煤层超高压定点水力压裂防冲试验研究

姜福兴; 王博; 翟明华; 郭信山; 黄广伟; 黄俊锐

doi:10.11779/CJGE201503017

煤层超高压定点水力压裂防冲试验研究 English Version

1. 北京科技大学土木与环境工程学院,北京 100083; 2. 山东能源集团有限公司,山东济南 250014

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51274022,51174016）; 国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）项目（2010CB226803）; 中国博士后科学基金面上项目（2014M560892）

详细信息

作者简介:
姜福兴(1962- ),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事矿山压力与岩层控制、微震监测工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: jiangfuxing1@163.com。

中图分类号: TU43
计量
- 文章访问数: 0324
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0273
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-08-15
- 发布日期: 2015-03-23

Field tests on fixed-point hydraulic fracture with extra-high pressure in coal seam for rock burst prevention

1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Shandong Energy Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China

摘要

摘要: 针对国内外没有成熟的区域主动防冲技术的现状,介绍了一种采用超高压定点压裂煤层形成区域性低应力区,从而为快速掘进和回采创造条件的新技术。现场试验在采深1000 m的山东省华丰煤矿进行,采用微地震监测煤岩体破裂、应力动态实时监测系统监测煤岩体应力变化和压力传感器监测管路压力,实现试验全过程监测。试验得到的主要结论如下：①压裂的压力达到24 MPa并持续11 s之后,煤体产生初次破裂,持续13 min后压裂半径达到8 m;②压裂过程中压裂点附近煤体应力动态为：管路加压后距离压裂点9.5 m的煤层内应力值明显升高—煤体产生破裂并产生微震—管路压力骤降—测点应力趋于稳定;③压裂过程中将煤体切割成了近似6.2 m×8.0 m×6.2 m的长方体,同时随着大量水的注入有效降低了煤体的冲击倾向性;④试验证明定点压裂能够实现“转移应力、弱化煤体和降低蓄能”的防冲机理。
- 水力压裂 /
- 定点 /
- 防冲 /
- 冲击地压 /
- 微震 /
- 应力
Abstract: Considering the current domestic and overseas situations of lacking mature active regional technology for rock burst prevention, a kind of new technology is introduced using fixed-point hydraulic fracturing with ultra-high pressure to form regional low stress areas in coal body for facilitating rapid excavation and mining. The field tests are carried out at the mining depth of about 1000 m in Shandong Huafeng Coal Mine. In order to monitor the whole process of the tests, microseismic monitoring system, stress dynamic real-time monitoring system and pressure sensors are used to monitor coal and rock fracture, stress variation in coal and rock and line pressure, respectively. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) After the fracture pressure reaches 24 MPa and remaines for about 11 seconds, the first fracture occurs in the coal, and then the fracture radius reaches 8 m when the pressure stays at the same level for around 13 minutes; (2) The stress performance of time sequence in the whole fracture process is that: the stress of the observation point 9.5 m away from the fracture point increases significantly after the water is pressurized→fracture occurs in the coal→line pressure plunges→stress at the observation point tends to be stable; (3) The fracture process approximately cuts the coal into cuboids of 6.2 m×8.0 m×6.2 m, and reduces coal burst tendency effectively with the injection of a great deal of water; (4) The tests show that the fixed-point hydraulic fracture can achieve rock burst prevention by means of “stress transfer, coal weakening and energy storage decrease”.
- hydraulic fracture /
- fixed point /
- rock burst prevention /
- rock burst /
- microseism /
- stress

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	姜瑞忠, 蒋廷学, 汪永利. 水力压裂技术的近期发展及展望[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2004, 26(4): 52-56. (JIANG Rui-zhong, JIANG Ting-xue, WANG Yong-li. Present development and prospecting of hydraulic fracturing technology[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2004, 26(4): 52-56. (in Chinese))
[2]	唐颖, 唐玄, 王广源, 等. 页岩气开发水力压裂技术综述[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30(2): 393-399. (TANG Ying, TANG Xuan, WANG Guang-yuan, et al. Summary of hydraulic fracturing technology in shale gas development[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2): 393-399. (in Chinese))
[3]	王玉海, 王庆红, 闫桂芳, 等. 煤层气井压裂效果评价方法[J]. 油气井测试, 2010, 19(5): 44-47. (WANG Yu-hai, WANG Qing-hong, YUAN Gui-fang, et al. Evaluation method of fracturing effect for coal-bed gas wells[J]. Well Testing, 2010, 19(5): 44-47. (in Chinese))
[4]	吴向前, 窦林名, 贺虎, 等. 济三煤矿深孔定向水力致裂防冲技术[J]. 中国煤炭, 2011, 37(10): 85-88. (WU Xiang-qian, DOU Lin-ming, HE Hu, et al. Technology of directional hydraulic fracture for rock-burst prevention in Jisan coal mine[J]. China Coal, 2011, 37(10): 85-88. (in Chinese))
[5]	黄炳香, 程庆迎, 刘长友, 等. 煤岩体水力致裂理论及其工艺技术框架[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2011, 28(2): 167-173. (HUANG Bing-xiang, CHENG Qing-ying, LIU Chang-you, et al. Hydraulic fracturing theory of coal-rock mass and its technical framework[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2011, 28(2): 167-173. (in Chinese))
[6]	窦林名, 何学秋. 冲击矿压防治理论与技术[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2001: 1-17. (DOU Lin-ming, HE Xue-qiu. The theory and technology of shock pressure in coal mine[M]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology Press, 2001: 1-17. (in Chinese))
[7]	章梦涛, 宋维源, 潘一山. 煤层注水预防冲击地压的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2003, 13(10): 69-72. (ZHANG Meng-tao, SONG Wei-yuan, PAN Yi-shan. Study on water pouring into coal seam to prevent rock-burst[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2003, 13(10): 69-72. (in Chinese))
[8]	姜福兴, 魏全德, 姚顺利, 等. 冲击地压防治关键理论与技术分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2013, 41(6): 6-9. (JIANG Fu-xing, WEI Quan-de, YAO Shun-li, et al. Key theory and technical analysis on mine pressure bumping prevention and control[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2013, 41(6): 6-9. (in Chinese))
[9]	姜耀东, 潘一山, 姜福兴, 等. 我国煤炭开采中的冲击地压机理和防治[J]. 煤炭学报, 2014, 39(2): 205-213. (JIANG Yao-dong, PAN Yi-shan, JIANG Fu-xing, et al. State of the art review on mechanism and prevention of coal bumps in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(2): 205-213. (in Chinese))
[10]	齐庆新, 雷毅, 李宏艳, 等. 深孔断顶爆破防治冲击地压的理论与实践[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(增刊1): 3522-3527. (QI Qing-xin, LEI Yi, LI Hong-yan, et al. Theory and application of prevention of rock burst by break-tip blast in deep hole[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(S1): 3522-3527. (in Chinese))
[11]	杨光宇, 姜福兴, 王存文. 大采深厚表土复杂空间结构孤岛工作面冲击地压防治技术研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(1): 189-194. (YANG Guang-yu, JIANG Fu-xing, WANG Cun-wen. Prevention and control technology of mine pressure bumping of coal mining face in seam island based on deep mining and thick topsoil of complex spatial structure of overlying strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(1): 189-194. (in Chinese))
[12]	王维虎. 煤层注水防尘技术的应用现状及展望[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2011, 39(1): 57-60. (WANG Wei-hu. Application present status and outlook of seam water injection dust control technology[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2011, 39(1): 57-60. (in Chinese))
[13]	张笑难, 蔡峰, 费玉祥, 等. 煤层注水除尘技术在综掘工作面中的应用[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2013, 9(10): 85-88. (ZHANG Xiao-nan, CAI Feng, FEI Yu-xiang, et al. Research and application of affusion dust removal technology in the mechanized excavation face[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(10): 85-88. (in Chinese))
[14]	黄炳香, 程庆迎, 陈树亮, 等. 突出煤层深孔水力致裂驱赶与浅孔抽采消突研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2013, 42(5): 701-711. (HUANG Bing-xiang, CHENG Qing-ying, CHEN Shu-liang, et al. Study of coal seam outburst mitigation by deep hole hydro-fracturing and shallow hole methane drainage[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2013, 42(5): 701-711. (in Chinese))
[15]	石必明, 穆朝民. 突出煤层注水湿润防突试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2013, 41(9): 147-150. (SHI Bi-ming, MU Chao-min. Experiment study on water injection and moist role for outburst prevention of outburst seam[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2013, 41(9): 147-150.(in Chinese))
[16]	欧阳振华, 齐庆新, 张寅, 等. 水压致裂预防冲击地压的机理与试验[J]. 煤炭学报, 2011, 36(增刊2): 321-325. (OUYANG Zhen-hua, QI Qing-xin, ZHANG Yin, et al. Mechanism and experiment of hydraulic fracturing in rock burst prevention[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2011, 36(S2): 321-325. (in Chinese))
[17]	张新科. 高压水力压裂技术在冲击地压防治中的应用[J]. 煤矿安全, 2010, 41(8): 51-52. (ZHANG Xin-ke. The application of the high pressure hydraulic fracturing technology for prevention of rock burst[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2010, 41(8): 51-52. (in Chinese))
[18]	郭相斌. 煤层定向水力压裂防治冲击地压的试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2011, 39(6): 12-14. (GUO Xiang-bin. Experiment study on mine pressure bumping prevention and control with directional hydraulic fracturing in seam[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2011, 39(6): 12-14. (in Chinese))