黑色页岩巴西劈裂破坏的层理效应研究及能量分析

侯鹏; 高峰; 杨玉贵; 张志镇; 张向向

doi:10.11779/CJGE201605020

黑色页岩巴西劈裂破坏的层理效应研究及能量分析 English Version

侯鹏^{1, 2},
高峰^{1, 2},
杨玉贵^{1, 2},
张志镇^1,2,,
张向向^{1, 2}

1. 中国矿业大学深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏徐州 221116;
2. 中国矿业大学力学与建筑工程学院,江苏徐州 221116

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51204161）; 江苏省自然科学基金项目（BK20140189）; 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目（KYLX15_1404）

详细信息

作者简介:
侯鹏(1989- ),男,博士研究生,主要从事页岩气开发方面的研究。E-mail: ZB13220001@cumt.edu.cn。

通讯作者:
张志镇

中图分类号: TU452
计量
- 文章访问数: 449
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 501
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-04-15
- 发布日期: 2016-05-24

Effect of bedding orientation on failure of black shale under Brazilian tests and energy analysis

HOU Peng^{1, 2},
GAO Feng^{1, 2},
YANG Yu-gui^{1, 2},
ZHANG Zhi-zhen^1,2,,
ZHANG Xiang-xiang^{1, 2}

1. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics & Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;
2. School of Mechanics & Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

摘要

摘要: 以重庆龙马溪组黑色页岩为试样,对黑色页岩进行了不同层理角度的巴西劈裂试验,研究了其抗拉强度和破坏形态的各向异性特征,分析了其变形破坏过程中的吸收能变化规律,揭示了层理角度、抗拉强度、AE能量与最终吸收能之间的关系。结果表明：①黑色页岩的抗拉强度受层理影响明显,90°时,抗拉强度最大,最小值则出现在30°附近。在0°≤θ ≤30°和60°≤θ ≤90°,抗拉强度值变化较小,而30°≤θ≤60°,其值随着层理角度增加而迅速增大;②试样破坏形态可以分为三类典型的裂纹,且低层理角度的试样仅出现单一种类的裂纹,而高层理角度的试样存在多种裂纹形态;③吸收能随着载荷增加呈非线性增长,根据吸收能增长速率的大小,发现黑色页岩发生拉伸滑移、滑移拉伸、纯拉伸、滑移和压张型拉伸破坏的剧烈程度依次减弱;④低角度试样的最终吸收能小,高角度试样的最终吸收能大,在30°≤θ≤60°,最终吸收能变化跨度最大,其与抗拉强度和AE能量均存在相应的二次非线性关系,为页岩气勘探开发提供了参考。
- 黑色页岩 /
- 巴西劈裂 /
- 层理效应 /
- 抗拉强度 /
- 吸收能 /
- 破坏形态
Abstract: The anisotropic characteristics of tensile strength and failure mode of black shale from Longmaxi Formation are investigated by using Brazilian tests. The evolution of absorbed energy during the deformation and failure of black shale is analyzed, and the relationship among the ultimated absorbed energy, bedding angles, tensile strength and AE energy is revealed. The results show that: (1) The tensile strength of black shale is obviously influenced by bedding orientations. The maximum tensile strength appears at angle of 90°, while the minimum tensile strength occurs at near 30°. In the ranges 0°≤ θ≤30°and 60°≤θ≤ 90°, variation of the tensile strength with bedding angles is small, however, it grows rapidly with the increase of bedding angles in the range 30°≤θ≤60°. (2) The failure modes of specimens can be divided into three typical fractures. The specimens with low bedding angles only show single variety fracture and more than one variety fractures are found in samples with high bedding angles. (3) The absorbed energy grows nonlinearly with the increase of load. The growth rate of absorbed energy reflects the violent extent of specimen failure, and the violent extent of failure decreases in turn for all types of failures as follows: tensile-slip failure, slip-tensile failure, tensile failure, sliding failure and pressure tension destruction. (4) The ultimated absorbed energy is small at low bedding angles and is large at high bedding angles. In the range 30°≤θ≤60°, variation of the ultimated absorbed energy is very large. The corresponding quadratic nonlinear relationship presents itself between the ultimated absorbed energy and the tensile strength, AE energy, respectively, which may provide references for the exploitation and development of shale gas.
- black shale /
- Brazilian test /
- effect of bedding /
- tensile strength /
- absorbed energy /
- failure mode

HTML全文

参考文献(26)

[1]	雷梦, 梁利喜, 熊键, 等. 硬脆性页岩基础物性实验及井壁稳定性分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(7): 34-40. (LEI Meng, LIANG Li-xi, XIONG Jian, et al. Experiment of the fundamental physical properties and analysis of the wellbore stability on hard brittle shale[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(7): 34-40. (in Chinese))
[2]	张金川, 金之钧, 袁明生. 页岩气成藏机理和分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2004, 24(7): 15-18. (ZHANG Jin-chuan, JIN Zhi-jun, YUAN Ming-sheng. Reservoirring mechanism of shale gas and its distribution[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(7) : 15-18. (in Chinese))
[3]	张金川, 汪宗余, 聂海宽, 等. 页岩气及其勘探研究意义[J]. 现代地质, 2008, 22(4): 640-646. (ZHANG Jin-chuan, WANG Zon-yu, NIE Hai-kuan, et al. Shale gas and its significance for exploration[J]. Geoscience, 2008, 22(4): 640-646. (in Chinese))
[4]	王兰生, 邹春艳, 郑平, 等. 四川盆地下古生界存在页岩气的地球化学依据[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(5): 59-62. (WANG Lan-sheng, ZOU Chun-yan, ZHEN Ping, et al. Geochemical evidence of shale gas existed in the Lower Paleozoic Sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(5): 59-62. (in Chinese))
[5]	董大忠, 程克明, 王世谦, 等. 页岩气资源评价方法及其在四川盆地的应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(5): 33-39. (DONG Da-zhong, CHENG Ke-ming, WANG Shi-qian, et al. An evaluation method of shale gas resource and its application in the Sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(5): 33-39. (in Chinese))
[6]	曾祥亮, 刘树根, 黄文明, 等. 四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩与美国Fort Worth 盆地石炭系Barnett 组页岩地质特征对比[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30(2/3): 372-384. (ZENG Xiang-liang, LIU Shu-gen, HUANG Wen-ming, et al. Comparison of silurian longmaxia formation shale of Sichuan basin in China and Carboniferous Barnett Formation shale of Fort Worth basin in United States[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2/3): 372-384. (in Chinese))
[7]	郭海英, 赵迪斐. 微观尺度海相页岩储层微观非均质性研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2015, 44(2): 300-307. (GUO Hai-ying, ZHAO Di-fei. Analysis of micro-scale heterogeneity characteristics in marine shale gas reservoir [J]. Journal of China University of Ming ＆ Technology, 2015, 44(2): 300-307. (in Chinese))
[8]	唐颖, 唐玄, 王广源, 等. 页岩气开发水力压裂技术综述[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30(2): 393-399. (TANG Ying, TANG Xuan, WANG Guang-yuan, et al. Summary of hydraulic fracturing technology in shale gas development[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2): 393-399. (in Chinese))
[9]	王倩, 王鹏, 项德贵, 等. 页岩力学参数各向异性研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(12): 62-65. (WANG Qian, WANG Peng, XIANG De-gui, et al. Anisotropic property of mechanical parameters of shales[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(12): 62-65. (in Chinese))
[10]	JOHNSTON J E, CHRISTENSEN N I. Seismic anisotropy of shales[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978-2012), 1995, 100(B4): 5991-6003.
[11]	陈天宇, 冯夏庭, 张希巍, 等. 黑色页岩力学特性及各向异性特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(9): 1772-1779. (CHEN Tian-yu, FENG Xia-ting, ZHANG Xi-wei, et al. Experimental study on mechanical and anisotrpic properties of black shale[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(9): 1772-1779. (in Chinese))
[12]	彭光忠. 单轴压应力下页岩岩块的结构面方向与其力学特性的关系[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1983, 5(2): 101-109. (PENG Guang-zhong. Relation between the mechanical performance and structural plane direction of shale under uniaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1983, 5(2): 101-109. (in Chinese))
[13]	王倩, 王鹏, 项德贵, 等. 页岩力学参数各向异性研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(12): 62-65. (WANG Qian, WANG Peng, XIANG De-gui, et al. Anisotropic property of mechanical parameters of shales[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(12): 62-65. (in Chinese))
[14]	贾长贵, 陈军海, 郭印同, 等. 层状页岩力学特性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(增刊2): 57-61. (JIA Chang-gui, CHEN Jun-hai, GUO Yin-tong, et al. Research on mechanical behaviors and failure modes of layer shale[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(S2): 57-61. (in Chinese))
[15]	衡帅, 杨春和, 张保平, 等. 页岩各向异性特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(3): 609-616. (HENG Shuai, YANG Chun-he, ZHANG Bao-ping, et al. Experimental research on anisotropic properties of shale[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(3): 609-616. (in Chinese))
[16]	徐敬宾, 杨春和, 吴文, 等. 页岩力学各向异性及其变形特性的试验研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2013, 33(4): 16-19. (XU Jing-bin, YANG Chun-he, WU Wen, et al. Experimental study of mechanics anisotropy and deformation characteristics of gas shale[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2013, 33(4): 16-19. (in Chinese))
[17]	衡帅, 杨春和, 曾义金, 等. 基于直剪试验的页岩强度各向异性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(5): 875-883. (HENG Shuai, YANG Chun-he, ZENG Yi-jin, et al. Anisotropy of shear strength of shale based on direct shear test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(5): 875-883. (in Chinese))
[18]	杨建, 付永强, 陈鸿飞, 等. 页岩储层的岩石力学特性[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(7): 12-14. (YANG Jian, FU Yong-qiang, CHEN Hong-fei, et al. Rock mechanical characteristics of shale reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(7): 12-14. (in Chinese))
[19]	JUNG-WOO C, HANNA K, SEOKWON J, et al. Deformation and strength anisotropy of Asan gneiss, Boryeong shale, and Yeoncheon schist[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2012, 50(1): 158-169.
[20]	SIMPSON N D J, STROISZ A, BAUER A, et al. Failure mechanics of anisotropic shale during Brazilian tests[C]// Proceedings of the 48th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium. Minneapolis: American Rock Mechanics Association, 2014.
[21]	刘胜利, 陈善雄, 余飞, 等. 绿泥石片岩各向异性特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(12): 3616-3623. (LIU Sheng-li, CHEN Shan-xiong, YU Fei, et al. Anisotropic properties study of chlorite schist[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(12): 3616-3623. (in Chinese))
[22]	CLAESSON J, BOHLOLI B. Brazilian test: stress field and tensile strength of anisotropic rocks using an analytical solution[J]. International Journal Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(8): 991-1004.
[23]	TAVALLALI A, VERVOORT A. Effect of layer orientation on the failure of layered sandstone under Brazilian test conditions[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2010, 47: 313-322.
[24]	苏承东, 张盛, 唐旭. 砂岩巴西劈裂疲劳破坏过程中变形与强度特征的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(1): 41-48. (SU Cheng-dong, ZHANG Sheng, TANG Xu. Experimental research on deformation and strength characteristics in process of Brazilian split fatigue failure of sandstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(1): 41-48. (in Chinese))
[25]	张志镇, 高峰. 单轴压缩下红砂岩能量演化试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(5): 953-962. (ZHANG Zhi-zhen, GAO Feng. Experimental research on energy evolution of red sandstone samples under uniaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31 (5): 953-962. (in Chinese))
[26]	WASANTHA P L P, RANJITH P G, SHAO S S. Energy monitoring and analysis during deformation of bedded- sandstone: use of acoustic emission[J]. Ultrasonics, 2014, 54: 217-226.