墙后有限宽度无黏性土主动土压力试验研究

杨明辉; 戴夏斌; 赵明华; 罗宏

doi:10.11779/CJGE201601014

墙后有限宽度无黏性土主动土压力试验研究 English Version

湖南大学岩土工程研究所,湖南长沙 410082

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51278184,50708030）; 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划（NCET-13-194）

详细信息

作者简介:
杨明辉(1978- ),男,博士,副教授,主要从事桩基础及特殊土路基工程研究。

计量
- 文章访问数: 400
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 425
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-04-06
- 发布日期: 2016-01-19

Experimental study on active earth pressure of cohesionless soil with limited width behind retaining wall

Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

摘要

摘要: 针对无黏性土体,开展了刚性挡墙平动、绕墙底转动和绕墙顶转动3种墙体主动变位模式情况下墙后有限宽度土体土压力试验。通过观察墙后不同宽度土体的破坏过程及对土压力的全程量测,对其破坏模式及土压力分布规律进行了探讨。试验结果表明,墙后有限宽度土体的破坏面为一连续曲面,随着墙后土体宽度的增加,土体破坏面逐渐向外侧偏移,最终趋于某一固定位置,但始终位于库仑破坏面内侧。土压力值监测表明,库仑土压力理论并不适用于有限宽度土体。当填土宽度为有限宽度时,土压力值小于库仑主动土压力值,其差距随土体宽度减小而逐渐增大。当墙体平动时,土压力值沿墙高先增大后减小;墙体绕墙底转动时土压力值则呈线性增长趋势;而当墙体绕墙顶转动时,在挡墙上部出现了明显的土拱效应。
- 主动土压力 /
- 有限土体 /
- 刚性挡墙 /
- 破坏模式 /
- 主动变位模式
Abstract: An experiment is conducted to study the active earth pressure of cohesionless soil with limited width behind retaining wall in three different modes, which are translational motion, rotation around bottom and rotation around top. In the experiment, the failure modes of the soil and the distribution of the active earth pressure with different backfill widths are observed. The results show that the failure surface of the limited-width soil behind the retaining wall is a continuous one, which continuously moves to the outside and approaches a fixed position with the increase of the backfill width. But the failure surface of cohensionless soil is always located inside the Coulomb failure surface. Furthermore, the actual active earth pressure is less than that calculated by the Coulomb's theory, and the difference increases with the decrease of the backfill width, which indicates the Coulomb's theory is not applicable anymore for the backfilled soil with limited width. In addition, the motion patterns of retaining wall have great effects on the distribution of the active earth pressure. When the motion of retaining wall is translational, the earth pressure increases to a peak value first, then decreases with the increase of depth; when the retaining wall is rotating around the bottom, the earth pressure linearly increases with the increase of depth; and when it is rotating around the top, a significant earth arch effect is observed at the upper part of the retaining wall
- active earth pressure /
- limited backfill /
- rigid retaining wall /
- failure mode /
- active movement mode

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	GB 50007—2002 建筑地基基础设计规范[S]. 2002. (GB 50007—2002 Code for design of building foundation[S]. 2002. (in Chinese))
[2]	FRYDMAN S, KEISSAR I. Earth pressures on retaining walls near rock faces[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1987, 113(6): 586-599.
[3]	GRECO V. Active thrust on retaining walls of narrow backfill width[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 50: 66-78.
[4]	GRECO V. Analytical solution of seismic pseudo-static active thrust acting on fascia retaining walls[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 57: 25-36.
[5]	高印立. 极限分析法计算有限范围土体土压力[J]. 建筑结构, 2001, 17(8): 66-68. (GAO Yin-li. Calculation of finite earth pressure by limit analysis[J]. Building Structures, 2001, 17(8): 66-68. (in Chinese))
[6]	马平, 秦四清, 钱海涛. 有限土体主动土压力计算[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(增刊1): 3070-3074.(MA Ping, QIN Si-qing, QIAN Hai-tao. Calculation of active earth pressure for limited soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(S1): 3070-3074. (in Chinese))
[7]	应宏伟, 朱伟, 黄东, 等．狭窄黏性填土刚性挡墙主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(增刊1): 13-18. (YING Hong-wei, ZHU Wei, HUANG Dong, et al. Active earth pressures against rigid retaining walls with narrow cohesive backfill[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(S1): 13-18. (in Chinese))
[8]	杨明辉, 汪罗成, 赵明华. 有限土体主动土压力计算的土拱效应分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2013, 43(2): 71-75. (YANG Ming-hui, WANG Luo-cheng, ZHAO Ming-hua. Calculation of active earth pressure for finite soils based on the soil arching theory[J]. Building Structure, 2013, 43(2): 71-75. (in Chinese))
[9]	TERZAGHI K. Large retaining wall tests[J]. ASCE Transaction, 1941, 106(67): 68-80.
[10]	FANG Y S, ISHIBASHI I. Static earth pressure with various wall movements[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1986, 112(3): 317-333.
[11]	FANG Y S, CHEN T J, WU B F. Passive earth pressures with various walls movements[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1994, 120(8): 651-659.
[12]	周应英. 桥用刚性挡土墙的土压力模型试验研究[J]. 国外公路, 1987, 7(3): 14-17. (ZHOU Ying-ying. Model test study of the earth pressure on the rigid retaining wall used in bridges[J]. Journal of Foreign Highway, 1987, 7(3): 14-17. (in Chinese))
[13]	周应英, 任美龙. 刚性挡土墙后主动土压力的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1990, 12(2): 19-26. (ZHOU Ying-ying, REN Mei-long. Experimental study of the active earth pressure on rigid retaining wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 12(2): 19-26. (in Chinese))
[14]	徐日庆, 陈页开, 杨仲轩, 等. 刚性挡墙被动土压力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(5): 569-575. (XU Ri-qing, CHEN Ye-kai, YANG Zhong-xuan, et al. Experimental reserch on the passive earth pressure acting on rigid wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 2002, 24(5): 569-575. (in Chinese))
[15]	李兴高, 刘维宁. 挡墙上作用土压力和水土压力的测试研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 24(12): 2149-2154. (LI Xing-gao, LIU Wei-ning. Study on measurements of earth pressure and water-soil pressure acting on retaining wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 24(12): 2149-2154. (in Chinese))
[16]	TERZAGHI K. Theotetical soil mechanics[M]. New York: Wiley, 1943.