• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

综放面动压回采巷道帮部大变形控制机理及应用

陈晓祥, 杜贝举, 王雷超, 付东辉

陈晓祥, 杜贝举, 王雷超, 付东辉. 综放面动压回采巷道帮部大变形控制机理及应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(3): 460-467. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201603009
引用本文: 陈晓祥, 杜贝举, 王雷超, 付东辉. 综放面动压回采巷道帮部大变形控制机理及应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(3): 460-467. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201603009
CHEN Xiao-xiang, DU Bei-ju, WANG Lei-chao, FU Dong-hui. Control mechanism and application of large deformation of dynamic pressure roadway of fully mechanized top-coal caving face[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(3): 460-467. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201603009
Citation: CHEN Xiao-xiang, DU Bei-ju, WANG Lei-chao, FU Dong-hui. Control mechanism and application of large deformation of dynamic pressure roadway of fully mechanized top-coal caving face[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(3): 460-467. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201603009

综放面动压回采巷道帮部大变形控制机理及应用  English Version

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51304068,U1504515); 中国煤炭工业协会指导性研究计划项目(MTKJ2010-379)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈晓祥(1979- ),男,江苏省涟水县人,博士,副教授,主要从事巷道围岩控制与岩土特殊施工技术方面的研究.E-mail: chenxxiang@163.com.

  • 中图分类号: P315

Control mechanism and application of large deformation of dynamic pressure roadway of fully mechanized top-coal caving face

  • 摘要: 基于综放面动压回采巷道的变形特征和两类滑移面的分布规律,研究了锚杆,锚索与第Ⅰ类及锚索与第Ⅱ类滑移面的微结构的力学模型,得到了一级和二级锚固体的重构机理,提出了"携顶底,控两帮"的支护思想,并推演了该思想的演化图解;运用FLAC3D数值模拟研究了综放面回采巷道在3种不同支护方案下的变形破坏规律,研究结果表明,与方案一相比,采用方案二和方案三支护的巷道破坏深度和塑性区发育单元体数量分别减小了44.4%,66.7%,巷道掘进与回采期间帮部变形分别减少了51.4%和68.6%,50%和68.9%;将新的支护思想在综放工作面回采巷道沿底和沿顶掘进两种情况下进行了工业性试验,结果表明,新思路下巷道围岩变形得到了有效控制;研究结果对类似工程地质条件下综放回采巷道的围岩控制具有重要的指导意义.
    Abstract: Based on the distribution law of two types of slip surface and the deformation characteristics of dynamic pressure roadway in fully mechanized top-coal caving face, the mechanical model for microstructure of anchor bolts, Class I slip surface and Class II slip surface are studied. The reconstruction mechanisms of level-one and level-two anchors are obtained. The support idea of "top and bottom to help control the sides" is put forward, and the evolution of the graphic is deduced. The roadway deformations and failure laws under three different support programs of fully mechanized top-coal caving face are studied through numerical simulation of FLAC3D. The results show that compared with option I, roadway damage depth and plastic zone development unit based on option II and III are reduced by 44.4% and 66.7%, and the deformations of two sides are reduced by 51.4% and 68.6%, and 50% and 68.9% during roadway excavation and mining. The industrial tests on mining roadway along the bottom and the top of tunneling by the new support idea are developed on the fully mechanized top-coal caving face. The roadway deformation by the proposed method can be effectively controlled, and meets the requirements of production safety. The results have important guidance to the surrounding rock control of caving mining roadway under similar engineering geological conditions.
  • [1] 康红普, 王金华, 林 健. 煤矿巷道锚杆支护应用与应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2010, 35(11): 1809-1814. (KANG Hong-pu, WANG Jin-hua, LIN Jian. Study and applications of roadway support techniques for coalmines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2010, 35(11): 1809-1814. (in Chinese))
    [2] 王卫军, 李树清, 欧阳广斌. 深井煤层巷道围岩控制技术及试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 25(10): 2102-2107. (WANG Wei-jun, LI Shu-qing, OUYANG Guang-bin. Study on technique and test of surrounding rock control deep shaft coal roadways[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 25(10): 2102-2107. (in Chinese))
    [3] 王宏伟, 姜耀东, 杨忠东, 等. 长壁孤岛工作面煤岩冲击危险性区域多参量预测[J]. 煤炭学报, 2012, 37(11): 1790-1795. (WANG Hong-wei, JANG Yao-dong, YANG Zhong-dong, et al. Multi-ariable assessment of coal bump risk during extraction of an island longwall panel[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(11): 1790-1795. (in Chinese))
    [4] 刘长友, 刘 奎, 郭永峰, 等. 超长"孤岛"综放面大煤柱护巷的数值模拟[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2006, 35(4): 473-477. (LIU Chang-you, LIU Kui, GUO Yong-feng, et al. Numerical simulation on roadway protected by wide coal pillar in super-wide and isolated island fully mechanized top-coal caving face[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2006, 35(4): 473-477. (in Chinese))
    [5] 赵 鹏, 马占国, 张 帆, 等. 孤岛面小煤柱沿空巷道稳定性研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2006, 23(3): 354-357. (ZHAO Peng, MA Zhan-guo, ZHANG Fan, et al. Research on stability of gob-side entry with small coal pillar on insular face[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2006, 23(3): 354-357. (in Chinese))
    [6] 曾凡宇. 软岩及动压巷道失稳机理与支护方法[J]. 煤炭学报, 2007, 32(6): 573-576. (ZENG Fan-yu. The loss of stability and supporting method for the soft and dynamic tunnels[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2007, 32(6): 573-576. (in Chinese))
    [7] 郭正宝. 沿空动压巷道围岩稳定性与支护技术研究[D]. 济南: 山东科技大学, 2011. (GUO Zheng-bao. Study on surrounding rock stability and supporting technology of gob-side entry with dynamic pressure[D]. Jinan: Shandong University of Scinece and Technology, 2011. (in Chinese))
    [8] 郭延华, 段景广, 李良红. 下分层回采巷道帮锚杆支护机理[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2007, 24(4): 465-468. (GUO Yan-hua, DUAN Jing-guang, LI Liang-hong. Support mechanism of side bo1ts in lower slicing roadway[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2007, 24(4): 465-468. (in Chinese))
    [9] 侯朝炯, 郭励生, 勾攀峰, 等. 煤巷锚杆支护[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 1999. (HOU Chao-jiong, GUO Li-sheng, GOU Pan-feng, et al. Study on surrounding rock stability and supporting technology of gob-side entry with dynamic pressure[M]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology Press, 1999. (in Chinese))
    [10] 王金华. 全煤巷道锚杆锚索联合支护机理与效果分析[J].煤炭学报, 2012, 37(1): 1-7. (WANG Jin-hua. Analysis on mechanism and effect gate road with coal of rock seam as bolts and cables in roof[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(1): 1-7. (in Chinese))
    [11] 王其胜, 李夕兵, 李地元.深部软岩巷道围岩变形特征及支护参数的确定[J]. 煤炭学报, 2008, 33(4): 364-367. (WANG Qi-sheng, LI Xi-bing, LI Di-yuan. Surrounding rock deformation properties and determination of support parameters of softrock roadway in deep mine [J] Journal of China Coal Society, 2008, 33(4): 364-367. (in Chinese))
    [12] 唐芙蓉, 王连国, 张华磊, 等. 动压软岩巷道破坏机理及控制技术研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2010, 27(4): 537-542. (TANG Fu-rong, WANG Lian-guo, ZHANG Hua-lei, et al. Failure mechanism of dynamically pressured soft rock roadway and control technology[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2010, 27(4): 537-542. (in Chinese))
    [13] 柏建彪, 王襄禹, 贾明魁, 等. 深部软岩巷道支护原理及应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(5): 632-635. (BAI Jian-biao, WANG Xiang-yu, JIA Ming-kui, et al. Theory and application of supporting in deep soft roadways[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(5): 632-635. (in Chinese))
    [14] 沈明荣, 陈建峰. 岩体力学[M]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2006. (SHEN Ming-rong, CHEN Jian-feng. Rockmass mechanics[M]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2006. (in Chinese) )
    [15] 马雪晴, 霍 亮, 郭永祥. 深部巷道分层围岩变形特征研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2013, 45(2): 80-82. (MA Xue-qing, HUO Liang, GUO Yong-xiang. Study on deformation features of individual surrounding rock along mine roadway in deep mine[J]. Coal Engineering, 2013, 45(2): 80-82. (in Chinese))
    [16] 徐永圻. 采矿学[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2003. (XU Yong-xin. Mining science[M]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology Press, 2003. (in Chinese))
    [17] 刘 波, 韩彦辉. FLAC 原理,实例与应用指南[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社, 2005: 3-15. (LIU Bo, HAN Yan-hui. Principle, instances and application guide of FLAC[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2005: 3-15. (in Chinese))
  • 期刊类型引用(18)

    1. 姚怡宁,宗桦,周璐,李荷,冯旭环. 川西大渡河干热河谷优势灌草植物根系特征及固土能力. 生态学报. 2025(06): 2798-2810 . 百度学术
    2. 王铁行,赵翊豪,金鑫. 喷射秸秆加筋黄土的强度特性研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2024(03): 800-811 . 百度学术
    3. 陈婧逸,陈晓清,宋东日,吕明,蒋豪. 灌木根系形态对土体强度影响的大型直剪试验研究. 长江科学院院报. 2024(08): 120-127+163 . 百度学术
    4. 程虎,李蒙,杨劭,张乃畅,李厚峰. 水陆交错带护坡植物固土抗蚀能力比较分析. 中国水土保持科学(中英文). 2024(03): 56-63 . 百度学术
    5. 谭瑞琪,谢亚军,李欣然,姜宝莹,张桂荣. 植被防护岸坡加筋机理研究. 中国水运. 2023(06): 71-74 . 百度学术
    6. 陈飞,谢蕴忠,王俊峰,张仕彬. 基于数值模拟方法的根系护坡研究进展. 科学技术与工程. 2023(16): 6728-6738 . 百度学术
    7. 梅红,马柯,刘瑾,王禄艺,冯玉晗,齐梦瑶,胡梦园. 生态型稳定剂协同植物根系固土特性及机理研究. 水利水电科技进展. 2023(04): 52-58 . 百度学术
    8. 蒋冬卫. 不同地区沿海港口物流业发展现状评价分析. 中国水运. 2023(11): 74-76 . 百度学术
    9. 杜技能,王中珏,段继琪,王忠良,段青松. 生态护坡理论及技术研究现状综述. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2023(06): 211-220 . 百度学术
    10. 徐华,袁海莉,王歆宇,王栋,陈建勋,荣才权. 根系形态和层次结构对根土复合体力学特性影响研究. 岩土工程学报. 2022(05): 926-935 . 本站查看
    11. 杨家庆,鲁明星,吴冠辰,袁雪涛,李富平,许永利,李小光. 矿山边坡植被修复研究现状及发展趋势分析. 矿山测量. 2022(01): 83-87 . 百度学术
    12. 穆奎,潘伟良,王利彬,李婷,陈雅雯,丁奠元. 生态河道植物护坡工程技术研究现状与展望. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2022(03): 206-216 . 百度学术
    13. 毕银丽,罗睿,王双明. 接菌对紫花苜蓿根系抗拉性及根菌复合土体抗剪强度影响. 煤炭学报. 2022(06): 2182-2192 . 百度学术
    14. 黄琛,张友谊,叶小兵. 基于SEEP/W的强震区根系土坡面物源失稳机制分析. 科技通报. 2022(07): 57-66+72 . 百度学术
    15. 李杰. 河道整治中根系植被特征对岸坡改良土影响试验研究. 水利技术监督. 2022(10): 129-132+177 . 百度学术
    16. 梅红,胡国长,王禄艺,梅绪哲,刘瑾,徐佳俊,杨欣雅,杨诺. 边坡植被固土抗冲刷特性及其护坡机理研究. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 86-91 . 百度学术
    17. 姜彤,李龙飞,薛雷,黄坤,丁昊,王昊宇. 乔木护坡效果物理模型试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2022(35): 15546-15553 . 百度学术
    18. 陈飞,施康,钱乾,罗特. 根土复合体材料的抗剪强度特性研究进展. 有色金属科学与工程. 2021(06): 96-104 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(20)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  356
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  336
  • 被引次数: 38
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-05-26
  • 发布日期:  2016-03-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回