摘要: 目前,黄土的应力应变曲线只能根据其形态类型选择不同的数学模式来描述,为实现描述应力应变数学模式的统一,提出了一种新的非线性模型,并给出了各参数的确定方法。通过应用新模型与现行主要的非线性模型(邓肯-张双曲线模型、指数模型、驼峰曲线模型),同时对结构性黄土常规三轴试验所得的各种类型的应力应变曲线进行模拟,并经与实测应力应变数据点对比研究表明:新模型表达式比驼峰曲线描述软化型应力应变曲线的精度高;同样新模型比邓肯-张双曲线模型、指数模型描述硬化型应力应变曲线的精度也高,说明此非线性新模型既可描述应变强硬化型也可描述应变弱硬化型应力应变曲线;既可描述应变强软化型也可描述应变弱软化型应力应变曲线。通过新模型对经典实例应力应变曲线的描述,进一步说明新模型具有良好的适应性。新模型为形态各异的应力应变曲线提供了一个统一的数学模型。
    Abstract: At present, the stress-strain curve of loess can only be described by using different mathematical models according to its morphological type. To achieve a unified description of the stress-strain mathematical model, a new nonlinear model is proposed, and the method for determining each parameter is also given. The various types of stress-strain curves of structural loess which are obtained from conventional triaxial tests are simulated by applying the new model and the current main nonlinear models (Duncan-Chang hyperbolic model, exponential model and model of camelback curve), and then they are compared with the measured stress-strain data points. The result shows that the expression of the new model can make a more accurate description for the softening stress-strain curve than that of the hump curve. Similarly, the new model describes the hardening stress-strain curve more accurately in comparison with the Duncan-Chang hyperbolic model and the exponential model, which indicates that the new nonlinear model can describe the strong hardening stress-strain curve and the weak hardening curve, and can also describe the strong softening curve and the weak softening curve. Meanwhile, based on the description of stress-strain curves of the classic example by the new model, it is shown that the new model has excellent adaptability. The proposed model provides a unified mathematical model for the stress-strain curves of different shapes.
  • [1] 殷德顺, 王保田. 负乘幂本构模型的切线模量[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(7): 2168-2173. (YIN De-shun, WANG Bao-tian. Tangent modulus of negative-power constitutive model[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(7): 2168-2173. (in Chinese))
    [2] 陈云敏, 高 登, 朱 斌. 城市固体废弃物的复合指数应力-应变模型及其应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(7): 1020-1029. (CHEN Yun-min, GAO Deng, ZHU Bin. Composite exponential stress-strain model of municipal solidwaste and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(7): 1020-1029. (in Chinese))
    [3] 王 伟, 卢廷浩, 周干武. 黏土非线性模型的改进切线模量[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(3): 458-462. (WANG Wei, LU Ting-hao, ZHOU Gan-wu. Improved tangent modulus of nonlinear soil model[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(3): 458-462. (in Chinese))
    [4] 何昌荣, 杨桂芳. 邓肯-张模型参数变化对计算结果的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(2): 170-174. (HE Chang-rong, YANG Gui-fang. Effects of parameters of Duncan-Chang model on calculated results[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(2): 170-174. (in Chinese))
    [5] 李广信. 关于土的本构模型研究的若干问题[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(10): 1636-1641. (LI Guang-xin. Some problems in researches on constitutive model of soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(10): 1636-1641. (in Chinese))
    [6] 陈正汉, 周海清, FREDLUND D G. 非饱和土的非线性模型及其应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1999, 21(5): 603-608. (CHEN Zheng-han, ZHOU Hai-qing, FREDLUND D G. Nonlinear model for unsaturated soils and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(5): 603-608. (in Chinese))
    [7] 刘祖典, 李 靖, 郭增玉, 等. 陕西关中黄土变形特性和变形参数的探讨[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1984, 6(3): 24-34. (LIU Zu-dian, LI Jing, GUO Zeng-yu, et al. Deformation behaviours and deformation parameter of loess in Shanxi district[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1984, 6(3): 24-34. (in Chinese))
    [8] DUNCAN J M, CHANG C Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1970, 96(5): 1629-1653.
    [9] GITAU A N, GUMBE L O, BIAMAH E K. Influence of soil water on stress-strain behaviour of a compacting soil in semi-arid Kenya[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2006, 89(2): 144-154.
    [10] AL-SHAYEA N, ABDULJAUWAD S, BASHIR R, et al. Determination of parameters for a hyperbolic model of soils[J]. Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 156(2): 105-117.
    [11] LEE K H, JU Y T, SHIN D S, et al. Development of a modified Duncan-Chang model for soils[C]// BLOSS D M, eds. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics. Leiden(Netherlands): Taylor and Francis, 2007: 93-98.
    [12] 孔德志, 朱俊高. 邓肯-张模型几种改进方法的比较[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(6): 971-974. (KONG De-zhi, ZHU Jun-gao. Comparison of several methods for improving Duncan-Chang model[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(6): 971-974. (in Chinese))
    [13] 章峻豪, 陈正汉, 赵 娜, 等. 非饱和土的新非线性模型及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(3): 616-624. (ZHANG Jun-hao, CHEN Zheng-han, ZHAO Na, et al. A new nonlinear model of unsaturated soils and its application[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(3): 616-624. (in Chinese))
    [14] 黄文熙. 土的弹塑性应力-应变模型理论[J]. 岩土力学, 1979, 1(1): 1-20. (HUANG Wen-xi. The elastoplastic stress strain model theory for soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 1979, 1(1): 1-20. (in Chinese))
    [15] 沈珠江. 考虑剪胀性的土和石料的非线性应力应变模式[J]. 水利水运科学研究, 1986(4): 1-14. (SHENG Zhu-jiang. A nonlinear dilatant stress-strain model for soils and rock materials[J]. Journal of Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, 1986(4): 1-14. (in Chinese))
    [16] 王 伟, 宋新江, 凌 华, 等. 滨海相软土应力-应变曲线复合指数-双曲线模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(9): 1455-1459. (WANG Wei, SONG Xin-jiang, LING Hua, et al. Composite exponential-hyperbolic model for stress-strain curve of seashore soft soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(9): 1455-1459. (in Chinese))
    [17] 何利军, 孔令伟. 土的应力-应变关系的一种描述模式[J]. 工程地质学报, 2010, 18(6): 900-905. (HE Li-jun, KONG Ling-wei. Uniform expression of stress-strain relationship of soils[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2010, 18(6): 900-905. (in Chinese))
    [18] 陈 成, 周正明. 一个考虑剪胀性和应变软化的土体非线性弹性模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增刊1): 39-43. (CHEN Cheng, ZHOU Zheng-ming. Nonlinear elastic model for soils incorporating both dilatancy and strain softening[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(S1): 39-43. (in Chinese))
    [19] 张 斌, 屈智炯. 考虑剪胀和软化特性的粗粒土应力-应变模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1991, 13(6): 64-69. (ZHANG Bin, QU Zhi-jiong. The stress-strain model of coarse-grained soil considering characteristics of dilation and softening[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1991, 13(6): 64-69. (in Chinese))
    [20] 王海波, 徐 明, 宋二祥. 基于硬化土模型的小应变本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(1): 39-43. (WANG Hai-bo, XU Ming, SONG Er-xiang. A small strain constitutive model based on hardening soil model[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(1): 39-43.(in Chinese)
    [21] JARDINE R J. Some observations on the kinematic nature of soil stiffness[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1992, 32(2): 111-124.
  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 朱庆华,朱志慧,左威龙,费康. 劲性搅拌桩复合地基承载特性数值分析. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(01): 181-188 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(10)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 11
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-07-03
  • 发布日期:  2017-09-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回