• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

上海软土地区半圆形基坑的实测结果研究

张中杰, 汤翔, 王建华

张中杰, 汤翔, 王建华. 上海软土地区半圆形基坑的实测结果研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(zk2): 451-454. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2078
引用本文: 张中杰, 汤翔, 王建华. 上海软土地区半圆形基坑的实测结果研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(zk2): 451-454. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2078
ZHANG Zhong-jie, TANG Xiang, WANG Jian-hua. Measured deformation of a semi-circular foundation pit in Shanghai soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk2): 451-454. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2078
Citation: ZHANG Zhong-jie, TANG Xiang, WANG Jian-hua. Measured deformation of a semi-circular foundation pit in Shanghai soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk2): 451-454. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2078

上海软土地区半圆形基坑的实测结果研究  English Version

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张中杰(1976- ),男,高级工程师,主要从事城市轨道交通、地下空间、基坑工程的设计与研究工作。E-mail: vincentsucdri@126.com。

Measured deformation of a semi-circular foundation pit in Shanghai soft soils

  • 摘要: 通过对上海临港新城某半圆形基坑实测数据的分析,结合对半圆形基坑结构优势、变形特性的综述,探讨了半圆形基坑围护结构变形、地表沉降的一般规律。结果表明:该半圆形基坑围护结构的最大侧向位移为开挖深度的0.152%~0.636%,平均值为0.325%;围护结构侧向变形通常为深层凸鼓形,围护结构最大侧移点深度一般位于开挖面以下2~6 m;基坑周边最大地表沉降为开挖深度的0.587%,平均值为0.312%。在相同地质和施工条件下,和矩形基坑相比,半圆形基坑结构形式对控制变形有一定优势。
    Abstract: A semi-circular foundation pit of Lingang metro station in Shanghai soft soil deposits is monitored and analyzed. Combined with the summarization of characteristics and advantages of the semi-circular pit, the deformations due to excavation are discussed. The monitoring results show that the ratio of the maximum lateral displacement of the retaining structures to the excavation depth ranges from 0.152% to 0.636%,and the mean value is about 0.325%. The deformation of the retaining structures exhibits a clearly deep bulging profile as the excavation continues, and the maximum lateral displacement of the retaining structures usually appears between 2 m and 6 m below the excavation surface. The ratio of the maximum surface ground settlement to the excavation depth is 0~0.587%. Under the same geological and construction conditions, compared with the rectangle pit, the semi-circular pit has the advantages of displacement control.
  • [1] HSIEH P G, OU C Y. Shape of groundsurface settlement profiles caused by excavation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(6): 1004-1017.
    [2] OU C Y, LIAO J T, LIN H D. Performance of diaphragmwall constructed using top-down method[J]. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(9): 798-808.
    [3] XU Z H, WANG W D, WANG J H, et al. Performance of deep excavated retaining wall in Shanghai soft deposit[J]. Lowland Technology International, 2005, 7(2): 31-43.
    [4] ZHANG J G, REN P. Numerical simulation for construction process of a very deep circular pit[J]. ASCE, 2011: 1786-1791.
    [5] 董新平, 郭庆海, 周顺华. 圆形基坑的变形特点及主要因素分析[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2005(4): 196-199. (DONG Xin-ping, GUO Qing-hai, ZHOU Shun-hua. Character and factor analysis of deformation of diaphragmwall in the cylindrical foundation pit[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Spaceand Engineering, 2005(4): 196-199. (in Chinese))
    [6] 徐中华. 上海地区支护结构与主题地下结构相结合的深基坑变形性状探究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2007. (XU Zhong-hua. Deformation behavior of deep excavations supported by permanent structure in shanghai soft deposit[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2007. (in Chinese))
计量
  • 文章访问数:  235
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  292
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-07-27
  • 发布日期:  2014-07-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回