高级搜索
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

基于K0固结排水卸荷应力路径试验粉土应力-变形特性研究

张坤勇, 李广山, 梅小洪, 杜伟

张坤勇, 李广山, 梅小洪, 杜伟. 基于K0固结排水卸荷应力路径试验粉土应力-变形特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(7): 1182-1188. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201707003
引用本文: 张坤勇, 李广山, 梅小洪, 杜伟. 基于K0固结排水卸荷应力路径试验粉土应力-变形特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(7): 1182-1188. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201707003
shu
ZHANG Kun-yong, LI Guang-shan, MEI Xiao-hong, DU Wei. Stress-deformation characteristics of silty soil based on K0 consolidation and drainage unloading stress path tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(7): 1182-1188. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201707003
Citation: ZHANG Kun-yong, LI Guang-shan, MEI Xiao-hong, DU Wei. Stress-deformation characteristics of silty soil based on K0 consolidation and drainage unloading stress path tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(7): 1182-1188. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201707003
shu

基于K0固结排水卸荷应力路径试验粉土应力-变形特性研究  English Version

  • 1. 河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室，江苏 南京210098；
    2. 河海大学岩土工程科学研究所，江苏 南京210098；
    3. 江西省建筑设计研究总院，江西 南昌330046

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点项目（41530637）; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（2015B17714）; 留学回国人员科技活动择优资助经费项目（2016-B10015）
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张坤勇(1975- ),男,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事土的本构关系,边坡稳定性分析等方面的教学和科研。E-mail: ky_zhang@hhu.edu.cn。

Stress-deformation characteristics of silty soil based on K0 consolidation and drainage unloading stress path tests

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;
    2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;
    3. Jiangxi Province Architectural Design and Research General Institute, Nanchang 330046, China

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 针对开挖土体复杂卸荷应力路径，按不同初始应力状态和卸荷应力比，对南水北调南干渠粉质黏土开展了K0固结排水卸荷应力路径试验。试样首先在不同围压条件下K0固结稳定，然后根据不同的轴向应力和径向应力卸荷比，进行卸荷试验，以模拟实际土体开挖过程中的应力路径。试验结果表明土体的应力应变特性与应力路径密切相关：不同卸荷应力比条件下，试样可能为压缩，先伸长再压缩或者为伸长变形；卸荷应力路径下压缩和伸长应力比临界值与初始固结状态和土性相关；相同平均应力增量条件下，卸荷应力比越小，试样体积膨胀绝对值越大；土体强度参数受加荷方式和应力路径影响不大。试验结果和常规三轴试验有显著区别，需要发展能够描述卸荷应力路径下的土体本构模型，对开挖土体开展符合工程实际的应力变形分析。
    Abstract: Based on different initial stress states and unloading stress ratios, the unloading stress path drainage tests under K0 consolidation are carried out on the silty clay sampled from the construction site of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. The specimens are firstly consolidated with a given value of K0 under different confining pressures. Then, to simulate the stress path at different locations of excavation soil, the stress decrements are applied from both the axial and the radial directions with different stress ratios. The test results show that the stress-strain behavior of soil is closely related to the stress path. Under different unloading stress ratios, the specimen may be compressed, elongated firstly and then compressed or elongated. The critical value of unloading stress ratio determining compression and extension is determined by the initial consolidation state and soil properties. With the decrement of the unloading stress ratio, the value of volume dilation increases. The tests also verify that the loading mode and stress path have little effect on the strength parameters. The characteristics observed from the tests are significantly different from those of the conventional triaxial test results. It is necessary to develop a proper constitutive model, which can describe the unloading stress path of the soil, and to carry out the stress and deformation analysis of the excavation soil.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(18)
  • [1] 张艳刚, 张坤勇, 史峤臻. 开挖卸荷土体本构模型研究方法[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2010, 8(4): 40-43. (ZHANG Yan-gang, ZHANG Kun-yong, SHI Qiao-zhen. Research method of constitutive model for excavation unloading soil mass[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2010, 8(4): 40-43. (in Chinese))
    [2] 童华炜, 邓袆文. 土体 K 0 固结-卸荷剪切试验研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2008(5): 13-16. (TONG Hua-wei, DENG Hui-wen. K 0 consolidation drained shear and unloading tests of soil[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2008(5): 13-16. (in Chinese))
    [3] 马晓文, 艾英钵. 基坑开挖土体卸荷特性研究进展[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(增刊1): 189-193. (MA Xiao-wen, AI Ying-bo. Review of soil behaviors under excavation unloading of foundation pits[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(S1): 189-193. (in Chinese))
    [4] LAMBE T W. Stress path method[J]. J of soil Mech and Found Div, ASCE, 1967, 93(6): 268-277.
    [5] NAGARAJ T S, SRIDHARAN M K. A incremental loading device for stress path and strength testing of soils[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1981, 4(2): 154-160.
    [6] 王瑞红, 李建林, 蒋昱州, 等. 开挖卸荷对砂岩力学特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(增刊1): 156-162, 206. (WANG Rui-hong, LI Jian-lin, JIANG Yu-zhou, et al. Experimental study of influence of excavation unloading on mechanical properties of sandstone[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(S1): 156-162, 206. (in Chinese))
    [7] 刘国彬, 侯学渊. 软土基坑隆起变形的残余应力分析法[J].地下工程与隧道, 1996, 14(2): 2-7. (LIU Guo-bin, HOU Xue-yuan. Residual stress analysis method of foundation pit in soft soil foundation pit[J]. Underground Engineering and Tunnels, 1996, 14(2): 2-7. (in Chinese))
    [8] 郑卫锋, 邵龙潭, 贾金青. 基于数字图像测量技术的基坑开挖卸荷试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2003, 24(1): 17-20. (ZHENG Wei-feng, SHAO Long-tan, JIA Jin-qing. Experimental study on excavation unloading of foundation pit based on digital image measurement technique[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2003, 24(1): 17-20. (in Chinese))
    [9] 梅国雄, 陈 浩, 卢廷浩, 等. 坑侧土体卸荷的侧向应力-应变关系研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(1): 3108-3112. (MEI Guo-xiong, CHEN Hao, LU Ting-hao, et al. Research on lateral stress-strain relation on side of foundation pit with lateral unloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(1): 3108-3112. (in Chinese))
    [10] 曾玲玲, 陈晓平. 软土在不同应力路径下的力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(5): 1264-1270. (ZENG Ling-ling, CHEN Xiao-ping. Analysis of mechanical characteristics of soft soil under different stress paths[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(5): 1264-1270. (in Chinese))
    [11] 陈林靖, 戴自航, 刘志伟. 应力路径对软土应力-应变特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(11): 3249-3257. (CHEN Lin-jing, DAI Zi-hang, LIU Zhi-wei. Experimental study of stress path of soft soils in influence range of foundation pit[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(11): 3249-3257. (in Chinese))
    [12] 殷 杰, 刘夫江, 刘 辰, 等. 天然沉积粉质黏土的应力路径试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(12): 3389-3393. (YIN Jie, LIU Fu-jiang, LIU Chen, et al. Stress path tests on natural sedimentary silty clay[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(12): 3389-3393. (in Chinese))
    [13] 张春进, 陈 斌, 姚燕明. 宁波淤泥质黏土应力路径试验研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2016(1): 5-11. (ZHANG Chun-jin, CHEN Bin, YAO Yan-ming. Experimental study on stress path of Ningbo soft clay[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2016(1): 5-11. (in Chinese))
    [14] 曾国熙, 潘秋元, 胡一峰. 软黏土地基基坑开挖性状的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1988, 10(3): 13-22. (ZENG Guo-xi, PAN Qiu-yuan, HU Yi-feng. The behavior of excavation in soft clay ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 10(3): 13-22. (in Chinese))
    [15] 施建勇, 雷国辉, 艾英钵, 等. 土压力变化规律的应力路径三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(11): 1700-1704. (SHI Jian-yong, LEI Guo-hui, AI Ying-bo, et al. Stress path controlled triaxial experimental study of lateral earth pressure behaviour[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(11): 1700-1704. (in Chinese))
    [16] 王保田. 土工测试技术[M]. 南京:河海大学出版社, 2005. (WANG Bao-tian. Principle of Geotechnical testing[M]. Nanjing: Hohai University Press, 2005. (in Chinese))
    [17] 杨雪强, 朱志政, 韩高升, 等. 不同应力路径下土体的变形特性与破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(12): 2181-2185. (YANG Xue-qiang, ZHU Zhi-zheng, HAN Gao-sheng, et al. Deformation and failure characteristics of soil mass under different stress paths[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(12): 2181-2185. (in Chinese))
    [18] 郑 刚, 颜志雄, 雷华阳, 等. 天津市第一海相层粉质黏土卸荷变形特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(5): 1237-1239. (ZHENG Gang, YAN Zhi-xiong, LEI Hua-yang, et al. Experimental studies on unloading deformation properties of silty clay of first marine layer in Tianjin urban area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(5): 1237-1239. (in Chinese))
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献(3)

  • 期刊类型引用(3)

    1. 补约依呷，洪佳敏，高勇. 白鹤滩水电站地下厂区防渗排水系统设计. 大坝与安全. 2022(01): 8-13+19 . 百度学术
    2. 周志芳，王哲，李雅冰，沈琪，李思佳，陈朦. 基于钻孔高压压水试验非线性流模拟计算错动带渗透参数. 工程地质学报. 2021(01): 197-204 . 百度学术
    3. 周志芳，沈琪，石安池，庄超，陈朦，李鸣威. 白鹤滩水电工程左岸玄武岩层间错动带渗透破坏预测与防治模拟. 工程地质学报. 2020(02): 211-220 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(0)

    • 资源附件(0)
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 3
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-04-04
  • 发布日期:  2017-07-24

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(18)
    相关文章
    施引文献
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    版权所有 © 2010水利部交通部国家能源局南京水利科学研究院 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    编辑部地址：南京市虎踞关34号《岩土工程学报》编辑部邮编：210024电话：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn